Find research datasets worth reusing

FIGURES 42– 47 in Redescription of the fossil oribatid mite Scutoribates perornatus, with implications for systematics of Unduloribatidae (Acari: Oribatida)

FIGURES 42– 47. Proposed neotype of Scutoribates perornatus Sellnick, 1918 (KMA-197-07, original number in Fritsch's collection: № 7). 42. Slide containing the specimen (before adding text to label: "Neotype: Sidorchuk, Norton 2010"). 43. Ventral view of neotype. 44. Same, dorsal view. 45. Side of the specimen with four setae visible. 46. Anterior part of prodorsum with lamellae, tutorium (tu), rostral incision (arrow) and setae. 47. Posterior margin of notogaster with blocky cerotegument visible. Scale bars: 43, 44: 100 µm, 45–47: 50 µm; 43–46 are combined from 8–15 layers each.

FIGURES 23–26. Scutoribates perornatus Sellnick, 1918 in Redescription of the fossil oribatid mite Scutoribates perornatus, with implications for systematics of Unduloribatidae (Acari: Oribatida)

FIGURES 23–26. Scutoribates perornatus Sellnick, 1918, tritonymph (sample k-2582). Right legs I–IV (trochanters I and II not visible). Scale bar: 50 µm.

FIGURES 12–22. Scutoribates perornatus Sellnick, 1918 in Redescription of the fossil oribatid mite Scutoribates perornatus, with implications for systematics of Unduloribatidae (Acari: Oribatida)

FIGURES 12–22. Scutoribates perornatus Sellnick, 1918, tritonymph (sample k-2582). 12–15. Prodorsal setae. 16–20. Hysterosomal setae. 21. Dorsal view of tritonymph, legs not shown. 22. Same, lateroventral view (one anal valve with tear). Scale bars: 12–20: 50 µm; 21, 22: 100 µm.

FIGURES 6–11. Scutoribates perornatus Sellnick, 1918 in Redescription of the fossil oribatid mite Scutoribates perornatus, with implications for systematics of Unduloribatidae (Acari: Oribatida)

FIGURES 6–11. Scutoribates perornatus Sellnick, 1918, adult (sample MGCP Ar-84), details. 6. Genital valves; oblique projection, anterior at top. 7. Genu and femur of right leg I (tibia and tarsus destroyed, trochanter poorly visible). 8. Tarsus, tibia and genu of right leg II (femur and trochanter poorly visible). 9. Femur of left leg II (trochanter poorly visible). 10. Left leg III (ventral part of trochanter poorly visible). 11. Left leg IV (trochanter poorly visible). Scale bar: 50 µm.

FIGURES 57–60. 57 in Redescription of the fossil oribatid mite Scutoribates perornatus, with implications for systematics of Unduloribatidae (Acari: Oribatida)

FIGURES 57–60. 57. Posterior of hysterosoma of Scutoribates perornatus Sellnick, 1918 (sample PIN 964/1152), lateral aspect; arrow on presumed posterolateral tectum of notogaster. 58. Same area in lateral cross-section of Unduloribates dianae Behan-Pelletier & Walter 2009. 59. Preanal organ of S. perornatus as seen by transparency (ventral aspect, anterior to top); horizontal arrows point to pair of elongated support rods, vertical arrows to innermost apodemal plate (sample MGCP Ar-84). 60. Interior view of same structure in highly cleared specimen of U. dianae; AN indicates anal valve. Scale bars: 57, 58: 20 µm; 59, 60: 50 µm; 57 is combined from 23 layers; 58–60—from 3–4 layers each.

FIGURES 48–56. 48–53 in Redescription of the fossil oribatid mite Scutoribates perornatus, with implications for systematics of Unduloribatidae (Acari: Oribatida)

FIGURES 48–56. 48–53—Scutoribates perornatus Sellnick, 1918. 48–50, Adults. 48, 49. Specimens from Fritsch's collection. 48. Dorsal view of one of the best preserved specimens (KMA-197-04). 49. Ventral view (KMA-197-02). 50. Lateral view (sample PIN 964/1152). 51–53. Tritonymph (sample k-2582). 51. Dorsal view of an air-filled specimen. 52. Enlarged proterosoma of the same specimen after 7 days maceration in mineral oil. 53. Lateral view. 54–56. Proposed neotype of Tectoribates parvus Sellnick, 1931 (KMA 197-24; № 24 in original Fritsch's collection:). 54. Dorsal view. 55. Ventral view. 56. Slide (before adding text to label: "Neotype: Sidorchuk, Norton 2010"). Scale bars: 47–50, 53–55: 100 µm; 52: 50 µm. 48, 49, 54, 55 are combined from 3–15 layers each, 50–53—from 52–87 layers.

