Find research datasets worth reusing

FIGURE 14 in Phylogenetic position of the fish genera Lobotes, Datnioides and Hapalogenys, with a reappraisal of acanthuriform composition and relationships based on adult and larval morphology

FIGURE 14. Lateral view of dentate portion of right premaxilla (reversed) of the acanthurid Naso brevirostris, ACG CS858, 51 mm SL, showing four series of teeth (shown in alternating red and yellow). Illustration by A.C. Gill.

FIGURE 17 in Phylogenetic position of the fish genera Lobotes, Datnioides and Hapalogenys, with a reappraisal of acanthuriform composition and relationships based on adult and larval morphology

FIGURE 17. Lateral view of posterior portion of right dentary (reversed) of Capros aper, USNM 320065, 60 mm SL. Methods of presentation as in Figure 11B. Illustration by A.C. Gill.

FIGURE 12 in Phylogenetic position of the fish genera Lobotes, Datnioides and Hapalogenys, with a reappraisal of acanthuriform composition and relationships based on adult and larval morphology

FIGURE 12. Lateral view of dentate portion of right dentary (reversed) of Hapalogenys darwiniensis, paratype, CSIRO H.4069- 12, 75.5 mm SL, showing two series of teeth with posterolateral tooth replacement (in red and yellow). Obscured portions of developing teeth indicated with dashed lines. Other methods of presentation as in Figure 11B. Illustration by A.C. Gill.

FIGURE 16 in Phylogenetic position of the fish genera Lobotes, Datnioides and Hapalogenys, with a reappraisal of acanthuriform composition and relationships based on adult and larval morphology

FIGURE 16. Lateral view of posterior portions of right dentary and premaxilla (reversed) of the leiognathid Photolateralis moretoniensis, ACG CS 162, 58 mm SL. Methods of presentation as in Figure 11B, except upper circles represent premaxillary teeth in ventral view. Illustration by A.C. Gill.

FIGURE 8. Capros aper, 4.2 in Phylogenetic position of the fish genera Lobotes, Datnioides and Hapalogenys, with a reappraisal of acanthuriform composition and relationships based on adult and larval morphology

FIGURE 8. Capros aper, 4.2 mm NL late flexion-stage larva ZMUC P42225, Dana 3529I. Spinule-shaped scales on most of trunk and tail but shown only on a patch laterally on the upper trunk. Pigment omitted. Scale bar = 1 mm. Illustration by J.M. Leis and S.B. Leis.

FIGURE 5. Moenkhausia australis MZUSP 115631, 32.8 in Taxonomy of Moenkhausia australis Eigenmann, 1908 (Characiformes, Characidae) with a discussion on its phylogenetic relationships

FIGURE 5. Moenkhausia australis MZUSP 115631, 32.8 mm SL, Rio Guaporé, Mato Grosso, Brazil, color in life. Photo by F. Dagosta.

opennotspecifiedDec 2015View details →

Fig. 4 in Phylogenetic relationships of Isospora, Lankesterella, and Caryospora species (Apicomplexa: Eimeriidae) infecting lizards

Fig. 4 Microphotographs and line drawing of Isospora chafarinensis n. sp. from Chalcides parallelus. SB stieda body, SSB substieda body, OW oocyst wall bilayered, SPR sporocyst residuum. Scale bars = 10 μm

opennotspecifiedNov 2022View details →

Fig. 2 in Phylogenetic relationships and divergence times of the poorly known genus Spalerosophis (Serpentes: Colubridae)

Fig. 2 Divergence times of Spalerosophis species based on three mitochondrial genes. Values on the left of nodes denote Bayesian posterior probabilities in percentage, and values on the right of nodes

opennotspecifiedNov 2022View details →

Fig. 1 in Phylogenetic relationships and divergence times of the poorly known genus Spalerosophis (Serpentes: Colubridae)

Fig. 1 Bayesian phylogenetic tree of Spalerosophis species based on 16 s + Cytb + 12 s genes. Values on the left of nodes denote bootstrap percentage (BP) and Bayesian posterior probabilities in percentage (PP) (BP/PP). Shown on the right are the results of species delimi-

opennotspecifiedSep 2022View details →

Fig. 4 in Not the same: phylogenetic relationships and ecological niche comparisons between two different forms of Aglaoctenus lagotis from Argentina and Uruguay

Fig. 4 Statistical parsimony network of tif5A alleles of A. lagotis. Colors of the pie plots correspond to the identifications of the individuals as in Figs. 1 and 2. The asterisks denote alleles that were present

opennotspecifiedSep 2022View details →

Fig. 3 in Not the same: phylogenetic relationships and ecological niche comparisons between two different forms of Aglaoctenus lagotis from Argentina and Uruguay

Fig. 3 Maximum likelihood (ML) concatenated mitochondrial gene tree of A. lagotis. Bars on branches denote clade support from ML (left) and Bayesian Inference (right). Black bar indicates clade supported by ML bootstrap (> 70%) and Bayesian posterior probabilities (pp> 0.95), and gray bar indicates clade recovered but with support below the threshold values. The main mitochondrial lineages colors

