Find research datasets worth reusing

Figure 3 in Natural history of a South African insect pollinator assemblage (Insecta: Coleoptera, Diptera, Hymenoptera, Lepidoptera): diagnostic notes, food web analysis and conservation recommendations

Figure 3. Our sampling activities included visual inspection of flowering trees and shrubs, and photographic documentation of insect pollinators and floral visitors (left image), as well as insect specimen voucher collection (right image).

Figure 13 in Natural history of a South African insect pollinator assemblage (Insecta: Coleoptera, Diptera, Hymenoptera, Lepidoptera): diagnostic notes, food web analysis and conservation recommendations

Figure 13. Plant-pollinator food web diagram for trees and shrubs that flower during the early rainy season in the Skukuza Ranger District, Kruger National Park, Republic of South Africa. The diagram links the known or likely pollinator species (right-hand side of diagram) with their associated plant species (left-hand side of diagram). Connectance values (defined as the number of observed interactions for a species, divided by the number of possible interactions for that species) for individual plant species ranged between 0.06 and 0.46, with an average connectance value across all plant species of 0.19 (standard deviation of 0.13). Connectance values for individual pollinator species ranged between 0.04 and 0.67, with an average connectance value across all pollinator species of 0.20 (standard deviation of 0.17).

Figure 12 in Natural history of a South African insect pollinator assemblage (Insecta: Coleoptera, Diptera, Hymenoptera, Lepidoptera): diagnostic notes, food web analysis and conservation recommendations

Figure 12. Summary of floral colouration and floral phenology characteristics for flowering tree and shrub species that we observed in the Skukuza Ranger District, Kruger National Park, Republic of South Africa. Numbers indicate percentages of the 27 tree and shrub species included in this study.

Figure 10 in Natural history of a South African insect pollinator assemblage (Insecta: Coleoptera, Diptera, Hymenoptera, Lepidoptera): diagnostic notes, food web analysis and conservation recommendations

Figure 10. Adults of species of the carpenter bee genus Xylocopa (Hymenoptera: Apidae) observed in the Skukuza Ranger District, Kruger National Park, Republic of South Africa. (a) X. caffra female; (b) X. caffra male; (c) X. inconstans female; (d) X. inconstans male; (e) X. flavorufa female; (f) X. lugubris female; (g) X. flavorufa male.

Figure 11 in Natural history of a South African insect pollinator assemblage (Insecta: Coleoptera, Diptera, Hymenoptera, Lepidoptera): diagnostic notes, food web analysis and conservation recommendations

Figure 11. Characteristic growth forms of common tree and shrub species in the Skukuza Ranger District, Kruger National Park, Republic of South Africa. (a) Peltophorum africanum; (b) Terminalia prunioides; (c) Terminalia sericea; (d) Grewia flavescens; (e) Acacia exuvialis; (f) Acacia nigrescens; (g) Acacia tortilis; (h) Dichrostachys cinerea; (i) Ziziphus mucronata.

Figure 2 in Natural history of a South African insect pollinator assemblage (Insecta: Coleoptera, Diptera, Hymenoptera, Lepidoptera): diagnostic notes, food web analysis and conservation recommendations

Figure 2. Schematic diagram showing our sampling framework as deployed along the road segments listed in the Appendix, centred along tourist roads, gravel roads and firebreak roads in the Skukuza Ranger District of the Kruger National Park. Floral visitors of flowering trees and shrubs located within 30 m of the road edge in each road segment were surveyed as part of our field effort.

Figure 9 in Natural history of a South African insect pollinator assemblage (Insecta: Coleoptera, Diptera, Hymenoptera, Lepidoptera): diagnostic notes, food web analysis and conservation recommendations

Figure 9. Adult females of the carpenter bee Xylocopa caffra (Hymenoptera: Apidae) on or near flowers of Peltophorum africanum, photographed in the Skukuza Ranger District, Kruger National Park, Republic of South Africa.

Figure 1 in Natural history of a South African insect pollinator assemblage (Insecta: Coleoptera, Diptera, Hymenoptera, Lepidoptera): diagnostic notes, food web analysis and conservation recommendations

Figure 1. Map of the Republic of South Africa, showing the location of the Kruger National Park and the Skukuza Ranger District.

Figure 8 in Natural history of a South African insect pollinator assemblage (Insecta: Coleoptera, Diptera, Hymenoptera, Lepidoptera): diagnostic notes, food web analysis and conservation recommendations

Figure 8. Adult of the day-flying moth Arniocera auriguttata (Lepidoptera: Thyrididae) on flowers of the shrub Flueggea virosa, photographed along the Sabie River in the Skukuza Ranger District, Kruger National Park, Republic of South Africa.

Figure 5 in Natural history of a South African insect pollinator assemblage (Insecta: Coleoptera, Diptera, Hymenoptera, Lepidoptera): diagnostic notes, food web analysis and conservation recommendations

Figure 5. Adults of species of Cleridae and Lycidae (Coleoptera) from the Skukuza Ranger District, Kruger National Park, Republic of South Africa. (a) Aphelochroa sanguinalis (Cleridae); (b) Lycus trabeatus male (Lycidae); (c) Aphelochroa sanguinea (Cleridae); (d) Lycus trabeatus female (Lycidae).

