Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
19,493
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
19,493 results for “Populism”
Intelligence in offspring born to women exposed to intimate partner violence: a population-based cohort study
<p>Extended data pertaining to the manuscript:</p> <p>"Intelligence in offspring born to women exposed to intimate partner violence: a population-based cohort study"</p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p>
DC-SIGN expression on myeloid population in Luminal Breast Cancer
<p>DC-SIGN expression by the different populations of DC and macrophages found in breast tumor samples using flow cytometry. As previously described (doi:10.1038/s41590-018-0145-8.), we identified four major DC populations: CD11c − CD123+ plasmacytoid pre-DCs, CD11c+BDCA1+ CD14− DCs, CD11c+ BDCA1− CD14− DCs, and CD11c+ BDCA1+ CD14+ inflammatory DCs. Staining was performed using the following antibodies: anti-CD45 APC-Cy7 (BD), anti-CD14 Qdot 605 (Thermo), anti-CD3 Alexa700 (Biolegend), anti-CD 19 Alexa700 (Biolegend), anti-CD56 Alexa700 (Biolegend), 400 anti-HLA-DR BV711 (Biolegend), anti-CD11c PC5 (Beckman Coulter), anti-BDCA-1 PE (BD), anti-CD123 PCy7 (BD) and anti-C-SIGN FITC (BD). Cells were analyzed by a LSRFORTESSA X-20 instrument (BD Biosciences). The most prominent intratumoral myeloid cell population, however, was shown to be represented by macrophages, defined as CD11c+ BDCA1−CD14+ cells. We analyzed DC-SIGN expression on the surface of these populations by flow cytometry. DC-SIGN was only expressed on the membrane of macrophages from tumoral as well as juxtatumoral tissues, but not on the DC populations analyzed. These results are represented in Figure 4 from the publication "Aberrant fucosylation enables breast cancer clusterin to interact with dendritic cell-specific ICAM-grabbing non-integrin (DC-SIGN)". </p> <p> </p>
Bioacoustic monitoring reveals shifts in breeding songbird populations and singing behaviour with selective logging in tropical forests
<b>Description: </b><p>Counts of individual male songbirds, males and females, songs and duets and original WAV audio recordings used to generate them</p><p><b>Project: </b>This dataset was collected as part of the following SAFE research project: <a href="https://www.safeproject.net/projects/project_view/131"><b>Population and behavioral responses of songbirds to logging and rain forest fragmentation</b></a></p><p><b>XML metadata: </b>GEMINI compliant metadata for this dataset is available <a href="https://www.safeproject.net/datasets/xml_metadata?id=3366104">here</a></p><p><b>Files: </b>This dataset consists of 13 files: Pillay_et_al_Songbirds_Acoustic_Counts_Vegetation_Cover.xlsx, 2013_B.zip, 2013_D.zip, 2013_E.zip, 2013_F.zip, 2013_OG1.zip, 2013_OG2.zip, 2014_B.zip, 2014_D.zip, 2014_E.zip, 2014_F.zip, 2014_OG1.zip, 2014_OG2.zip</p><p><b>Pillay_et_al_Songbirds_Acoustic_Counts_Vegetation_Cover.xlsx</b></p><p>This file contains dataset metadata and 5 data tables:</p><ol><li><p><b>CountsMale</b> (described in worksheet CountsMale)</p><p>Description: Counts of male individuals of songbird species</p><p>Number of fields: 12</p><p>Number of data rows: 5700</p><p>Fields: </p><ul><li><b>year</b>: Year of Survey (Field type: id)</li><li><b>ftype</b>: Forest Type (Field type: categorical)</li><li><b>block</b>: Unique ID of Blocks within which Sampling Plots are located (Field type: id)</li><li><b>location</b>: Unique ID of Sampling Plots (Field type: location)</li><li><b>fragment</b>: Future fragments within which sampling plots in logged forest plots were located; not applicable for unlogged forest plots (Field type: id)</li><li><b>species</b>: Species Identity (Field type: taxa)</li><li><b>day</b>: Days 1 to 2 of sampling in each plot (Field type: numeric)</li><li><b>date</b>: Date of Sampling (Field type: date)</li><li><b>jul.date</b>: Julian Date of Sampling (Field type: numeric)</li><li><b>time1-6AM</b>: Counts of male individuals for 6:00-6:05 AM; detection histories generated by collapsing counts to 1/0 data (Field type: numeric)</li><li><b>time2-7AM</b>: Counts of male individuals for 7:00-7:05 AM; detection histories generated by collapsing counts to 1/0 data (Field type: numeric)</li><li><b>time3-8AM</b>: Counts of male individuals for 8:00-8:05 AM; detection histories generated by collapsing counts to 1/0 data (Field type: numeric)</li></ul></li><li><p><b>CountsMaleFemale</b> (described in worksheet CountsMaleFemale)</p><p>Description: