Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 2 in Figs. 16–17. 16 in A Description of the First Instar of Hoperius planatus Fall, 1927 (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae: Colymbetinae: Colymbetini), with Phylogenetic Implications

Fig. 2. Maxilla of adult Nearctic Brychius spp. (Coleoptera: Haliplidae); left side, ventral view: a) B. hornii Crotch; b) B. hungerfordi Spangler; c) B. pacificus Carr.

Fig. 8 in Figs. 16–17. 16 in A Description of the First Instar of Hoperius planatus Fall, 1927 (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae: Colymbetinae: Colymbetini), with Phylogenetic Implications

Fig. 8. Gonocoxa of Nearctic Brychius spp. (Coleoptera: Haliplidae); a) B. hornii Crotch; b) B. hungerfordi Spangler; c) B. pacificus Carr.

Fig. 10 in Figs. 16–17. 16 in A Description of the First Instar of Hoperius planatus Fall, 1927 (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae: Colymbetinae: Colymbetini), with Phylogenetic Implications

Fig. 10. Right paramere of Nearctic Brychius spp. (Coleoptera: Haliplidae); a) B. hornii Crotch; b) B. hungerfordi Spangler; c) B. pacificus Carr.

Figs. 14–19 in Figs. 16–17. 16 in A Description of the First Instar of Hoperius planatus Fall, 1927 (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae: Colymbetinae: Colymbetini), with Phylogenetic Implications

Figs. 14–19. Polyclada species, the Omusati and Ohangwena regions, northern Namibia, January–February. 14) host plant, Sclerocarya birrea (Anarcardiaceae), marula

opennotspecifiedApr 2024View details →

FIGURE 21. Aclis stilifer Dall, 1927. A–D. Holotype, USNM 108024. E–G in Taxonomic review of Aclis Lóven, 1846 (Gastropoda, Eulimidae) from Brazil with notes on other congeners from the western Atlantic and Saint Helena

FIGURE 21. Aclis stilifer Dall, 1927. A–D. Holotype, USNM 108024. E–G. Holotype of Aclis pendata Dall, 1927, USNM 108021. A, E. Shell in frontal view. B. Shell in lateral view. C, F. Shell in dorsal view. D, G. Protoconch in apical view. Scale bars: A–F. 1 mm; D, G. 200 μm. Credits: USNM.

opennotspecifiedApr 2024View details →

FIGURE 20. A–C. Aclis conula Dall, 1927. Holotype, USNM 108022. A in Taxonomic review of Aclis Lóven, 1846 (Gastropoda, Eulimidae) from Brazil with notes on other congeners from the western Atlantic and Saint Helena

FIGURE 20. A–C. Aclis conula Dall, 1927. Holotype, USNM 108022. A. Shell in frontal view. B. Shell in dorsal view. C. Protoconch in apical view; arrow indicate transition protoconch-teleoconch. D–F. Aclis pyramida Dall, 1927: Holotype, USNM 108223. D. Shell in frontal view. E. Shell in lateral view. F. Protoconch in apical view; arrow indicate transition protoconchteleoconch. Scale bars: A–B, D–E. 1 mm; C, F. 200 μm. Credits: USNM.

opennotspecifiedApr 2024View details →

FIGURE 11. Aclis aff. conula Dall, 1927. A–E. IBUFRJ 7584. F–J. IBUFRJ 8497. A, C, F, G in Taxonomic review of Aclis Lóven, 1846 (Gastropoda, Eulimidae) from Brazil with notes on other congeners from the western Atlantic and Saint Helena

FIGURE 11. Aclis aff. conula Dall, 1927. A–E. IBUFRJ 7584. F–J. IBUFRJ 8497. A, C, F, G. Shell in frontal view. B, H. Shell in lateral view. D, E. Detail of teleoconch surface; square in D indicates detail in E. I. Detail of apical whorls. J. Protoconch in apical view; arrow indicates transition protoconch-teleoconch. Scale bars: A–C, F–H. 1 mm; D–E. 50 μm; I–J. 200 μm.

