Find research datasets worth reusing

FIGURE 2 in Synopsis of Miridae (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) in Atlantic Forest Dominion, Espírito Santo State, Brazil: keys, diagnoses, new species, plant associations, and geographic distribution. Part I: Bryocorinae, Cylapinae and Deraeocorinae.

FIGURE 2. Pretarsus claw of the Miridae subfamilies. A—Mirinae, B—Orthotylinae, C—Bryocorinae, D—Dicyphinae, E— Phylinae, F—Cylapinae, G—Deraecorinae. (Modified from Carvalho & Costa 1997, with permission).

FIGURE 9. Subfamily Deraeocorinae, A in Synopsis of Miridae (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) in Atlantic Forest Dominion, Espírito Santo State, Brazil: keys, diagnoses, new species, plant associations, and geographic distribution. Part I: Bryocorinae, Cylapinae and Deraeocorinae.

FIGURE 9. Subfamily Deraeocorinae, A—Ambracius dufouri, B, C—Clivinema sp. C1-extended hood-like over head; D— Lundiella reinhardit, E—Lundiella rubra (Modified from Carvalho & Capriles, 1982, with permission), F—Annona fuscata G—Brasiliocarnus incaicus H—Carijoanus ruberfasciatus, I—Florus insolitus, J—Hyaliodes beckeri, K—Hyaliodocoris clarus, L—Hyaliodocoris insignis, M—Perissobais heroni.

FIGURE 11 in Synopsis of Miridae (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) in Atlantic Forest Dominion, Espírito Santo State, Brazil: keys, diagnoses, new species, plant associations, and geographic distribution. Part I: Bryocorinae, Cylapinae and Deraeocorinae.

FIGURE 11. Male genitalia of the tribe Eccritotarsini, A—Cyrtocapsus rostratus, A1—Right paramere, A2—Left paramere (Henry 2022, with permission); B—Eccritotarsus carioca, B1—Left paramere, B2—Pygophore, B3—Right paramere (Modified from Carvalho & Gomes 1971A, with permission); C—Eccritotarsus emboabanus, C1—Vesica, C2—Left paramere (Modified from Carvalho & Gomes 1971A, with permission); D—Eccritotarsus hyalinus, D1—Vesica, D2—Left paramere, D3—Right paramere (Modified from Carvalho & Gomes 1971, with permission); E—Eccritotarsus nigrocruciatus, E1—Right paramere, E2—Left paramere (modified from Ferreira & Henry 2011, with permission); F—Eurychilella discoidalis, F1—Pygophore, F2—Left paramere, F3—Right paramere (Modified from Carvalho 1953B, with permission); G—Neella lutescens, G1—Left paramere, G2—Right paramere (Modified from Carvalho, 1954, with permission); H—Neofurius capichabensis, H1—Vesica, H2—Right paramere, H3—Left paramere(dorsal), H4—Left paramere (ventral) (Modified from Carvalho & Gomes 1971B, with permission); I—Pachymeroceroides bromeliae, I1—Left paramere, I2—Right paramere, I3—Vesica (Modified from Carvalho & Gomes 1971C); J—Pycnoderes cataguensis, J1—Right paramere (Modified from Carvalho 1988, with permission); K—Pycnoderes quadrimaculatus, K1—Left paramere, K2—Right paramere (Modified from Zapata 2016, with permission); L—Sinervus baerensprungi, L1—Left paramere, L2—Endosoma, L3—Apex of left paramere, L4—Right paramere (Modified from Carvalho 1945C, with permission); M—Sinervus hyalipedes, M1—Left paramere, M2—Right paramere, (Modified from Carvalho 1945C, with permission); N—Sinervus vendanovensis n. sp., N1—Right paramere, N2—Left paramere, N3— Endosoma; O—Sinervus venturai n. sp. O1—Right paramere, O2—Left paramere, O3—Endosoma; P—Spartacus albatus, P1— Right paramere, P2—Left paramere, P3—Vesica (Modified from Carvalho 1945C, with permission); Q—Sysinas pallidipes, Q1—Right paramere, Q2—Left paramere (Modified from Zapata 2022, with permission); R—Tenthecoris nanus, R1, R2— Right paramere (dorsal), R3—Right paramere (ventral) (Modified from Carvalho 1948A, with permission); S—Tenthecoris orchidearum, S1—Right paramere, S2—Left paramere (Modified from Carvalho 1951B, with permission).