Counts of male plus female individuals of songbird species</p><p>Number of fields: 12</p><p>Number of data rows: 1000</p><p>Fields: </p><ul><li><b>year</b>: Year of Survey (Field type: id)</li><li><b>ftype</b>: Forest Type (Field type: categorical)</li><li><b>block</b>: Unique ID of Blocks within which Sampling Plots are located (Field type: id)</li><li><b>location</b>: Unique ID of Sampling Plots (Field type: location)</li><li><b>fragment</b>: Future fragments within which sampling plots in logged forest plots were located; not applicable for unlogged forest plots (Field type: id)</li><li><b>species</b>: Species Identity (Field type: taxa)</li><li><b>day</b>: Days 1 to 2 of sampling in each plot (Field type: numeric)</li><li><b>date</b>: Date of Sampling (Field type: date)</li><li><b>jul.date</b>: Julian Date of Sampling (Field type: numeric)</li><li><b>time1-6AM</b>: Counts of male and female individuals for 6:00-6:05 AM; detection histories generated by collapsing counts to 1/0 data (Field type: numeric)</li><li><b>time2-7AM</b>: Counts of male and female individuals for 7:00-7:05 AM; detection histories generated by collapsing counts to 1/0 data (Field type: numeric)</li><li><b>time3-8AM</b>: Counts of male and female individuals for 8:00-8:05 AM; detection histories generated by collapsing counts to 1/0 data (Field type: numeric)</li></ul></li><li><p><b>CountsSong</b> (described in worksheet CountsSong)</p><p>Description: Counts of songs</p><p>Number of fields: 9</p><p>Number of data rows: 2850</p><p>Fields: </p><ul><li><b>year</b>: Year of Survey (Field type: id)</li><li><b>ftype</b>: Forest Type (Field type: categorical)</li><li><b>block</b>: Unique ID of Blocks within which Sampling Plots are located (Field type: id)</li><li><b>location</b>: Unique ID of Sampling Plots (Field type: location)</li><li><b>fragment</b>: Future fragments within which sampling plots in logged forest plots were located; not applicable for unlogged forest plots (Field type: id)</li><li><b>species</b>: Species Identity (Field type: taxa)</li><li><b>day3-6AM</b>: Counts of songs for 6:00-6:05 AM on day 3 or third consecutive day of sampling in each plot (Field type: numeric)</li><li><b>day3-7AM</b>: Counts of songs for 7:00-7:05 AM on day 3 or third consecutive day of sampling in each plot (Field type: numeric)</li><li><b>day3-8AM</b>: Counts of songs for 8:00-8:05 AM on day 3 or third consecutive day of sampling in each plot (Field type: numeric)</li></ul></li><li><p><b>CountsDuet</b> (described in worksheet CountsDuet)</p><p>Description: Counts of duets</p><p>Number of fields: 9</p><p>Number of data rows: 500</p><p>Fields: </p><ul><li><b>year</b>: Year of Survey (Field type: id)</li><li><b>ftype</b>: Forest Type (Field type: categorical)</li><li><b>block</b>: Unique ID of Blocks within which Sampling Plots are located (Field type: id)</li><li><b>location</b>: Unique ID of Sampling Plots (Field type: location)</li><li><b>fragment</b>: Future fragments within which sampling plots in logged forest plots were located; not applicable for unlogged forest plots (Field type: id)</li><li><b>species</b>: Species Identity (Field type: taxa)</li><li><b>day3-6AM</b>: Counts of duets for 6:00-6:05 AM on day 3 or third consecutive day of sampling in each plot (Field type: numeric)</li><li><b>day3-7AM</b>: Counts of duets for 7:00-7:05 AM on day 3 or third consecutive day of sampling in each plot (Field type: numeric)</li><li><b>day3-8AM</b>: Counts of duets for 8:00-8:05 AM on day 3 or third consecutive day of sampling in each plot (Field type: numeric)</li></ul></li><li><p><b>VegetationCover</b> (described in worksheet VegetationCover)</p><p>Description: Vegetation cover data</p><p>Number of fields: 6</p><p>Number of data rows: 50</p><p>Fields: </p><ul><li><b>location</b>: Unique ID of Sampling Plots (Field type: location)</li><li><b>forest.type</b>: Forest Type (Field type: categorical)</li><li><b>udens</b>: Proportion understory cover (Field type: numeric)</li><li><b>cc</b>: Proportion canopy cover (Field type: numeric)</li><li><b>can.ht</b>: Average canopy height (Field type: numeric)</li><li><b>max.canopy</b>: Maximum height of standing vegetation (Field type: numeric)</li></ul></li></ol><p><b>2013_B.zip</b></p><p>Description: WAV files from 2013 for site B</p><p><b>2013_D.zip</b></p><p>Description: WAV files from 2013 for site D</p><p><b>2013_E.zip</b></p><p>Description: WAV files from 2013 for site E</p><p><b>2013_F.zip</b></p><p>Description: WAV