opennotspecifiedJan 2009View details →

Subspecies and Distribution. V. z. zibetha Linnaeus, 1758 — SW China (Xizang) to Nepal and NE India. V. z. expectata Colbert & Hooijer, 1953 — China. V.z. sigillata Robinson & Kloss, 1920 — Thailand and Peninsular Malaysia. V. z. hainana Wang & Xu, 1983 — China (Hainan I). V. z. pruinosus Wroughton, 1915 — Myanmar. V. z. surdaster Thomas, 1927 — Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam. Introduced to the Andaman Islands. in Viverridae

Subspecies and Distribution. V. z. zibetha Linnaeus, 1758 — SW China (Xizang) to Nepal and NE India. V. z. expectata Colbert & Hooijer, 1953 — China. V.z. sigillata Robinson & Kloss, 1920 — Thailand and Peninsular Malaysia. V. z. hainana Wang & Xu, 1983 — China (Hainan I). V. z. pruinosus Wroughton, 1915 — Myanmar. V. z. surdaster Thomas, 1927 — Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam. Introduced to the Andaman Islands.

opennotspecifiedAug 2011View details →

Subspecies and Distribution. S. s. scrofa Linnaeus, 1758 — W Europe, from Denmark, Germany, Poland, and Czech Republic to N Italy and N Iberian Peninsula; possibly also Albania. The taxonomic status of animals in Austria, Switzerland, Slovenia, and Slovakia is unclear but presumably these populations are included in scrofa, as are the populations of Sweden, Finland, and the Baltic states. However, restocking of once depleted populations, for example in Italy, has likely involved the introduction and mixing of this subspecies with other subspecies, such as attila. S. s. affinis Gray, 1847 — S India and Sri Lanka. S. s. algirus Loche, 1867 — Tunisia, Algeria, and Morocco, on the coastal side of the mountains or in the low montane areas. S. s. attila Thomas, 1912 — Hungary, Ukraine, C & S Belarus, Romania, Moldova, and S Russia towards the N flank of the Caucasus, but not including the Transcaucasian countries of Georgia, Armenia, and Azerbaijan. The range possibly extends as far S as the Mesopotamian Delta in Iraq, in which case it would likely include W & SW Iran, and possibly E Turkey and Syria, where it borders with lybicus. Such a range could not be easily reconciled with a statement by Groves that "the difference between pigs from N and S of the Caucasus is quite striking; Transcaucasian boars are certainly not attila." This subspecies may also extend into C Asia and include Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, and Turkmenistan, but no data exist to support this. S. s. baeticus Thomas, 1912 — originally described from Coto Donana, S Spain, and later merged with meridionalis; also S Portugal. Unless evidence is found that these Italian and Iberian populations are the relics of a much larger formerly contiguous range, this subspecies should be kept as distinct. S. s. coreanus Heude, 1897 — Korean Peninsula. S. s. eristatus Wagner, 1839 — Himalayas S to C India and E to Indochina (N of the Kra Isthmus). S. s. davidi Groves, 1981 — the arid zone from E Iran to Gujarat, including Pakistan and NW India, and perhaps N to Tajikistan. S. s. leucomystax Temminck, 1842 — main Is ofJapan (Honshu, Shikoku, Kyushu, Nakadori, Hiburijima, Tojima, Kushima, and other smaller Is). S. s. lybicus Gray, 1868 — Bulgaria, Greece, Turkey, Syria, Jordan, Israel, Palestine, in the past also in Lybia, and Egypt. The former Yugoslavia was included in its range, which would suggest