Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
13,017
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
13,017 results for “Positionning”
Figure 23 in Cranial osteology and phylogenetic position of the theropod dinosaur Proceratosaurus bradleyi (Woodward, 1910) from the Middle Jurassic of England
Figure 23. Phylogenetic relationships of Proceratosaurus. Strict consensus tree of 315 trees resulting from the analysis of a matrix with 38 taxa and 206 characters.
Figure 26 in Cranial osteology and phylogenetic position of the theropod dinosaur Proceratosaurus bradleyi (Woodward, 1910) from the Middle Jurassic of England
Figure 26. Biogeographic distribution of Jurassic tyrannosauroids. 1, Proceratosaurus bradleyi, Great Oolite, England (Bathonian); Stokesosaurus langhami, Kimmeridge Clay, England (Tithonian); 2, Guanlong wucaii, Shishougou Formation, Xinjiang, China (Oxfordian); 3, Aviatyrannis jurassica, Guimarota Beds, Portugal (Kimmeridgian); 4, Stokesosaurus clevelandi, Morrison Formation, Utah, USA (Kimmeridgian–Tithonian).
Figure 1 in Cranial osteology and phylogenetic position of the theropod dinosaur Proceratosaurus bradleyi (Woodward, 1910) from the Middle Jurassic of England
Figure 1. Proceratosaurus bradleyi, type skull: NHM R 4860. A, left lateral view; B, right lateral view. Scale bars: 10 cm.
Figure 13 in Phylogenetic position of the poorly known montane cascade frog Amolops monticola (Ranidae) and description of a new closely related species from Northeast India
Figure 13. Male advertisement calls of Amolops adicola sp. nov.: (a) 10 s oscillogram showing a call group comprising pulsatile calls; (b) 0.5 s oscillogram for a single call; (c) 0.1 s oscillogram for a call segment; (d) 0.5 s spectrogram for a single call.
Figure 14 in Phylogenetic position of the poorly known montane cascade frog Amolops monticola (Ranidae) and description of a new closely related species from Northeast India
Figure 14. (a) Habitat at the collection locality for topotypes of Amolops monticola in south Sikkim; (b) habitat at the holotype locality of Amolops adicola sp. nov. in Arunachal Pradesh. Thumbnail images of the species indicate the site of collection.
Figure 12 in Phylogenetic position of the poorly known montane cascade frog Amolops monticola (Ranidae) and description of a new closely related species from Northeast India
Figure 12. (a) Plot of first two principal components (PC1 and PC2) from principal component analysis based on morphometric data for Amolops adicola sp. nov. and A. monticola; (b–e) total contributions of the first four principal components: (b) PC1 (38.3% variance); (c) PC2 (22% variance); (d) PC3 (12.9% variance); (e) PC4 (7.8% variance). The red dashed line on the histograms indicates the expected average contribution.
Figure 11 in Phylogenetic position of the poorly known montane cascade frog Amolops monticola (Ranidae) and description of a new closely related species from Northeast India
Figure 11. Paratype (BNHS 6123, male) of Amolops adicola sp. nov. in preservation: (a) dorsal view; (b) ventral view; (c) dorsal view of head; (d) ventral view of hand; (e) dorsal view of hand showing nuptial pad on finger I; (f) illustration of tip morphology on finger I; (g) illustration of tip morphology on finger III; (h) ventral view of foot; (i) schematic illustration of webbing on foot.
Figure 10 in Phylogenetic position of the poorly known montane cascade frog Amolops monticola (Ranidae) and description of a new closely related species from Northeast India
Figure 10. Holotype (BNHS 6121, female) of Amolops adicola sp. nov. in preservation: (a) dorsal view; (b) ventral view; (c) lateral view of head; (d) front view of the snout showing light-coloured snout with dark spots; (e) ventral view of hand; (f) ventral view of foot; (g) schematic illustration of webbing on foot.
Figure 9 in Phylogenetic position of the poorly known montane cascade frog Amolops monticola (Ranidae) and description of a new closely related species from Northeast India
Figure 9. Holotype and paratypes of Amolops adicola sp. nov. in life (photographed under captive conditions): (a–d) holotype (BNHS 6121, female): (a) dorsal view; (b) ventral view; (c) posterior view of thighs; (d) dorsolateral view of head; (e, f) paratype (BNHS 6123, male): (e) dorsal view; (f) ventral view. Photographs: AD.
Figure 8 in Phylogenetic position of the poorly known montane cascade frog Amolops monticola (Ranidae) and description of a new closely related species from Northeast India
Figure 8. Amolops adicola sp. nov. in life: (a) dorsolateral view (holotype, BNHS 6121, female); (b) dorsolateral view of amplected pair (paratype, BNHS 6125, female, male not preserved); (c) dorsolateral view of amplected pair (paratype, BNHS 6124, female; paratype, BNHS 6122, male).
