Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 18 in The Fruit Flies (Diptera, Tephritidae) In Bhutan: New Faunistic Records And Compendium Of Fauna

Fig. 18. Hemilea sp. nr cnidella Ơ: a — head, anterior view; b — habitus, left-side lateral view; c — dorsal view.

Fig. 20 in The Fruit Flies (Diptera, Tephritidae) In Bhutan: New Faunistic Records And Compendium Of Fauna

Fig. 20. Morinowotome sp. nr flavonigra Ơ: a — left-side lateral view; b — dorsal view; c — anterior view.

Fig. 17 in The Fruit Flies (Diptera, Tephritidae) In Bhutan: New Faunistic Records And Compendium Of Fauna

Fig. 17. Cornutrypeta sp. nr sesquitrifasciata ♀: a — left-side lateral view; b — dorsal view and detached abdomen; c —anterior view.

Fig. 12 in The Fruit Flies (Diptera, Tephritidae) In Bhutan: New Faunistic Records And Compendium Of Fauna

Fig. 12. Rioxoptilona dunlopi ♀ (a, b) and Ơ (c): a — left-side lateral view; b — anterior view; c — dorsal view.

Fig. 14 in The Fruit Flies (Diptera, Tephritidae) In Bhutan: New Faunistic Records And Compendium Of Fauna

Fig. 14. Rioxoptilona vaga (a, b — ♀, c — Ơ): a — anterior view; b — left-side lateral view; c — dorsal view.

Fig. 13 in The Fruit Flies (Diptera, Tephritidae) In Bhutan: New Faunistic Records And Compendium Of Fauna

Fig. 13. Rioxoptilona formosana (a, b — ♀, c — Ơ): a — anteroventral view; b — left-side lateral view; c — dorsal view.

Fig. 8 in The Fruit Flies (Diptera, Tephritidae) In Bhutan: New Faunistic Records And Compendium Of Fauna

Fig. 8. Zeugodacus (Capparidacus) fereuncinatus Ơ: a — dorsal view; b — left-side lateral view; c — anterior view; d — posterior view.

Fig. 7 in The Fruit Flies (Diptera, Tephritidae) In Bhutan: New Faunistic Records And Compendium Of Fauna

Fig. 7. Zeugodacus (Zeugodacus) diversus Ơ (a, c) and ♀ (b, d): a — left-side lateral view; b, c — anterior view; d — dorsal view.

Fig. 6 in The Fruit Flies (Diptera, Tephritidae) In Bhutan: New Faunistic Records And Compendium Of Fauna

Fig. 6. Zeugodacus (Zeugodacus) apiciflavus Ơ: a — dorsal view; b — left-side lateral view; c — anterolateral view; d — posterior view.

Fig. 5 in The Fruit Flies (Diptera, Tephritidae) In Bhutan: New Faunistic Records And Compendium Of Fauna

Fig. 5. Dacus (Mellesis) jacobi Ơ: a — dorsal view; b — left-side lateral view; c — anteroventral view; d — posterior view.

Fig. 4 in The Fruit Flies (Diptera, Tephritidae) In Bhutan: New Faunistic Records And Compendium Of Fauna

Fig. 4. Bactrocera (Bactrocera) syzygii Ơ: a — dorsal view; b — left-side lateral view; c — anterolateral view; d —posterior view.

Fig. 3 in The Fruit Flies (Diptera, Tephritidae) In Bhutan: New Faunistic Records And Compendium Of Fauna

Fig. 3. Bactrocera (Bactrocera) nigrifacia Ơ: a —dorsal view; b —left-side lateral view; c —anteroventral view; d —posterior view.

Fig. 2 in The Fruit Flies (Diptera, Tephritidae) In Bhutan: New Faunistic Records And Compendium Of Fauna

Fig. 2. Bactrocera (Bactrocera) latifrons ♀: a —dorsal view; b — wing; c —left-side lateral view; d — head, anterior view; e —posterodorsal view.

Fig. 1 in The Fruit Flies (Diptera, Tephritidae) In Bhutan: New Faunistic Records And Compendium Of Fauna

Fig. 1. Bactrocera (Tetradacus) connecta Ơ: a — le ft-side lateral view; b — dorsal view; c —anterior view.

