Find research datasets worth reusing

Figure 13. Genitalia. A in Systematic revision of the genus Everettia Godwin-Austen, 1891 (Mollusca: Gastropoda: Dyakiidae) in Sabah, northern Borneo

Figure 13. Genitalia. A, Everettia jasilini sp. nov.; B, Everettia dominiki sp. nov.; C, Everettia safriei sp. nov.

Figure 9 in Systematic revision of the genus Everettia Godwin-Austen, 1891 (Mollusca: Gastropoda: Dyakiidae) in Sabah, northern Borneo

Figure 9. Distribution maps (Mount Kinabalu and Mount Tambuyukon). A, Everettia monticola sp. nov. and Everettia safriei sp. nov.; B, Everettia planispira sp. nov., Everettia jasilini sp. nov., and Everettia corrugata corrugata; C, Everettia dominiki sp. nov.; D, Everettia themis, Everettia subconsul, Everettia corrugata williamsi ssp. nov. and Everettia layanglayang sp. nov.

Figure 12. Shells. A in Systematic revision of the genus Everettia Godwin-Austen, 1891 (Mollusca: Gastropoda: Dyakiidae) in Sabah, northern Borneo

Figure 12. Shells. A, Everettia jasilini sp. nov.; B, Everettia monticola sp. nov.; C, Everettia dominiki sp. nov.; D, Everettia safriei sp. nov.; E, Everettia planispira sp. nov. Scale bar = 10 mm.

Figure 8. Animal and mantle pigmentation. A in Systematic revision of the genus Everettia Godwin-Austen, 1891 (Mollusca: Gastropoda: Dyakiidae) in Sabah, northern Borneo

Figure 8. Animal and mantle pigmentation. A, Everettia subconsul west coast lowland; B, Everettia layanglayang sp. nov.; C, Everettia monticola sp. nov.; D, Everettia safriei sp. nov.; E, Everettia interior sp. nov.; F, Everettia subconsul east coast lowland; G, Everettia corrugata corrugata; H, Everettia jucundior sp. nov.; I, Everettia klemmantanica; J, Everettia lapidini sp. nov.

Figure 4. Animal head and body pigmentation. A in Systematic revision of the genus Everettia Godwin-Austen, 1891 (Mollusca: Gastropoda: Dyakiidae) in Sabah, northern Borneo

Figure 4. Animal head and body pigmentation. A, Everettia klemmantanica; B, Everettia interior sp. nov.; C, Everettia jucunda; D, Everettia themis; E, Everettia layanglayang sp. nov.; F, Everettia subconsul; G–I, possible hybrid of E. themis and E. subconsul.

Figure 5 in Systematic revision of the genus Everettia Godwin-Austen, 1891 (Mollusca: Gastropoda: Dyakiidae) in Sabah, northern Borneo

Figure 5. Distribution maps (Sabah). A, Everettia subconsul in the east and west coast lowland, Everettia jucunda in the west coast, and Everettia occidentalis sp. nov. in the western mountain range; B, Everettia klemmantanica in the central mountain ranges, Everettia interior sp. nov. in the interior area, Everettia paulbasintali sp. nov. in the east coast lowland, Everettia themis in the central mountain ranges; C, Everettia lapidini sp. nov. in the central mountain ranges, Everettia jucundior sp. nov. in the east coast lowland; D, Everettia monticola sp. nov. in the central mountain ranges, Everettia planispira sp. nov. in the eastern and northern parts of Sabah.

Figure 1. A in Systematic revision of the genus Everettia Godwin-Austen, 1891 (Mollusca: Gastropoda: Dyakiidae) in Sabah, northern Borneo

Figure 1. A, genitalia of Everettia corrugata corrugata, abbreviations: AG, albumen gland; AT, atrium; BC, bursa copulatrix; DG, dart-glands; DGD, dart-gland ducts; HD, hermaphroditic duct; P, penis; PG, prostate gland; PP, penial papilla; PR, penial retractor; PS, penial sheath; UT, uterus; V, vagina; VD, vas deferens; B, radula of E. corrugata corrugata.

