Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
6,059
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
6,059 results for “Journal”
Figure 6 from: Trietsch C, Mikó I, Ulmer JM, Deans AR (2017) Translucent cuticle and setiferous patches in Megaspilidae (Hymenoptera, Ceraphronoidea). Journal of Hymenoptera Research 60: 135-156. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.60.13692
Figure 6 - Brightfield images with arrows pointing to the patches of translucent cuticle in a Trogus sp. (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) (identifier: PSUC_FEM 86178).
Figure 1 from: Báthori F, Pfliegler WP, Zimmerman C-U, Tartally A (2017) Online image databases as multi-purpose resources: discovery of a new host ant of Rickia wasmannii Cavara (Ascomycota, Laboulbeniales) by screening AntWeb.org. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 61: 85-94. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.61.20255
Figure 1 Appearance of the fungal infection on mounted specimens: Rickia-infected Myrmica scabrinodis hosts killed by freezing (A) or with ethanol (B) or chloroform (C), photographed one month after mounting and dry storage.
Figure 2 from: Messas YF, Sobczak JF, Vasconcellos-Neto J (2017) An alternative host of Hymenoepimecis japi (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae) on a novel family (Araneae, Araneidae), with notes on behavioral manipulations. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 60: 111-118. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.60.14817
Figure 2 - Mecynogea biggiba parasitized by Hymenoepimecis japi. A Adult female spider and first instar larvae B Adult female spider with second instar larvae on its abdomen C Third instar larvae of H. japi after killing its host spider D Third instar larvae consuming the hemolymph of M. biggiba E Detail of dorsal tubercles bearing several hooks F Cocoon of H. japi G Dense weave of cocoon threads in detail.
Figure 5 from: Trietsch C, Mikó I, Ulmer JM, Deans AR (2017) Translucent cuticle and setiferous patches in Megaspilidae (Hymenoptera, Ceraphronoidea). Journal of Hymenoptera Research 60: 135-156. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.60.13692
Figure 5 - Brightfield images showing the dorsal and ventral patches of translucent cuticle in Orussidae, viewed externally. A Dorsal view of an Orussus sp. (Hymenoptera: Orussidae), viewed externally (identifier: IM 1445/ NCSU 53625) B Ventral view of the same specimen C Arrows pointing to dorsal patches of translucent cuticle in Orussus abietinus Scopoli, 1763 (Hymenoptera: Orussidae) (identifier: PSUC_FEM 86200) D A closer view of one of the translucent patches from the same specimen.
Figure 4 from: Trietsch C, Mikó I, Ulmer JM, Deans AR (2017) Translucent cuticle and setiferous patches in Megaspilidae (Hymenoptera, Ceraphronoidea). Journal of Hymenoptera Research 60: 135-156. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.60.13692
Figure 4 - SEM image of the synsternal translucent patch and synsternal setiferous patch in a male (A) and female (B) Lagynodes sp. (Hymenoptera: Megaspilidae) Specimens from lot IM 930. Abbreviations: smp = synsternal setiferous patch; stp = synsternal translucent patch.
Figure 9 from: Brothers DJ, Lelej AS (2017) Phylogeny and higher classification of Mutillidae (Hymenoptera) based on morphological reanalyses. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 60: 1-97. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.60.20091
Figure 9 - Single most-parsimonious tree (raw length = 1134, ci = 0.19, ri = 0.61), of 101 sub/genera of Mutillidae and 4 outgroups, females only, 97 characters many additive and all with implied weighting (N = 5, k = 81). Group support (GC) values shown for all groups supported by resampling. Terminals in bold are those whose placements differ by more than mere taxonomic level in the classifications of DB and LN (see Appendix 1).
Figure 2 from: Trietsch C, Mikó I, Ulmer JM, Deans AR (2017) Translucent cuticle and setiferous patches in Megaspilidae (Hymenoptera, Ceraphronoidea). Journal of Hymenoptera Research 60: 135-156. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.60.13692
Figure 2 - SEM images of the syntergal and synsternal translucent patches and synsternal setiferous patches in male Megaspilus armatus Say, 1836 (Hymenoptera: Megaspilidae) specimens. A Dorsal surface of the metasoma, showing the scutes (identifier PSUC_FEM 68527) B Ventral surface of the metasoma (identifier: PSUC_FEM 50127) C Closer view of the synsternal setiferous patch and scutes, with arrows pointing to pore openings in the cuticle (identifier: PSUC_FEM 50127) Abbreviations: smp = synsternal setiferous patch; stp = synsternal translucent patch.
