Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
5,155
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
5,155 results for “resolution”
United Nations Security Council Resolutions, 1946-2019
<p>This dataset contains all Security Council resolutions from 1946-2019 in PDF format, as they are provided by the United Nations through their Official Documents System. As of 31 December 2019, the Security Council has adopted 2503 resolutions. The PDFs are provided "as is". For the purposes of automatic text analysis/corpus building, the following notes might be important, without claiming to be exhaustive: </p> <p>- each resolution is consecutively numbered (1-2503, with year in brackets) and preceded by S/RES/.</p> <p>- UN Official Documents are electronically published since 1993/1994. PDFs prior to 1994 might not be readable. </p> <p>- Documents prior to 1994 are usually provided as scanned documents without OCR. This means not only that documents would need to be optimized for automatic character recognition, it also means that the relevant pages might contain more than one document, or parts of another document than the one indicated in the document code. </p> <p>Copyright note: Security Council resolutions are part of the Security Council Official Records (SCOR) and officially issued as UN documents with an official document symbol. These documents are part of the public domain according to the United Nations, cf. ST/AI/189/Add.9/Rev.2, para. 2, lit. a) and b), available at undocs.org/ST/AI/189/Add.9/Rev.2. All Security Council resolutions are available at: https://www.un.org/securitycouncil/content/resolutions-0 (last accessed 4 December 2020).</p>
High Resolution Digital Terrain Models of Mercury
<p>Supplementary material of the article:<br> Tenthoff, M.; Wohlfarth, K.; Wöhler, C. High Resolution Digital Terrain Models of Mercury. <em>Remote Sens.</em> <strong>2020</strong>, <em>12</em>, 3989.</p> <p><br> Abstract:<br> We refined our Shape from Shading (SfS) algorithm, which has previously been used to<br> create digital terrain models (DTMs) of the Lunar and the Martian surface, to generate high-resolution<br> DTMs of Mercury from MESSENGER imagery. To adapt the reconstruction procedure to the specific<br> conditions of Mercury and the available imagery, we introduced two methodic innovations. First, we<br> extended the SfS algorithm to enable the 3D-reconstruction from image mosaics. Because most mosaic<br> tiles were acquired at different times and under various illumination conditions, the brightness of<br> adjacent tiles may vary. Brightness variations that are not fully captured by the reflectance model may<br> yield discontinuities at tile borders. We found that the relaxation of the constraint for a continuous<br> albedo map improves the topographic results of an extensive region removing discontinuities at<br> tile borders. The second innovation enables the generation of accurate DTMs from images with<br> substantial albedo variations, such as hollows. We employed an iterative procedure that initializes the<br> SfS algorithm with the albedo map that was obtained by the previous iteration step. This approach<br> converges and yields a reasonable albedo map and topography. With these approaches, we generated<br> DTMs of several science targets such as the Rachmaninoff basin, Praxiteles crater, fault lines, and<br> several hollows. To evaluate the results, we compared our DTMs with stereo DTMs and laser altimeter<br> data. In contrast to coarse laser altimetry tracks and stereo algorithms, which tend to be affected by<br> interpolation artifacts, SfS can generate DTMs almost at image resolution. The root mean squared<br> errors (RMSE) at our target sites are below the size of the lateral image resolution. For some targets,<br> we could achieve an effective resolution of less than 10 m/pixel, which is the best resolution of<br> Mercury to date. We critically discuss the limitations of the evaluation methodology.<br> <br> </p>
Reply to comment on "High-resolution, multi-layer modelling of Singapore's urban climate incorporating local climate zones"
<p>This data is for the publication submitted to the Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres</p>
High resolution global industrial and smallholder oil palm map for 2019
<p>The dataset contains 634 100x100 km tiles, covering areas where oil palm plantations were detected. The file '<em>grid.shp</em>' contains the grid that covers the potential distribution of oil palm. The file '<em>grid_withOP.shp</em>' shows the 100x100 grid squares with presence of oil palm plantations. The classified images (‘<em>oil_palm_map</em>’ folder, in geotiff format) are the output of the convolutional neural network based on Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 half-year composites. The images have a spatial resolution of 10 meters and contain three classes: [1] Industrial closed-canopy oil palm plantations, [2] Smallholder closed-canopy oil palm plantations, and [3] other land covers/uses that are not closed canopy oil palm. The file ‘<em>Validation_points_GlobalOilPalmLayer_2019.shp</em>’ includes the 13,495 points that were used to validate the product. Each point includes the attribute ‘Class’, which is the labelled class assigned by visual interpretation, and the attribute ‘predClass, which reflects the predicted class by the convolutional neural network. The ‘Class’ and ‘predClass’ values are the same as the raster files: [1] Industrial closed-canopy oil palm plantations, [2] Smallholder closed-canopy oil palm plantations, and [3] other land covers/uses that are not closed canopy oil palm.