Figure 4 in Systematics of Oreobates and the Eleutherodactylus discoidalis species group (Amphibia, Anura), based on two mitochondrial DNA genes and external morphology

Figure 4. Type localities of members of Oreobates: (1) O. quixensis, San José de Moti, Prov. Napo, Ecuador; (2) O. simmonsi, Río Piuntza, 1830 m a.s.l., Cordillera del Cóndor, Prov. Morona-Santiago, Ecuador; (3) O. saxatilis, Ponga de Shilcayo, 470 m a.s.l., Department San Martín, Peru; (4) O. lehri, Apurimac River Valley, 2445 m a.s.l., Department Cusco, Peru; (5) O. granulosus, Santo Domingo, Carabaya, Department Puno, Peru, 1800 m a.s.l.; (6) O. madidi, Arroyo Huacataya, Serranía Eslabón, 1500 m a.s.l., Department La Paz, Bolivia; (7) O. sanderi, Arroyo Bilunto, Chunirumi Valley, 1800 m a.s.l., near Santa Cruz de Valle Ameno, Department La Paz, Bolivia; (8) O. zongoensis, Valle de Zongo, 1250 m a.s.l., Department La Paz, Bolivia; (9) O. choristolemma, Serranía de Bellavista c. 1000 m a.s.l., Department La Paz, Bolivia; (10) O. cruralis, Department La Paz, Bolivia, 4000 m a.s.l. (in error); (11) O. heterodactylus, gruta Facendinha, State Mato-Grosso, Brazil; (12) O. ibischi, km 68.5 on Santa Cruz de la Sierra-Samaipata road c. 750 m a.s.l., Department Santa Cruz, Bolivia; (13) O. sanctaecrucis, El Chapé, Department Santa Cruz, Bolivia, 2060 m a.s.l.; (14) O. discoidalis, Tucumán, Prov. Tucumán, Argentina.

Figure 6 in Systematics of Oreobates and the Eleutherodactylus discoidalis species group (Amphibia, Anura), based on two mitochondrial DNA genes and external morphology

Figure 6. Type specimens of some members of Oreobates. A–B, holotype of O. cruralis (BM 1947.2.15.70); C–D, holotype of O. simmonsi (KU 147068); E–F, paralectotype of O. discoidalis (BM 1947.2.15.63); G–H, holotype of O. granulosus (BM 1947.2.15.72); I–J, lectotype of O. quixensis (MNCN 1708).

Figure 1 in Systematics of Oreobates and the Eleutherodactylus discoidalis species group (Amphibia, Anura), based on two mitochondrial DNA genes and external morphology

Figure 1. Majority rule consensus tree based on maximum parsimony (MP) and Bayesian phylogenetic analyses of combined data from the partial cytochrome b (c. 350 bp) and 16S (c. 590 bp) mitochondrial DNA. The numbers above branches indicate boostrap support (± 50%) for the MP topology, followed by Bayesian posterior probabilities for the Bayesian topology (± 95).

Figure 2 in Systematics of Oreobates and the Eleutherodactylus discoidalis species group (Amphibia, Anura), based on two mitochondrial DNA genes and external morphology

Figure 2. Majority rule consensus tree based on Bayesian phylogenetic analyses of partial 16S (c. 590 bp) mitochondrial DNA of some members of the genera Oreobates, Eleutherodactylus, and Craugastor. The numbers above branches are Bayesian posterior probabilities, followed by boostrap support for maximum parsimony topology. Values lower than 0.90 Bayesian posterior probability, or lower than 60 for boostrap, are not depicted.

Figures 5–14 in Systematics and phylogeny of the tribe Paragini (Diptera: Syrphidae) based on molecular and morphological characters

Figures 5–14. Head, lateral view (Figs 5–7); head, anterior view (Figs 8–10); antenna (Figs 10–14). Paragus (Pandasyopthalmus) jozanus (Figs 5, 8); Paragus (Pandasyopthalmus) brachycerus (Fig. 13); Paragus (Pandasyopthalmus) atratus (Fig. 14); Paragus (Pandasyopthalmus) haemorrhous (Figs 7, 10); Paragus (Paragus) quadrifasciatus (Fig. 9); Paragus (Paragus) strigatus (Fig. 12); Paragus (Serratoparagus) auritus (Fig. 11); Paragus (Serratoparagus) capricorni (Fig. 6). Names of subgenera according classification proposed in this paper.

Figures 72–83 in Systematics and phylogeny of the tribe Paragini (Diptera: Syrphidae) based on molecular and morphological characters

Figures 72–83. Aedeagal apodeme, lateral view (Figs 72,74,76,78,80,82); aedeagal apodeme, dorsal view (Figs 73,75,77,79,81,83). Paragus (Afroparagus) borbonicus (Figs 74, 75); Paragus (Pandasyopthalmus) brachycerus (Figs 78, 79); Paragus (Pandasyopthalmus) jozanus (Figs 80, 81); Paragus (Pandasyopthalmus) haemorrhous (Figs 82, 83); Paragus (Paragus) variabilis (Figs 76, 77); Paragus (Serratoparagus) auritus (Figs 72, 73).