files from 2013 for site F</p><p><b>2013_OG1.zip</b></p><p>Description: WAV files from 2013 for site OG1</p><p><b>2013_OG2.zip</b></p><p>Description: WAV files from 2013 for site OG2</p><p><b>2014_B.zip</b></p><p>Description: WAV files from 2014 for site B</p><p><b>2014_D.zip</b></p><p>Description: WAV files from 2014 for site D</p><p><b>2014_E.zip</b></p><p>Description: WAV files from 2014 for site E</p><p><b>2014_F.zip</b></p><p>Description: WAV files from 2014 for site F</p><p><b>2014_OG1.zip</b></p><p>Description: WAV files from 2014 for site OG1</p><p><b>2014_OG2.zip</b></p><p>Description: WAV files from 2014 for site OG2</p><p><b>Date range: </b>2013-04-09 to 2014-07-26</p><p><b>Latitudinal extent: </b>4.6881 to 4.7530</p><p><b>Longitudinal extent: </b>116.9477 to 117.6249</p><p><b>Taxonomic coverage: </b><br> All taxon names are validated against the GBIF backbone taxonomy. If a dataset uses a synonym, the accepted usage is shown followed by the dataset usage in brackets. Taxa that cannot be validated, including new species and other unknown taxa, morphospecies, functional groups and taxonomic levels not used in the GBIF backbone are shown in square brackets.</p><div> -  Animalia <br> -  -  Chordata <br> -  -  -  Aves <br> -  -  -  -  Passeriformes <br> -  -  -  -  -  Timaliidae <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Stachyris</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Stachyris maculata</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Stachyris erythroptera</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Stachyris poliocephala</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Macronus</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Macronus bornensis</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Macronus ptilosus</i> (as synonym: <i>Macronous ptilosus</i>)<br> -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Stachyridopsis</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Stachyridopsis rufifrons</i> (as synonym: <i>Stachyris rufifrons</i>)<br> -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Pomatorhinus</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Pomatorhinus montanus</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  Pellorneidae <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Trichastoma</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Trichastoma bicolor</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Alcippe</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Alcippe brunneicauda</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Pellorneum</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Pellorneum capistratum</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Malacocincla</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Malacocincla malaccensis</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Malacopteron</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Malacopteron magnirostre</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Malacopteron magnum</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Malacopteron cinereum</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Malacopteron affine</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  Pycnonotidae <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Alophoixus</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Alophoixus bres</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Alophoixus phaeocephalus</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Tricholestes</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Tricholestes criniger</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Iole</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Iole olivacea</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Pycnonotus</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Pycnonotus atriceps</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Pycnonotus simplex</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Pycnonotus eutilotus</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Pycnonotus brunneus</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Pycnonotus erythropthalmos</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  Stenostiridae <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Culicicapa</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Culicicapa ceylonensis</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  Muscicapidae <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Cyornis</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Cyornis superbus</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Cyornis unicolor</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Rhinomyias</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Rhinomyias umbratilis</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Trichixos</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Trichixos pyrropygus</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Copsychus</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Copsychus stricklandii</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  Monarchidae <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Terpsiphone</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Terpsiphone paradisi</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Hypothymis</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Hypothymis azurea</i> <br></div><p></p>
Striking differences in virulence, transmission, and sporocyst growth dynamics between two schistosome populations
<p>Dataset (v2) associated with the accepted publication in Parasites & Vectors - Striking differences in virulence, transmission, and sporocyst growth dynamics between two schistosome populations.</p>
Impacts of habitat disturbance on population health of Bornean frogs
<b>Description: </b><p>The raw data required for estimates of size, body condition and fluctuating asymmetry of riparian anurans across a series of streams within the SAFE landscape, providing insight into the population health of frog populations at these sites. Streams were selected to provide a habitat disturbance gradient enabling identification of any effect of habitat disturbance on the population health indices. Stream characteristics were measured to provide estimates of habitat disturbance sorrounding the streams (canopy cover) and enable the impact of any potentially confounding variables (stream width and slope) to be eliminated. </p><p><b>Project: </b>This dataset was collected as part of the following SAFE research project: <a href="https://www.safeproject.net/projects/project_view/205"><b>The impact of habitat modification on feeding interactions between riparian anuran communities and their arthropod prey </b></a></p><p><b>XML metadata: </b>GEMINI compliant metadata for this dataset is available <a href="https://www.safeproject.net/datasets/xml_metadata?id=3485086">here</a></p><p><b>Files: </b>This consists of 1 file: Fluctuating_Asymmetry_and_Body_Condition_of_Anurans_in_the_SAFE_Project.xlsx</p><p><b>Fluctuating_Asymmetry_and_Body_Condition_of_Anurans_in_the_SAFE_Project.xlsx</b></p><p>This file contains dataset metadata and 2 data tables:</p><ol><li><p><b>Fluctuating asymmetry and body condition measurements of Bornean riparian anurans</b> (described in worksheet Frogs)</p><p>Description: Species, snout-vent length, mass and limb measurements of anurans sampled across a tropical forest disturbance gradient and within oil palm plantations. </p><p>Number of fields: 37</p><p>Number of data rows: 240</p><p>Fields: </p><ul><li><b>site</b>: SAFE identification code for the location where sampling was conducted (Field type: location)</li><li><b>date</b>: Date of sampling (Field type: date)</li><li><b>identification_code</b>: Code for the distinction of individual sampled frogs (Site of capture followed by the number of the individual within the overall sample taken within the site) (Field type: id)</li><li><b>species</b>: Identification of sampled frog to species level (Field type: taxa)</li><li><b>sex</b>: Sex of the sampled frog (male, female or unknown) (Field type: categorical trait)</li><li><b>svl</b>: Length of the frog from its snout to its vent (Field type: numeric trait)</li><li><b>mass</b>: Mass of the frog (Field type: numeric trait)</li><li><b>left_ru_1</b>: First measurement of the left radio-ulna of the frog (NA indicates that frog escaped before measurement could be completed) (Field type: numeric trait)</li><li><b>left_ru_2</b>: Second measurement of the left radio-ulna of the frog (NA indicates that frog escaped before measurement could be completed) (Field type: numeric trait)</li><li><b>left_ru_3</b>: Third measurement of the left radio-ulna of the frog (NA indicates that frog escaped before measurement could be completed) (Field type: numeric trait)</li><li><b>left_ru_mean</b>: Average of the three measurements of the left radio-ulna of the frog (NA indicates that frog escaped