</p> <p>See article for additional information:</p> <p>Descals, Adrià, et al. "High-resolution global map of smallholder and industrial closed-canopy oil palm plantations." <em>Earth System Science Data</em> 13.3 (2021): 1211-1231.</p> <p> </p> <p>Changelog v1:</p> <p>- The analysis was extended to Sri Lanka, South India, and countries in Eastern Africa where oil palm can potentially grow.</p> <p>- The validation dataset only includes the points drawn by simple random sampling and stratified random sampling in the grid cells where the IUCN industrial layer detected oil palm.</p> <p>- The 'Class' and 'predClass' values in the validation dataset were reclassified with the same values as the raster images: [1] Industrial plantations, [2] Smallholder plantations, and [3] Other land covers/uses.</p>
High-resolution CONUS-wide downscaled rainfall estimates (HRCDRE)
<p>The spatiotemporal character of rainfall is particularly important for hydrologic modeling, as well as hydroclimatic risk estimation and impact assessment. Existing atmospheric reanalysis datasets offer extensive record lengths and global coverage, but usually their spatial resolution is coarse for distributed hydrologic simulations at small spatial scales. On the other hand, the temporal coverage of high-resolution radar-based rainfall estimates can be rather short for risk applications. To address these shortcomings, we simultaneously bias-correct and downscale a state-of-the-art atmospheric reanalysis (<a href="https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.adbb2d47">ERA5</a>) rainfall dataset, using the radar-based <a href="https://doi.org/10.5065/D6PG1QDD">Stage IV</a> precipitation product as fine resolution reference, to develop an hourly CONUS-wide precipitation product over a 4-km grid, which extends back to 1979. In this regard, we refine an existing parametric quantile mapping framework based on a two-component theoretical distribution model, where we impose continuity of the parametric forms via optimal threshold selection to transition between higher and lower rain rates. An evaluation over the probability frequency and time domains, using <a href="https://doi.org/10.25921/p7j8-2170">NOAA's raingauge</a> measurements as benchmark, reveals that the developed product benefits from the strengths of the calibration datasets, demonstrating good performance and robust behavior over all studied time periods and Köppen climate classification zones, including snow-prone regions or areas where mesoscale convective systems become dominant. The accuracy of the yielded high spatial-resolution rain rates, especially in low probability events, shows that the developed product can be effectively used for hydroclimatic risk applications and frequency analysis, while its high temporal and spatial resolution makes it particularly useful for distributed hydrologic modeling.</p>
Feature-based multi-resolution registration of immunostained serial sections - online material
<p>This is the supplementary online material, including full data, evaluation, and executables, for the paper "Feature-based multi-resolution registration of immunostained serial sections" that appeared in Medical Image Analysis, Volume 35, January 2017, Pages 288–302.</p> <p>Same material was deposited online under https://gdv-server.inf.uni-bayreuth.de/gdvcloud/index.php/s/NnSov0O65n9Gp01 </p> <p>We also include here further supplementary files deposited at the journal page (http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136184151630127X) under CC-BY licence. See there for the definite version of the paper or http://www.mathematik.uni-marburg.de/~lobachev/papers/lobachev-media16-registration-preprint.pdf for the preprint.</p>
Atomic resolution X-ray diffraction images for methanol dehydrogenase from Methylobacterium extorquens.
<p>Atomic resolution X-ray diffraction images for methanol dehydrogenase from <em>Methylobacterium extorquens</em> collected at ESRF (Grenoble, France) using beamline ID29 in May 2002 with an ADSC detector. The diffraction resolution for the first pass is approximately 1.1 - 1.2 Angstroms and a second pass was collected to recoup the reflections that were overloaded in the first pass. More details of the data collection are in the included scanned notes and log files. </p>
Atomic resolution X-ray diffraction images of native endothiapepsin.
<p>X-ray diffraction images that were collected at DESY (Hamburg) to a resolution of 0.9 Angstroms from native endothiapepsin. The data were collected using a MAR345 detector at beamline BW7B in June 1999. More details are in the included notes. </p>
Atomic resolution X-ray diffraction images for endothiapepsin complexed with the inhibitor H261.
<p>X-ray diffraction images for a complex of endothiapepsin with the hydroxyethylene renin inhibitor H261 which were collected at DESY (Hamburg) in June 1998 using the beamline BW7B with a Mar image plate detector in two passes. The data extend to a resolution of almost 1.1 Angstroms. More details are given in the accompanying notes. </p>
Atomic resolution X-ray diffraction images for endothiapepsin complexed with a cyclic statine inhibitor.