Figure 10 from: Trietsch C, Mikó I, Ulmer JM, Deans AR (2017) Translucent cuticle and setiferous patches in Megaspilidae (Hymenoptera, Ceraphronoidea). Journal of Hymenoptera Research 60: 135-156. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.60.13692
Figure 10 - TEM image of the lamellar bodies found underneath the synsternal translucent patch in a Dendrocerus sp. (Hymenoptera: Megaspilidae) Specimen identifier: IM 5442.
Figure 12 from: Brothers DJ, Lelej AS (2017) Phylogeny and higher classification of Mutillidae (Hymenoptera) based on morphological reanalyses. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 60: 1-97. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.60.20091
Figure 12 - Preferred most-parsimonious tree (see Fig. 5) with potential groups incorporating ideas from both previous classifications indicated.
Figure 3 from: Pérez-de-Heredia I, Darrouzet E, Goldarazena A, Romón P, Iturrondobeitia J-C (2017) Differentiating between gynes and workers in the invasive hornet Vespa velutina (Hymenoptera, Vespidae) in Europe. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 60: 119-133. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.60.13505
Figure 3 - PCA of the three CHC profiles labelled by hornet size, WW and DW. Principal Component Analysis of CHC profiles in each of the four autumn colonies. Chemical groups are defined by continuous line: Group 1; dash line: Group 2 and dot-dash line: Group 3. PCA dots show representations according to GMMs size, wet weight and dry weight thresholds of hornets. Size, Black dots: Large females (MW ≥ 4.5 mm); White dots: Small females (MW < 4.5 mm). Wet weight, Black dots: Heavy fresh females (≥ 0.618 g); White dots: Light fresh females (< 0.618 g). Dry weight, Black dots: Heavy dry females (≥ 0.225 g); White dots: Light dry females (< 0.225 g).
Figure 4 from: Pezzini C, Jahnke SM, Köhler A (2017) Morphological characterization of immature stages of Habrobracon hebetor (Hymenoptera, Braconidae) ectoparasitoid of Ephestia kuehniella (Lepidoptera, Pyralidae). Journal of Hymenoptera Research 60: 157-171. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.60.20104
Figure 4 - Immature stages of Habrobracon hebetor female (side view): A Prepupa B first pupal phase C second pupal phase D third pupal phase before adult emergence. Scale: 0.5 mm.
Figure 1 from: Trietsch C, Mikó I, Ulmer JM, Deans AR (2017) Translucent cuticle and setiferous patches in Megaspilidae (Hymenoptera, Ceraphronoidea). Journal of Hymenoptera Research 60: 135-156. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.60.13692
Figure 1 - Brightfield images of syntergal and synsternal translucent patches and synsternal setiferous patches in different species of Conostigmus (Hymenoptera: Megaspilidae), viewed externally. A Dorsal surface (syntergite) within a C. bipunctatus Kieffer, 1907 (Hymenoptera: Megaspilidae) specimen (identifier: IM 1751) B Ventral surface (synsternite) within the same C. bipunctatus specimen C Ventral surface of Conostigmus sp. C7A (identifier: CLEV 22741) D Ventral surface of Conostigmus sp. C7B (identifier: PSUC_FEM 83781) Abbreviations: smp = synsternal setiferous patch; stp = syntergal/synsternal translucent patch. The species notations given are not issued for purposes of zoological nomenclature, and are not published within the meaning of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature.
Figure 2 from: Pezzini C, Jahnke SM, Köhler A (2017) Morphological characterization of immature stages of Habrobracon hebetor (Hymenoptera, Braconidae) ectoparasitoid of Ephestia kuehniella (Lepidoptera, Pyralidae). Journal of Hymenoptera Research 60: 157-171. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.60.20104
Figure 2 - Cephalic capsule (frontal view) of fourth instar larva of Habrobracon hebetor illustrating chaetotaxy (AN antenna, CS clypeal setae, FS frons setae on the antennal region, GN genal setae, HS hypostomal setae, VS vertex setae).
