Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
1,287
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
1,287 results for “innovative”
Data from: Innovative ochre processing and tool-use in China 40,000 years ago
<p>These data were generated to determine the anthropogenic hematite grains resulted from ochre processing at the Xiamabei site in the Nihewan Basin, northern China. Four samples were selected for sediment analyses, including Raman spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction (XRD), high-temperature magnetic susceptibilities, and/or magnetic component analysis of coercivity distributions. Two sediment samples (X1 and X2) come from the red stained area on which the ochre fragments OP1 and OP2, stone slab LS and quartzite cobble QC were found; two samples (X3 and X6) were retrieved in the same layer but at ~2 m distance from the stained area. All of the samples consist of flood plain silts.</p> <p>The Raman spectra unambiguously identify hematite in red particles abundantly present in samples X1 and X2. The XRD measurements clearly show that hematite is abundant in samples X1 and X2. However, hematite is not detectable in samples X3 and X6. The volume percent for hematite is 0.9% in sample X1 and 1.7% in sample X2. The high-temperature magnetic susceptibility measurements suggest that hematite dominates the magnetic mineralogy of samples X1 and X2. Magnetic component analyses of coercivity distributions show distinct assemblages of magnetic minerals in samples X1 and X2, which have three components with low, middle and high coercivities. The low-coercivity component with median acquisition field of 40-62 mini Tesla (mT) is interpreted as magnetite and/or maghemite. The middle-coercivity component with median acquisition field of 100-166 mT is interpreted as partially-oxidized coarse-grained magnetite. The high-coercivity component with median acquisition field of up to 575 mT is interpreted as single domain hematite, because the single domain threshold grain size of hematite is considerably larger than 15 micrometers, and even up to 100 micrometers. This kind of hematite grains with high coercivities up to several hundreds of mT is usually of detrital origin, and is documented as evidence for the earliest ochre processing in east Asia. The new findings provide new insights into the expansion of Homo sapiens.</p>
Data set from "Impact of the Free-Pelvis innovation in very rigid braces for adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis: short-term results of a matched case-control study"
<p>Dataset from a still non-published study titled "Impact of the Free-Pelvis innovation in very rigid braces for adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis: short-term results of a matched case-control study"</p>
Supplementary information for the paper: "Barriers and drivers to implement innovative business models towards sustainable urban mobility"
<p>The dataset presents excerpts from the interviews used as main source of empirical evidence in the coding process for the identification of barriers and solutions adopted by the companies in the paper: “Barriers and drivers to implement innovative business models towards sustainable urban mobility”.</p>
Literature review on innovative, sustainable and competitive agrifood value chains
<p>This Literature review Data-set has been produced in the frame of CO-FRESH - D1.1. State of the art summarized in an overview of the key success factors (and their theoretical explanations) of innovative, sustainable and competitive agrifood value chains.</p> <p>Grand societal challenges, such as climate change, environmental degradation, food security, immigration, and digital transformation, urge agrifood value chains to embrace sustainability objectives and measures. This objective requires value chains actors from farm to fork to interact for environmental, social and economic improvement of the system. In this context, innovation, that has long been considered as a factor of growth and competitiveness, becomes an increasingly important factor to create value while addressing sustainability challenges. Therefore, the emergence of concepts such as sustainability-oriented innovation and sustainable innovation are undeniable results of this trend. However, our scholarly understanding of these emerging concepts can be improved. In addition, it has been acknowledged that sustainability outcomes cannot be gained individually and that collaboration among value chain partners is needed. Thus, collaboration is seen as an effective way to turn ambition and commitment into action in the journey toward sustainability.</p> <p><strong>The CO-FRESH project</strong> aims to enhance collaboration for sustainability-oriented innovation, by proposing tools for re-designing fruit and vegetables (F&V) agrifood value chains across Europe. To reach these objectives, Work Package 1 takes the lead in <em>Identification, Analysis and Design of Innovative and Sustainable Agrifood Value Chains</em>. The current report is the outcome of Task 1.1, a review of the state of the art.