Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
4,144
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
4,144 results for “ITS barcode”
Figure 1 from: Wesener T, Voigtländer K, Decker P, Oeyen JP, Spelda J (2016) Barcoding of Central European Cryptops centipedes reveals large interspecific distances with ghost lineages and new species records from Germany and Austria (Chilopoda, Scolopendromorpha). ZooKeys 564: 21-46. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.564.7535
Figure 1 - Distribution map of all successfully sequenced Central European specimens of Cryptops. Numbers refer to each specimen (see Table 1). Symbols and colours denote species. Blue rectangle = Cryptops parisi; red circle = Cryptops anomalans; green triangle = Cryptops hortensis; brown diamond = Cryptops croaticus; orange cross = Cryptops umbricus; light blue, orange, and yellow symbols mark undetermined Cryptops species.
Figure 5 from: Wesener T, Voigtländer K, Decker P, Oeyen JP, Spelda J (2016) Barcoding of Central European Cryptops centipedes reveals large interspecific distances with ghost lineages and new species records from Germany and Austria (Chilopoda, Scolopendromorpha). ZooKeys 564: 21-46. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.564.7535
Figure 5 - Frequency distribution of pairwise intraspecific (blue) and interspecific (red) distances. The three lineages of Cryptops parisi treated as different species. Basic table see Suppl. material 1.
Figure 1 from: Magoga G, Sassi D, Daccordi M, Leonardi C, Mirzaei M, Regalin R, Lozzia G, Montagna M (2016) Barcoding Chrysomelidae: a resource for taxonomy and biodiversity conservation in the Mediterranean Region. In: Jolivet P, Santiago-Blay J, Schmitt M (Eds) Research on Chrysomelidae 6. ZooKeys 597: 27–38. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.597.7241
Figure 1 - Area investigated by the Chrysomelidae Barcoding project. The countries in which were performed the collecting campaigns are reported in dark grey. The percentage of the total processed specimens is reported for each country.
Figure 4 from: Ševčík J, Kaspřák D, Rulik B (2016) A new species of Docosia Winnertz from Central Europe, with DNA barcoding based on four gene markers (Diptera, Mycetophilidae). ZooKeys 549: 127-143. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.549.6925
Figure 4 - Maximum likelihood hypothesis for relationships among selected species of Docosia Winnertz based on DNA sequence data (COI, COII, CytB and ITS2), 2039 characters. Above node number = bootstrap support for ML.
Figures 1-3 from: Ševčík J, Kaspřák D, Rulik B (2016) A new species of Docosia Winnertz from Central Europe, with DNA barcoding based on four gene markers (Diptera, Mycetophilidae). ZooKeys 549: 127-143. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.549.6925
Figures 1-3 - Docosia dentata sp. n. (holotype), male terminalia; 1 ventral view 2 tergite 9 in dorsal view 3 right gonostylus in dorsal view. Scale bar = 0.1 mm.
Figure 3 from: Pazhenkova EA, Zakharov EV, Lukhtanov VA (2015) DNA barcoding reveals twelve lineages with properties of phylogenetic and biological species within Melitaea didyma sensu lato (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae). ZooKeys 538: 35-46. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.538.6605
Figure 3 - Fragment of the Bayesian tree of Melitaea didyma complex (haplogroups turkestanica, mixta, chitralensis, mauretanica and didyma) based on analysis of the cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) gene. Numbers at nodes indicate Bayesian posterior probability/ML bootstrap/MP bootstrap values, with nonmatching clades using different analyses indicated by '-'. Scale bar = 0.1 substitutions per position.
Figure 4 from: Pazhenkova EA, Zakharov EV, Lukhtanov VA (2015) DNA barcoding reveals twelve lineages with properties of phylogenetic and biological species within Melitaea didyma sensu lato (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae). ZooKeys 538: 35-46. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.538.6605
Figure 4 - Distribution ranges of haplogroups didyma (■), didymoides (∆), interrupta (●), latonigena (○), liliputana (◊), mauretanica (⃰ ), mixta (▼), neera (▲), occidentalis (#), sutschana (♦), turkestanica (□) and chitralensis (►).
Figure 1 from: Pazhenkova EA, Zakharov EV, Lukhtanov VA (2015) DNA barcoding reveals twelve lineages with properties of phylogenetic and biological species within Melitaea didyma sensu lato (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae). ZooKeys 538: 35-46. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.538.6605
Figure 1 - The Bayesian tree of Melitaea based on analysis of the cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) gene. Numbers at nodes indicate Bayesian posterior probability/ML bootstrap/MP bootstrap values. Scale bar = 0.1 substitutions per position.
Figure 2 from: Pazhenkova EA, Zakharov EV, Lukhtanov VA (2015) DNA barcoding reveals twelve lineages with properties of phylogenetic and biological species within Melitaea didyma sensu lato (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae). ZooKeys 538: 35-46. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.538.6605
Figure 2 - Fragment of the Bayesian tree of Melitaea didyma complex (haplogroups neera, liliputana, occidentalis, interrupta, latonigena, sutschana and didymoides) based on analysis of the cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) gene. Numbers at nodes indicate Bayesian posterior probability/ML bootstrap/MP bootstrap values, with nonmatching clades using different analyses indicated by '-'. Scale bar = 0.1 substitutions per position.
Figure 2 from: Raupach MJ, Radulovici AE (2015) Looking back on a decade of barcoding crustaceans. ZooKeys 539: 53-81. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.539.6530
Figure 2 - Subject areas of DNA barcoding studies of the Crustacea. Number of articles with "barcod*" and "crusta*" as keywords in their topic as retrieved from the Web of Science (period covered: 2003–2014; n = 164) and divided into six subject areas (from bottom to top): identification and barcode library (red), genetic variability (orange), species description (green), phylogenetics (violet), methods (blue), and numts (grey).
