Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
2,929
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
2,929 results for “holotypes”
FIG. 1 in Redescription of the holotype of Phyloblatta gaudryi (Agnus, 1903) (Pennsylvanian; Commentry, France), an exceptionally wellpreserved stem-dictyopteran
FIG. 1. — Phyloblatta gaudryi (Agnus, 1903); holotype specimen (MNHN.F.R51454), right forewing; reconstruction and photograph (negative imprint, reversed). See text for abbreviations. Scale bar: 5 mm.
FIG. 4 in Redescription of the holotype of Phyloblatta gaudryi (Agnus, 1903) (Pennsylvanian; Commentry, France), an exceptionally wellpreserved stem-dictyopteran
FIG. 4. — Details of the forewing venation of Phyloblatta gaudryi (Agnus, 1903); holotype specimen MNHN.F.R51454: A, B, detail of the area between M and CuA, forewing base; arrows without labels indicate veinlets; their thickness indicates strength of indicated veinlet; A, right forewing, reconstruction and photograph, location as indicated by "4A" in Figure 1 (negative imprint, reversed); B, left forewing, reconstruction and photograph, location as indicated by "4B" in Figure 2 (negative imprint); C, D, detail of the divergence of M branches from M partim + CuA, forewings; arrows without labels indicate branches of M diverging from M partim + CuA; their thickness indicates strength of indicated vein; C, right forewing, location as indicated by "4C" in Figure 1 (negative imprint, reversed). D, left forewing, location as indicated by "4D" in Figure 2 (negative imprint). See text for abbreviations. Scale bars: 1 mm.
FIG. 6 in Redescription of the holotype of Phyloblatta gaudryi (Agnus, 1903) (Pennsylvanian; Commentry, France), an exceptionally wellpreserved stem-dictyopteran
FIG. 6. — Interpretation of the forewing medio-cubital area in Phyloblatta gaudryi (Agnus, 1903). See text for abbreviations.
FIGURES 127–136. Wroughtonia vietnamica holotype, female. 127. Head, dorsal. 128. Head, frontal. 129. Head, lateral. 130. Mesoscutum. 131. Mesopleuron. 132. Metasoma. 133 in Review of the genus Wroughtonia Cameron, 1899 (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Helconinae), with the description of 12 new species from Vietnam
FIGURES 127–136. Wroughtonia vietnamica holotype, female. 127. Head, dorsal. 128. Head, frontal. 129. Head, lateral. 130. Mesoscutum. 131. Mesopleuron. 132. Metasoma. 133. Hind coxa and femur, lateral. 134. Propodeum. 135. Hind wing. 136. Forewing.
FIGS. 117–125. Wroughtonia undulata holotype, female. 117. Head, dorsal. 118. Head, frontal. 119. Head, lateral. 120. Mesoscutum. 121. Mesopleuron. 122. Hind femur, lateral. 123. Propodeum. 124. Metasoma. 125 in Review of the genus Wroughtonia Cameron, 1899 (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Helconinae), with the description of 12 new species from Vietnam
FIGS. 117–125. Wroughtonia undulata holotype, female. 117. Head, dorsal. 118. Head, frontal. 119. Head, lateral. 120. Mesoscutum. 121. Mesopleuron. 122. Hind femur, lateral. 123. Propodeum. 124. Metasoma. 125. Hind wing.
FIGS. 105–115. Wroughtonia sonla holotype, female. 105. Head, dorsal. 106. Head, frontal. 107. Head, lateral. 108. Mesoscutum. 109. Mesopleuron. 110. Propodeum. 111. Hind femur, lateral. 112. Metasoma. 113. Hind coxa, lateral. 114. Forewing. 115 in Review of the genus Wroughtonia Cameron, 1899 (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Helconinae), with the description of 12 new species from Vietnam
FIGS. 105–115. Wroughtonia sonla holotype, female. 105. Head, dorsal. 106. Head, frontal. 107. Head, lateral. 108. Mesoscutum. 109. Mesopleuron. 110. Propodeum. 111. Hind femur, lateral. 112. Metasoma. 113. Hind coxa, lateral. 114. Forewing. 115. Hind wing.
