Skip to main content
Powered by ShareScore

Find research datasets worth reusing

Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.

17,039

datasets available to search

ShareScore release 0.9.0

Reset

Dataset results

17,039 results for “Natural”

Learn how ShareScore rates datasets ↗
zenodo40/100

Figs 67-70 in Classification, natural history, and evolution of Tarsosteninae (Coleoptera: Cleroidea: Cleridae). Part IV. Taxonomy of the Tarsostenodes complex of Australia, New Caledonia, New Guinea, and Tasmania

Figs 67-70: Habitus. (67) Tarsostenus hilaris. (68) T. kanak. (69) T. tricolor. (70) T. univittatus.

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2016View details →
zenodo40/100

Figs 22-40 in Classification, natural history, and evolution of Tarsosteninae (Coleoptera: Cleroidea: Cleridae). Part IV. Taxonomy of the Tarsostenodes complex of Australia, New Caledonia, New Guinea, and Tasmania

Figs 22-40: Pronota. (22) Paratillus carus. (23) Tarsostenodes cribripennis. (24) T. guttulus. (25) T. albonotatus. (26) Blackburniella apicula. (27) B. intricata. (28) Tarsostenodes simulator. (29) T. bullatus. (30) T. tentus. (31) T. gibbus. (32) T. leucogramma. (33) T. howensis. (34) T. vesica. (35) Tarsostenus hilaris. (36) Tarsostenus. univittatus. (37) T. morulus. (38) T. bicolor. (39) T. kanak. (40) Paratillus atali.

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2016View details →
zenodo40/100

Figs 41-43 in Classification, natural history, and evolution of Tarsosteninae (Coleoptera: Cleroidea: Cleridae). Part IV. Taxonomy of the Tarsostenodes complex of Australia, New Caledonia, New Guinea, and Tasmania

Figs 41-43: Various organs. 41-42 Pronota. (41) Tarsostenus tricolor. (42) T. antehelvis. 43 Elytron. T. bullatus.

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2016View details →
zenodo40/100

Figs 2-21 in Classification, natural history, and evolution of Tarsosteninae (Coleoptera: Cleroidea: Cleridae). Part IV. Taxonomy of the Tarsostenodes complex of Australia, New Caledonia, New Guinea, and Tasmania

Figs 2-21: Antennae. (2) Paratillus carus. (3) Tarsostenus bicolor. (4) T. kanak. (5) Tarsostenodes tentus. (6) T. guttulus. (7) T. simulator. (8) Tarsostenus univittatus. (9) Tarsostenodes morulus. (10) Blackburniella intricata. (11) Tarsostenodes albonotatus. (12) T. gibbus. (13) T. leucogramma. (14) Tarsostenus antehelvis. (15) Blackburniella apicula. (16) Tarsostenus tricolor. (17) Paratillus atali. (18) Tarsostenodes vesica. (19) T. cribripennis. (20) Tarsostenus hilaris. (21) Tarsostenodes howensis.

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2016View details →
zenodo40/100

Figs 36-39 in Classification, Natural History, and Evolution of the Enopliinae GISTEL (Coleoptera Cleridae). Part IV. The New World genus Pyticara SPINOLA

Figs 36-39: Photographs of Pyticara and Chrysomelidae species. (36) P. lineatohumeralis. (37) P. simoata. (38) P. duponti. (39) Chrysomelidae: Monocesta depressa.

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2015View details →
zenodo40/100

Figs 21-26 in Classification, Natural History, and Evolution of the Enopliinae GISTEL (Coleoptera Cleridae). Part IV. The New World genus Pyticara SPINOLA

Figs 21-26: Morphological organs of Pyticara championi GORHAM. 21-22 Heads. (21) Frontal view. (22) Ventral view. 23-25 Antennae. (23) Funicle. (24) Ninth antennomere. (25) Entire antenna. (26) Front leg.

