Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 300 in Generic Revision Of The Dioptinae (Lepidoptera: Noctuoidea: Notodontidae) Part 2: Josiini

Fig. 300. Scanning electron micrographs of Polyptychia hermieri (3), HW dorsal surface. A, close-up of brush scale surface; B, central androconial pocket, showing bare area where deciduous androconia have been removed; C, deciduous androconia of central pocket; D, apex of deciduous androconium; E, base of deciduous androconium from central pocket; F, close-up of deciduous androconium base.

Fig. 290 in Generic Revision Of The Dioptinae (Lepidoptera: Noctuoidea: Notodontidae) Part 2: Josiini

Fig. 290. Scanning electron micrographs of Getta baetifica 3. A, area surrounding androconial organ on FW ventral surface, near anal margin of wing; B, androconia on FW ventral surface; C, scaleless area surrounding androconial organ on FW ventral surface; D, base of scent scale on FW ventral surface; E, typical scales on HW dorsal surface; F, base of typical scale on HW dorsal surface.

Fig. 296 in Generic Revision Of The Dioptinae (Lepidoptera: Noctuoidea: Notodontidae) Part 2: Josiini

Fig. 296. Mexico and northern Central America, showing the known distribution of Getta turrenti, sp. nov.

Fig. 293 in Generic Revision Of The Dioptinae (Lepidoptera: Noctuoidea: Notodontidae) Part 2: Josiini

Fig. 293. Genitalia of Getta tica, sp. nov. (3 JSM-1519, ♀ JSM-564). A, 3 genitalia; B, 3 Tg8; C, aedeagus; D, ♀ genitalia; E, 3 St8.

Fig. 306 in Generic Revision Of The Dioptinae (Lepidoptera: Noctuoidea: Notodontidae) Part 2: Josiini

Fig. 306. Morphology of Phavaraea (33). A, wings of P. rejecta; B, wings of P. dilatata (illustration by J.S. Miller).

Fig. 295 in Generic Revision Of The Dioptinae (Lepidoptera: Noctuoidea: Notodontidae) Part 2: Josiini

Fig. 295. Genitalia of Getta turrenti, sp. nov. (paratype 3 JSM-569, paratype ♀ JSM-1733). A, 3 genitalia; B, 3 Tg8; C, aedeagus; D, ♀ genitalia; E, 3 St8, ventral view.

Fig. 305 in Generic Revision Of The Dioptinae (Lepidoptera: Noctuoidea: Notodontidae) Part 2: Josiini

Fig. 305. Morphology of Phavaraea (33). A, head of P. rejecta, lateral view; B, head of P. rejecta, lateral view; C, head of P. rejecta, frontal view; D, head of P. rejecta, posterior view; E, head of P. dilitata, lateral view; F, head of P. dilatata, frontal view; G, head of P. dilatata, posterior view (illustration by J.S. Miller).

Fig. 304 in Generic Revision Of The Dioptinae (Lepidoptera: Noctuoidea: Notodontidae) Part 2: Josiini

Fig. 304. Known distributions of newly described South American Josiini: Josia neblina, Notascea brevispinula, Notascea loxa, Phintia broweri, Polyptychia hermieri, and Scea torrida.

Fig. 307 in Generic Revision Of The Dioptinae (Lepidoptera: Noctuoidea: Notodontidae) Part 2: Josiini

Fig. 307. Genitalia of Phavaraea dilatata (3 JSM-346, ♀ JSM-347). A, 3 genitalia; B, 3 St8; C, aedeagus; D, 3 Tg8; E, ♀ genitalia (illustration by A. Trabka).

Fig. 292 in Generic Revision Of The Dioptinae (Lepidoptera: Noctuoidea: Notodontidae) Part 2: Josiini

Fig. 292. Genitalia of Getta niveifascia (3 JSM-366, ♀ JSM-563). A, 3 genitalia; B, 3 St8; C, aedeagus; D, 3 Tg8; E, ♀ genitalia (illustration by A. Trabka).