MAP 1 in Synopsis of Miridae (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) in Atlantic Forest Dominion, Espírito Santo State, Brazil: keys, diagnoses, new species, plant associations, and geographic distribution. Part I: Bryocorinae, Cylapinae and Deraeocorinae.

MAP 1. Vegetation types of Espírito Santo with inset showing location within Brazil (Based on Wikipedia 2023).

opennotspecifiedOct 2018View details →

FIGURE 2. Bromeliad species sampled. A in Ciliate species from tank-less bromeliads in a dry tropical forest and their geographical distribution in the Neotropics

FIGURE 2. Bromeliad species sampled. A=Tillandsia dasyliriifolia, B=T. rothii, C=Bromelia pinguin, D=T. polystachia and E=B. karatas.

opennotspecifiedOct 2018View details →

FIGURE 3. a–p in Ciliate species from tank-less bromeliads in a dry tropical forest and their geographical distribution in the Neotropics

FIGURE 3. a–p. Ciliate from tank-less bromeliads in vivo (a, c, f, h, i, l), silver nitrate impregnation (e, j, k, n, o, p), protargol impregnation (b, d, m) and nigrosine (g). a. Spathidium spathula, b. Pattersoniella vitiphila, c. Gonostomum bromelicola, d. Drepanomonas revoluta, e. D. minuta, f. Bresslauides terricola, g. Colpoda cucullus, h. Epistylis sp., i. Vorticella sp., j. C. maupasi, k. Colpoda aspera, l. Leptopharynx costatus, m. Phacodinium metchnikoffi, n. Cyclidium glaucoma, o. Odontochlamys gouraudi, p. Tetrahymena sp. Scale bar: 10 µm. 20 X (f), 40 X (a, b, c, g, h, i, j, l, m, p), 100 X (d, e, k, n, o).

FIGURE 5. A in The soft ticks (Parasitiformes: Ixodida: Argasidae) of Mexico: species, hosts, and geographical distribution

FIGURE 5. A) Antricola mexicanus, larva, pulvilli extended. B) Ornithodoros marinkellei, larva, cornua-like extensions. C) Ornithodoros azteci, larva, denticles crowded and deformed. D) Ornithodoros knoxjonesi, larva, hypostome constricted at midlength. E) Ornithodoros yumatensis, larva, ventral idiosoma with 8 pairs of setae. F) Ornithodoros brodyi, larva, posterior margin of basis capituli rounded. G) Ornithodoros dyeri, larva, posterior margin of basis capituli trapezoidal.

FIGURE 2. A in The soft ticks (Parasitiformes: Ixodida: Argasidae) of Mexico: species, hosts, and geographical distribution

FIGURE 2. A) Argas sanchezi, male, showing irregular peripheral cells. B) Otobius lagophilus, male, dorsal idiosomal integument. C) Ornithodoros coriaceus, male, showing iridescent mammillae. D) Ornithodoros coriaceus, male, lateral view of eyes (arrows). E) Ornithodoros nicollei, male, tarsus I proximally with a single prominent dorsal hump (arrow). F) Ornithodoros turicata, female, mammillae large and not crowded. G) Ornithodoros parkeri, male, mammillae small and crowded. H) Ornithodoros dyeri, female, with dorsal contiguous ridges (arrow).

FIGURE 1. A in The soft ticks (Parasitiformes: Ixodida: Argasidae) of Mexico: species, hosts, and geographical distribution

FIGURE 1. A) Argas persicus, female. B) Otobius megnini, female. C) Nothoaspis reddelli, male, dorsal idiosoma with false scutum. D) Antricola mexicanus, male. E) Ornithodoros brodyi, female.

FIGURE 4. A in The soft ticks (Parasitiformes: Ixodida: Argasidae) of Mexico: species, hosts, and geographical distribution

FIGURE 4. A) Antricola marginatus, male, hypostome scoop-like, and B) digitiform tubercles (arrow). C) Antricola mexicanus, female, tufts of setae (arrow). D) Ornithodoros yumatensis, female, cheeks large (arrow), and E) micromammillated surface of legs (arrow). F) Ornithodoros brodyi, female, hood (arrow).