</p> <p><strong>Deliverable 1.1.</strong> presents the state of the art of the academic and grey literature on sustainability-oriented innovation (SOI) in agrifood chains, more specifically presenting key success factors and their theoretical explanations for innovative, sustainable and competitive agrifood value chains. The review, first, gives a clear definition of ”sustainable and innovative agrifood chains’’ in the CO-FRESH project, drawing on the literature about SOI. Second, the review explores different modes of collaboration that contribute to sustainability and innovation in agrifood chains. Finally, the review elaborates on the role of public policies in promoting SOIs in agrifood chains.</p> <p>The outcome of this review will be used in offering a list of search criteria to create an inventory of innovative and sustainable F&V value chains in Europe. In addition, the insights of this deliverable will be used for characterizing and assessing the F&V value chains and their success factors (Task 1.2). On the basis of this review and the assessment in Task 1.2, recommendations will be given for data collection on and redesigning of the CO-FRESH pilot cases.</p> <p><strong>Chapter 2 presents the main methodology applied in the literature review.</strong> A framework for guiding the review was designed around the key concepts of sustainability, innovation, value-chain and collaboration. The main questions were: How is SOI defined in the literature and how does it apply to the agrifood sector? What are the specificities of SOI in fruit and vegetable value-chains? How does inter-organizational collaboration relate to SOI in agrifood chains? How do public policies relate to SOI in agrifood chains? The agrifood sector was the primary focus, but perspectives from other sectors were brought in to complement our understanding. No limitations were put on the type of agricultural products considered. The disciplines of Business, Management and Economics were studied, but also Agriculture, Regional and Urban Planning, Environmental Studies. This process result in more than 350 references reviewed.</p> <p><strong>Chapter 3 addresses how sustainability-oriented innovation (SOI) is defined in the economics, business and strategic management literature.</strong> The chapter starts by reminding that sustainability in itself is subject to debate. In the agrifood sector, sustainability has long been addressed through the environmental lens, first at the farm level and then at the level of the value chain with the development of LCA methods. The concept has then evolved to encompass a more holistic view of sustainability taking into account social dimensions of food systems (like healthiness and relational proximity) and economic dimensions in value chains (like a fair distribution of value, and competition within and across value chains). Even when consensus exists on the sustainable development goals, the indicators developed by international organizations often differ from the ones that are of interest for corporates or developed by academics. From our review of the literature, we conclude that SOI can be defined according to the <em>direction</em>, <em>distribution</em>, <em>diversity</em>, and <em>degree of openness</em>.</p> <ul> <li>The direction of SOI refers to the three pillars of sustainability.</li> </ul> <p>While eco-innovation or social innovation put the emphasis on one dimension, SOI takes into account more than one dimension. As a result, SOI involves a higher level of complexity and more uncertainty on the outcomes of the innovation compared to conventional innovation.</p> <ul> <li>The distribution of SOI refers to the repartition of the benefits.</li> </ul> <p>Many authors argue that SOI should enable a fair benefit-sharing among the value chain actors. In addition to that, the outcomes of SOI do benefit not only the value chain actors but also external actors. For instance, a reduction of the use of chemical inputs on the farm results in cost reduction, thus an economic benefit for the farmer, while it also results in a reduction of greenhouse gas emission, thus an environmental benefit for society as a whole.</p> <ul> <li>The diversity of SOI refers to the type of innovation. Based on economics of innovation and innovation management literature, we rely on the following types of innovation in the CO-FRESH project: <ul> <li><em>Technical innovation:</em> The implementation of new or significantly improved goods and services, or new or improved methods of producing goods and services.</li> <li><em>Organizational innovation:</em> The implementation of a new routines, management structures and methods of coordination within or between organizations.</li> <li><em>Managerial innovation</em><em>:</em> A form of organizational innovation focused on the specific roles and functions of the manager, including the interpersonal roles, the informational roles and the decision-making roles.</li> <li><em>Institutional innovation</em>: A legitimate change in the cognitive, normative, or regulative rules of a social system</li> </ul> </li> </ul> <p> </p> <ul> <li>The degree of openness of SOI refers to the participation of different actors in the innovation process.