before all measurements could be completed) (Field type: numeric trait)</li><li><b>right_ru_1</b>: First measurement of the right radio-ulna of the frog (NA indicates that frog escaped before measurement could be completed) (Field type: numeric trait)</li><li><b>right_ru_2</b>: Second measurement of the right radio-ulna of the frog (NA indicates that frog escaped before measurement could be completed) (Field type: numeric trait)</li><li><b>right_ru_3</b>: Third measurement of the right radio-ulna of the frog (NA indicates that frog escaped before measurement could be completed) (Field type: numeric trait)</li><li><b>right_ru_mean</b>: Mean of the three measurements of the right radio-ulna of the frog (NA indicates that frog escaped before all measurements could be completed) (Field type: numeric trait)</li><li><b>mean_ru_size</b>: Average length of both radio-ulnas (NA indicates that frog escaped before all measurements could be completed) (Field type: numeric trait)</li><li><b>ru_diff</b>: Difference between the mean length of the right radio-ulna from all three measurements and that of the left (Field type: numeric trait)</li><li><b>left_thigh_1</b>: First measurement of the left thigh of the frog (NA indicates that frog escaped before measurement could be completed) (Field type: numeric trait)</li><li><b>left_thigh_2</b>: Second measurement of the left thigh of the frog (NA indicates that frog escaped before measurement could be completed) (Field type: numeric trait)</li><li><b>left_thigh_3</b>: Third measurement of the left thigh of the frog (NA indicates that frog escaped before measurement could be completed) (Field type: numeric trait)</li><li><b>left_thigh_mean</b>: Average of the three measurements of the left thigh of the frog (NA indicates that frog escaped before all measurements could be completed) (Field type: numeric trait)</li><li><b>right_thigh_1</b>: First measurement of the right thigh of the frog (NA indicates that frog escaped before measurement could be completed) (Field type: numeric trait)</li><li><b>right_thigh_2</b>: Second measurement of the right thigh of the frog (NA indicates that frog escaped before measurement could be completed) (Field type: numeric trait)</li><li><b>right_thigh_3</b>: Third measurement of the right thigh of the frog (NA indicates that frog escaped before measurement could be completed) (Field type: numeric trait)</li><li><b>right_thigh_mean</b>: Mean of the three measurements of the right thigh of the frog (NA indicates that frog escaped before all measurements could be completed) (Field type: numeric trait)</li><li><b>mean_thigh_size</b>: Average length of both thighs (NA indicates that frog escaped before all measurements could be completed) (Field type: numeric trait)</li><li><b>thigh_diff</b>: Difference between the mean length of the right thigh from all three measurements and that of the left (NA indicates that frog escaped before all measurements could be completed) (Field type: numeric trait)</li><li><b>left_tf_1</b>: First measurement of the left tibio-fibula of the frog (NA indicates that frog escaped before measurement could be completed) (Field type: numeric trait)</li><li><b>left_tf_2</b>: Second measurement of the left tibio-fibula of the frog (NA indicates that frog escaped before measurement could be completed) (Field type: numeric trait)</li><li><b>left_tf_3</b>: Third measurement of the left tibio-fibula of the frog (NA indicates that frog escaped before measurement could be completed) (Field type: numeric trait)</li><li><b>left_tf_mean</b>: Mean of the three measurements of the left tibio-fibula of the frog (NA indicates that frog escaped before all measurements could be completed) (Field type: numeric trait)</li><li><b>right_tf_1</b>: First measurement of the right tibio-fibula of the frog (NA indicates that frog escaped before measurement could be completed) (Field type: numeric trait)</li><li><b>right_tf_2</b>: Second measurement of the right tibio-fibula of the frog (NA indicates that frog escaped before measurement could be completed) (Field type: numeric trait)</li><li><b>right_tf_</b>: Third measurement of the right tibio-fibula of the frog (NA indicates that frog escaped before measurement could be completed) (Field type: numeric trait)</li><li><b>right_tf_mean</b>: Mean of the three measurements of the right tibio-fibula of the frog (NA indicates that frog escaped before all measurements could be completed) (Field type: numeric trait)</li><li><b>mean_tf_length</b>: Average length of both tibio-fibulas (NA indicates that frog escaped before all measurements could be completed) (Field type: numeric trait)</li><li><b>tf_diff</b>: Difference between the mean length of the right tibio-fibula from all three measurements and that of the left (NA indicates that frog escaped before all measurements could be completed) (Field type: numeric trait)</li></ul></li><li><p><b>Stream morphometrics and riparian canopy cover</b> (described in worksheet Streams)</p><p>Description: The width and slope of, as well as the canopy cover above, the streams along which anurans were sampled.