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2015View details →
zenodo40/100

Figs 27-30 in Classification, Natural History, and Evolution of the Enopliinae GISTEL (Coleoptera Cleridae). Part IV. The New World genus Pyticara SPINOLA

Figs 27-30: Morphological organs of Pyticara species. (27) Pyticara championi front leg ungues. (28) Pyticara championi, metatibial subapical secretory pit. (29) Pyticara duponti, posterior angle of prothorax. (30) Pyticara championi, elytral disc.

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2015View details →
zenodo40/100

Figs 1-20 in Classification, Natural History, and Evolution of the Enopliinae GISTEL (Coleoptera Cleridae). Part IV. The New World genus Pyticara SPINOLA

Figs 1-20: Morphological organs of Pyticara species. 1-6 Antennae. (1) Pyticara batesiana; (2) P. duponti. (3) P. championi. (4) P. implana. (5) P. lineatohumeralis; (6) P. simoata. 7-12 Pronota. (7) P. batesiana. (8) P. championi. (9) P. duponti. (10) P. implana. (11) P. lineatohumeralis. (12) P. simoata. 13-20 Aedeagi. (13) P. batesiana phallus. (14) P. batesiana tegmen. (15) P. championi phallus. (16) P. championi tegmen. (17) P. duponti phallus. (18) P. duponti tegmen. (19) P. lineatohumeralis phallus. (20) P. lineatohumeralis phallus.

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2015View details →
zenodo40/100

Fig. 32-35 in Classification, Natural History, and Evolution of the Enopliinae GISTEL (Coleoptera Cleridae). Part IV. The New World genus Pyticara SPINOLA

Fig. 32-35: Photographs of Pyticara species. (32) P. batesiana. (33) P. championi. (34) P. duponti. (35) P. implana.

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2015View details →
zenodo40/100

Figures 39–42. Fig. 39 in The species of Papilionidae and Pieridae (Lepidoptera) described by Cramer and Stoll and their putative type material in the Natural History Museum in London

Figures 39–42. Fig. 39. Papilio lycimnia Cramer (syntype). Fig. 40. Papilio paulina Cramer (syntype). Fig. 41. Papilio phiale Cramer (syntype). Fig. 42 Papilio philyra Godart (paralectotype).

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2005View details →
zenodo40/100

Figures 33–38. Fig. 33 in The species of Papilionidae and Pieridae (Lepidoptera) described by Cramer and Stoll and their putative type material in the Natural History Museum in London

Figures 33–38. Fig. 33. Papilio glaucippe Linnaeus (specimen with 'van Lennep' label). Fig. 34. Papilio gliciria Cramer (syntype). Fig. 35. Papilio isse Cramer (paralectotype). Fig. 36. Papilio jugurtha Cramer (syntype). Fig. 37. Papilio leucippe Cramer (syntype). Fig. 38. Papilio mesentina Cramer (possible syntype).

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2005View details →
zenodo40/100

Figures 27–32. Fig. 27 in The species of Papilionidae and Pieridae (Lepidoptera) described by Cramer and Stoll and their putative type material in the Natural History Museum in London

Figures 27–32. Fig. 27. Papilio creona Cramer (possible syntype). Fig. 28. Papilio crocale Cramer (syntype). Fig. 29. Papilio delia Cramer (syntype). Fig. 30. Papilio ecclipsis of Cramer. Fig. 31. Aphrissa statira Cramer (mislabelled specimen). Fig. 32. Papilio epaphia Cramer (syntype).

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2005View details →
zenodo40/100

Figures 15–20. Fig. 15 in The species of Papilionidae and Pieridae (Lepidoptera) described by Cramer and Stoll and their putative type material in the Natural History Museum in London

Figures 15–20. Fig. 15. Papilio lycidas Cramer (syntype). Fig. 16. Papilio lysander Cramer (syntype). Fig. 17. Papilio minos Cramer (specimen matching Cramer figure). Fig. 18. Papilio polydorus Linnaeus (specimen with 'van Lennep' label). Fig. 19. Papilio protenor Cramer (syntype). Fig. 20. Papilio sesostris Cramer (syntype).