</li> </ul> <p>SOI is a process that can rely on various degree of value-chain collaboration. In other words, a process that brings together value chain actors (and sometimes also external actors) toward a common goal and a common understanding of developing and implementing an innovation. These value chain actors share decision rights on a part of their individual activities. While SOI begins at the firm level in response to external stimuli such as legislation, it evolves in a pro-active change at the wider system level.</p> <p>In sum, we provide the following general definition of <strong>sustainability-oriented innovation: </strong>“A collaborative process of change directed at improving one or more of the three pillars of sustainability (i.e., environmental, economical and social), relying on a diversity of bundled innovations (notably technological, organizational and institutional), and whose benefits are fairly distributed along the value chain actors”.</p> <p>Acknowledging that collaboration is of paramount importance for SOI,<strong> Chapter 4 analyses how inter-organizational collaboration relates to SOI</strong>. In this report, the focus is on inter-organizational relationship and not on intra-organizational collaboration. The modes of inter-organizational collaboration in the agrifood sector include collaborations among value chain actors (such as joint ventures, cooperatives, licensing, contracting) and collaborations between value chain actors and actors in the business ecosystem, the technological innovation system or the socio-ecological system (including public-private partnerships and multistakeholder partnerships). In the agrifood sector, collaboration traditionally concerns knowledge exchange; production and distribution activities; new product development; and commercialization of products. As collaboration entails risk and loss of autonomy, organizations engage in collaborations only if there are clear benefits. Current motives for horizontal and vertical collaboration include strengthening of bargaining power; gaining economies of scale; accessing tangible and intangible resources; reducing transaction costs; sharing of risks; improving lobbying power and legitimization; and joint learning and innovation. Success factors of collaboration include trust, reciprocity, communication, partner compatibility, and the complementarity of resources.</p> <p>The remainder of chapter 4 explores<strong> how particular collaboration modes relate to SOI in agrifood chains</strong> and derives with six main themes.</p> <p><em>One,</em> <strong>cooperatives</strong> could enable collective investments necessary for SOI. Moreover, cooperatives could facilitate a reduction of the individual risk of farmers in SOI and provide the technical assistance and financial room for experimenting with sustainable agricultural practices.</p> <p><em>Two,</em> the dual role of <strong>contracts</strong> appears to be crucial for SOI in value chains. On the one hand, contracts facilitate adoption of new technologies and farming practices, that could lead to improved environmental sustainability. On the other hand, contractual arrangements are an organizational innovation that enable value creation and value sharing, that could lead to better socio-economical sustainability. Contracts in general facilitate incentive alignment, risk mitigation and benefit sharing; co-investment, joint-funding and protection of specific investment; socio-technical interactions and inter-organizational learning; and provision of credit, inputs and technical services.</p> <p><em>Three,</em> <strong>involving consumers and citizens </strong>is a strong driver of innovation and a move toward more responsible patterns of consumption. However, the match between citizen preference and consumer purchase behaviour is yet to be better understood. Consumer-driven initiatives such as community-supported agriculture, buying groups, and participatory guarantee systems are growing and have been described in the literature on short food supply chains.</p> <p><em>Four</em>, the advantages of <strong>multistakeholder partnerships </strong>appear to be evident for promoting SOI along the value chain. Actors and stakeholders in the periphery of a firm's stakeholder network (e.g., universities, civil society and public authorities) may be even more relevant for SOI than primary stakeholders.</p> <p><em>Five,</em> the relevance of <strong>open innovation</strong> and the collaboration among value chain actors for innovation is undeniable. Although open SOI capabilities comply with the traditional open innovation capability framework, the capabilities should be accustomed to the sustainability context and adapted to the diversity of sustainability as perceived by actors.