Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 3 in Further additions to the knowledge of Strumigenys (Formicidae: Myrmicinae) within South East Asia, with the descriptions of 20 new species

Fig. 3. Holotype worker (ANTWEB1011855) of Strumigenys anhdaoae sp. nov. A. Full-face view. B. Profile view. C. Dorsal view.

Fig. 34 in Further additions to the knowledge of Strumigenys (Formicidae: Myrmicinae) within South East Asia, with the descriptions of 20 new species

Fig. 34. New species records of Strumigenys Smith, 1860 in full-face, profile and dorsal views. A–C. Worker of S. natynion Bolton, 2000 from Thailand (ANTWEB1011940). D–F. Worker of S. nepalensis De Andrade, 1994 from Hainan, mainland China (HNA-00614). G–I. Worker of S. rallarhina Bolton, 2000 from Hainan, mainland China (HNA-01469W).

Fig. 6 in Further additions to the knowledge of Strumigenys (Formicidae: Myrmicinae) within South East Asia, with the descriptions of 20 new species

Fig. 6. Type specimens of Strumigenys claviseta sp. nov. A, E–F. Holotype worker (ANTWEB1011993). B–D. Paratype worker (ANTWEB1011956). A. Full-face view. B–C. Mandible close-ups. D. Promesonotum close-up in dorsal view. E. Profile view. F. Dorsal view.

Fig. 16 in Further additions to the knowledge of Strumigenys (Formicidae: Myrmicinae) within South East Asia, with the descriptions of 20 new species

Fig. 16. Workers of Strumigenys elegantula (Terayama & Kubota, 1989) in full-face, profile and dorsal views. A–C. Worker from Hong Kong (ANTWEB1009804). D–F. Worker from Thailand (ANTWEB1011998).

Fig. 33 in Further additions to the knowledge of Strumigenys (Formicidae: Myrmicinae) within South East Asia, with the descriptions of 20 new species

Fig. 33. Workers of Strumigenys nanzanensis Lin & Wu, 1996 from Hong Kong. A–B, D–E. ANTWEB1010909. C. K-D-084. A. Full-face view. B–C. Petiole close-up in profile view. D. Profile view. E. Dorsal view.

Fig. 31 in Further additions to the knowledge of Strumigenys (Formicidae: Myrmicinae) within South East Asia, with the descriptions of 20 new species

Fig. 31. Queen of Strumigenys cf. mitis (Brown, 2000) from Hong Kong (JV1T2W2). A. Full-face view. B. Profile view. C. Dorsal view.

Fig. 21 in Further additions to the knowledge of Strumigenys (Formicidae: Myrmicinae) within South East Asia, with the descriptions of 20 new species

Fig. 21. New species records of Strumigenys Smith, 1860 from Hainan, mainland China in full-face, profile and dorsal views. A–C. Worker of S. heteropha Bolton, 2000 (HNA-01608). D–F. Worker of S. hexamera (Brown, 1958) (HNA-01556). G–I. Worker of S. hirsuta Tang et al., 2019 (HNA-01573).

Fig. 41 in Further additions to the knowledge of Strumigenys (Formicidae: Myrmicinae) within South East Asia, with the descriptions of 20 new species

Fig. 41. Holotype worker (ANTWEB1010901) of Strumigenys yamanei sp. nov. A. Full-face view. B. Profile view. C. Dorsal view.

Fig. 26 in Further additions to the knowledge of Strumigenys (Formicidae: Myrmicinae) within South East Asia, with the descriptions of 20 new species

Fig. 26. Type specimens ofStrumigenys jaitrongi sp. nov.A, C–D. Holotype worker (ANTWEB1011987). B. Paratype worker (ANTWEB1011985). A. Full-face view. B. Mandible close-up. C. Profile view. D. Dorsal view.

Fig. 30 in Further additions to the knowledge of Strumigenys (Formicidae: Myrmicinae) within South East Asia, with the descriptions of 20 new species

Fig. 30. New species records of Strumigenys Smith, 1860 in full-face, profile and dorsal views. A–C. Worker of S. membranifera Emery, 1869 from Vietnam (NN-S56-sp01). D–F. Worker of S. minutula Terayama & Kubota, 1989 from Hainan, mainland China (HNA-01641). G–I. Worker of S. mitis (Brown, 2000) from Hainan, mainland China (HNA-00275).

Fig. 1. Seta shape terminologies. 1. Fine. 2–3. Stout and truncated. 4–5. Plank-like. 6–7. Acicular. 8. Narrowly elliptic. 9. Elliptic. 10. Linear. 11 in Further additions to the knowledge of Strumigenys (Formicidae: Myrmicinae) within South East Asia, with the descriptions of 20 new species

Fig. 1. Seta shape terminologies. 1. Fine. 2–3. Stout and truncated. 4–5. Plank-like. 6–7. Acicular. 8. Narrowly elliptic. 9. Elliptic. 10. Linear. 11. Short linear or short subspatulate. 12–13. Subspatulate. 14–15. Spatulate. 16–17. Oblanceolate. 18–19. Small obovate. 20. Large obovate. 21. Suborbicular / orbicular. 22. Orbicular. 23. Remiform. 24. Remiform / narrowly claviform (red arrow). 25–26. Claviform. 27. Shoehorn-shaped. 28. Spoon-shaped.