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2016View details →

FIGURES 1–4 in A Re-evaluation of the Generic Limits of Pison Jurine, and a New Species of the Genus Aulacophilinus Lomholdt (Hymenoptera: Crabronidae: Trypoxylini)

FIGURES 1–4, Aulacophilinus rennellensis, male features. 1, lateral profile of abdomen. 2, front view of head. 3 and 4, mandible, clypeus, and labrum

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2017View details →

Fig. 3 Trees obtained under the implied weighting using three concavity values k in First phylogenetic analysis of the tribe Oligaphorurini (Collembola: Onychiuridae) inferred from morphological data, with implications for generic classification

Fig. 3 Trees obtained under the implied weighting using three concavity values k = 6 (a), 9 (b), and 12 (c)

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2017View details →

Fig. 4 Abdominal sternite IV in First phylogenetic analysis of the tribe Oligaphorurini (Collembola: Onychiuridae) inferred from morphological data, with implications for generic classification

Fig. 4 Abdominal sternite IV showing organization of furcal remnant. a, b Oligaphorura ursi Fjellberg, 1984; c Micraphorura gamae Buşmachiu and Weiner, 2013; d Oligaphorura groenlandica (Tullberg, 1876); e Dimorphaphorura inya Weiner and Kaprus, 2014; f Protaphorura eichhorni (Gisin, 1954)

Fig. 10 in The identity of Barbus capensis Smith, 1841 and the generic status of southern African tetraploid cyprinids (Teleostei, Cyprinidae)

Fig. 10. Species representative of southern African tetraploid cyprinine genera. A. Pseudobarbus afer (Peters, 1864). B. Cheilobarbus capensis Smith, 1841. C. Amatolacypris trevelyani (Günther, 1877) gen. et comb. nov. D. Sedercypris calidus (Barnard, 1938) gen. et comb. nov. E. Namaquacypris hospes (Barnard, 1938) gen. et comb. nov. Photograph credits: A–D by P.H. Skelton (SAIAB); E by R.I. Bills (SAIAB).

Fig. 8 in The identity of Barbus capensis Smith, 1841 and the generic status of southern African tetraploid cyprinids (Teleostei, Cyprinidae)

Fig. 8. Summary trees showing alternative phylogenies from the literature of the tetraploid cyprinines from southern Africa, using the nomenclature proposed by the present study. Only relationships with bootstrap support>80 or Bayesian posterior probability support greater than 95% were considered and all unsupported relationships were collapsed. A. The present study. B. Tsigenopoulos et al. (2002); de Graaf et al. (2007); neighbour-joining tree, De Graaf et al. (2010); Berrebi et al. (2014); Yang et al. (2015). C. Bayesian tree by de Graaf et al. (2007).

Fig. 7 in The identity of Barbus capensis Smith, 1841 and the generic status of southern African tetraploid cyprinids (Teleostei, Cyprinidae)

Fig. 7. Proof sheet of plate X, annotated by Andrew Smith in the R.T. Günther Collection (A649), Cullen Library, University of Witwatersrand. Photograph by P.H. Skelton.

Fig. 9 in The identity of Barbus capensis Smith, 1841 and the generic status of southern African tetraploid cyprinids (Teleostei, Cyprinidae)

Fig. 9. Scatterplot of snout length (% HL) vs SL (mm) of the witvis, sawfin and Clanwilliam yellowfish to show the consistently longer snout of the witvis and sawfin. Specimens of Clanwilliam yellowfish with 'rubberlips' have longer snouts than normal and these exceptions intrude into the scatterfield of the witvis and sawfin. Barbus andrewi: o = holotype; B. capensis: ¢ = holotype, N = specimens; B. serra: Ł = holotype, A = specimens; Labeobarbus seeberi: O = lectotype and paralectotype, O = specimens.

Fig. 6 in The identity of Barbus capensis Smith, 1841 and the generic status of southern African tetraploid cyprinids (Teleostei, Cyprinidae)

Fig. 6. Andrew Smith's 1841 Plate X illustrating Barbus capensis (above) and Barbus marequensis (below). Photo credit: Cory Library, Rhodes University, Grahamstown.

Fig. 5 in The identity of Barbus capensis Smith, 1841 and the generic status of southern African tetraploid cyprinids (Teleostei, Cyprinidae)

Fig. 5. Bayesian phylogram, showing the phylogenetic relationships among southern African tetraploid barbs based on the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene. Bayesian posterior probabilities are shown above branches. Allele codes are indicated at terminal branches. NS: Not significant. The Bayesian posterior probability at higher NS node is 53%; at the subsequent node 77%.

Fig. 4 in The identity of Barbus capensis Smith, 1841 and the generic status of southern African tetraploid cyprinids (Teleostei, Cyprinidae)

Fig. 4. Scatterplot of anal fin length (% SL) vs SL (mm) of the witvis, sawfin and Clanwilliam yellowfish to show the consistently longer anal fin of the latter. Barbus andrewi: o = holotype; B. capensis: ¢ = holotype, N = specimens; B. serra: Ł = holotype, A = specimens; Labeobarbus seeberi: O = lectotype and paralectotype, O = specimens.