Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 4 in P H E N O T Y P I C P L A S T I C I T Y A N D N U C L E A R D N A Polymorphism Of Two Differing Pinus Sylvestris L. Open-Pollinated Families Originating From The Same Population

Fig. 4. Distribution of observed heterozygosity (HO) at 5 loci among the investigated Scots pine trials.

Fig. 8 in P H E N O T Y P I C P L A S T I C I T Y A N D N U C L E A R D N A Polymorphism Of Two Differing Pinus Sylvestris L. Open-Pollinated Families Originating From The Same Population

Fig. 8. Unweighted pair group method (UPGMA) dendrogram based on Nei's genetic distances among investigated half-sib open-pollinated families of one Lithuanian Pinus sylvestris L. population.

Fig. 2 in Factors Influencing Weed Species Diversity In Southeastern Part Of Latvia: Analysis Of A Two-Year Weed Survey Data

Fig. 2. Influence of field variables and crop groups on weed density, common and rare species richness in 2013 and 2014. Constrained analysis (RDA) with five constraining variables: Year (2013 or 2014), N_group (N1 0-50, N2 50- 100, N3 100-140, N4>140 kg ha–1 pure nitrogen per hectar), pH and crop group (c.s. – spring cereals, c.w. – winter cereals, S o.s.r. – spring oilseed rape, W o.s.r. – winter oilseed rape, Other – other crops, including maize, grassland, root crops and legumes). The proportion of constrained variation was 33%, the overall analysis and each of the factors were significant (p <0.05), significance tested with permutation tests.

Fig. 1 in Factors Influencing Weed Species Diversity In Southeastern Part Of Latvia: Analysis Of A Two-Year Weed Survey Data

Fig. 1. Generalized linear models (Poisson) of the total species richness against species density in 2014 and 2013. Model coefficients were 2.41 (p <0.0001) in 2014 and 2.40 (p <0.0001) in 2013. Residual deviance / residual d.f. ratio was used to estimate model overdispersion (1.62 in 2014 and 1.35 in 2013).

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2023View details →

Figure 2 in New Data On Distribution Of Two Palaearctic Leptaleus Laferté-Sénectère, 1849 (Coleoptera: Anthicidae) Species With New Records And A Correction

Figure 2. Leptaleus chaudoiri (Kolenati, 1846), male aedeagus. A – specimen from Cyprus, 'CYP RUS TROODOS Mts. Dhiarizos Riv., on light eastAgios Georgios leg. PREISS', 18 VII 99; B – specimen from 'Greece, Rodos, Koljmbia, 18– 25.06.2001 Leg. L. Fancello'; C – specimen from Iran, 'IRAN, Gilan Province S Astara, 5 km W Lavandvil: Koteh Komeh, 180 m 38°18'26" N, 048°47'14" E 10.10.2011, leg. Frisch'; D – specimen from Nepal, 'NEPAL, Prov. Bheri 28°38'23" N, 81°17'14" E Chisapani, KarnaliUfer 17.VI.2005; 180 m leg.: J. Weipert'; E – specimen from Pakistan, Islamabad sect. 7 (see studied material).

Fig. 2 in Two New Species Of The Genus Macrocyrtus Subgenus Exmacrocyrtus Schultze, 1924 (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Entiminea) From Luzon Island, Philippines

Fig. 2. Male genitalia of M. (E.) fulgidus sp. nov. (A – D); M. (E.) caerulans sp. nov. (E – H); A, E – aedeagus in latereal view; B, F – aedeagus in ventral view; C, G – strenite IX in ventral view; D, H – tegmen in ventral view.