<p>X-ray diffraction images for endothiapepsin complexed with inhibitor CP-129,541. The data were collected on 29th April 2001. </p>
High-resolution neutron spectroscopy of La1.855Sr0.145CuO4
<p>Data from a high-resolution neutron spectroscopy investigation of the low-energy incommensurate spin excitations in the high-temperature superconductor La1.855Sr0.145CuO4. The study was conducted using the IN5 time-of-flight neutron spectrometer at the Institut Laue-Langevin. The sample consisted of two crystals with a combined mass of 3.5 g and a superconducting transition temperature of 36 K. These crystals were prepared from a single rod grown via the traveling-solvent floating-zone method and aligned within a deviation of less than a degree. The lattice parameters are a = b = 3.81 Å and c = 13.2 Å, in the notation of the high-temperature tetragonal unit cell. Measurements were performed on the sample in a standard cryostat. Magnetic excitation spectra were acquired with a fixed sample orientation (b-axis perpendicular to the horizontal scattering plane) over 12 or 24 hours at various temperatures. Two distinct experimental configurations were utilized, employing incident wavelengths λ_i = 3.3 Å and 5 Å. The shorter wavelength was used to validate the magnitude of the superconducting spin gap (4 meV) at a base temperature of T = 2 K. The λ = 5 Å setup was employed to gather spectra at temperatures of T = 40, 30, 25, and 20 K, with an elastic full-width at half maximum resolution of ΔE = 80 μeV.</p>
High-resolution analysis of power plant land requirements for GODEEEP
<p>This dataset contains data associated with Mongird et al. (under review). Files include output from the following three analyses found in the paper: (1) Projected power plant siting intersections with US Disadvantaged Communities (DACs), important farmland, and natural areas; (2) onshore wind and solar photovoltaic capacity factor availability under 27 different siting restriction cases, and (3) output from an analysis that determines how many DACs are projected to see both fossil fuel generation retirement and new renewable power plant development. Each of the files associated with these components are described below. </p> <p>For more detailed information please refer to Mongird et al. (under review), "High-resolution analysis of power plant land requirements for the evolving Western United States power grid indicates coordinated land use policies will be essential"</p> <p>Outputs included in this dataset are associated with two different scenarios. Summaries of each of the two scenarios included are provided below. For additional information, see <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egycc.2023.100117">Ou et al. 2023.</a></p> <h2>Scenario Descriptions</h2> <ul> <li><strong>business-as-usual</strong>: <ul> <li>This scenario does not include any long-term federal policies requiring decarbonization.</li> <li>It does include the US Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) incentives.</li> <li>It assumes that CCS technologies are available.</li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>high renewables</strong>: <ul> <li>This scenario includes a clean electricity grid in the U.S. by 2035 and a net-zero economy by 2050.</li> <li>It does include US IRA incentives.</li> <li>It assumes that CCS technologies are available.</li> </ul> </li> </ul> <h2>Data Descriptions</h2> <h3>1. Projected power plant siting intersections</h3> <p><strong>Description</strong></p> <p>These files identify the intersection of projected power plant locations with three types of land: federall identified disadvantaged communities (DACs), important farmland, and land in close proximity to natural areas.</p> <p><strong>Scenario Files:</strong></p> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td>File Name</td> <td>File Description</td> </tr> <tr> <td>bau_dac_analysis_2050.csv</td> <td>Results from analysis identifying how many projected power plant sitings through 2050 under the busines-as-usual scenario intersect with federally identified US DACs by technology type and Western US state</td> </tr> <tr> <td>bau_env_analysis_2050.csv</td> <td>Results from analysis identifying how many projected power plant sitings through 2050 under the busines-as-usual scenario intersect with areas within 1 km, 5 km, and 10km of environmental areas by technology type and Western US state</td> </tr> <tr> <td>bau_farm_analysis_2050.csv</td> <td>Results from analysis identifying how many projected power plant sitings through 2050 under the busines-as-usual scenario intersect with important farmland by technology type and Western US state</td> </tr> <tr> <td>hr_dac_analysis_2050.csv</td> <td>Results from analysis identifying how many projected power plant sitings through 2050 under the high renewables scenario intersect with federally identified US DACs by technology type and Western US state</td> </tr> <tr> <td>hr_env_analysis_2050.csv</td> <td>Results from analysis identifying how many projected power plant sitings through 2050 under the high renewables scenario intersect with areas within 1 km, 5 km, and 10km of environmental areas by technology type and Western US state</td> </tr> <tr> <td>hr_farm_analysis_2050.csv</td> <td>Results from analysis identifying how many projected power plant sitings through 2050 under the high renewables scenario intersect with important farmland by technology type and Western US state</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <p><strong>Data