</p><p>Number of fields: 10</p><p>Number of data rows: 260</p><p>Fields: </p><ul><li><b>site</b>: SAFE identification code for the location where sampling was conducted (Field type: location)</li><li><b>date</b>: Date of sampling (Field type: date)</li><li><b>point</b>: 20m interval point along 500m in-stream transect at which measurements were taken (Field type: id)</li><li><b>upstream_%_canopy_cover</b>: Percentage canopy coverage when facing upstream from the centre of the stream at the given sampling point (Field type: numeric)</li><li><b>right_%_canopy</b>: Percentage canopy coverage when facing toward the right bank from the centre of the stream at the given sampling point (Field type: numeric)</li><li><b>downstream_%_canopy_cover</b>: Percentage canopy coverage when facing downstream from the centre of the stream at the given sampling point (Field type: numeric)</li><li><b>left_%_canopy_cover</b>: Percentage canopy coverage when facing toward the left bank from the centre of the stream at the given sampling point (Field type: numeric)</li><li><b>average_cover</b>: Average of the four canopy cover measurements (Field type: numeric)</li><li><b>stream_width</b>: Wetted width of the stream (Field type: numeric)</li><li><b>stream_slope</b>: Slope of the stream (Field type: numeric)</li></ul></li></ol><p><b>Date range: </b>2019-03-23 to 2019-05-16</p><p><b>Latitudinal extent: </b>4.6025 to 4.7317</p><p><b>Longitudinal extent: </b>117.4556 to 117.6414</p><p><b>Taxonomic coverage: </b><br> All taxon names are validated against the GBIF backbone taxonomy. If a dataset uses a synonym, the accepted usage is shown followed by the dataset usage in brackets. Taxa that cannot be validated, including new species and other unknown taxa, morphospecies, functional groups and taxonomic levels not used in the GBIF backbone are shown in square brackets.</p><div> -  Animalia <br> -  -  Chordata <br> -  -  -  Amphibia <br> -  -  -  -  Anura <br> -  -  -  -  -  Bufonidae <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Phrynoidis</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Phrynoidis juxtaspera</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  Dicroglossidae <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Limnonectes</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Limnonectes finchi</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Limnonectes kuhlii</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Limnonectes leporinus</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  Rhacophoridae <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Polypedates</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Polypedates otilophus</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  Ranidae <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Chalcorana</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  [Chalcorana raniceps] <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Meristogenys</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  [Meristogenys orphnocnemus] <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Staurois</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Staurois guttatus</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Staurois latopalmatus</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  Megophryidae <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Leptolalax</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  [Leptolalax friteniens] <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Leptobrachium</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  [Leptobrachium abboti] <br></div><p></p>
Anthropogenic pressures drive population genetic structuring across a Critically Endangered lemur species range
<p>Includes initial input landscape surfaces (.acs) and final resistance surfaces (.out) generated during the current study.</p>