Figures 55–60 in Systematics and phylogeny of the tribe Paragini (Diptera: Syrphidae) based on molecular and morphological characters

Figures 55–60. Hypandrium, lateral view (Figs 55–57); hypandrium, ventral view (Figs 58–60). Paragus (Pandasyopthalmus) jozanus (Figs 57, 60); Paragus (Pandasyopthalmus) brachycerus (Figs 55, 58); Paragus (Pandasyopthalmus) manensis (Figs 56, 59).

Figures 49–54 in Systematics and phylogeny of the tribe Paragini (Diptera: Syrphidae) based on molecular and morphological characters

Figures 49–54. Hypandrium, lateral view (Figs 49–52); epandrium, ventral view (Fig. 43); epandrium, dorsal view (Fig. 54). Paragus (Paragus) absidatus (Figs 53, 54); Paragus (Paragus) pecchiolli (Fig. 51); Paragus (Paragus) punctulatus (Fig. 49); Paragus (Paragus) quadrifasciatus (Fig. 50); Paragus (Paragus) strigatus (Fig. 52).

Figures 35–42 in Systematics and phylogeny of the tribe Paragini (Diptera: Syrphidae) based on molecular and morphological characters

Figures 35–42. Epandrium, ventral view (Figs 35,37,39,41); epandrium, ventral view (Figs 36,38,40,42). Paragus (Pandasyopthalmus) brachycerus (Figs 41, 42); Paragus (Pandasyopthalmus) jozanus (Figs 37, 38); Paragus (Pandasyopthalmus) manensis (Figs 39, 40); Paragus (Serratoparagus) auritus (Figs 35, 36).

Figures 66–71 in Systematics and phylogeny of the tribe Paragini (Diptera: Syrphidae) based on molecular and morphological characters

Figures 66–71. Aedeagus complex, lateral view. Paragus (Afroparagus) borbonicus (Fig. 70); Paragus (Pandasyopthalmus) brachycerus (Fig. 67); Paragus (Pandasyopthalmus) jozanus (Fig. 66); Paragus (Pandasyopthalmus) tibialis (Fig. 68); Paragus (Paragus) pecchiollii (Fig. 71); Paragus (Serratoparagus) auritus (Fig. 69).

Figures 100–112 in Systematics and phylogeny of the tribe Paragini (Diptera: Syrphidae) based on molecular and morphological characters

Figures 100–112. Ejaculatory apodeme and spermal sac (Figs 100–106); postgonites (Figs 107–112). Paragus (Afroparagus) borbonicus (Figs 104, 108); Paragus (Pandasyopthalmus) brachycerus (Figs 102, 110); Paragus (Pandasyopthalmus) jozanus (Figs 103, 111); Paragus (Pandasyopthalmus) manensis (Fig. 101); Paragus (Pandasyopthalmus) haemorrhous (Fig. 112); Paragus (Pandasyopthalmus) longiventris (Fig. 100); Paragus (Paragus) quadrifasciatus (Fig. 106); Paragus (Paragus) variabilis (Fig. 109); Paragus (Serratoparagus) capricorni (Fig. 105); Paragus (Serratoparagus) auritus (Fig. 107).

Figure 4 in Systematics and phylogeny of the tribe Paragini (Diptera: Syrphidae) based on molecular and morphological characters

Figure 4. Strict consensus tree of eight equally parsimonious trees resulting from parsimony analysis of combined morphological and molecular data sets (length = 1365 steps, consistency index = 0.53, retention index = 0.67). Bootstrap and Bremer support values above and below nodes, respectively. The new taxonomical classification of the Paragini, according to results of this study, is shown on the right side of the tree.

Figure 1 in Systematics and phylogeny of the tribe Paragini (Diptera: Syrphidae) based on molecular and morphological characters

Figure 1. One of the six most parsimonious trees using only morphological characters. Multistate characters treated as unordered (length = 53 steps, consistency index = 0.69, retention index = 0.92). Character numbers are indicated above nodes, character states below nodes. Closed circle, non-homoplastic changes; open circle, changes with homoplasy. The current taxonomy [Stuckenberg's (1954a, b) species groups] is shown on the right side of the tree. B = bicolor-group; T = tibialis-group.