Dictionary:</strong></p> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td><strong>Column</strong></td> <td><strong>Description</strong></td> <td><strong>Units</strong></td> </tr> <tr> <td>state</td> <td>Name of US state</td> <td>N/A</td> </tr> <tr> <td>technology</td> <td>Power plant technology type inclusive of turbine type, presence of CCS, and cooling type (as applicable)</td> <td>N/A</td> </tr> <tr> <td>technology_simple</td> <td>Power plant technology type excluding turbine type, presence of CCS, and cooling type (as applicable)</td> <td>N/A</td> </tr> <tr> <td>layer_name</td> <td>Descriptive name of geospatial raster layer used for intersection analysis</td> <td>N/A</td> </tr> <tr> <td>layer</td> <td>Name of geospatial raster layer used for intersection analysis</td> <td>N/A</td> </tr> <tr> <td>total_plants</td> <td>Number of projected power plants of specified technology in specified state under given scenario</td> <td>#</td> </tr> <tr> <td>intersection</td> <td>Number of projected power plant intersections of specified technology in specified state with given layer under given scenario </td> <td>#</td> </tr> <tr> <td>fraction</td> <td>ratio of intersection and total_plants</td> <td>fraction</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <p><strong>Scenario Difference Analysis Files:</strong></p> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td>difference_dac_analysis_2050.csv</td> <td>Results from analysis identifying how many more projected power plant sitings through 2050 under the high renewables scenario intersect with federally identified US DACs by technology type and Western US state compared to projected power plant sitings through 2050 under the business-as-usual scenario. Negative results indicate that the business-as-usual scenario had a greater number of intersections.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>difference_env_analysis_2050.csv</td> <td>Results from analysis identifying how many more projected power plant sitings through 2050 under the high renewables scenario intersect with areas within 1 km, 5 km, and 10km of environmental areas by technology type and Western US state compared to projected power plant sitings through 2050 under the business-as-usual scenario. Negative results indicate that the business-as-usual scenario had a greater number of intersections.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>difference_farm_analysis_2050.csv</td> <td>Results from analysis identifying how many more projected power plant sitings through 2050 under the high renewables scenario intersect with important farmland by technology type and Western US state compared to projected power plant sitings through 2050 under the business-as-usual scenario. Negative results indicate that the business-as-usual scenario had a greater number of intersections.</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <p><strong>Data Dictionary:</strong></p> <table style="width: 85.255198%; height: 152px;"> <tbody> <tr style="height: 19px;"> <td style="width: 8.458634%; height: 19px;"><strong>Column</strong></td> <td style="width: 82.845413%; height: 19px;"><strong>Description</strong></td> <td style="width: 4.029241%; height: 19px;"><strong>Units</strong></td> </tr> <tr style="height: 19px;"> <td style="width: 8.458634%; height: 19px;">state</td> <td style="width: 82.845413%; height: 19px;">Name of US state</td> <td style="width: 4.029241%; height: 19px;">N/A</td> </tr> <tr style="height: 19px;"> <td style="width: 8.458634%; height: 19px;">technology</td> <td style="width: 82.845413%; height: 19px;">Power plant technology type</td> <td style="width: 4.029241%; height: 19px;">N/A</td> </tr> <tr style="height: 19px;"> <td style="width: 8.458634%; height: 19px;">layer</td> <td style="width: 82.845413%; height: 19px;">Name of geospatial raster layer used for intersection analysis</td> <td style="width: 4.029241%; height: 19px;">N/A</td> </tr> <tr style="height: 19px;"> <td style="width: 8.458634%; height: 19px;">hr</td> <td style="width: 82.845413%; height: 19px;">Number of projected power plant intersections with given layer under the high renewables scenario</td> <td style="width: 4.029241%; height: 19px;">#</td> </tr> <tr style="height: 19px;"> <td style="width: 8.458634%; height: 19px;">bau</td> <td style="width: 82.845413%; height: 19px;">Number of projected power plant intersections with given layer under the business-as-usual scenario</td> <td style="width: 4.029241%; height: 19px;">#</td> </tr> <tr style="height: 38px;"> <td style="width: 8.458634%; height: 38px;">intersection</td> <td style="width: 82.845413%; height: 38px;">Difference in projected power plant intersections between the high renewables scenario and the business-as-usual scenario</td> <td style="width: 4.029241%; height: 38px;">#</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <h3> </h3> <h3>2. Projected onshore wind and solar photovoltaic capacity factor availability under 27 siting restriction cases</h3> <p>Description:</p> <p>This file contains results from an analysis on the capability of reaching high renewables scenario solar and wind generation in 2050 under 27 different siting restriction cases.