that now Slovenia, Serbia, Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro, and Kosovo are within the range of this subspecies, although the exact boundaries are unclear. Pigs from Albania have been assigned to S. s. scrofa. S. s. majori De Beaux & Festa, 1927 — C & S Italian Peninsula. S. s. menidionalis Forsyth Major, 1882 — Corsica and Sardinia, with the proviso that the two populations are very likely to be introduced or feral. S. s. moupinensis Milne-Edwards, 1871 — China, S to Vietnam and W to Sichuan. S. s. nigripes Blanford, 1875 — the flanks of the Tianshan mountains in Kyrgyzstan and NW China (Xinjiang). An animal photographed in NE Iran (Golestan) looked like this subspecies. S. s. nukiuanus Kuroda, 1924 — Iriomote, Ishigaki, Okinawa, Tokunoshima, Amamioshima, and Kakerome Is in the Ryukyu chain in extreme S Japan, though some of these populations have hybridized with introduced domesticates. S. s. sibiricus Staffe, 1922 — Mongolia and Transbaikal (S & E of Lake Baikal). S. s. tawvanus Swinhoe, 1863 — Taiwan. S. s. ussuricus Heude, 1888 — far E Russia and the Manchurian region (China). Korean populations were previously included in this subspecies, but based on new evidence, the Korean taxon seems more similar to moupinensis. S. s. vittatus Boie, 1828 — Malay Peninsula, S of the Isthmus of Kra, the offshore islands of Terutai and Langkawi, Sumatra, Riau Archipelago, Java, Bali, and a range of smaller islands around these, including Babi, Bakong, Batam, Bawean, Bengkalis, Bintan, Bulan, Bunguran, Cuyo, Deli, Durian, Enggano, Galang, Jambongan, Karimon (Riau Is), Kundur, Lagong, Laut, Lingga, Lingung, Mapor, Moro Kecil, North Pagai, Nias, Panaitan, Payong, Penang, Pinie, Rupat, Siantan, Siberut, Simeulue, Singkep, Sugi, Sugi Bawa, Telibon, Tinggi, Tuangku, and the Tambelan Is. This species was originally present from the British Is in the extreme W, through Eurasia from S Scandinavia to S Siberia, extending as far E as Korea and Japan, and SE into some of the Sunda Is and Taiwan. In the S the species ranged along the Nile Valley to Khartoum, and N of the Sahara in Africa, more orless following the continental coasts of S, E, and SE Asia. Within this range it was absent only from extremely dry deserts, e.g. the driest regions of Mongolia and in China W of Sichuan; and alpine zones, such as the high altitudes of Pamir and Tien Shan. In recent centuries, the range of S. scrofa has changed dramatically because of hunting and changes in available habitat. The species disappeared from the British Is in the 17" century, from Denmark in the 19" century, and was greatly reduced in range and numbers in the 20" century from areas as distant as Tunisia, Sudan, Germany, and Russia. Following these severe declines, there were some slight population recoveries in Russia, Italy, Spain, and Germany in the mid-20™ century, and natural and assisted range expansions in Denmark and Sweden. The species has also been inadvertently reintroduced in various locations in the Great Britain via escapees of mixed origin from commercial farming enterprises. Ex-S. scrofa stocks also occur as introduced feral populations in various other parts of the world, including Australia, New Zealand, the eastern Malay Archipelago, and in North, Central, and South America. In all of these areas they are now generally recognized as a major pest. in Suidae