FIG. 7 in Spatial Distribution and Substrate Preferences of Bryophyte Species in Mangrove Ecosystems of the East Coast of Marajó Island, Brazil

FIG. 7. — Dendrogram of floristic similarity of the bryophyte flora of mangroves on the Northern and Southeastern coast of Brazil.

FIG. 5. — A in Spatial Distribution and Substrate Preferences of Bryophyte Species in Mangrove Ecosystems of the East Coast of Marajó Island, Brazil

FIG. 5. — A, mean richness; B, density of bryophytes in the sampled mangroves per light tolerance guilds; C, interaction plot between sampled zones and light tolerance guilds on mean richness of bryophytes; D, interaction plot between sampled zones and light tolerance guilds on mean density of bryophytes.

FIG. 4 in Spatial Distribution and Substrate Preferences of Bryophyte Species in Mangrove Ecosystems of the East Coast of Marajó Island, Brazil

FIG. 4. — Violin plot with included boxplot: A, species richness; B, species density. Alpha-diversity indices: C, Shannon Index (H'); D, Pielou's Evenness (J').

FIG. 3 in Spatial Distribution and Substrate Preferences of Bryophyte Species in Mangrove Ecosystems of the East Coast of Marajó Island, Brazil

FIG. 3. — Accumulation curves based on the abundance of individuals in the fringe and inland zones of the mangroves of Salvaterra, Pará, Brazil: A, species richness (q = 0); B, Shannon diversity (q = 1). The fringe zone is shown in red color and the inland zone in blue color. Continuous line represents interpolation and dotted line represents extrapolation.

FIG. 2 in Spatial Distribution and Substrate Preferences of Bryophyte Species in Mangrove Ecosystems of the East Coast of Marajó Island, Brazil

FIG. 2. — Mangroves on the east coast of the municipality of Salvaterra, Marajó Island, Pará: A, B, mangrove in inland zone; C, D, fringe zone.

FIG. 1 in Spatial Distribution and Substrate Preferences of Bryophyte Species in Mangrove Ecosystems of the East Coast of Marajó Island, Brazil

FIG. 1. — Location map of collection points in Marajó Island, Pará, Brazilian Amazon:A, localization of Marajó Island in Pará, Brazil, South America (red rectangle); B, localization of Salvaterra in Marajó Island; C, localization of sampling points on the east coast of the Salvaterra, with 1 km between the fringe zone and the inland zone in each area (map prepared by P.W.P. Gomes).

FIG. 7 in A new platyrostrine sperm whale from the Early Miocene of the southeastern Pacific (East Pisco Basin, Peru) supports affinities with the southwestern Atlantic cetacean fauna

FIG. 7. — Cranium of Diaphorocetus poucheti (Moreno, 1892) MLP 5-6 (holotype) in dorsal (A), ventral (B), right lateral (C), and posterior (D) views, illustrating among others some diagnostic characters at the genus and species levels. The figured photos were taken by one of us (CM) in 1981, with a preservation state that is closer to the original illustrations in Lydekker (1893), prior to the separation of the right and left rostral parts and pterygoids/palatines from the neurocranium and with more complete antorbital notches and right orbit. Scale bar: 200 mm.

FIG. 4FIG. 4 in A new platyrostrine sperm whale from the Early Miocene of the southeastern Pacific (East Pisco Basin, Peru) supports affinities with the southwestern Atlantic cetacean fauna

FIG. 4FIG. 4. — Cranium of Diaphorocetus ortegai n. sp. MUSM 3246 (holotype, Chilcatay Formation, East Pisco Basin, Peru) in left (A) and right (B) lateral views. Black dashed lines for sutures, foramina, and outline of several bones and temporal fossa; red dashed line for posterior outline of supracranial basin. Scale bar: 200 mm.

FIG. 1 in A new platyrostrine sperm whale from the Early Miocene of the southeastern Pacific (East Pisco Basin, Peru) supports affinities with the southwestern Atlantic cetacean fauna

FIG. 1. — Geographic and geological setting. A, Location of the main outcrops of the Chilcatay Formation along the southern coast of Peru. B, Simplified map providing the position of Ullujaya (the type locality of Diaphorocetus ortegai n. sp.) alongside other highly fossiliferous sites of the Ica desert (including Zamaca, the type locality of Rhaphicetus valenciae Lambert, Muizon, Urbina & Bianucci, 2020). C, Schematic stratigraphic column of the Cenozoic succession exposed in the East Pisco Basin. D, Simplified stratigraphic section of the Chilcatay Formation in Ullujaya, showing the exact position of the holotype of D. ortegai n. sp. in the Ct1 allomember, Ct1a facies association. E, Simplified stratigraphic section of the Chilcatay Formation in Zamaca, showing the exact position of the holotype of R. valenciae in the Ct1 allomember, Ct1a facies association. Both sections D and E include positions of ash layers dated with 40Ar/39Ar and shell-rich beds dated with 87Sr/86Sr along with the corresponding age estimates (after Bosio et al. 2022). Maps and sections modified from Bianucci et al. (2018b), Di Celma et al. (2018, 2019), Bosio et al. (2020, 2022), and Lambert et al. (2020).