Figure 5 from: Raupach MJ, Radulovici AE (2015) Looking back on a decade of barcoding crustaceans. ZooKeys 539: 53-81. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.539.6530
Figure 5 - Example for a BIN page in BOLD. The amphipod Rhachotropis aculeata (Lepechin, 1780) is registered in the BIN registry as BOLD:AAB3310. Note that BOLD is a dynamic environment and updates will be reflected on the BIN page, including BIN changes.
Figure 4 from: Raupach MJ, Radulovici AE (2015) Looking back on a decade of barcoding crustaceans. ZooKeys 539: 53-81. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.539.6530
Figure 4 - Project console for DS-CRST in BOLD. Various statistics for the current status of specimens are displayed: record count, species count, taxonomy breakdown, specimen depositories, country of collection, sequence count, flagged records count, trace count, image count. Note that BOLD is a dynamic environment and updates will be reflected on the project console.
Figure 3 from: Raupach MJ, Radulovici AE (2015) Looking back on a decade of barcoding crustaceans. ZooKeys 539: 53-81. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.539.6530
Figure 3 - Geographic and habitat focus of the analyzed DNA barcoding studies of the Crustacea. Studies were listed in the Web of Science (period covered: 2003–2014, n = 164), with the number of publications shown on the X axis. Green bars indicate freshwater studies, dark blue bars marine studies. A black bar represents studies that were performed on a global scale. For 11 studies, no classification was possible (grey bar). Note that publications can include taxa from more than one habitat or region.
Figure 6 from: Raupach MJ, Radulovici AE (2015) Looking back on a decade of barcoding crustaceans. ZooKeys 539: 53-81. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.539.6530
Figure 6 - Sampling locations for crustaceans used in this review. GPS data was taken from the dataset DS-CRST in BOLD. Note that only 5,425 out of 6,270 records had GPS coordinates and are reflected here.
Figure 1 from: Raupach MJ, Radulovici AE (2015) Looking back on a decade of barcoding crustaceans. ZooKeys 539: 53-81. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.539.6530
Figure 1 - DNA barcoding studies of the Arthropoda. Total number and percentage values of articles published with "barcod*" and insect*" (green), "crusta*" (blue), "chelicer*" (orange), or "myriapod*" (violet) as keywords in their topic and listed in the Web of Science (period covered: 2003-2014; n = 1,382). For crustaceans, the total number of articles is split into: 1) the number of articles removed from our analysis (duplications and false positives) (pie sector in light blue) and 2) the core number of articles used in this review (pie sector in dark blue). Arthropod illustrations were modified from Gruner (1993) and Dathe (2003).
Figure 8 from: Weng Y-M, Yeh W-B, Yang M-M (2016) A new species of alpine Apenetretus Kurnakov from Taiwan: evidences from DNA barcodes and morphological characteristics (Coleoptera, Carabidae, Patrobini). ZooKeys 584: 121-134. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.584.6320
Figure 8 - Molecular clock dating of mitochondrial COI gene with BEAST ver. 1.8.0. The oldest divergence between Apenetretus yushanensis and the other Apenetretus species occurred at 1.81 million years ago (mya); the divergence between Apenetretus hsueshanensis and the group of Apenetretus smetanai and Apenetretus nanhutanus occurred at 0.94 mya; and the divergence between Apenetretus smetanai and Apenetretus nanhutanus occurred at 0.53 mya.
Figure 4 from: Weng Y-M, Yeh W-B, Yang M-M (2016) A new species of alpine Apenetretus Kurnakov from Taiwan: evidences from DNA barcodes and morphological characteristics (Coleoptera, Carabidae, Patrobini). ZooKeys 584: 121-134. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.584.6320
Figure 4 - Apical portion of aedeagus of Apenetretus spp. in lateral view. A Apenetretus hsueshanensis sp. n. holotype B Apenetretus smetanai C Apenetretus yushanensis D Apenetretus nanhutanus. Adapted from Habu 1973; Zamotajlov and Sciaky 1996. Scale bar: 1 mm.
Figure 7 from: Weng Y-M, Yeh W-B, Yang M-M (2016) A new species of alpine Apenetretus Kurnakov from Taiwan: evidences from DNA barcodes and morphological characteristics (Coleoptera, Carabidae, Patrobini). ZooKeys 584: 121-134. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.584.6320
Figure 7 - Mitochondrial COI phylogeny of Taiwanese Apenetretus constructed with Maximum Likelihood method. One thousand bootstrap values are showed on the branches in percentage.
Figure 3 from: Weng Y-M, Yeh W-B, Yang M-M (2016) A new species of alpine Apenetretus Kurnakov from Taiwan: evidences from DNA barcodes and morphological characteristics (Coleoptera, Carabidae, Patrobini). ZooKeys 584: 121-134. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.584.6320
Figure 3 - Apical portion of aedeagus of Apenetretus spp. in dorsal view. A Apenetretus hsueshanensis sp. n. holotype B Apenetretus smetanai C Apenetretus yushanensis D Apenetretus nanhutanus. Adapted from Habu 1973; Zamotajlov and Sciaky 1996. Scale bar: 1 mm.
Figure 3 from: Zhao L, Lin L-L, Zheng Z-M (2016) DNA barcoding reveals polymorphism in the pygmy grasshopper Tetrix bolivari (Orthoptera, Tetrigidae). ZooKeys 582: 111-120. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.582.6301
Figure 3 - Morphs of pygmy grasshoppers (Tetrix bolivari) classified by type of colour and markings on the pronotum. A1-7 belongs to type A; B1-4 belongs to type B.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.