Subspecies and Distribution. S. s. scrofa Linnaeus, 1758 — W Europe, from Denmark, Germany, Poland, and Czech Republic to N Italy and N Iberian Peninsula; possibly also Albania. The taxonomic status of animals in Austria, Switzerland, Slovenia, and Slovakia is unclear but presumably these populations are included in scrofa, as are the populations of Sweden, Finland, and the Baltic states. However, restocking of once depleted populations, for example in Italy, has likely involved the introduction and mixing of this subspecies with other subspecies, such as attila. S. s. affinis Gray, 1847 — S India and Sri Lanka. S. s. algirus Loche, 1867 — Tunisia, Algeria, and Morocco, on the coastal side of the mountains or in the low montane areas. S. s. attila Thomas, 1912 — Hungary, Ukraine, C & S Belarus, Romania, Moldova, and S Russia towards the N flank of the Caucasus, but not including the Transcaucasian countries of Georgia, Armenia, and Azerbaijan. The range possibly extends as far S as the Mesopotamian Delta in Iraq, in which case it would likely include W & SW Iran, and possibly E Turkey and Syria, where it borders with lybicus. Such a range could not be easily reconciled with a statement by Groves that "the difference between pigs from N and S of the Caucasus is quite striking; Transcaucasian boars are certainly not attila." This subspecies may also extend into C Asia and include Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, and Turkmenistan, but no data exist to support this. S. s. baeticus Thomas, 1912 — originally described from Coto Donana, S Spain, and later merged with meridionalis; also S Portugal. Unless evidence is found that these Italian and Iberian populations are the relics of a much larger formerly contiguous range, this subspecies should be kept as distinct. S. s. coreanus Heude, 1897 — Korean Peninsula. S. s. eristatus Wagner, 1839 — Himalayas S to C India and E to Indochina (N of the Kra Isthmus). S. s. davidi Groves, 1981 — the arid zone from E Iran to Gujarat, including Pakistan and NW India, and perhaps N to Tajikistan. S. s. leucomystax Temminck, 1842 — main Is ofJapan (Honshu, Shikoku, Kyushu, Nakadori, Hiburijima, Tojima, Kushima, and other smaller Is). S. s. lybicus Gray, 1868 — Bulgaria, Greece, Turkey, Syria, Jordan, Israel, Palestine, in the past also in Lybia, and Egypt. The former Yugoslavia was included in its range, which would suggest that now Slovenia, Serbia, Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro, and Kosovo are within the range of this subspecies, although the exact boundaries are unclear. Pigs from Albania have been assigned to S. s. scrofa. S. s. majori De Beaux & Festa, 1927 — C & S Italian Peninsula. S. s. menidionalis Forsyth Major, 1882 — Corsica and Sardinia, with the proviso that the two populations are very likely to be introduced or feral. S. s. moupinensis Milne-Edwards, 1871 — China, S to Vietnam and W to Sichuan. S. s. nigripes Blanford, 1875 — the flanks of the Tianshan mountains in Kyrgyzstan and NW China (Xinjiang). An animal photographed in NE Iran (Golestan) looked like this subspecies. S. s. nukiuanus Kuroda, 1924 — Iriomote, Ishigaki, Okinawa, Tokunoshima, Amamioshima, and Kakerome Is in the Ryukyu chain in extreme S Japan, though some of these populations have hybridized with introduced domesticates. S. s. sibiricus Staffe, 1922 — Mongolia and Transbaikal (S & E of Lake Baikal). S. s. tawvanus Swinhoe, 1863 — Taiwan. S. s. ussuricus Heude, 1888 — far E Russia and the Manchurian region (China). Korean populations were previously included in this subspecies, but based on new evidence, the Korean taxon seems more similar to moupinensis. S. s. vittatus Boie, 1828 — Malay Peninsula, S of the Isthmus of Kra, the offshore islands of Terutai and Langkawi, Sumatra, Riau Archipelago, Java, Bali, and a range of smaller islands around these, including Babi, Bakong, Batam, Bawean, Bengkalis, Bintan, Bulan, Bunguran, Cuyo, Deli, Durian, Enggano, Galang, Jambongan, Karimon (Riau Is), Kundur, Lagong, Laut, Lingga, Lingung, Mapor, Moro Kecil, North Pagai, Nias, Panaitan, Payong, Penang, Pinie, Rupat, Siantan, Siberut, Simeulue, Singkep, Sugi, Sugi Bawa, Telibon, Tinggi, Tuangku, and the Tambelan Is. This species was originally present from the British Is in the extreme W, through Eurasia from S Scandinavia to S Siberia, extending as far E as Korea and Japan, and SE into some of the Sunda Is and Taiwan. In the S the species ranged along the Nile Valley to Khartoum, and N of the Sahara in Africa, more orless following the continental coasts of S, E, and SE Asia. Within this range it was absent only from extremely dry deserts, e.g. the driest regions of Mongolia and in China W of Sichuan; and alpine zones, such as the high altitudes of Pamir and Tien Shan. In recent centuries, the range of S. scrofa has changed dramatically because of hunting and changes in available habitat. The species disappeared from the British Is in the 17" century, from Denmark in the 19" century, and was greatly reduced in range and numbers in the 20" century from areas as distant as Tunisia, Sudan, Germany, and Russia. Following these severe declines, there were some slight population recoveries in Russia, Italy, Spain, and Germany in the mid-20™ century, and natural and assisted range expansions in Denmark and Sweden. The species has also been inadvertently reintroduced in various locations in the Great Britain via escapees of mixed origin from commercial farming enterprises. Ex-S. scrofa stocks also occur as introduced feral populations in various other parts of the world, including Australia, New Zealand, the eastern Malay Archipelago, and in North, Central, and South America. In all of these areas they are now generally recognized as a major pest.