FIGURES 1–5. Scutoribates perornatus Sellnick, 1918 in Redescription of the fossil oribatid mite Scutoribates perornatus, with implications for systematics of Unduloribatidae (Acari: Oribatida)

FIGURES 1–5. Scutoribates perornatus Sellnick, 1918, adult (1–3 – sample PIN 964/1152, 4–5 – sample MGCP Ar- 21). 1. Dorsal aspect. 2. Ventral aspect (legs not shown). 3. Lateral aspect (legs not shown, tutorium partly obscured); paired rostral incision indicated by arrow. 4. Asymmetrical lamellae with different cusp length and shape of seta le; oblique projection. 5. Rostrum with lateral incisions (indicated by arrows); oblique projection. Scale bars: 100 µm.

opennotspecifiedDec 2006View details →

FIGURES 1–4. 1–2 in Remarkable sexual dimorphism in the Afrotropical species Nycterimyia capensis Bezzi, 1924 (Diptera: Nemestrinidae), and its taxonomic implications

FIGURES 1–4. 1–2. Wings of Nycterimyia capensis. 1. Male. 2. Female. 3. Female abdomen, dorsal view, showing lack of vestiture. 4. Female ovipositor, profile.

opencc-by-4.0May 2017View details →

HUMANE Survey for REVEAL project: Implications and Design Solutions for Human-Machine Network

The objective of the HUMANE project is to provide a framework and method for classifying and analysing the characteristics of such networks (collectively called HumanMachine Networks (HMNs)), inform design and policy making, and provide recommendations for R&I actions. In order to perform these tasks, HUMANE is revisiting current or recent ICT projects and performing surveys in order to collect feedback about the implications of HMNs and recommendations for design practices. In this survey we focus on the REVEAL project (http://revealproject.eu) as an example of a HMN that provides advanced content aggregationfilteringcuration and recommendation tools for making a higher level analysis of social media possible, enabling users to reveal hidden ‘modalities’ such as reputation, influence or credibility of information. In the REVEAL use case, journalists interact with information sources, the public and other journalists, and use the developed tools for revealing information with respect to social media contributors (source of the information), content (the information itself) and context.

FIGURE 13 in Validation of Astropecten jarli Madsen, 1950 and implications for A. cingulatus Sladen, 1883 (Paxillosida: Astropectinidae)

FIGURE 13. Spination of the IM and AD plates. A) Asteropecten jarli, modified from Cherbonnier & Nataf (1973, Fig. 8) Arrow: proximal. B). AD plate of A. jarli, modified from Cherbonnier & Nataf (1973, Fig. 8). 1: elongated middle spine of the furrow row, 2: enlarged spine of the second row. C) Astropecten cingulatus, modified from Sladen (1889, Plate XXXIX, Fig. 3). Fr: IM fringe spines.

FIGURE 12 in Validation of Astropecten jarli Madsen, 1950 and implications for A. cingulatus Sladen, 1883 (Paxillosida: Astropectinidae)

FIGURE 12. Three specimens of Astropecten spp. from the East Atlantic Region initially identified as A. jarli and subsequently relabeled as A. cingulatus. A) Abactinal view (USNM E18546). R = 33 mm, R:r = 3.6. B) Actinal view (USNM E18546) of IM plates covered with wide squamules and long spines along the distal edge of the plate (proximal left, distal right). C) Abactinal view (USNM E18543). R = 19 mm, R:r = 3.6. D) Lateral view (USNM E18543) of the IM fringe spines aligned at an oblique angle. R = 14 mm, R:r = 4.2 (proximal left, distal right).. E) Abactinal view (USNM E18544) R=14 mm, R:r = 4.2. F) Abactinal view (USNM E18544) of the SM plate of the interradial area with spines on the SM plates (Ss) surrounded by irregularly shaped granules.

FIGURE 8 in Validation of Astropecten jarli Madsen, 1950 and implications for A. cingulatus Sladen, 1883 (Paxillosida: Astropectinidae)

FIGURE 8. Astropecten jarli. Holotype (ZMUC AST-24). Furrow at mid-arm and spination of AD plates. A) Furrow at midarm. B) Enlarged area of the box in panel A. Numbers 1–4 indicate each row on one AD plate. Arrows indicate middle spine of the second row that is either longer than or equal in length to the middle spine of the first (furrow) row and longer than adjacent spines in the same row.

FIGURE 11 in Validation of Astropecten jarli Madsen, 1950 and implications for A. cingulatus Sladen, 1883 (Paxillosida: Astropectinidae)

FIGURE 11. Spination of AD plates of dried specimens of Astropecten jarli (paratype; ZMUC AST-201) and A. cingulatus (FSBC I 129674) from South America (AD spines of the plate in the center of the photo are intact; spines on other plates are damaged). Arrows indicate the middle spine of the second row.