Fig. 16 in Phylogenetic relationships in Stephanopinae: systematics of Stephanopis and Sidymella based on morphological characters (Araneae: Thomisidae)

Fig. 16 Characters relative to opisthosoma of specimens sampled in the present analysis: a Stephanopis nana. b Stephanopis monulfi. c Sidymella hirsuta, d Stephanopis altifrons, cuspidate surface. e Tmarus elongatus, mazed-surface. f Isala rufiventris comb. nov., granular surface. g Isala punctata comb. nov., fingerprint surface. h Sidymella hirsuta, needle-shaped and filamentous setae

Fig. 11 in Phylogenetic relationships in Stephanopinae: systematics of Stephanopis and Sidymella based on morphological characters (Araneae: Thomisidae)

Fig. 11 Characters relative to prosoma and mouth parts of specimens sampled in the present analysis: a Stephanopis monulfi, frontal view. b Sidymella sp. 2, frontal view. c Stephanopis quinquetuberculata, lateral view. d Stephanopis pentacantha, e Epicadus taczanowskii, chelicerae (detail of papules). f Stephanopoides simoni, chelicerae. g Phrynarachne ceylonica, chelicerae. h Epicadus trituberculatus, chelicerae

Fig. 10 in Phylogenetic relationships in Stephanopinae: systematics of Stephanopis and Sidymella based on morphological characters (Araneae: Thomisidae)

Fig. 10 Characters relative to prosoma of specimens sampled in the present analysis: a Epicadus caudatus, frontal view. b Epicadus heterogaster, carapace. c Epicadus taczanowskii, frontal view. d Sidymella bicuspidata. e Tmarus elongatus, lateral view. f Epicadus heterogaster, lateral view. g Stephanopis nana, frontal view (black arrows indicate lateral cephalic tubercles; white arrows indicate the not projected lateral margin of the clypeus). h Epicadus rubripes, frontal view (arrows indicate the lateral margins of the clypeus projected laterally)

Fig. 9 in Phylogenetic relationships in Stephanopinae: systematics of Stephanopis and Sidymella based on morphological characters (Araneae: Thomisidae)

Fig. 9 Characters relative to carapace and sternum of specimens sampled in the present analysis: a Sidymella bicuspidata, sternum. b Epicadus caudatus, sternum. c Onocolus intermedius, sternum. d Geraesta hirta (white arrows indicate pointed setae; black arrows indicate filamentous setae). e Sidymella trapezia, sternum. f Phrynarachne ceylonica, sternum. g Stephanopis macrostyla, prosoma. h Isala cambridgei comb. nov., prosoma

Fig. 17 in Phylogenetic relationships in Stephanopinae: systematics of Stephanopis and Sidymella based on morphological characters (Araneae: Thomisidae)

Fig. 17 Characters relative to opisthosoma and female genitalia of specimens sampled in the present analysis: a Stephanopis lata (arrows indicate abdominal setae clusters). b Stephanopis monulfi, barbed setae. c Stephanopis monulfi, ventral view of the epigynal plate. d Coenypha antennata comb. nov., ventral view of the epigynal plate. e Sidymella hirsuta, dorsal view of the epigynal plate (arrows indicate the direction of entry into the copulatory ducts). f Coenypha antennata comb. nov., dorsal view of the epigynal plate (arrows indicate the direction of entry into the copulatory ducts). g Sidymella sp.1, dorsal view of the epigynal plate. h Epicadus trituberculatus, dorsal view of the epigynal plate

Fig. 14 in Phylogenetic relationships in Stephanopinae: systematics of Stephanopis and Sidymella based on morphological characters (Araneae: Thomisidae)

Fig. 14 Characters relative to legs of specimens sampled in the present analysis: a Sidymella kolpogaster (arrows indicate femoral setae). b Sidymella trapezia (arrow indicates femoral setae). c Stephanopis monulfi, leg I. d Stephanopis lata, leg I. e Epicadus heterogaster, femoral setiferous tubercles. f Epicadus caudatus, femoral setiferous tubercles. g Geraesta hirta, leg I. h Stephanopis pentacantha, leg I

Fig. 12 in Phylogenetic relationships in Stephanopinae: systematics of Stephanopis and Sidymella based on morphological characters (Araneae: Thomisidae)

Fig. 12 Characters relative to carapace and mouth parts of specimens sampled in the present analysis: a Borboropactus cinerascens, labium and endites. b Sidymella kolpogaster, labium and endites. c Tmarus elongatus, frontal view. d Stephanopis altifrons, lateral view. e Isala rufiventris comb. nov., frontal view (arrows indicate cheliceral macrosetae). f Borboropactus cinerascens, frontal view. g Stephanopis barbipes, frontal view. h Stephanopis. bicornis, frontal view

opennotspecifiedJul 2024View details →

FIGURE 3 in Resolving the conflictive phylogenetic relationships of Oceanites (Oceanitidae: Procellariiformes) with the description of a new species

FIGURE 3. Biogeography and diversification of Oceanites genera plotted on consensus tree based on Cytb gene. Pie charts indicate ancestral range states at each node according to DIVALIKE+j model in BioGeoBears: A) South-east Pacific; B) Southern Ocean (including Antarctica); and C) Atlantic. Outgroups are not shown.