</p> <p><strong>Relevant File:</strong></p> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td>File Name</td> <td>File Description</td> </tr> <tr> <td>capacity_factor_analysis_2050.csv</td> <td>Amount of solar PV or onshore wind generation projected to be available in a given state under a specified siting restriction case </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p><strong>Data Dictionary:</strong></p> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td><strong>Column</strong></td> <td><strong>Description</strong></td> <td><strong>Units</strong></td> </tr> <tr> <td>region_name</td> <td>Name of US state</td> <td>N/A</td> </tr> <tr> <td>technology</td> <td>Power plant technology type (either solar PV or Wind)</td> <td>N/A</td> </tr> <tr> <td>capacity_density_mw</td> <td>Assumed MW per square-km</td> <td>MW</td> </tr> <tr> <td>case</td> <td>Name of siting exclusion case</td> <td>N/A</td> </tr> <tr> <td>total_generation_mwh</td> <td>Projected total generation available given remaining available land after exclusions</td> <td>MWh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>target_generation_mwh</td> <td>Projected target annual generation in 2050 for technology type under high renewables scenario</td> <td>MWh</td> </tr> <tr> <td>gcam_trading_region</td> <td>Name of zonal representation of electricity trading regions as defined in the capacity expansion model</td> <td>N/A</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <h3> </h3> <h3>3. US DACs that see both fossil fuel generation retirement and new renewable power plant development by 2050</h3> <p><strong>Description:</strong></p> <p>This data contains US census tract GEOIDs that see both new renewable sitings and the retirement of fossil generating resources.</p> <p><strong>Relevant File:</strong></p> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td>File Name</td> <td>File Description</td> </tr> <tr> <td>dac_fossil_retire_analysis_2050.csv</td> <td>List of US census tracts that see both fossil fuel generation retirement and new renewable generation siting by 2050 </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p><strong>Data Dictionary:</strong></p> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td><strong>Column</strong></td> <td><strong>Description</strong></td> </tr> <tr> <td> census_tract</td> <td> US census tract GEOID</td> </tr> <tr> <td>state_name</td> <td>Name of US state</td> </tr> <tr> <td>county_name</td> <td>Name of US county</td> </tr> <tr> <td>scenario</td> <td>scenario name</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <h2>Funding statement</h2> <p>This research was supported by the Grid Operations, Decarbonization, Environmental and Energy Equity Platform (GODEEEP) Investment, under the Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) Program at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL).</p> <p>PNNL is a multi-program national laboratory operated for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) by Battelle Memorial Institute under Contract No. DE-AC05-76RL01830.</p> <p> </p> <h2>Changelog</h2> <p>v1.1</p> <p> The following updates were made following manuscript revision:</p> <ul> <li>"power_density_mw" variable name in `capacity_factor_analysis_2050.csv` file changed to "capacity_density_mw"</li> <li>More estimates are provided in `capacity_factor_analysis_2050.csv` reflecting additional capacity density and turbine hub height assumptions.</li> <li>Scenario naming adjusted to align with manuscript naming</li> </ul>
BioTISR: a time-lapse biological image dataset for super-resolution microscopy
<p>BioTISR is a biological image dataset for super-resolution microscopy, currently including 2D and 3D time-lapse image pairs of low-and-high resolution images of a variety of biology structures, aiming to provide a high-quality dataset of time-lapse biological SR images for the community to spark more developments of computational SR methods.</p> <p>At present, 2D dataset includes five specimens (clathrin-coated pits, lysosomes, outer mitochondrial membrane, microtubules, and F-actin) acquired with the GI/TIRF-SIM mode and nonlinear SIM mode of our Multi-SIM system, and 3D dataset includes three specimens (outer mitochondrial membrane, microtubules, and F-actin) acquired with 3D-SIM mode of the Multi-SIM system. For each type of specimen and each imaging modality, we acquired the raw data from at least 50 distinct regions-of-interest (ROI). For each ROI, we acquired two (3D data) or three (2D data) groups of N-phase × M-orientation × T-timepoint raw images with a constant exposure time but increasing the excitation light intensity, where (N, M, T) are (3, 3, 20) for TIRF-SIM and GI-SIM, (5, 5, 10) for nonlinear SIM, and (3, 5, 10) for 3D-SIM. Specific imaging conditions and scripts for reading MRC file are provided in Supplement Files.</p> <p>The BioTISR dataset is related to the following paper:<a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41587-025-02553-8#citeas">Qiao, C., Liu, S., Wang, Y. <em>et al.</em> A neural network for long-term super-resolution imaging of live cells with reliable confidence quantification. <em>Nat Biotechnol</em> (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-025-02553-8</a>, which is an extension of our previously published <a href="https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.13264793.v9">BioSR dataset</a> (https://www.nature.com/articles/s41592-020-01048-5).</p> <p>Limited by quota, the original images uploaded in the current 3D dataset are wide-field images obtained after averaging 15 images, where (N, M, T) are (1, 1, 10). We will update them to raw SIM images after the quota is expanded.