Find research datasets worth reusing

Figure 16 in Skull morphology and functionality of extant Felidae (Mammalia: Carnivora): a phylogenetic and evolutionary perspective

Figure 16. Morphofunctional relationships between the members of the Ocelot lineage. Species' images are digitally adjusted and scaled according to the skull of Leopardus pardalis, and are positioned over the centroids of their principal component analysis (PCA) scores. Arrows indicate bite force and neck robustness (abscissa), and jaw muscle optimization (ordinate). Acronyms are defined in the text.

Figure 20 in Skull morphology and functionality of extant Felidae (Mammalia: Carnivora): a phylogenetic and evolutionary perspective

Figure 20. Morphofunctional relationships between the members of the bay cat lineage. Species' images are digitally adjusted and scaled according to the skull of Catopuma temminckii, and are positioned over the centroids of their principal component analysis (PCA) scores. Arrows indicate bite force and neck robustness (abscissa), and jaw muscle optimization (ordinate). Acronyms are defined in the text.

Figure 10 in Skull morphology and functionality of extant Felidae (Mammalia: Carnivora): a phylogenetic and evolutionary perspective

Figure 10. Morphological relationships between the members of the Caracal lineage. Species' images are digitally adjusted and scaled according to the skull of Profelis aurata, and are positioned over the centroids of their principal component analysis (PCA) scores. Arrows indicate the enlargement of the skull measurements related to each axis. Acronyms are defined in the text.

Figure 9 in Skull morphology and functionality of extant Felidae (Mammalia: Carnivora): a phylogenetic and evolutionary perspective

Figure 9. Morphological relationships between the members of the leopard cat lineage. Species' images are digitally adjusted and scaled according to the skull of Prionailurus viverrinus, and are positioned over the centroids of their principal component analysis (PCA) scores. Arrows indicate the enlargement of the skull measurements related to each axis. Acronyms are defined in the text.

FIGURE 7 in Pollen morphology of selected taxa of Valeriana (Caprifoliaceae): taxonomic and evolutionary implications

FIGURE 7. Box plots illustrating the variation of polar axis (A) and equatorial diameter (B) of Valeriana pollen grains. 1. V. montana. 2. V. tripteris. 3. V. supina. 4. V. transsilvanica. 5. V. pyrenaica. 6. V. dioica. 7. V. simplicifolia. 8. V. wolgensis. 9. V. stolonifera. 10. V. angustifolia. 11. V. sambucifolia. 12. V. officinalis. 13. V. exaltata. 14. V. grossheimii. 15. V. rossica. 16. V. tuberosa. 17. V. alliariifolia.

FIGURE 4 in Pollen morphology of selected taxa of Valeriana (Caprifoliaceae): taxonomic and evolutionary implications

FIGURE 4. Pollen grains of Valeriana (LM). A–D. V. montana. E–H. V. tripteris. I–L. V. supina. M–P. V. pyrenaica. Q–T. V. transsilvanica. A, B, E, F, I, J, M, N, Q, R. Equatorial view. C, D, G, H, K, L, O, P, S, T. Polar view. Scale bars: 10 µm.

FIGURE 1 in Pollen morphology of selected taxa of Valeriana (Caprifoliaceae): taxonomic and evolutionary implications

FIGURE 1. Pollen grains of Valeriana (SEM). A. V. montana. B. V. tripteris. C. V. supina. D. V. pyrenaica. E, F. V. transsilvanica. G. V. dioica. H. V. simplicifolia. I. V. wolgensis. J. V. officinalis. K. V. exaltata. L. V. sambucifolia. M. V. angustifolia. N. V. stolonifera. O. V. grossheimii. P. V. rossica. Q. V. tuberosa. R. V. alliariifolia. A, C, F, I, K–O, Q, R. Polar view. B, D, E, G, H, J, P. Equatorial view. Scale bars: 10 µm, except in H: 5 µm.

FIGURE 6 in Pollen morphology of selected taxa of Valeriana (Caprifoliaceae): taxonomic and evolutionary implications

FIGURE 6. Pollen grains of Valeriana (LM). A–D. V. angustifolia. E–H. V. stolonifera. I–L. V. grossheimii. M–P. V. rossica. Q–T. V. tuberosa. U–X. V. alliariifolia. A, B, E, F, I, J, M, N, Q, R, U, V. Equatorial view. C, D, G, H, K, L, O, P, S, T, W, X. Polar view. Scale bars: 10 µm.

FIGURE 3 in Pollen morphology of selected taxa of Valeriana (Caprifoliaceae): taxonomic and evolutionary implications

FIGURE 3. Exine structure of pollen grains of Valeriana (SEM). A. V. montana. B. V. tripteris. C. V. pyrenaica. D, E. V. rossica. F. V. simplicifolia. G–I. V. alliariifolia. A–D, F, G. Columellae in mesocolpia. E, H. Columellae in apocolpia. I. Colpus with halo.

FIGURE 5 in Pollen morphology of selected taxa of Valeriana (Caprifoliaceae): taxonomic and evolutionary implications

FIGURE 5. Pollen grains of Valeriana (LM). A–D. V. dioica. E–H. V. simplicifolia. I–L. V. wolgensis. M–P. V. officinalis. Q–T. V. exaltata. U–X. V. sambucifolia. A, B, E, F, I, J, M, N, Q, R, U, V. Equatorial view. C, D, G, H, K, L, O, P, S, T, W, X. Polar view. Scale bars: 10 µm.

FIGURE 8 in Pollen morphology of selected taxa of Valeriana (Caprifoliaceae): taxonomic and evolutionary implications

FIGURE 8. UPGMA dendrograms showing the relationships of pollen grains of Valeriana species. A. Quantitative characters. B. Qualitative characters.

FIGURE 2 in Pollen morphology of selected taxa of Valeriana (Caprifoliaceae): taxonomic and evolutionary implications

FIGURE 2. Exine sculpture of pollen grains of Valeriana (SEM). A. V. montana. B. V. tripteris. C. V. supina. D. V. pyrenaica. E, F. V. transsilvanica. G. V. dioica. H. V. simplicifolia. I. V. wolgensis. J. V. officinalis. K. V. exaltata. L. V. sambucifolia. M. V. angustifolia. N. V. stolonifera. O. V. grossheimii. P. V. rossica. Q. V. tuberosa. R. V. alliariifolia.