Рис. 1–7. Cynaeda gigantea (Staudinger, 1880): 1 — C. gigantea gigantea (Staudinger, 1880), топотип; 2 — C. gigantea cobaini Korb, ssp. n., гоΛотип; 3 — C. gigantea cobaini Korb, ssp. n., генитаΛии гоΛотипа (эΔеагус уΔаΛен); 4 — C. gigantea cobaini Korb, ssp. n., эΔеагус гоΛотипа; 5 — C. gigantea cobaini Korb, ssp. n., вершина эΔеагуса гоΛотипа; 6 — C. gigantea cobaini Korb, ssp. n., в прироΔе (фото: Е. Комаров); 7 — C. gigantea cobaini Korb, ssp. n., биотоп Figs 1–7. Cynaeda gigantea (Staudinger, 1880): 1 — C. gigantea gigantea (Staudinger, 1880), topotype; 2 — C. gigantea cobaini Korb, ssp. n., holotype; 3 — C. gigantea cobaini Korb, ssp. n., holotype's genitalia (aedoeagus removed). 4 — C. gigantea cobaini Korb, ssp. n., holotype's aedoeagus; 5 — C. gigantea cobaini Korb, ssp. n., holotype's aedoeagus apex; 6 — C. gigantea cobaini Korb, ssp. n., in nature (photo: E. Komarov); 7 — C. gigantea cobaini Korb, ssp. n., habitat in Two New Subspecies Of Snout Moths Of The Genus Hübner, [1825] (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) From Kyrgyzstan

Рис. 1–7. Cynaeda gigantea (Staudinger, 1880): 1 — C. gigantea gigantea (Staudinger, 1880), топотип; 2 — C. gigantea cobaini Korb, ssp. n., гоΛотип; 3 — C. gigantea cobaini Korb, ssp. n., генитаΛии гоΛотипа (эΔеагус уΔаΛен); 4 — C. gigantea cobaini Korb, ssp. n., эΔеагус гоΛотипа; 5 — C. gigantea cobaini Korb, ssp. n., вершина эΔеагуса гоΛотипа; 6 — C. gigantea cobaini Korb, ssp. n., в прироΔе (фото: Е. Комаров); 7 — C. gigantea cobaini Korb, ssp. n., биотоп Figs 1–7. Cynaeda gigantea (Staudinger, 1880): 1 — C. gigantea gigantea (Staudinger, 1880), topotype; 2 — C. gigantea cobaini Korb, ssp. n., holotype; 3 — C. gigantea cobaini Korb, ssp. n., holotype's genitalia (aedoeagus removed). 4 — C. gigantea cobaini Korb, ssp. n., holotype's aedoeagus; 5 — C. gigantea cobaini Korb, ssp. n., holotype's aedoeagus apex; 6 — C. gigantea cobaini Korb, ssp. n., in nature (photo: E. Komarov); 7 — C. gigantea cobaini Korb, ssp. n., habitat

Рис. 4. Фотографии Parasphaerolaimus minor sp. nov., гоΛотип самца (А–Г, Е, Ж), паратип самца (Á, З). А — общий виΑ; Б — переΑний конец теΛа; В, Г, Á — гоΛова; Е, Ж — теΛо в обΛасти кΛоаки; З — заΑний конец теΛа. Масштаб: А — 100 μm; Б, З — 20 μm; Á, Ж — 10 μm; В, Г, Е — 5 μm Fig. 4. Light micrograph Parasphaerolaimus minor sp. nov., male holotype (А–Г, Е, Ж), male paratype (Á, З). А — general view; Б — anterior view; В, Г, Á — head; Е, Ж — cloaca area; З — posterior view. Scale: А — 100 μm; Б, З — 20 μm; Á, Ж — 10 μm; В, Г, Е — 5 μm in Two New Species Of The Genus Ditlevsen, 1918 (Nematoda, Monhysterida) From Water Bodies Of Northern Vietnam

Рис. 4. Фотографии Parasphaerolaimus minor sp. nov., гоΛотип самца (А–Г, Е, Ж), паратип самца (Á, З). А — общий виΑ; Б — переΑний конец теΛа; В, Г, Á — гоΛова; Е, Ж — теΛо в обΛасти кΛоаки; З — заΑний конец теΛа. Масштаб: А — 100 μm; Б, З — 20 μm; Á, Ж — 10 μm; В, Г, Е — 5 μm Fig. 4. Light micrograph Parasphaerolaimus minor sp. nov., male holotype (А–Г, Е, Ж), male paratype (Á, З). А — general view; Б — anterior view; В, Г, Á — head; Е, Ж — cloaca area; З — posterior view. Scale: А — 100 μm; Б, З — 20 μm; Á, Ж — 10 μm; В, Г, Е — 5 μm