</p> <p>2D dataset's url:</p> <p><a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13843670" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13843670</a></p> <p>3D dataset's urls:</p> <p>F-actin:</p> <p>WF input: <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13843673">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13843673</a></p> <p>Raw SIM input:<a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13994464" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13994464</a></p> <p>Microtubules:</p> <p>WF input: <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13932988" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13932988</a></p> <p>Raw SIM input: <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13989327" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13989327</a></p> <p>Mitochondria:</p> <p>WF input: <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13843183" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13843183</a></p> <p>Raw SIM input: <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14000502" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14000502</a></p> <p> </p> <p>Update 2025.5.6</p> <p>Add optical transfer function(OTF) of the microscopy system and the pixel size of each data to the supplementary files.</p>
Code outputs and figures from "Efficient high-resolution refinement in cryo-EM with stochastic gradient descent"
<p>Code outputs and figures for the numerical experiments on preconditioned SGD for cryo-EM reconstruction for reproducing the results in the article:</p> <blockquote> <p><a title="doi" href="https://doi.org/10.1107/S205979832500511X" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><code><em>Efficient high-resolution refinement in cryo-EM with stochastic gradient descent</em>.</code></a></p> <p><em>Bogdan Toader, Marcus A. Brubaker, Roy R. Lederman</em></p> <pre>Acta Crystallographica Section D, 2025</pre> </blockquote> <p>The outputs are obtained by running the Jupyter notebooks in the <em>notebooks/preconditioned_sgd</em> directory in the GitHub repository (release v0.2):</p> <blockquote> <p><a title="github link" href="https://github.com/bogdantoader/simplecryoem">https://github.com/bogdantoader/simplecryoem</a></p> </blockquote> <div>The particle images used for these experiments can be downloaded from <a title="empiar-10076 link" href="https://www.ebi.ac.uk/empiar/EMPIAR-10076">EMPIAR-10076</a> and require inverting the contrast. The file containing the pose variables and CTF parameters is the <em>particles_file/my_particles_8.star </em>file in the attached archive.</div>
Smart 3D super-resolution microscopy reveals the architecture of the RNA scaffold in a nuclear body
<p>Data associated with the article "Smart 3D super-resolution microscopy reveals the architecture of the RNA scaffold in a nuclear body". A README.txt is provided that explains the data provided.</p>
StageIV-IRC – A High-resolution Dataset of Extreme Orographic Quantitative Precipitation Estimates (QPE) Constrained to Water Budget Closure for Historical Floods in the Appalachian Mountains
<h2>Quantitative Flood Estimation (QFE) in complex terrain remains a grand challenge in operational hydrology due to the lack of accurate high-resolution Quantitative Precipitation Estimates (QPE) at spatial and temporal resolutions needed to capture the variability of orographic precipitation, and where radar-based QPE are available there are significant biases due to the geometry and constraints of radar operations. Here, we present a high-resolution (i.e. 250m, 5minute-hourly) QPE dataset for the most extreme (flood-producing) events from 2008 to 2024 for 26 gauged basins (in total 215 events) in the Appalachian mountains constrained to meet basin-scale water budget closure through inverse rainfall-runoff modeling to correct the Next Generation Weather Radar (NEXRAD) Stage IV analysis (4km resolution, hourly) using a fully-distributed uncalibrated hydrological model that leverages recent advances in hydrologic modeling in mountainous regions (e.g. improved river routing and initial soil moisture estimation) (Liao and Barros, 2024a and 2024b). The corrected Stage IV analysis is referred to as StageIV-IRC (Inverse Rainfall Correction). Previously, a subset of this dataset informed the construction of a generalized QPE error model (Liao and Barros, 2023), supporting the development of water budget closure constrained QPE and providing physics insights into orographic QPE uncertainties for various radar-based products at high resolution in complex terrain. The unique advantage of the StageIV-IRC QPE is that it achieves water budget closure at the storm-flood event scale within observational uncertainty of streamflow observations, that is the golden standard in hydrological modeling. The QPE dataset is publicly available at: <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14028867">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14028867</a></h2> <p><strong> </strong></p>
EUNIS Habitat Maps: Enhancing Thematic and Spatial Resolution for Europe through Machine Learning
<p>The EUNIS habitat classification is essential for categorising European habitats and supporting European policy on nature conservation and to implement the Nature Restoration Law. As such, to meet the growing demand for detailed and accurate habitat information, we provide spatial predictions for 260+ EUNIS habitat types at EUNIS level 3, together with validation and uncertainty analyses. </p> <p>More specifically, using ensemble machine learning models together with high-resolution satellite imagery and other climatic, terrain and soil variables, we produced an European habitat map at a 100-m resolution indicating the most likely EUNIS habitat at level 3 for every location across Europe. Predictions were validated for three independent countries, namely for France, the Netherlands and Austria. We also provide information on uncertainty and the most probable habitats at level 3 within each EUNIS level 1 formation. Products can be further refined with accurate and local land cover data. This product is thus likely to be particularly useful for restoration but also conservation purposes. </p> <p>Figure: <strong>Wall-to-wall map of EUNIS habitats at level 3 - (color coded at level 2 for visibility)</strong></p> <p></p>
