Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 3 in The Predatory Mites (Phytoseiidae, Parasitiformes) In The Fauna Of Ukraine: A Review With A Key To Species And New Combinations In The Genus Transeius

Fig. 3. Transeius herbarius (Wainstein, 1960), ♀ (1–7), Ơ (8, 9): 1 — dorsal shield; 2 — ventral body surface; 3 — metapodal plates; 4 — posterior part of peritremal shield; 5 — chelicera; 6 — spermatheca; 7 — fragment of leg IV (macrosetae shown only); 8 — ventrianal shield; 9 — chelicerae with spermatodactil.

Fig. 7 in The Predatory Mites (Phytoseiidae, Parasitiformes) In The Fauna Of Ukraine: A Review With A Key To Species And New Combinations In The Genus Transeius

Fig. 7. Transeius montanus (Wainstein, 1962), ♀ (1–7), Ơ (8, 9): 1 — dorsal shield; 2 — ventral body surface; 3 — metapodal plates; 4 — posterior part of peritremal shield; 5 — chelicera; 6 — spermatheca; 7 — fragment of leg IV; 8 — ventrianal shield; 9 — chelicerae with spermatodactil.

Fig. 8 in The Predatory Mites (Phytoseiidae, Parasitiformes) In The Fauna Of Ukraine: A Review With A Key To Species And New Combinations In The Genus Transeius

Fig. 8. Transeius proximus (Кolоdoсhкa, 1991), ♀ (1–9), Amblyseius (Amblyseius) avetianae Arutujan et Ohandjanian, 1972 (10): 1 — dorsal shield; 2 — ventral body surface; 3 — metapodal plates; 4 — caudal part of peritremal shield;5 — chelicera; 6 — spermatheca; 7 — fragment of leg IV; 8 — chelicera; 9, 10 — spermatheca.

Fig. 6 in The Predatory Mites (Phytoseiidae, Parasitiformes) In The Fauna Of Ukraine: A Review With A Key To Species And New Combinations In The Genus Transeius

Fig. 6. Transeius masseei (Nesbitt, 1951), ♀ (1–7), Ơ (8, 9): 1 — dorsal shield; 2 — ventral body surface; 3 — metapodal plates; 4 — posterior part of peritremal shield; 5 — chelicera; 6 — spermatheca; 7 — fragment of leg IV (macrosetae shown only); 8 — ventrianal shield; 9 — chelicerae with spermatodactil.

Fig. 9 in The Predatory Mites (Phytoseiidae, Parasitiformes) In The Fauna Of Ukraine: A Review With A Key To Species And New Combinations In The Genus Transeius

Fig. 9. Transeius volgini (Wainstein et Beglyarov, 1971), ♀ (1–8), Ơ (9, 10): 1 — dorsal shield; 2 — backward curved ends of peritremes; 3 — posterior part of ventral body surface; 4 — metapodal plates; 5 — posterior part of peritremal shield; 6 — chelicera; 7 — spermatheca; 8 — fragment of leg IV; 9 — ventrianal shield; 10 — chelicerae with spermatodactil.

Fig. 15 in A new genus of rhinebothriidean cestodes from batoid elasmobranchs, with the description of five new species and two new combinations

Fig. 15. Line drawing of bothridium of the holotype (QM GL4621) of Stillabothrium amuletum (Butler, 1987) comb. n. from Glaucostegus typus [Anonymous (Bennett)].

Fig. 13 in A new genus of rhinebothriidean cestodes from batoid elasmobranchs, with the description of five new species and two new combinations

Fig. 13. Histological sections through bothridium of Stillabothrium cadenati (Euzet, 1954) comb. n. from Zanobatus schoenleinii (Müller et Henle). Arrows indicate divisions between proximal and distal portions of transverse septa. Abbreviations: ATS – an- teriormost transverse septum; IV – intestinal villus; RM – radial musculature; RTS – reduced transverse septum; SM – septal mus- culature; ST – stalk; TM – transverse muscle bundle.

Fig. 12 in A new genus of rhinebothriidean cestodes from batoid elasmobranchs, with the description of five new species and two new combinations

Fig. 12. Line drawings of Stillabothrium cadenati comb. n. from Zanobatus schoenleinii (Müller et Henle). A – whole worm (LRP 9135); B – bothridium (LRP 9134); C – terminal proglottid (LRP 9136).