opennotspecifiedAug 2011View details →

Subspecies and Distribution. O.a.aferPallas,1766—NEBotswana,Zimbabwe,SouthAfrica,Swaziland,Lesotho. O.a.adametziGrote.1921-NWCameroon. O.a.aethiopicusSundevall,1843-Sudan,Uganda. O.a.albicaudusRothschild,1907-Angola,WZambia,Namibia,Botswana. O.a.angolensisZukowsky&Haltenorth,1957-WAngola. O.a.erikssoniLönnberg,1906-NDRCongo. O.a.faradjiusHatt,1932-NEDRCongo,NWUganda. O.a.haussanusMatschie,1900-Togo. O.a.kordofanicusRothschild,1927-CSudan. O.a.lademanniGrote,1921-CTanzania. O.a.leptodonHirst,1906-Cameroon. O.a.matschieiGrote,1921—SETanzania. O.a.observandusGrote,1921-STanzania. O.a.ruvanensisGrote,1921—Rwanda,NTanzania. O.a.senegalensisLesson,1840-Senegal. O.a.somalicusLydekker,1908-Somalia. O.a.wardiLydekker,1908-EDRCongo,NEZambia. O. a. wertheri Matschie, 1898 — NE Tanzania. The following countries fall within the distributional range of the Aardvark, but the subspecies status within each country is not resolved: Mauritania, Gambia, Guinea Bissau, Guinea, Sierra Leone, Liberia, Ivory Coast, Mali, Burkina Faso, Ghana, Benin, Niger, Nigeria, Chad, Central African Republic, Eritrea, Djibouti, Ethiopia, Equatorial Guinea, Gabon, Republic of the Congo, Kenya, Burundi, Malawi, and Mozambique. in Orycetropodidae

Subspecies and Distribution. O.a.aferPallas,1766—NEBotswana,Zimbabwe,SouthAfrica,Swaziland,Lesotho. O.a.adametziGrote.1921-NWCameroon. O.a.aethiopicusSundevall,1843-Sudan,Uganda. O.a.albicaudusRothschild,1907-Angola,WZambia,Namibia,Botswana. O.a.angolensisZukowsky&Haltenorth,1957-WAngola. O.a.erikssoniLönnberg,1906-NDRCongo. O.a.faradjiusHatt,1932-NEDRCongo,NWUganda. O.a.haussanusMatschie,1900-Togo. O.a.kordofanicusRothschild,1927-CSudan. O.a.lademanniGrote,1921-CTanzania. O.a.leptodonHirst,1906-Cameroon. O.a.matschieiGrote,1921—SETanzania. O.a.observandusGrote,1921-STanzania. O.a.ruvanensisGrote,1921—Rwanda,NTanzania. O.a.senegalensisLesson,1840-Senegal. O.a.somalicusLydekker,1908-Somalia. O.a.wardiLydekker,1908-EDRCongo,NEZambia. O. a. wertheri Matschie, 1898 — NE Tanzania. The following countries fall within the distributional range of the Aardvark, but the subspecies status within each country is not resolved: Mauritania, Gambia, Guinea Bissau, Guinea, Sierra Leone, Liberia, Ivory Coast, Mali, Burkina Faso, Ghana, Benin, Niger, Nigeria, Chad, Central African Republic, Eritrea, Djibouti, Ethiopia, Equatorial Guinea, Gabon, Republic of the Congo, Kenya, Burundi, Malawi, and Mozambique.

Figure 1 in New information about the third stage larva and larval habitat of Microdon (Chymophila) bruchi Shannon, 1927 (Diptera, Syrphidae) from Argentina

Figure 1. (a) Trunk of the grapevine; (b) third-stage larvae of Microdon (Chymophila) bruchi Shannon, 1927 in ant nests inside Vitis vinifera L. plant.

Figure 8 in New information about the third stage larva and larval habitat of Microdon (Chymophila) bruchi Shannon, 1927 (Diptera, Syrphidae) from Argentina

Figure 8. Microdon (Chymophila) SUR-02 of Reemer (2014), male, habitus; representative of the 'metallic species group' (Suriname, Peperpot, 24 February 2006, leg. M. Reemer, coll. RMNH).

Figure 7 in New information about the third stage larva and larval habitat of Microdon (Chymophila) bruchi Shannon, 1927 (Diptera, Syrphidae) from Argentina

Figure 7. Microdon (Chymophila) histrio Wiedemann, holotype female, abdomen; representative of the 'striped-abdomen species group'.