FIGURES 93–103. Wroughtonia simulata holotype, female. 93. Head, dorsal. 94. Head, frontal. 95. Head, lateral. 96. Mesoscutum. 97. Mesopleuron. 98. Propodeum. 99. Hind coxa, lateral. 100. Metasoma 101. Hind femur, lateral. 102. Forewing. 103 in Review of the genus Wroughtonia Cameron, 1899 (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Helconinae), with the description of 12 new species from Vietnam
FIGURES 93–103. Wroughtonia simulata holotype, female. 93. Head, dorsal. 94. Head, frontal. 95. Head, lateral. 96. Mesoscutum. 97. Mesopleuron. 98. Propodeum. 99. Hind coxa, lateral. 100. Metasoma 101. Hind femur, lateral. 102. Forewing. 103. Hind tibia, lateral.
FIGURES 83–91. Wroughtonia similis holotype, female. 83. Head, dorsal. 84. Head, frontal. 85. Head, lateral. 86. Mesoscutum. 87. Mesopleuron. 88. Hind femur, lateral. 89. Propodeum. 90. Metasomal tergites 1 in Review of the genus Wroughtonia Cameron, 1899 (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Helconinae), with the description of 12 new species from Vietnam
FIGURES 83–91. Wroughtonia similis holotype, female. 83. Head, dorsal. 84. Head, frontal. 85. Head, lateral. 86. Mesoscutum. 87. Mesopleuron. 88. Hind femur, lateral. 89. Propodeum. 90. Metasomal tergites 1+2+3. 91. Forewing.
FIG. 1 in DNA Sequence Data from the Holotype of Marmosa elegans coquimbensis Tate, 1931 (Mammalia: Didelphidae) Resolve Its Disputed Relationships
FIG. 1. Bayesian phylogenetic tree of Thylamys cytochrome b sequences. Numbers at nodes indicate posterior probabilities (PP). Filled circles at nodes denote PPs equal to 1.0. Unmarked nodes received PPs less than 0.5. Within T. elegans, tips are labeled with country, region, specimen identifier, and, in parentheses, a GenBank accession number. The holotype of Marmosa elegans coquimbensis Tate, 1931, is in boldface type. For other species, tips of the phylogeny are collapsed and the outgroup is not shown. See appendix 1 for a full list of sequences included in the phylogeny. A full tree file corresponding to this topology is available on TreeBase (doi: http://purl.org/phylo/treebase/phylows/study/TB2:S25505).
FIG. 7. — Holotype Epidamaeus tenuisetosus n in Three new soil mites of the genus Epidamaeus (Acari, Oribatida, Damaeidae) from Mongolia
FIG. 7. — Holotype Epidamaeus tenuisetosus n. sp.; A, dorsal aspect; B, ventral aspect; C, lateral aspect. Scale bar: 100 µm.
FIG. 1. — Holotype Epidamaeus aokii n in Three new soil mites of the genus Epidamaeus (Acari, Oribatida, Damaeidae) from Mongolia
FIG. 1. — Holotype Epidamaeus aokii n. sp.; A, dorsal aspect; B, ventral aspect; C, lateral aspect. Abbreviations: 1a, 1b, 1c, 2a, 3a, 3b, 3c, 3d, 4a, 4b, 4c, 4d, epimeral setae; a, m, h, hypostosomal setae; ad1, ad2, ad3, adanal setae; ag, aggenital setae; an1, an2, anal setae; Ba, anterior postbothridial tubercle; bo, bothridium; c1, c2, la, lm, lp, h1, h2, h3, notogastral setae; di, discidium; E2a, E2p, epimeral tubercles; ex, exobothridial seta; g1-g6, genital setae; gla, latero-opisthosomal gland opening; ia, im, ih, ips, ip, notogastral lyrifissures; iad, adanal lyrifissure; in, interlamellar seta; le, lamellar seta; ps1, ps2, ps3, posterior notogastral setae; ro, rostral seta; sa, spinae adnatae; Sa, Sp, parastigmatic tubercles; ss, sensillus; Va, Vp, ventrosejugal tubercles. Scale bar: 100 µm.