</p> <p><em>Six,</em> <strong>digitalization</strong> has substantial influence on inter-organizational collaboration for SOI in agrifood. Digitalization influences collaboration modes in several ways: facilitation of information and knowledge sharing by overcoming material constraints; improvement of transparency and reliability; and intensification of the volume and rapidity of data collection and data analysis. However, digitalization has downsides such as increasing the power of dominant actors and the risk of exclusion of small-scale and computer-illiterate producers.</p> <p><strong>Chapter 5 analyses how public policies relate to SOI in agrifood chains</strong>. Among the most debated public policies addressed in the literature, the EU Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) is the most explored, especially with reference to the instruments provided within the framework of the two pillars of the CAP. With regard to policy instruments aimed at supporting SOI, most of the literature focused on financial instruments. However, some authors explored normative instruments, mainly with reference to environmental and phytosanitary regulations. There is little debate on informative policy instruments, studied mostly with reference to advisory services and educational campaigns. Another theme that found relatively modest debate was the impact of innovation on the social dimension of sustainability. Most authors focused on the environmental and economic impact of sustainability. The role of public policies to promote social sustainability along the value chain remains a key area of improvement, especially with regard to rural employment and livelihood. The review highlights that, in general, the investigation approach to explore the role of public policies in promoting SOI along agrifood value chains is often rather narrow and case study-oriented.</p> <p><strong>Finally, the report derives at two main conclusions. </strong>First, we draw <strong>lessons learnt</strong> on how collaboration and public policies relate to SOI in agrifood chains, and on the factors that strengthen SOI. Independently of the types of collaboration (within the value chain or between the value chain and the broader innovation system), this review reveals common factors that lead to successful collaboration for SOI. A prerequisite is for actors to share a common vision on the sustainability goals. In addition, the importance of relational factors such social capital, trust and communication was highlighted in all literature. The complementarity of resources between the actors is also a major factor for successful collaboration. Finally, the importance of combining different collaborations modes was revealed in our review, as well as the importance of enabling institutions and public policies. We also found that inclusive and evolutionary governance structures at different levels of the value chain promote collaboration for SOI. For instance, bilateral collaboration in a value chain for access to specific resources may be complemented with open innovation strategies that enable generating knowledge. Finally, this review principally focused on meso-level factors that can influences collaboration modes for SOI. Further explorations should focus on micro-determinants of innovation and the evolution of success factors of collaboration along the process of SOI.</p> <p>Second, our literature review has allowed us to present <strong>16 </strong><strong>recommendations for interventions</strong> for improvements in the pilot cases of the CO-FRESH project. These recommendations are clustered in three categories: relational, structural and operational, and strategic. Relational factors are about the (social) interactions between actors involved in the value chain and in the innovation process. Structural and operational factors are about structuring the agrifood chain, structuring the innovation process, and the operations in the value chain. Strategic factors include the goals that the actors in the value chain pursue, individually and jointly, and the translation of these goals into management decisions.</p>
Database of social innovation in energy initiatives
<p>A database of n = 500 social innovation in energy initiatives.</p>
Teaching, sharing experience and innovation
<p>Teaching is widely understood to have an important role in cultural transmission. But cultural transmission experiments typically do not document or analyse what happens during teaching. Here, we examine the content of teaching during skill transmission under two conditions: in the presence of the artefact (no-displacement condition) and in the absence of the artefact (displacement condition). Participants built baskets from various materials to carry as much rice as possible before teaching the next participant in line. The efficacy of baskets increased over generations in both conditions, and higher-performing baskets were more frequently copied, however the weight of rice transported did not differ between conditions. Displacement affected the choice of strategy by increasing innovation. Teachers shared personal experience more to discuss non-routine events (those departing from expectations) than they did other types of teaching, especially in the presence of the artefact. Exposure to non-routine experience sharing during teaching increased subsequent innovation, supporting the idea that sharing experience through activities such as storytelling serves a sensemaking function in teaching. This study thus provides experimental evidence that sharing experience is a useful teaching method in the context of manual skill transmission.</p>