Figure 7 from: Brothers DJ, Lelej AS (2017) Phylogeny and higher classification of Mutillidae (Hymenoptera) based on morphological reanalyses. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 60: 1-97. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.60.20091
Figure 7 - Single most-parsimonious tree (raw length = 3822, ci = 0.14, ri = 0.75), of 101 sub/genera of Mutillidae and 4 outgroups (but each duplicated and recoded so as to reflect maximal character-state differences for polymorphisms, and taxa retained as monophyletic collapsed in the figure, see text), both sexes, 230 characters many additive and all with implied weighting (N = 5, k = 169). Group support (GC) values shown for all groups supported by resampling. Names in bold are of "terminals" shown not to be monophyletic.
Figure 15 from: Brothers DJ, Lelej AS (2017) Phylogeny and higher classification of Mutillidae (Hymenoptera) based on morphological reanalyses. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 60: 1-97. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.60.20091
Figure 15 - Subtending states for tree reflecting proposed taxa as monophyletic. Blue indicates states found only when most characters were considered additive, red only when all states were considered non-additive, and black under both conditions. Solid hashmarks indicate unique state changes, and open hashmarks are homoplasies. Letters within boxes indicate breaks in branches to enable effective layout.
Figure 11 from: Brothers DJ, Lelej AS (2017) Phylogeny and higher classification of Mutillidae (Hymenoptera) based on morphological reanalyses. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 60: 1-97. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.60.20091
Figure 11 - Preferred most-parsimonious tree (see Fig. 5) showing distribution of characters (upper numbers) and states (lower numbers) optimized as in Appendix 2. Asterisks (*) indicate character states unambiguously placed (position not changing under any optimization). Solid hashmarks indicate unique state changes, and open hashmarks are homoplasies. Letters within boxes indicate breaks in branches to enable effective layout. [continued over 5 pages]
Figure 1 from: Pezzini C, Jahnke SM, Köhler A (2017) Morphological characterization of immature stages of Habrobracon hebetor (Hymenoptera, Braconidae) ectoparasitoid of Ephestia kuehniella (Lepidoptera, Pyralidae). Journal of Hymenoptera Research 60: 157-171. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.60.20104
Figure 1 - Second instar larva of Habrobracon hebetor (dorsal view) illustrating the terminology used in the text (A1-A9 abdominal segments, AS anal segment, CC cephalic capsule, T1-T3 thoracic segments).
Figure 16 from: Brothers DJ, Lelej AS (2017) Phylogeny and higher classification of Mutillidae (Hymenoptera) based on morphological reanalyses. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 60: 1-97. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.60.20091
Figure 16 - Final proposed higher classification of Mutillidae, as related to the rearranged tree (cf. Fig. 1).
Figures 7–14 from: Müller A, Mauss V, Prosi R (2017) Unique nest architecture in the North African osmiine bee Hoplitis (Hoplitis) mucida (Hymenoptera, Megachilidae). Journal of Hymenoptera Research 60: 99-109. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.60.20218
Figures 7–14 - Morphological differences in the male sex between Hoplitis mucida (left) and H. stecki (right) (see Table 2): 7–8 Antenna 9–10 Tergum 7 11–12 Membraneous appendage of sternum 6 13–14 Genitalia.
Figure 8 from: Brothers DJ, Lelej AS (2017) Phylogeny and higher classification of Mutillidae (Hymenoptera) based on morphological reanalyses. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 60: 1-97. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.60.20091
Figure 8 - Single most-parsimonious tree (raw length = 2024, ci = 0.21, ri = 0.63), of 101 sub/genera of Mutillidae and 4 outgroups both sexes, 198 characters (32 of the original 230 deleted, those found to be polymorphic in at least 10% of terminals) many additive and all with implied weighting (N = 5, k = 81). Group support (GC) values shown for all groups supported by resampling. Terminals in bold are those whose placements differ by more than mere taxonomic level in the classifications of DB and LN (see Appendix 1).
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.