Dataset of the Volkswagen Fond Project no. 90 216 " Early mounted nomads and their vessels Ceramic analysis project aimed at supporting the reconstruction of socio-economic conditions in mobile populations north of the Black Sea between 1100 and 600 BC"
<p>The Excel-Sheet contains information (location of the site, chronological position, type of site, archaeological culture, literature, photographies and drawings, analysis made, results of the analysis, etc.) about the samples taken in the Volkswagen Fond Project no. 90 216 "Early mounted nomads and their vessels Ceramic analysis project aimed at supporting the reconstruction of socio-economic conditions in mobile populations north of the Black Sea between 1100 and 600 BC".</p> <p>The project itself focuses on contacts and interactions between groups with different material culture remains in two vegetation zones to the north of the Black Sea.The investigation takes a complex archaeometric approach to characterise the pottery of communities that lived in the forest steppe zone and steppe zone to the north of the Black Sea between the Dniester and Dnieper rivers between 1100 and 600 BC. By using an multidisciplinary approach to study the material culture of these communities with mobile lifeways, this project will allow the comparison of the natural science and archaeological data for the first time.</p> <p>The Excel-Sheet presents the results of various analyses performed during the project and serves as the database for publications of the project members.</p>
Zea mays MAGIC RIL population - field trial phenotyping data
<p>MIAPPE compliant ISA-tab files of the Zea mays MAGIC RIL population derived from eight genetically diverse founder lines.</p>
Zea mays MAGIC RIL population - growth chamber phenotyping data
<p>MIAPPE compliant ISA-tab files of 197 recombinant inbred lines of two different maize (Zea mays) populations including indepth phenotyping of the fourth leaf at later stages of development.</p>
Fig. 4 in Population analysis of white grubs (Coleoptera: Melolonthidae) throughout the Brazilian Pampa biome
Fig. 4. Melolonthidae species and number of locations that each species was found.
Fig. 4 in Morphometric and molecular differences among Calvertius tuberosus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) populations associated with Andean and coastal populations of Araucaria araucana in the La Araucanía Region, Chile
Fig. 4. ISSR analysis. (A): Dendrogram for the populations studied (control group A. viridans).
Figure 5 in Pleistocene population differentiation in the ant Myrmica scabrinodis (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) - a taxonomic borderline case
Figure 5. Measuring the maximum width of scape at lobe level.
Figure 3 in Two-fold increase in White Stork (Ciconia ciconia) population in Lithuania: a consequence of changing agriculture?
Figure 3. Distance from recorded White Stork nests to the nearest neighbouring nest.
Figure 2 in Two-fold increase in White Stork (Ciconia ciconia) population in Lithuania: a consequence of changing agriculture?
Figure 2. Distance from recorded White Stork nests to the nearest building.
Figure 1 in Changes in abundance and community structure of the zooplankton population during the 2008 mucilage event in the northeastern Marmara Sea
Figure 1. Study area.
Figure 1 in Two-fold increase in White Stork (Ciconia ciconia) population in Lithuania: a consequence of changing agriculture?
Figure 1. Distribution of densities of occupied White Stork nests and colonies in Lithuania.
Figure 3 in Morphological variation among populations of Mesalina watsonana (Stoliczka, 1872) (Sauria: Lacertidae) in Iran
Figure 3. Dendrogram resulting from cluster analysis of 3 OTUs of Mesalina watsonana.
Figure 2 in Seasonal composition and population density of zooplankton in Lake Karaboğaz from the Kızılırmak Delta (Samsun, Turkey)
Figure 2. Cluster diagram based on salinity and electrical conductivity recorded at each station.
Plate 1 in Population status and distribution assessment of Nicobar Long-Tailed Macaque Macaca Fascicularis Umbrosus (Miller, 1902) in Nicobar Group of Islands
Plate 1. Nicobar Long tailed Macaque in its natural forested habitat.
Figure 3 in Recently resighted population of Blue-breasted Quail (Synoicus chinensis) in and around East Kolkata Wetland is under threat due to development activities
Figure 3. Showing LULC of the area where the BBQ were sighted.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.