The Evaluation and Construction of the Capacities of Urban Innovation Chains Based on Efficiency Improvement
<p>This paper studies urban innovation activities from the perspective of improving the efficiency of innovation chains and explores the operation patterns of urban innovation chains. The connotation of the urban innovation chain is analyzed according to the process of the innovation chain and the characteristics of urban innovation activities. The urban innovation chain can be divided into three stages (original innovation, technological innovation, and innovation transformation) and establishes an indicator system for evaluating the three capacities of the urban innovation chain using the development level of strategic emerging industries as an indicator to measure the efficiency of the urban innovation chain and analysing the relationship between these three constructed capacities in Chinese national innovative cities. Published data on China’s national innovative cities are used to measure the capacity of the urban innovation chain. The development of strategic emerging industries measures cities’ innovation performance, and an inductive approach is applied to analyze the relationship between the capacity construction of the urban innovation chain and innovation performance in innovative cities. This study found that the capacity of the urban innovation chain positively affected urban innovation performance and that the balanced development of the three capacities of the urban innovation chain positively affected urban innovation performance; when urban innovation performance was at its highest, the contribution of original innovation capacity to innovation performance was significantly greater than that of the other two capacities; an inverted U curve illustrated the relationship between the improvement of urban innovation performance and the balance of the three capacities of the urban innovation chain. The research conclusions of this paper enrich the relevant theories of innovation chain, provide reference for the construction of the UIC, and promote the development of strategic emerging industries.</p>
FIGURE. Branching patterns of complex thalloid liverworts in Sri Lanka. (A) Terminal innovations (B) Terminal dichotomies (C) Ventral intercalary. in Thalloid Liverworts (Marchantiopsida) of Sri Lanka
FIGURE. Branching patterns of complex thalloid liverworts in Sri Lanka. (A) Terminal innovations (B) Terminal dichotomies (C) Ventral intercalary.
Main global innovation management standards
<p>Innovation Management Systems (IMSs) are new players that appeared in recent years in the context of innovation and must be considered. They are management standards, norms or guides —similar to Quality Management Systems, i.e., ISO 9000 family— that propose managing innovation, instead of quality, in a systematised and standardised manner [1].</p> <p>In this dataset, it is possible to find a complete list of IMSs available till 2020. This list is an extended versión of the work proposed by [1], including a great number of new IMSs analysed.</p> <p>[1] Mauri, M. M., & Fa, M. C. (2011). Normas para las gestión de la innovación. Un análisis comparativo. Dyna, 86(1), 49-58.</p>
Dataset and Research Questions for Open Science and Open Innovation
<p>Worksheet with a dataset of 55 articles and Research Questions in regard to bridging Open Science and Open Innovation.</p>
Innovative intersection and interchange designs and their use across the Southeast [Dataset]
<p><span>Innovative intersection designs have become more widely implemented in the United States, due to their well-studied operational and safety benefits while minimizing cost and right-of-way acquisition. Although many states have aggressively pursued implementation of these intersections, there is still a demonstrated need to provide additional insight on the design, operation and safety of these innovative intersections. This project helps address this need by both evaluating use of existing innovative intersections and supporting further implementation of these innovative intersection designs through advancing safety analysis, providing guidance on assessing the comfort and safety of pedestrians and bicyclists at innovative intersections, expanding available performance measures, and improving operational analysis through the application of Naturalistic Driving Study (NDS) data.</span></p> <p><span>The data set consists of the Vissim files used to create the simulation model for the emissions analysis.</span></p>
THE SECOND INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC-PRACTICAL VIRTUAL CONFERENCE IN HEALTH INNOVATIONS & RESEARCH: PROGNOSIS, ACHIEVEMENT, AND CHALLENGES.