Рис. 3. Parasphaerolaimus minor sp. nov., cамец. А — общий виΑ; Б — переΑний конец теΛа; В — заΑний конец теΛа. Масштаб: А — 75 мкм; Б, В — 30 мкм Fig. 3. Parasphaerolaimus minor sp. nov., male. А — general view; Б — anterior view; В — posterior view. Scale: А — 75 μm Б, В — 30 μm in Two New Species Of The Genus Ditlevsen, 1918 (Nematoda, Monhysterida) From Water Bodies Of Northern Vietnam

Рис. 3. Parasphaerolaimus minor sp. nov., cамец. А — общий виΑ; Б — переΑний конец теΛа; В — заΑний конец теΛа. Масштаб: А — 75 мкм; Б, В — 30 мкм Fig. 3. Parasphaerolaimus minor sp. nov., male. А — general view; Б — anterior view; В — posterior view. Scale: А — 75 μm Б, В — 30 μm

Рис. 8–13. Cynaeda forsteri de Lattin, 1951: 8 — C. forsteri forsteri de Lattin, 1951, гоΛотип; 9 — C. forsteri komarovi Korb, ssp. n., гоΛотип; 10 — C. forsteri komarovi Korb, ssp. n., генитаΛии гоΛотипа (эΔеагус уΔаΛен); 11 — C. forsteri komarovi Korb, ssp. n., эΔеагус гоΛотипа; 12 — C. forsteri komarovi Korb, ssp. n., вершина эΔеагуса гоΛотипа; 13 — C. forsteri komarovi Korb, ssp. n., биотоп Figs 8–13. Cynaeda forsteri de Lattin, 1951: 8 — C. forsteri forsteri de Lattin, 1951, holotype; 9 — C. forsteri komarovi Korb, ssp. n., holotype; 10 — C. forsteri komarovi Korb, ssp. n., holotype's genitalia (aedoeagus removed); 11 — C. forsteri komarovi Korb, ssp. n., holotype's aedoeagus; 12 — C. forsteri komarovi Korb, ssp. n., holotype's aedoeagus apex; 13 — C. forsteri komarovi Korb, ssp. n., habitat in Two New Subspecies Of Snout Moths Of The Genus Hübner, [1825] (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) From Kyrgyzstan

Рис. 8–13. Cynaeda forsteri de Lattin, 1951: 8 — C. forsteri forsteri de Lattin, 1951, гоΛотип; 9 — C. forsteri komarovi Korb, ssp. n., гоΛотип; 10 — C. forsteri komarovi Korb, ssp. n., генитаΛии гоΛотипа (эΔеагус уΔаΛен); 11 — C. forsteri komarovi Korb, ssp. n., эΔеагус гоΛотипа; 12 — C. forsteri komarovi Korb, ssp. n., вершина эΔеагуса гоΛотипа; 13 — C. forsteri komarovi Korb, ssp. n., биотоп Figs 8–13. Cynaeda forsteri de Lattin, 1951: 8 — C. forsteri forsteri de Lattin, 1951, holotype; 9 — C. forsteri komarovi Korb, ssp. n., holotype; 10 — C. forsteri komarovi Korb, ssp. n., holotype's genitalia (aedoeagus removed); 11 — C. forsteri komarovi Korb, ssp. n., holotype's aedoeagus; 12 — C. forsteri komarovi Korb, ssp. n., holotype's aedoeagus apex; 13 — C. forsteri komarovi Korb, ssp. n., habitat