Planting Date Maps (Low Resolution) and County Data for the US Corn Belt
<p>Aggregated dataset on planting dates for maize and soybean crops in the US Corn Belt from 2000-2020. This dataset was generated from Landsat satellite data and covers 12 states. The methodology is described in <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2023.113551">Deines et al. 2023 </a>in Remote Sensing of Environment (open access).</p> <p>Note: Version 2 is identical to Version 1, but includes a file missing from v1 (soybeans_progressByCounty_2000-2020_DeinesEtAl_vRSE_formatted.csv)</p> <p><strong>Preferred citation:</strong></p> <p>Deines, J.M., A. Swatantran, D. Ye, B. Myers, S. Archontoulis, & D.B. Lobell. 2023. Field-scale dynamics of planting dates in the US Corn Belt from 2000 to 2020. <em><strong>Remote Sensing of Environment. </strong></em><a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2023.113551">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2023.113551</a></p> <p><strong>Contents</strong></p> <ol> <li>Gridded map datasets of planting dates aggregated to 10 km resolution. Map datasets are contained in zip files by crop type. Each zip file contains 21 annual geotiff rasters covering the full study region. <ol> <li>Maize_plantingDates_2000-2020_10000m_DeinesEtAl_vRSE.zip</li> <li>Soybeans_plantingDates_2000-2020_10000m_DeinesEtAl_vRSE.zip</li> </ol> </li> <li>Tabular county planting date statistics derived from the high-resolution (30 m) planting date maps. This data is presented in .csv format and includes the day-of-year when 10, 25, 50, 75, and 90 percent of crop area was planted for each year. There is one record for each county-year; data files are separated by crop type. <ol> <li>maize_countyStats_doyPercentPlanted_2000-2020_DeinesEtAl_vRSE.csv</li> <li>soybeans_countyStats_doyPercentPlanted_2000-2020_DeinesEtAl_vRSE.csv</li> </ol> </li> <li>Tabular planting progress by county. These .csv's present the area planted for each crop by county for each day. They can be considered the "raw" version of item #2 (county stats) and can therefore be used to derive other planting progress percentiles other than those provided in item #2. <ol> <li>maize_progressByCounty_2000-2020_DeinesEtAl_vRSE_formatted.csv</li> <li>soybeans_progressByCounty_2000-2020_DeinesEtAl_vRSE_formatted.csv</li> </ol> </li> </ol> <p><strong>Metadata</strong></p> <p>1. Planting date maps</p> <ul> <li>Value: day-of-year of planting</li> <li>No Data value = -999 (grid cells outside of the study area or lacking maize/soybeans that year)</li> <li>Map projection: EPSG:5070, CONUS Albers Equal Area</li> <li>Maps for 2008-2018 use the USDA's Cropland Data Layers to identify maize pixels; maps for 1999-2007 use the Corn-Soy Data Layer produced by <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41597-020-00646-4">Wang et al. 2000</a> (data + manuscript are open access).</li> </ul> <p>2. Tabular datasets</p> <ul> <li>GEOID = 5 digit county FIPS, or the unique identifier assigned to each county by the US TIGER county dataset</li> <li>county_code = 3 digit county identifier. Represents places 3-5 in the 5 digit code.</li> <li>state_code = 2 digit state identifier. Represents places 1-2 in the 5 digit code.</li> <li>DOY = day-of-year</li> <li>area_daily_m2 = area of that crop planted that day in that county, in square meters</li> <li>doy_X = day-of-year when X% of area was planted that year</li> </ul> <p><br> </p>
Data set: "Higher Antarctic ice sheet accumulation and surface melt rates revealed at 2 km resolution"
<p>This data set includes the materials required to reproduce the figures and tables presented in the study: "Higher Antarctic ice sheet accumulation and surface melt rates revealed at 2 km resolution". The data consist of:</p><p> </p><p><strong>ASCII files:</strong></p><ol><li><strong>SMB-ANT-Sectors-1979-2021-RACMO2.3p2-ERA5-2km.txt</strong>: time series of Antarctic sector-integrated annual SMB<strong> (Gt per year)</strong> from ERA5-forced RACMO2.3p2 at 27 km, statistically downscaled to 2 km resolution (1979-2021).</li><li><strong>Melt-ANT-Sectors-1979-2021-RACMO2.3p2-ERA5-2km.txt:</strong> time series of Antarctic sector-integrated annual surface melt (Gt per year) from ERA5-forced RACMO2.3p2 at 27 km, statistically downscaled to 2 km resolution (1979-2021).</li><li><strong>Melt-ANT-Sectors-1950-2014-RACMO2.3p2-CESM2-HIST-2km.txt:</strong> time series of Antarctic sector-integrated annual surface melt from CESM2-forced RACMO2.3p2 historical reconstruction (HIST), statistically downscaled to 2 km resolution (1950-2014).</li><li><strong>Melt-ANT-Sectors-2015-2099-RACMO2.3p2-CESM2-SSP126-2km.txt:</strong> time series of Antarctic sector-integrated annual surface melt from CESM2-forced RACMO2.3p2 SSP1-2.6 projection (SSP126), statistically downscaled to 2 km resolution (2015-2099).