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2005View details →
zenodo40/100

Figures 9–14. Fig. 9 in The species of Papilionidae and Pieridae (Lepidoptera) described by Cramer and Stoll and their putative type material in the Natural History Museum in London

Figures 9–14. Fig. 9. Papilio drusius Cramer (syntype). Fig. 10. Papilio erymanthus Cramer (syntype). Fig. 11. Papilio eurimedes Stoll (syntype). Fig. 12. Papilio gambrisius Cramer (syntype). Fig. 13. Papilio hypolitus Cramer (specimen with 'van Lennep' label). Fig. 14. Papilio hyppason Cramer (syntype).

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2005View details →
zenodo40/100

Figures 21–26. Fig. 21 in The species of Papilionidae and Pieridae (Lepidoptera) described by Cramer and Stoll and their putative type material in the Natural History Museum in London

Figures 21–26. Fig. 21. Papilio torquatus Cramer (syntype). Fig. 22. Papilio tullus Cramer (syntype). Fig. 23. Papilio vertumnus Cramer (syntype). Fig. 24. Papilio alcmeone Cramer (lectotype). Fig. 25. Papilio arithusa Drury (specimen with 'van Lennep' label). Fig. 26. Papilio cipris Cramer (syntype).

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2005View details →
zenodo40/100

Figures 3–8. Fig. 3 in The species of Papilionidae and Pieridae (Lepidoptera) described by Cramer and Stoll and their putative type material in the Natural History Museum in London

Figures 3–8. Fig. 3. Papilio amosis Cramer (syntype). Fig. 4. Papilio amphimedon Cramer (syntype). Fig. 5. Papilio anchises Linnaeus (specimen with 'van Lennep' label). Fig. 6. Papilio arbates Stoll (syntype). Fig. 7. Papilio codrus Cramer (possible syntype). Fig. 8. Papilio deiphobus Linnaeus (specimen with 'van Lennep' label).

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2005View details →
dryad40/100

Zebra finch song and distance call amplitude measurements: A transmission experiment and observational transects in the natural environment

<p>Birdsong is typically seen as a long-range signal functioning in mate attraction and territory defense. Among birds, the zebra finch is the prime model organism in bioacoustics, yet almost exclusively studied in the lab. In the wild, however, zebra finch song differs strikingly from songbirds commonly studied in the wild as zebra finch males sing most after mating and in the absence of territoriality. Using data from the wild, we here provide an ecological context for a wealth of laboratory studies. By integrating calibrated sound recordings, sound transmission experiments and social ecology of zebra finches in the wild with insights from hearing physiology we show that wild zebra finch song is a very short-range signal with an audible range of about nine meters and that even the louder distance calls do not carry much farther (up to about fourteen meters). These integrated findings provide an ecological context for the interpretation of laboratory studies of this species and indicate that the vocal communication distance of the main laboratory species for avian acoustics contrasts strikingly with songbirds that use their song as a long-range advertisement signal.</p>

opencc-zeroDec 2020View details →
zenodo40/100

Conditional Driving from Natural Language Instruction

<p>A pre-trained model of the paper &quot;Conditional Driving from Natural Language Instructions,&quot; CoRL 2019.</p>

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2019View details →
zenodo40/100