FIGURE 3. A in The soft ticks (Parasitiformes: Ixodida: Argasidae) of Mexico: species, hosts, and geographical distribution

FIGURE 3. A) Ornithodoros azteci, female. B) Ornithodoros brodyi, female (upper) compared with Ornithodoros puertoricensis, female (lower). C) Ornithodoros kelleyi, female. D) Ornithodoros dusbabeki, female. E) Ornithodoros talaje, female, discs. F) Ornithodoros kohlsi, female, discs. G) Ornithodoros talaje, female, ventral view. H) Ornithodoros talaje, female, genital aperture. I) Ornithodoros talaje, male, ventral view.

opencc-by-nc-4.0Jul 2017View details →

Geographic distribution of 24 Mediterranean and European forest tree species

The 24 distribution maps are a contribution to the regional project "Maximize the production of goods and services of Mediterranean forest ecosystems in the context of global changes" funded by the French Global Environmental Facility (FGEF) and coordinated by FAO-Silva Mediterranea and Plan Bleu. The maps are part of the activities of component 1 "Production of data and development of tools to support decision and management of vulnerable Mediterranean forest ecosystems affected by climate change and the ability of these forest ecosystems to adapt to global change". A total of 24 key forest tree species have been selected by the project partners for their importance for the biodiversity of the Mediterranean basin and for delivering ecosystem services to the Mediterranean forestry community. Data on the geographic distribution of the 24 species were compiled from different sources and make a distinction between locations of known distribution, presumed area of native distribution, and countries (or region within countries) of native distribution. Details on how the maps were produced are given in a published report: N. Wazen, B. Fady (2016) Geographic distribution of 24 major tree species in the Mediterranean and their genetic resources, FAO and Plan Bleu, ISBN 978-92-5-109469-3, http://www.fao.org/3/a-i6338e.pdf The 24 tree species are: <ul> <li>Acer hyrcanum subsp. tauricolum (Boiss. & Balansa) Yalt</li> <li>Arbutus unedo L</li> <li>Cedrus atlantica (Endl.) Manetti ex Carriere</li> <li>Cedrus libani A. Rich</li> <li>Chamaerops humilis L.</li> <li>Ilex aquifolium L.</li> <li>Juniperus drupacea Labill.</li> <li>Juniperus excelsa M. Bieb.</li> <li>Juniperus oxycedrus L.</li> <li>Juniperus phoenicea L.</li> <li>Laurus nobilis L.</li> <li>Pinus brutia Ten.</li> <li>Pinus halepensis Mill.</li> <li>Pinus nigra J.F. Arnold</li> <li>Pinus pinea L.</li> <li>Pistacia lentiscus L.</li> <li>Platanus orientalis L.</li> <li>Quercus canariensis Willd.</li> <li>Quercus cerris L.</li> <li>Quercus coccifera L.</li> <li>Quercus ilex L.</li> <li>Quercus suber L.</li> <li>Taxus baccata L.</li> <li>Tetraclinis articulata (Vahl) Mast.</li> </ul> Updates of the maps are published on the FAO GeoNetwork at http://www.fao.org/geonetwork/srv/en/metadata.show?id=56996 Changes in the successive versions Version 5 <ul> <li>A shapefile was added showing a single distribution area for each species. This distribution area was obtained by merging the different distributions areas available from the different sources. Known distribution localities were converted into a distribution area using alpha-shapes and this area was merged with the others.</li> </ul> Version 4 <ul> <li>Quercus suber, map in Bohbot et al. (2005): the polygon corresponding to the Venetian Lagoon was removed.</li> </ul> Version 3 <ul> <li>Pinus nigra, map of Bolos & Vigo (1984): polygons indicating presence in the eastern part of Corsica and the Balearic Islands were removed. Polygons indicating presence in the coastal zone of Croatia and some Greek islands were added.</li> <li>Quercus cerris, map of the Atlas Florae Europeae: points of occurrence corresponding to coastal tiles with a center that falls in the sea were displaced to the closest land locations.</li> <li>Arbutus unedo, map 39 in Quézel & Santa (1962): three small polygons corresponding to the southernmost part of the distribution were added. </li> <li>Pinus halepensis, map 2 in Quézel & Santa (1962): the polygon corresponding to the zone K2 of the map was added.</li> <li>Pinus halepensis, map 3 in Quézel & Santa (1962): the polygons corresponding to the former georeferencing were removed. A small polygon in the southern and westernmost part of the distribution was added.</li> </ul> Version 2 <ul> <li>The “Source_Dat” field was harmonized using the “author_date_title” format for published references.</li> <li>All polygons were snapped together vertices within a small distance threshold to fix small coordinate misalignment in adjacent polygons. In addition, polygons were clipped with sea and administrative boundaries. </li> <li>Pinus halepensis, map 3 in Quézel & Santa (1962): a new georeferencing using the Algerian chotts as additional georeferencing points was made. However, by mistake, the polygons from the old referencing were kept in the shapefile. This mistake was corrected in the subsequent version.</li> </ul>