Fig. 7 in A new genus of rhinebothriidean cestodes from batoid elasmobranchs, with the description of five new species and two new combinations

Fig. 7. Scanning electron micrographs of Stillabothrium campbelli sp. n. from Himantura cf. pastinacoides. A – scolex; letters indicate locations of other SEMs; B – bothridium; C – distal bothridial surface at third loculus (upper half) and transverse septum (lower half); D – proximal bothridial surface with rim; E – proximal bothridial surface near rim; F – strobila. White arrowheads indicate cilia in Fig. 7C,D.

Fig. 3 in A new genus of rhinebothriidean cestodes from batoid elasmobranchs, with the description of five new species and two new combinations

Fig. 3. Scanning electron micrographs of Stillabothrium ashleyae sp. n. from Dasyatis biasa (Last, White et Naylor). A–C – scoleces, letters indicate locations of other SEMs; D – distal bothridial surface at anterior loculus; E – proximal bothridial surface and rim, letter indicates location of F; F – proximal bothridial surface; G – stalk; H – strobila.

Fig. 2 in A new genus of rhinebothriidean cestodes from batoid elasmobranchs, with the description of five new species and two new combinations

Fig. 2. Line drawings of Stillabothrium ashleyae sp. n. from Dasyatis biasa (Last, White et Naylor). A – whole worm (holotype; MZUM [P] 2016.6 [H]); B – scolex (LRP 9011); C – terminal proglottid (LRP 9010) with position of sections labeled (uterus not shown); D – section of mature proglottid at level of testes (LRP 9037); E – section of mature proglottid posterior to ovarian bridge (LRP 9030).

Fig. 1 in A new genus of rhinebothriidean cestodes from batoid elasmobranchs, with the description of five new species and two new combinations

Fig. 1. Phylogram based on Bayesian analysis of 1 084 bp region of D1–D3 28S rDNA. Numbers above branches indicate Bayesian posterior probabilities, numbers below indicate Bootstrap percentage values, based on 1 000 replicates. Scale indicates expected num- ber of substitutions per site. Diagrammatic line drawings of fully opened bothridia of the seven described species mapped onto the clades representing those respective species. Host species information in Table 1.

Fig. 9 in A new genus of rhinebothriidean cestodes from batoid elasmobranchs, with the description of five new species and two new combinations

Fig. 9. Scanning electron micrographs of Stillabothrium hyphantoseptum sp. n. from Pastinachus solocirostris Last, Manjaji et Years- ley. A – scolex; letters indicate locations of other SEMs; B – distal bothridial surface at second loculus and transverse septum; C, D – proximal bothridial surface with rim; E – proximal bothridial surface near rim; F – proximal bothridial surface; G – strobila.

Fig. 8 in A new genus of rhinebothriidean cestodes from batoid elasmobranchs, with the description of five new species and two new combinations

Fig. 8. Line drawings of Stillabothrium hyphantoseptum sp. n. from Pastinachus solocirostris Last, Manjaji et Yearsley. A – whole worm (holotype; MZUM [P] 2016.13 [H]); B – scolex (LRP 9092); C – terminal proglottid (LRP 9088).

Fig. 6 in A new genus of rhinebothriidean cestodes from batoid elasmobranchs, with the description of five new species and two new combinations

Fig. 6. Line drawings of Stillabothrium campbelli sp. n. from Himantura cf. pastinacoides. A – whole worm (holotype; MZUM [P] 2016.11 [H]); B – scolex (LRP 9066); C – terminal proglottid (LRP 9067).

Fig. 5 in A new genus of rhinebothriidean cestodes from batoid elasmobranchs, with the description of five new species and two new combinations

Fig. 5. Scanning electron micrographs of Stillabothrium davidcynthiaorum sp. n. from Himantura uarnak 3 (A, C, F) and Himantura heterura (Bleeker) (B, D, E, G). A, B – scoleces, letters indicate locations of other SEMs; C – distal bothridial surface in center of loc- ulus; D – proximal bothridial surface with rim; E – proximal bothridial surface near rim; F – proximal bothridial surface; G – strobila.

Fig. 4 in A new genus of rhinebothriidean cestodes from batoid elasmobranchs, with the description of five new species and two new combinations

Fig. 4. Line drawings of Stillabothrium davidcynthiaorum sp. n. from Himantura heterura (Bleeker). A – whole worm (LRP 9046); B – scolex (holotype, MZUM [P] 2016.9 [H]); C – terminal proglottid (LRP 9046).