On the binary origin of Be stars and the nature of exotic Be binary systems

<p>Despite the large impact of massive stars on their environment, important questions concerning their formation, evolution, and final explosions remain unanswered. One of them is the origin of the Be phenomenon, which occurs in ~20% of the early-type OB star. Observationally, Be stars are defined as B-type stars with Balmer line emission, indicative of a circumstellar decretion disk. While the presence of a disk is thought to strongly correlate with rapid rotation of the star, the processes that lead to such high rotation rates are still widely debated. One of the proposed mechanisms for the spin up of Be stars is mass and angular momentum transfer from an initially more massive companion in previous binary interactions. If merging is avoided, the mass donor is now a He-burning stripped star or a compact object. If this is the predominant channel for Be star formation, there are two important implications: first, there should be no Be + main sequence binaries on tight orbits; and second, Be stars should have a stripped star or a compact object as companion (unless the system has been disrupted). Here, we present observational evidence that the binary channel is predominant in Be star formation. We report on a lack of main-sequence companions to massive Be stars, and argue that the few known Be binaries are indeed exotic systems with stripped star or compact companions. We further present new analyses that shed light on the nature and evolutionary status of the two famous Be systems LB-1 and HR 6819 who have recently been reported to contain a black hole companion.</p>

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2021View details →
dryad40/100

Active restoration fosters better recovery of tropical rainforest birds than natural regeneration in degraded forest fragments

<ol> <li>Ecological restoration has emerged as a key strategy for conserving tropical forests and habitat specialists, and monitoring faunal recovery using indicator taxa like birds can help assess restoration success. Few studies have examined, however, whether active restoration achieves better recovery of bird communities than natural regeneration, or how bird recovery relates to habitat affiliations of species in the community.</li> <li>In rainforests restored over the past two decades in a fragmented landscape (Western Ghats, India), we examined whether bird species richness and community composition recovery in 23 actively restored (AR) sites was significantly better than recovery in paired naturally regenerating (NR) sites, relative to 23 undisturbed benchmark (BM) rainforests. We measured 8 habitat variables and tested whether bird recovery tracked habitat recovery, whether rainforest and open-country birds showed contrasting patterns, and assessed species-level responses to restoration.</li> <li>We recorded 92 bird species in 460 point-count surveys. Rainforest bird species richness was highest in BM, intermediate in AR, and lowest in NR. Contrastingly, open-country bird species richness was least in BM, intermediate in AR, and highest in NR.</li> <li>Bird community composition varied significantly across treatment types with composition in AR in transition from NR to BM. Bird community dissimilarity between sites was positively related to dissimilarity in habitat structure and floristics, and geographic distance between sites. Variance partitioning indicated that structural and floristic dissimilarity explained 90% of the variation in community composition.</li> <li>Indicator species analysis revealed significant associations of 34 species with one or more treatment types. Species associated with BM and AR treatment types were all rainforest species, while only 38% of species associated with AR and NR treatment types were rainforest species.</li> <li> <em>Synthesis and applications</em>: We show that active restoration of degraded fragments benefits rainforest birds and reduces the infiltration of open-country birds, and highlight the importance of considering rainforest and open-country species separately. In human-modified tropical rainforest landscapes, active restoration of degraded fragments fosters partial recovery and complements protection of mature forests for bird conservation.</li> </ol>

opencc-zeroSep 2021View details →

ScienceDex guides

Understand access before you commit

These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.

Compare curated datasets

Allen Brain Atlas

Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.

allen-brain-atlas
neuroscienceopenDocumentation, web resources, and API references are available online.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)

ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.

abode-home-cage
behavioral-neuroscienceopenThe DataShare record exposes download links for annotations, documentation, license text, and the zipped per-snippet data directory.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

DANDI Archive for NWB datasets

DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.

dandi-nwb
electrophysiologyopenPublished Dandiset metadata and archive endpoints are available through the production DANDI API.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

International Brain Laboratory public data

The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.

ibl
behavioral-neuroscienceopenPublic sessions can be searched and loaded from the IBL public data server through ONE.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

OpenNeuro

OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.

openneuro
neuroscienceopenPublished datasets are available on demand over the internet.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

ScienceDex for faculty

Your academic CV and NIH biosketch

Make your CV in your school's format and your NIH biosketch from it, then download both as Word files.