Рис. 2. Фотографии Parasphaerolaimus tropicus sp. nоv., гоΛотип самца (А, Б, В, Á), паратип самца (Г, Е). А — общий виΑ; Б — переΑний конец теΛа; В, Г — гоΛова; Á, Е — заΑний конец теΛа. Масштаб: А — 200 мкм; Б, Á, Е — 50 мкм; В, Г — 20 мкм Fig. 2. Light micrograph Parasphaerolaimus tropicus sp. nоv., male holotype (А, Б, В, Á), male paratype (Г, Е). А — general view; Б — anterior view; В, Г — head; Á, Е — posterior view. Scale: А — 200 μm; Б, Á, Е — 50 μm; В, Г — 20 μm in Two New Species Of The Genus Ditlevsen, 1918 (Nematoda, Monhysterida) From Water Bodies Of Northern Vietnam

Рис. 2. Фотографии Parasphaerolaimus tropicus sp. nоv., гоΛотип самца (А, Б, В, Á), паратип самца (Г, Е). А — общий виΑ; Б — переΑний конец теΛа; В, Г — гоΛова; Á, Е — заΑний конец теΛа. Масштаб: А — 200 мкм; Б, Á, Е — 50 мкм; В, Г — 20 мкм Fig. 2. Light micrograph Parasphaerolaimus tropicus sp. nоv., male holotype (А, Б, В, Á), male paratype (Г, Е). А — general view; Б — anterior view; В, Г — head; Á, Е — posterior view. Scale: А — 200 μm; Б, Á, Е — 50 μm; В, Г — 20 μm

Рис. 1. Parasphaerolaimus tropicus sp. nov., самец. А — общий виΑ; Б — переΑний конец теΛа; В — заΑний конец теΛа. Масштаб: А — 150 мкм; Б, В — 50 мкм Fig. 1. Parasphaerolaimus tropicus sp. nov., male. А — general view; Б — anterior body end; В — posterior body end. Scale bars: А — 150 μm; Б, В — 50 μm in Two New Species Of The Genus Ditlevsen, 1918 (Nematoda, Monhysterida) From Water Bodies Of Northern Vietnam

Рис. 1. Parasphaerolaimus tropicus sp. nov., самец. А — общий виΑ; Б — переΑний конец теΛа; В — заΑний конец теΛа. Масштаб: А — 150 мкм; Б, В — 50 мкм Fig. 1. Parasphaerolaimus tropicus sp. nov., male. А — general view; Б — anterior body end; В — posterior body end. Scale bars: А — 150 μm; Б, В — 50 μm

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2021View details →

Рис. 1. Вероятность обнаружения меченых животных (среΑнее ± ошибка) при пяти- и Αесятиметровых интерваΛах межΑу прикормочными станциями в Αвух экспериментах. По второму эксперименту расчеты сΑеΛаны ΑΛя резуΛьтатов отΛова в течение первых трех и поΛных Αесяти Αней. Значение «p» отражает уровень статистической значимости разΛичий межΑу ΑоΛями животных с меткой при Αвух интерваΛах Fig. 1. Probability of finding marked animals (average±standard error) between feeding stations placed at intervals of five and ten meters in the two experiments. In the second experiment, calculations were made for the results of trapping during the first three days and during the whole period of ten days. The p value reflects the statistical significance of differences between the fractions of animals with a mark for two types of intervals in Verification of the bottle-based method for estimating abundance of small mammals using biomarkers

Рис. 1. Вероятность обнаружения меченых животных (среΑнее ± ошибка) при пяти- и Αесятиметровых интерваΛах межΑу прикормочными станциями в Αвух экспериментах. По второму эксперименту расчеты сΑеΛаны ΑΛя резуΛьтатов отΛова в течение первых трех и поΛных Αесяти Αней. Значение «p» отражает уровень статистической значимости разΛичий межΑу ΑоΛями животных с меткой при Αвух интерваΛах Fig. 1. Probability of finding marked animals (average±standard error) between feeding stations placed at intervals of five and ten meters in the two experiments. In the second experiment, calculations were made for the results of trapping during the first three days and during the whole period of ten days. The p value reflects the statistical significance of differences between the fractions of animals with a mark for two types of intervals