<p>THE SECOND INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC-PRACTICAL VIRTUAL CONFERENCE IN HEALTH INNOVATIONS & RESEARCH: <br>PROGNOSIS, ACHIEVEMENT, AND CHALLENGES.</p>
Older adults and technological innovations
<p>Author: Thomas More - LiCalab - University of Stavanger</p> <p>Description: This dataset presents qualitative data gathered during two user café sessions involving older adults. In each session, participants engaged in discussions about three Nordic innovations. These discussions encompassed questions arising from product introductions, deliberations on the pros and cons of the innovations, and suggestions regarding potential target groups for these innovations. This dataset offers valuable qualitative information for researchers interested in user-centered innovation development and understanding how older adults perceive and engage with novel products and technologies. It can inform product refinement, marketing strategies, and innovation targeting in the Nordic context.</p>
The impact of top management team tenure heterogeneity on declining firm's innovation efficiency
<p>A firm maybe experiences a flourishing or declining period, and it also probably survives or even dies in future. Most firms have experienced decline in their development process. The impact of demand contraction and COVID-19 has caused more firms to face decline. Under the dilemma of resources reduction and recovery, the declining firm pays more and more attention to the efficient utilization of limited resources. It attempts to achieve turnaround through CEO substitution, adjustment of ownership concentration, innovation-oriented and other strategies. Based on Upper echelons theory and resource-based view, using the data of A-share listed manufacturing firms in Shanghai and Shenzhen from 2015 to 2019, the impacts of TMT tenure heterogeneity and ownership concentration on the innovation efficiency were investigated. The results show that the TMT tenure heterogeneity promotes the innovation efficiency of declining firms, while the relatively centralized ownership structure negatively moderates this effect. The robustness analysis of variable replacement and the solving of endogenous problem also further support this conclusion. This study not only enriches the application areas of Upper echelons theory, but also provides practical guideline for declining firms to replace top management members and to dilute equity in order to achieve recovery.</p>
Interview and Observation Result for Post-metaverse Class Implementation "Innovations in Sustainable Education; Case Study on Metaverse Implementation in BINUS University Language Departments and Future Prospects""
<p>This data file is open for viewing as proof of Author; Brandon Lie - BINUS University for conffrence paper<strong> "Innovations in Sustainable Education; Case Study on Metaverse Implementation in BINUS University Language Departments and Future Prospects" <br><br>Data can be use an reffrence with author permission*</strong></p>
Embeddings for the paper "The Zapatista Semantic Struggle: Analysing the Linguistic Innovation of the EZLN with Semantic Difference Keywords (SDKs)"
<p>Embeddings from word2vec models described in "The Zapatista Semantic Struggle: Analysing the Linguistic Innovation of the EZLN with Semantic Difference Keywords (SDKs)". Full reference TBD.</p>
Data Leveraging Digital Innovation: Enhancing Tourist Intentions through Social Media, Websites, and Mobile App Experiences
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Fig. 4 in The uncinate viscidium and floral setae, an evolutionary innovation and exaptation to increase pollination success in the Telipogon alliance (Orchidaceae: Oncidiinae)
Fig. 4 Telipogon species with different kinds of floral setae and floral callus. From left top to right bottom: Telipogon antisuyuensis Nauray & A.Galán, Telipogon austroperuvianus Nauray & A.Galán, Telipogon bowmanii Rchb.f. and Telipogon selbyanus N.H.Williams & Dressler. Photographs by Benjamin Collantes/Inka-Terra Association
Fig. 1 in The uncinate viscidium and floral setae, an evolutionary innovation and exaptation to increase pollination success in the Telipogon alliance (Orchidaceae: Oncidiinae)
Fig. 1 Floral morphology of Telipogon peruvianus: a frontal view of a flower; b lateral view showing the uncinate viscidium (arrow); c close-up of the central area with details of the reduced callus and the setae on the corolla bottom (arrow). Photographs by Manfred Ayasse
Fig. 3 in The uncinate viscidium and floral setae, an evolutionary innovation and exaptation to increase pollination success in the Telipogon alliance (Orchidaceae: Oncidiinae)
Fig. 3 Pollinarium morphology and viscidium morphology. Top, drawn (dorsal and ventral views, respectively) of pollinaria from diverse Telipogon species, all with uncinate viscidia (a Telipogon koechliniorum, b Telipogon huancavelicanus, c Telipogon phuyupatamarcensis, d Telipogon peruvianus). Bottom, Telipogon peruvianus (left) and Trichoceros muralis (right) viscidia. Note the uncinate and cochleariform viscidium, respectively. Viscidium of Trichoceros muralis is not in its natural position to make structure clearer. Photograph by Carlos Martel
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.