Figure 8a–b in Abundance and Seasonal Occurrence of Pest Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Residential and Rural Areas of Oahu (Hawaiian Islands)

Figure 8a–b. Mean captures of female C. capitata per trap per week in torula yeast traps at different sites (a), in different habitats (a, insert graph), and as monthly means throughout the trapping periods in different habitats (b). Values with the same letter in insert graph are not significantly different at the 0.05 level (Tukey's test, post ANOVA). F = 315.75; df = 6,27535; P <0.001; r2 = 6.44%; n = 228 (coffee), 2514 (gardens), 1807 (NW Oahu), 13230 (residential), 1658 (rural), 5630 (urban), 2475 (Waialua).

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2015View details →

Figure 5 in Trapping Pestiferous Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae): Additional Studies on the Performance of Solid Bactrocera Male Lures and Separate Insecticidal Strips Relative to Standard Liquid Lures

Figure 5. Captures of Bactrocera cucurbitae males in traps baited with toxicants of variable age. Data for DDVP strips weathered in Arizona and Florida are given in top and bottom plots, respectively. While toxicant age varied among treatments, the lure was fresh (no weathering) in all treatments. All traps were baited with fresh liquid CL, except the Fresh DDVP treatment which employed a fresh CL plug. Height of bar represents mean number of males captured per trap (n = 15 traps per treatment) in a 24-h period; error bars are + 1 SE. No significant variation existed among treatments for either Arizona (F = 2.5, P = 0.07) or Florida (F = 0.5, P = 0.66). Bars sharing a letter did not differ significantly (P> 0.05).

Figure 4a–b in Abundance and Seasonal Occurrence of Pest Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Residential and Rural Areas of Oahu (Hawaiian Islands)

Figure 4a–b. Mean captures of female B. cucurbitae per trap per week in torula yeast traps at different sites (a), in different habitats (a, insert graph), and as monthly means throughout the trapping periods in different habitats (b). Values with the same letter in insert graph are not significantly different at the 0.05 level (Tukey's test, post ANOVA). F = 2897.68; df = 5,27536; P <0.001; r2 = 34.48%; n = 2514 (gardens), 1807 (NW Oahu), 13230 (residential), 1886 (rural), 5630 (urban), 2475 (Waialua).

Figure 3a–b in Abundance and Seasonal Occurrence of Pest Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Residential and Rural Areas of Oahu (Hawaiian Islands)

Figure 3a–b. Mean captures of male B. cucurbitae per trap per week in cue-lure traps at different sites (a), in different habitats (a, insert graph), and as monthly means throughout the trapping periods in different habitats (b). Values with the same letter in insert graph are not significantly different at the 0.05 level (Tukey's test, post ANOVA). F = 5453.02; df = 5,18128; P <0.001; r2 = 60.06%); n = 2514 (gardens), 1807 (NW Oahu), 8879 (residential), 1720 (rural), 739 (urban), 2475 (Waialua).

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2012View details →

Figures 26 in Host Plant Records for Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae: Dacini) in the Pacific Islands

Figures 26 to 31. Bactrocera umbrosa (26), B. penefurva (27), B. neoxanthodes (28), B. xanthodes (29), B. decipiens (30), B. atrisetosa (31). All photos by Steve Wilson, Queensland Museum.

Figure 7a–b in Abundance and Seasonal Occurrence of Pest Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Residential and Rural Areas of Oahu (Hawaiian Islands)

Figure 7a–b. Mean captures of male C. capitata per trap per week in trimedlure traps at different sites (a), in different habitats (a, insert graph), and as monthly means throughout the trapping periods in different habitats (b). Values with the same letter in insert graph are not significantly different at the 0.05 level (Tukey's test, post ANOVA). F = 586.20; df = 6,18127; P <0.001; r2 = 16.25%; n = 228 (coffee), 2514 (gardens), 1807 (NW Oahu), 8879 (residential), 1492 (rural), 739 (urban), 2475 (Waialua).