Figure 7 in Phylogenetic position of the poorly known montane cascade frog Amolops monticola (Ranidae) and description of a new closely related species from Northeast India
Figure 7. (a) Distribution map of all known members of the Amolops monticola species group found in India; (b) inset rectangle enlarged to show the type locality of Amolops monticola 'Darjeeling' and the rediscovered locality in south Sikkim. An asterisk (*) after the species name indicates members whose type locality is in India. A question mark (?) indicates a doubtful record. Geographical coordinates and their source information are referenced in Table S2.
Figure 4 in Phylogenetic position of the poorly known montane cascade frog Amolops monticola (Ranidae) and description of a new closely related species from Northeast India
Figure 4. Topotypes of Amolops monticola in life: (a, b) adult female, BNHS 6120: (a) dorsolateral view; (b) dorsal view; (c–e) adult male, WIIADA 544: (c) lateral view; (d) dorsolateral view; (e) dorsal view; (f) dorsolateral view (adult male, WIIADA 545); (g) lateral view of head (adult female, BNHS 6120); (h) ventral view of head showing loose skin of the vocal sacs (adult male, WIIADA 544). Photographs: NGP.
Figure 6 in Phylogenetic position of the poorly known montane cascade frog Amolops monticola (Ranidae) and description of a new closely related species from Northeast India
Figure 6. Topotype of Amolops monticola in preservation, an adult male, WIIADA 544: (a) dorsal view; (b) ventral view; (c) lateral view of head; (d) dorsal view of hand showing nuptial pad on finger I; (e) ventral view of hand; (f) illustration of tip morphology on finger I; (g) illustration of tip morphology on finger III; (h) ventral view of foot; (i) schematic illustration of webbing on foot.
Figure 2 in Phylogenetic position of the poorly known montane cascade frog Amolops monticola (Ranidae) and description of a new closely related species from Northeast India
Figure 2. (a) The type localities of all known members of the Amolops monticola species group. Geographical coordinates and their source information are referenced in Table S2. Illustrations for species are prepared based on type images or subsequently published photographs. (b) The number of A. monticola group species originally described from different Asian countries, based on their type localities. (c) The number of A. monticola group species currently recognised to occur in different countries. An asterisk (*) after the species name indicates a provisionally grouped species.
Figure 1. Bayesian consensus phylogram for 167 in Phylogenetic position of the poorly known montane cascade frog Amolops monticola (Ranidae) and description of a new closely related species from Northeast India
Figure 1. Bayesian consensus phylogram for 167 taxa representing members of the genus Amolops and five outgroup species, based on 2001 bp of concatenated mitochondrial DNA (16S, COI, and ND2 genes). Voucher numbers and associated details are referenced in Table S1. Bayesian posterior probabilities (BPP) and RAxML bootstrap support (BS) values>50% are denoted above and below the branches, or separated by an oblique (/) mark, respectively. Black vertical bars beside the terminal nodes indicate Amolops species recognised based on Bayesian and ML inferences; grey bars and open rectangles indicate putative species delimited in the bPTP analysis with support values of>90% or <90%, respectively. The genus comprises eight major species groups following Wu et al. (2020), as indicated with coloured bars on the extreme right and corresponding circles on the internal and terminal nodes. Four subgroups are observed within the focal Amolops monticola group. Illustrations representing species groups were prepared based on published photographs.
Figure 3 in Phylogenetic position of the poorly known montane cascade frog Amolops monticola (Ranidae) and description of a new closely related species from Northeast India
Figure 3. Holotype (ZSIC 10036, adult female) of Amolops monticola in preservation: (a) dorsal view; (b) ventral view; (c) lateral view of head; (d) ventral view of hand; (e) ventral view of foot; (f) schematic illustration of webbing on foot.
FIGURES 5–8. Meschia pugnax Distant, 1910 in Taxonomic position of Heissothignus and review of the species of Meschia (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Meschiidae)
FIGURES 5–8. Meschia pugnax Distant, 1910, habitus showing variations in colour markings: 5, male, Bengaluru (Karnataka); 6, male, Bengaluru (Karnataka); 7, male, Chikkaballapura (Karnataka); 8, male, Bengaluru (Karnataka). Mean body length of specimens in Figs 5–8 is 3.90 mm.
FIGURES 3 & 4. 3 in Taxonomic position of Heissothignus and review of the species of Meschia (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Meschiidae)
FIGURES 3 & 4. 3, Meschia pugnax Distant, 1910, syntype female with label data; 4, Meschia quadrimaculata Distant, 1910, syntype female with label data.
FIGURES 1 & 2 in Taxonomic position of Heissothignus and review of the species of Meschia (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Meschiidae)
FIGURES 1 & 2. Heissothignus armatus Slater & Brailovsky, 2006, holotype male: 1, head and pronotum, dorsal; 2, same, lateral.
Figure 18 in Phylogenetic position and morphological descriptions of Chiton species from the south-eastern Pacific
Figure 18. Chiton magnificus, Chile, Huinay, BL 20.0 mm, 05.01.2005: A, C, dorsal and ventral scales and marginal spicules; B, D, radula.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.