</li><li><strong>Melt-ANT-Sectors-2015-2099-RACMO2.3p2-CESM2-SSP245-2km.txt:</strong> time series of Antarctic sector-integrated annual surface melt from CESM2-forced RACMO2.3p2 SSP2-4.5 projection (SSP245), statistically downscaled to 2 km resolution (2015-2099).</li><li><strong>Melt-ANT-Sectors-2015-2099-RACMO2.3p2-CESM2-SSP585-2km.txt:</strong> time series of Antarctic sector-integrated annual surface melt from CESM2-forced RACMO2.3p2 SSP5-8.5 projection (SSP585), statistically downscaled to 2 km resolution (2015-2099).</li></ol><p>Antarctic sectors include the Antarctic Peninsula (APIS), the West Antarctic ice sheet (WAIS), the East Antarctic ice sheet (EAIS), the grounded Antarctic ice sheet (AIS), the floating ice shelves (Ice shelves), and the whole of Antarctica (ANT) including both the AIS and Ice shelves. The APIS, WAIS, EAIS and AIS sectors include land ice from neighbouring Antarctic islands.</p><p> </p><p><strong>Netcdf files:</strong></p><ol><li><strong>smb_rec.1979-2021.BN_RACMO2.3p2_ANT27_ERA5-3h.AIS.2km.YY.nc: </strong>map of annual SMB (kg per m² or mm w.e. per year) from ERA5-forced RACMO2.3p2 at 27 km, statistically downscaled to 2 km resolution, covering the whole of Antarctica (1979-2021).</li><li><strong>snowmelt.1979-2021.BN_RACMO2.3p2_ANT27_ERA5-3h.AIS.2km.YY.nc: </strong>map of annual surface melt (kg per m² or mm w.e. per year) from ERA5-forced RACMO2.3p2 at 27 km, statistically downscaled to 2 km resolution, covering the whole of Antarctica (1979-2021).</li><li><strong>snowmelt.1950-2014.BN_RACMO2.3p2_ANT27_CESM2_HIST.AIS.2km.YY.nc: </strong>map of annual surface melt (kg per m² or mm w.e. per year) from CESM2-forced RACMO2.3p2 historical reconstruction (HIST), statistically downscaled to 2 km resolution, covering the whole of Antarctica (1950-2014).</li><li><strong>snowmelt.2015-2099.BN_RACMO2.3p2_ANT27_CESM2_SSP126.AIS.2km.YY.nc: </strong>map of annual surface melt (kg per m² or mm w.e. per year) from CESM2-forced RACMO2.3p2 SSP1-2.6 projection (SSP126), statistically downscaled to 2 km resolution, covering the whole of Antarctica (2015-2099).</li><li><strong>snowmelt.2015-2099.BN_RACMO2.3p2_ANT27_CESM2_SSP245.AIS.2km.YY.nc: </strong>map of annual surface melt (kg per m² or mm w.e. per year) from CESM2-forced RACMO2.3p2 SSP2-4.5 projection (SSP245), statistically downscaled to 2 km resolution, covering the whole of Antarctica (2015-2099).</li><li><strong>snowmelt.2015-2099.BN_RACMO2.3p2_ANT27_CESM2_SSP585.AIS.2km.YY.nc: </strong>map of annual surface melt (kg per m² or mm w.e. per year) from CESM2-forced RACMO2.3p2 SSP5-8.5 projection (SSP585), statistically downscaled to 2 km resolution, covering the whole of Antarctica (2015-2099).</li><li><strong>ANT_masks.2km.nc</strong>: file including the grounded AIS mask (AIS), Antarctic sectors mask (Sectors), floating ice shelves mask (Shelves), surface elevation down-sampled from REMA (Topography), latitude and longitude on the 2 km grid<strong>. </strong>The sector mask includes: 0 – Ocean, 1 – APIS, 2 – WAIS, 3 – EAIS, 4 – APIS islands, 5 – WAIS islands, 6 – EAIS islands, and 7 – ice shelves.<strong> </strong></li></ol><p>The projection used for statistical downscaling is Polar Stereographic South (EPSG:3031) with a spatial resolution of 2 km x 2 km. </p><p> </p><p><strong>Additional data: </strong>The gridded, daily downscaled SMB data sets from the ERA-forced RACMO2.3p2 simulation, and the CESM2-forced RACMO2.3p2 projections under a low-end SSP1-2.6, moderate SSP2-4.5 and high-end SSP5-8.5 warming scenario are freely available from the authors upon request and without conditions (contact: bnoel@uliege.be). Besides SMB, the data sets include total precipitation (snow and rain), snowfall, total melt (snow and ice), runoff, refreezing and retention, drifting snow erosion, and total sublimation (surface and drifting snow) at 2 km horizontal resolution. </p><p> </p><p><strong>Abstract:</strong> Antarctic ice sheet (AIS) mass loss is predominantly driven by increased solid ice discharge, but its variability is governed by surface processes. Snowfall fluctuations control the surface mass balance (SMB) of the grounded AIS, while meltwater ponding can trigger ice shelf collapse potentially accelerating discharge. Surface processes are essential to quantify AIS mass change, but remain poorly represented in climate models typically running at 25-100 km resolution. Here we present SMB and surface melt products statistically downscaled to 2 km resolution for the contemporary climate (1979-2021) and low, moderate and high-end warming scenarios until 2100. We show that statistical downscaling modestly enhances contemporary SMB (3%), which is sufficient to reconcile modelled and satellite mass change. Furthermore, melt strongly increases (46%), notably near the grounding line, in better agreement with in-situ and satellite records. The melt increase persists by 2100 in all warming scenarios, revealing higher surface melt rates than previously estimated.</p>
ChinaSoyArea10m: a dataset of soybean planting areas with a spatial resolution of 10 m across China from 2017 to 2021
<p>This dataset provides 10m-resolution maps of soybean planting areas in China during 2017-2021.</p><p>*** The data file is in ".tif" format</p><p>*** Temporal Resolution: Annually</p><p>*** Temporal coverage: 2017-2021</p><p>*** Pixel size: 10 m</p><p>*** Projection information: EPSG: 4326</p><p>The map boundary employed in this database does not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of us concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.</p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.