FIGURE 3 in A new species of snook, Centropomus (Teleostei: Centropomidae), from northern South America, with notes on the geographic distribution of other species of the genus

FIGURE 3. Maximum Likelihood tree showing the evolutionary relationships among the Centropomus species. The values at the nodes are the bootstrap support, with 1000 pseudoreplicates.

FIGURE 2 in A new species of snook, Centropomus (Teleostei: Centropomidae), from northern South America, with notes on the geographic distribution of other species of the genus

FIGURE 2. Specimens of Centropomus irae sp. nov. A – Holotype (MPEG 30613), 326.3 mm SL. B – Paratype (MPEG 30614), 233.4 mm SL. C – Unpreserved specimen, 535.0 mm SL, from Lake Piratuba. Photographs: Alfredo Carvalho Filho.

FIGURE 1 in A new species of snook, Centropomus (Teleostei: Centropomidae), from northern South America, with notes on the geographic distribution of other species of the genus

FIGURE 1. Collecting localities of the Centropomus irae sp. nov. specimens (black dots) in Amapá, northern Brazil.

FIGURE 4. Centropomus mexicanus 290 in A new species of snook, Centropomus (Teleostei: Centropomidae), from northern South America, with notes on the geographic distribution of other species of the genus

FIGURE 4. Centropomus mexicanus 290 mm SL, from Guarujá, São Paulo, Brazil. B - Centropomus pectinatus 95 mm SL, from Guaraqueçaba, Paraná, Brazil. Photographs: Alfredo Carvalho Filho.

opennotspecifiedNov 2019View details →

FIGURE 3. Geographical distribution. a. Spathipheromyia albiceps Malloch, 1934. b. Spathipheromyia atra Malloch, 1934. c in A review of Spathipheromyia (Diptera: Muscidae) from Argentina with the description of an extra-large new species

FIGURE 3. Geographical distribution. a. Spathipheromyia albiceps Malloch, 1934. b. Spathipheromyia atra Malloch, 1934. c. Spathipheromyia goliat sp. nov. and Spathipheromyia magellani Malloch, 1934. d. Spathipheromyia guttipennis (Thomson, 1869). (Red circle: new records; black star: previous distribution, black square: previous distribution of S. magellani.)

opennotspecifiedMar 2024View details →

FIGURE 4 in Species richness, geographic distribution and endemism of Pinguicula (Lentibulariaceae) in the Mexican Transition Zone

FIGURE 4. Species richness and endemism distribution of Pinguicula by: A) country; B) biome; C) biogeographic province. Dark grey = total species, light grey = endemic species.

opennotspecifiedMar 2024View details →

FIGURE 3 in Species richness, geographic distribution and endemism of Pinguicula (Lentibulariaceae) in the Mexican Transition Zone

FIGURE 3. Biomes with habitats of Pinguicula. A) Cave with stalactites, Tropical & Subtropical Coniferous Forest; B, I) Inselbergs, Tropical & Subtropical Coniferous Forest; C–D) Limestone rock walls, Tropical & Subtropical Moist Broadleaf Forest; E–G, L) Tropical & Subtropical Dry Broadleaf Forest; H) Ravine with a gypsum soils, Tropical & Subtropical Coniferous Forest; J–L) Tropical & Subtropical Coniferous Forest; K) Desert & Xeric Shrubland.