Figure 4 in Natural history of a South African insect pollinator assemblage (Insecta: Coleoptera, Diptera, Hymenoptera, Lepidoptera): diagnostic notes, food web analysis and conservation recommendations

Figure 4. Examples of high-resolution digital images showing pollen grains adhering to insect floral visitors. (a) Pedinorrhina trivittata on flowers of Acacia grandicornuta. (b) Leucocelis amethystina on flowers of Acacia grandicornuta. (c) pair of Leucocelis vitticollis on flowers of Peltophorum africanum. White arrows point to areas where pollen is adhering to the insect's integument.

Figure 4 in Reinforcement as a conservation tool - assessing site fidelity and movement of the endangered elongated tortoise Indotestudo elongata (Blyth, 1854)

Figure 4. Example of a male tortoise's MCP and KDE home ranges. Habitat use intensity is displayed as a grid clipped with 95% KDE outline (red = high use intensity; green = low use intensity; grid cell size = 10 m), the 50% core area is displayed as a stippled polygon. (A) Total MCP and overall KDE home range; (B) RS MCP and KDE home range; (C) DS MCP and KDE home range. Map designed using ArcGis 9.3.

Figure 3 in Reinforcement as a conservation tool - assessing site fidelity and movement of the endangered elongated tortoise Indotestudo elongata (Blyth, 1854)

Figure 3. MCP home ranges for all radio-telemetered tortoises; left = females; right = males. Map designed using ArcGis 9.3.

Figure 2 in Reinforcement as a conservation tool - assessing site fidelity and movement of the endangered elongated tortoise Indotestudo elongata (Blyth, 1854)

Figure 2. Incremental area analysis plots for (A) MCPs; (B) 95% KDE; and (C) core areas. Grey bars represent ranges of mean MCP and KDE area.

Figure 1 in Reinforcement as a conservation tool - assessing site fidelity and movement of the endangered elongated tortoise Indotestudo elongata (Blyth, 1854)

Figure 1. Map displaying the location of the KPWS in northern Cambodia as well as extent and location of the major habitat types. Map designed using ArcGis 9.3. Elevation data: CGIAR SRTM (Jarvis et al. 2008). Protected area shape file: IUCN and UNEP-WCMC (2010).

Figure 2. Maximum likelihood tree showing relationships among mitochondrial 16S in On the systematics, distribution and conservation status of Ichthyophis longicephalus Pillai, 1986 (Amphibia: Gymnophiona: Ichthyophiidae)

Figure 2. Maximum likelihood tree showing relationships among mitochondrial 16S ribosomal RNA haplotypes for Ichthyophis from Sri Lanka (I. glutinosus, I. orthoplicatus) and the Western Ghats of peninsular India (other species). Numbers at nodes indicate bootstrap support. Scale bar in substitutions per site. For I. longicephalus, voucher numbers are given; for other species GenBank accession numbers.

Figure 1 in On the systematics, distribution and conservation status of Ichthyophis longicephalus Pillai, 1986 (Amphibia: Gymnophiona: Ichthyophiidae)

Figure 1. Map of southwestern peninsular India (the whole of the state of Kerala showing district boundaries plus the western edge of Tamil Nadu and southern edge of Karnataka) showing localities (numbered circles) mentioned in text: 1: Aralam Wildlife Sanctuary; 2: Thirunelli; 3: Kalarikkal; 4: Silent Valley National Park; 5: Kalakkad. Localities 1–4 are for Ichthyophis

Figure 3 in On the systematics, distribution and conservation status of Ichthyophis longicephalus Pillai, 1986 (Amphibia: Gymnophiona: Ichthyophiidae)

Figure 3. (A) Holotype of Ichthyophis longicephalus, photographed in 2010. (B) dorsal view of head of Ichthyophis sp. ZSIM VAG-11 (male, snout tip to first nuchal groove, ST-NG1 = 10.5 mm). (C–E) Dorsal views of heads of new I. longicephalus specimens, standardized to same head length as part B. (C) BNHS 5542 (male, ST-NG1 = 12.8 mm). (D) BMNH 2008.636 (female, ST-NG1 = 12.8 mm); (E) ZSI/WGRC/V/A/854 (female, ST-NG1 = 10.9 mm).

Figure 4 in On the systematics, distribution and conservation status of Ichthyophis longicephalus Pillai, 1986 (Amphibia: Gymnophiona: Ichthyophiidae)

Figure 4. Photographs of some of the new (2009–2010) specimens of Ichthyophis longicephalus in life. (A) BNHS 5565 from Kalarikkal. (B) ZSI/WGRC/V/A/856 from Kalarikkal. (C) from Aralam (specimen either BNHS 5542 or ZSI/WGRC/V/A/854.

Figure 5 in On the systematics, distribution and conservation status of Ichthyophis longicephalus Pillai, 1986 (Amphibia: Gymnophiona: Ichthyophiidae)

Figure 5. Ichthyophis longicephalus, an adult male specimen (BNHS 5542) from among the newly collected material. Scales in mm.