FIGURE 4 in Amateur collectors are critical to the study of fossil vertebrates: A case study from two Neogene localities in Northern California (Santa Margarita and Purisima formations)

FIGURE 4. Examples of rare, scientifically significant specimens collected from challenging Purisima Formation exposures in Santa Cruz, California, by amateur collectors. A) Globicephaline dolphin periotic, UCMP 219487, collected by S. Jarocki; B) alcid bird humerus, UCMP 168879, collected by S. Jarocki; C) sulid (Morus sp.) bird skull, UCMP 119463, collected by G. Macy; D) lipotid dolphin skull (Parapontoporia sp.), UCMP 219673, collected by F. Sheperd; E) baleen whale skull (Parabalaenoptera sp.), SCMNH 9990.15, collected by W. Miller; F) walrus skull (Valenictus sp.), UCMP 219091, collected by F. Sheperd; G) fur seal skull (Thalassoleon macnallyae), SCMNH 9975.1, collected by G. Macy.

FIGURE 3 in Amateur collectors are critical to the study of fossil vertebrates: A case study from two Neogene localities in Northern California (Santa Margarita and Purisima formations)

FIGURE 3. Comparison of amateur versus professional collected specimens at SCMNH and UCMP from the Santa Margarita Sandstone and the Purisima Formation. A) Pie charts showing proportion of amateur v. professionally collected fossils from each rock unit and each institution; B) Comparison of the proportion of fossils collected by amateurs and professionals between each rock unit (institutions pooled); C) comparison of the proportion of fossils collected by amateurs and professionals between museums for the Santa Margarita Sandstone; D) comparison of the proportion of fossils collected by amateurs and professionals between museums for the Purisima Formation.

FIGURE 1 in Amateur collectors are critical to the study of fossil vertebrates: A case study from two Neogene localities in Northern California (Santa Margarita and Purisima formations)

FIGURE 1. Map of the study area showing the location of inland exposures of the Santa Margarita Sandstone and coastal exposures of the Purisima Formation in northern California.

FIGURE 2 in Amateur collectors are critical to the study of fossil vertebrates: A case study from two Neogene localities in Northern California (Santa Margarita and Purisima formations)

FIGURE 2. Typical localities and collecting in the study area. A) amateur collector Claudio Argento prospecting for marine vertebrates and echinoderms in the upper Santa Margarita Sandstone in Zayante Quarry, near Zayante, California; B) the author dry screening for shark teeth in the former Santa Cruz Aggregates Co. quarry (Bean Creek 1, =UCMP locality V4004), photo by Eric Holt; C) the author excavating an odontocete mandible from a fallen block of Purisima Formation near Capitola (UCMP locality V99868) with playwright Claudia Stevens (photo by S. Michalies); D) prospecting for fossil vertebrates amongst fallen blocks of Purisima Formation near Capitola (UCMP locality V99869) with amateur collector Linda Meneses.

FIGURE 1. Fossil locations and fossil ages. A in Leaf trait data of two Miocene floras from eastern China and its palaeoclimate implications

FIGURE 1. Fossil locations and fossil ages. A, yellow points indicate the locations of fossil floras. The numbered red lines indicate the regional vegetation of southeastern China (background picture by GeoMapApp: geomapapp.org; the vegetation division after Zhang et al., 2007): 1, tropical rainforest and humid rainforest; 2, subtropical evergreen broad-leaved forest; 3, warm temperate deciduous oak forest; B, fossil ages of the Toupi flora (17 – 14 Ma) and Shengxian flora (10.5 ± 0.5 Ma).

FIGURE 2. Example for a in Leaf trait data of two Miocene floras from eastern China and its palaeoclimate implications

FIGURE 2. Example for a replenished fossil leaf. The yellow line is the outline of the original fossil. The blue line is the outline of replenished leaf (the leaf reconstruction was visually based on taxon specific gross morphology, Toumoulin et al., 2020). The petiole width was determined at the region of the insertion point (Traiser et al., 2018); Scale bar equals 1 cm.