Figure 5 in New information about the third stage larva and larval habitat of Microdon (Chymophila) bruchi Shannon, 1927 (Diptera, Syrphidae) from Argentina

Figure 5. Microdon (Chymophila) argentinae Hull, 1937, holotype male. (a) habitus – dorsal; (b) habitus – lateral; (c) head – frontal; (d) head – lateral; (e) head – dorsal; (f) scutellum; (g) abdomen – dorsal.

FIGURE 10 in Two new species of Elachistocleis Parker, 1927 (Anura: Microhylidae: Gastrophryninae) from Colombia

FIGURE 10. Lateral and frontal view of Elachistocleis tinigua sp. nov., live specimens. A and B. Holotype, adult female, IAvH-Am–15251 (SVL= 38.8 mm), B and C. Paratype adult male, IAvH-Am–15252 (SVL= 34.1 mm), D and E Paratype, adult male, IAvH-Am–15275 (SVL = 30.1 mm). Photographs by Andrés Acosta.

FIGURE 11 in Two new species of Elachistocleis Parker, 1927 (Anura: Microhylidae: Gastrophryninae) from Colombia

FIGURE 11. Phylogenetic relationships of Elachistocleis tinigua sp. nov. and E.sikuani sp. nov. The two new species cluster within Elachistocleis as the sister group to E. pearsei, E. panamensis, Elachistocleis sp. Bootstrap values supporting the branches of the new species are high (>80). A large-scale phylogenetic analysis of the genus will confirm or clarify the placement of the new species within Elachistocleis.

FIGURE 9. A in Two new species of Elachistocleis Parker, 1927 (Anura: Microhylidae: Gastrophryninae) from Colombia

FIGURE 9. A. Type locality of Elachistocleis tinigua sp. nov. at Vereda Los Alpes, La Macarena Municipality, Meta Department. B. Predation on specimen by the of the false fer-de-lance snake Leptodeira annulata in type locality, Photos: Andrés Acosta-Galvis.

FIGURE 7. A in Two new species of Elachistocleis Parker, 1927 (Anura: Microhylidae: Gastrophryninae) from Colombia

FIGURE 7. A. Distribution of species in the genus Elachistocleis from Colombia, Elachistocleis sikuani sp. nov (violet dots), Elachistocleis tinigua sp. nov (yellow triangle), Elachistocleis pearsei (red dots), and Elachistocleis panamensis (blue triangle) for localities see appendix I. B. Vocalization of Elachistocleis sikuani sp. nov., Adult male specimen (specimen IAvH-Am–13074, track IAvH-CSA–34356), SVL: 27.3 mm, featured as a picture on the map) from Maní Municipality, Casanare Department, Colombia, Spectrogram (above),oscillogram (below), and Power spectrum (right) of one note recorded from the male. C. Vocalization of Elachistocleis tinigua sp. nov., Adult male specimen (specimen IAvH-Am–15252, track IAvH-CSA–34357, SVL: 34.1 mm, featured as a picture on the map) from La Macarena Municipality, Meta Department, Colombia, Spectrogram(above), oscillogram (below), and Power spectrum (right) of one note recorded from the male. D. Vocalization of Elachistocleis pearsei. Adult male featured as a picture on the map) from Cimitarra Municipality, Santander Department, Colombia, Spectrogram (above), oscillogram (below), and Power spectrum (right) of one note recorded from the male.

FIGURE 8 in Two new species of Elachistocleis Parker, 1927 (Anura: Microhylidae: Gastrophryninae) from Colombia

FIGURE 8. Elachistocleis tinigua sp. nov., preserved holotype, adult female, IAvH-Am–15251 (SVL = 38.8 mm). A Dorsal view B Ventral view C Lateral surfaces. D. Ventral view of hand E. Ventral view of foot. Scale bar = 10 mm. Photographs by Andrés Acosta.

FIGURE 6 in Two new species of Elachistocleis Parker, 1927 (Anura: Microhylidae: Gastrophryninae) from Colombia

FIGURE 6. Color pattern variation of flanks and posterior thigh in life of type series of Elachistocleis sikuani sp. nov. A, B. Paratype adult female IAvH-Am–13073, C, D: Paratype adult female IAvH-Am–13072, E, F. Paratype adult male IAvH-Am–13074.