FIGURE 5 in Validation of Astropecten jarli Madsen, 1950 and implications for A. cingulatus Sladen, 1883 (Paxillosida: Astropectinidae)

FIGURE 5. MDS morphometric comparison of specimens from the West Atlantic Region identified as Astropecten cingulatus (open blue squares), from the East Atlantic Region identified as Astropecten jarli (open red diamonds) with the holotype of each species (filled diamond and square), and specimens from the East Atlantic Region identified by Downey in 1977 as A. jarli and subsequently relabeled as A. cingulatus (open green circles). Specimens examined (number in parenthesis): East Atlantic A. jarli—ZMUC AST-24 (1), ZMUC AST-201 (1), MNHN-IE-2013-12841 (2), MNHN-IE-2013-12842 (2), MNHN- IE-2013-12843 (1), MNHN-IE-2013-12845 (1), USNM E18542 (1), USNM 1418044 (1); West Atlantic A. cingulatus— NHMUK 1890.5.7.304 (1), NHMUK 1890.5.7.305 (1), USNM E18416 (1), USNM E18421 (2), USNM E18426 (1), USNM E15902 (3), USNM E18397 (1), USNM E18398 (2), CASIZ 11605 (3), FSBC I 129674 (1), FSBC I 80727 (2); East Atlantic A. cingulatus—USNM E18543 (3), USNM E18544 (2), USNM E18545 (1), USNM E18546 (2).

FIGURE 7 in Validation of Astropecten jarli Madsen, 1950 and implications for A. cingulatus Sladen, 1883 (Paxillosida: Astropectinidae)

FIGURE 7. IM fringe spines at mid-arm. A) Astropecten jarli. Holotype (ZMUC AST-24). R = 100 mm. Abactinal view. B) Astropecten cingulatus. Holotype (NHMUK 1890.5.7.304). R = 28 mm. Abactinal view. C) Astropecten jarli. Holotype (ZMUC AST-24). R = 100 mm. Lateral view. D) Astropecten cingulatus (CASIZ 116105). R = 48 mm. Abactinal view. Proximal (left), distal (right). FR: IM fringe spines.

FIGURE 10 in Validation of Astropecten jarli Madsen, 1950 and implications for A. cingulatus Sladen, 1883 (Paxillosida: Astropectinidae)

FIGURE 10. Astropecten cingulatus. Holotype (NHMUK 1890.5.7.304). Spination of AD plates. A) Furrow from mid-arm (left) to the interadial area (right). Arrow indicates enlarged spine of the second row of the AD plates which are adjacent to AL plates. B) Enlarged area of the box in panel A with enlarged middle spine. Numbers 1–3 indicate each row on one AD plate.

FIGURE 2 in Validation of Astropecten jarli Madsen, 1950 and implications for A. cingulatus Sladen, 1883 (Paxillosida: Astropectinidae)

FIGURE 2. Astropecten jarli Madsen. Abactinal view (left) and actinal view (right). A) Holotype (ZMUC AST-24) from off the coast of Ahobre. R = 102 mm, R:r = 7.0. B) Specimen from off the coast of Dakar (MNHN-IE-2013-12842). R = 51 mm, R:r = 6.0.

FIGURE 1 in Validation of Astropecten jarli Madsen, 1950 and implications for A. cingulatus Sladen, 1883 (Paxillosida: Astropectinidae)

FIGURE 1. Distribution of specimens identified as Astropecten cingulatus vouchered into museum collections (OBIS 2015a reports by Diveboard, OBIS 2015b, were excluded) and Astropecten jarli (Madsen 1950, Cherbonnier & Nataf 1973) with holotype locations indicated by stars. Astropecten spp. are specimens that were incorrectly identified as A. cingulatus and data submitted to OBIS (2015a).

FIGURE 9 in Validation of Astropecten jarli Madsen, 1950 and implications for A. cingulatus Sladen, 1883 (Paxillosida: Astropectinidae)

FIGURE 9. Astropecten jarli. Paratype (ZMUC AST-201). Spination of AD plates with pedicellariae in the second row of spines. Arrows indicate pedicellariae.

FIGURE 4 in Validation of Astropecten jarli Madsen, 1950 and implications for A. cingulatus Sladen, 1883 (Paxillosida: Astropectinidae)

FIGURE 4. Scatterplot of A) R:r vs R and B) R:SM# vs R of specimens of A. cingulatus and A. jarli. Scatterplot for A. jarli for R:r vs. R includes data reported by Madsen (1950, n = 4) and Cherbonnier & Nataf (1973, n = 3) and scatterplot for R:SM# includes data reported by Madsen, 1950 (n = 2). Specimens examined: see Table 1.