FIG. 4. — Holotype Epidamaeus angustirostratus n in Three new soil mites of the genus Epidamaeus (Acari, Oribatida, Damaeidae) from Mongolia
FIG. 4. — Holotype Epidamaeus angustirostratus n. sp.; A, dorsal aspect; B, ventral aspect; C, lateral aspect. Scale bar: 100 µm.
Figs. 29–31. Sceliomorpha longicornis Ashmead, holotype male. 29, Lateral habitus. 30 in Review of Genera of the Tribe Sparasionini (Hymenoptera: Platygastroidea, Scelionidae), and Description of Two New Genera from the New World
Figs. 29–31. Sceliomorpha longicornis Ashmead, holotype male. 29, Lateral habitus. 30, Head and mesosoma, dorsal view. 31, Head, frontal view. Figs. 32–34. Aliofreniger rugosiceps Szabó, holotype female. 32, Head, frontal view. 33, Lateral habitus. 34, Head and mesosoma, dorsal view. Scale bars in millimeters.
Fig. 14. Cratokalotermes santanensis Bechly, photomicrographs. A. ROM 1764. B. Holotype, SMNS 66195 in The Species of Isoptera (Insecta) from the Early Cretaceous Crato Formation: A Revision
Fig. 14. Cratokalotermes santanensis Bechly, photomicrographs. A. ROM 1764. B. Holotype, SMNS 66195.
Figs. 1–2. Proteroscelio antennalis Brues, holotype female. 1, Ventrolateral habitus. 2 in The Cretaceous Scelionid Genus Proteroscelio Brues (Hymenoptera: Platygastroidea)
Figs. 1–2. Proteroscelio antennalis Brues, holotype female. 1, Ventrolateral habitus. 2, Head and mesosoma, ventrolateral view. Figs. 3–4. Proteroscelio gravatus, n. sp. 3, Dorsolateral habitus. 4, Ventrolateral habitus. Scale bars in millimeters.
Fig. 5. Henosferus molus holotype MEFP 2353 in New Jurassic Mammals from Patagonia, Argentina: A Reappraisal of Australosphenidan Morphology and Interrelationships
Fig. 5. Henosferus molus holotype MEFP 2353. Stereophotograph of the posterior portion of the right lower jaw in lingual view and accompanying line drawing. Scale bar represents 5 mm. Abbreviations: an 5 angular process; anc 5 concave surface of the angular process; con 5 condyle; cop 5 coronoid process; cor 5 scar for the paradentary coronoid bone; cr 5 medial crest of the angular process; dt 5 dentary trough; mck 5 Meckelian groove; mf 5 mandibular foramen; mfl 5 medial flange; s 5 step may be homologous to the ''diagonal ridge'' of Morganucodon (Kermack et al., 1973).
Fig. 7. Henosferus molus holotype MEFP 2353 in New Jurassic Mammals from Patagonia, Argentina: A Reappraisal of Australosphenidan Morphology and Interrelationships
Fig. 7. Henosferus molus holotype MEFP 2353. Stereophotograph of the m1 in lingual and occlusal views, with accompanying drawings. Scale bar represents 1 mm.
Text-fig. 3. Scanning electron micrographs (a, b) and synchrotron radiation X-ray tomographic microscopy orthoslices (c–e) of flower of Lambertiflora elegans gen. et sp. nov. from the Early Cretaceous Puddledock locality, Virginia, USA (holotype, PP53796, Puddledock sample 082). a) Flower in lateral view showing long pedicel and overlapping elongated tepals; b) Detail of flower showing overlapping elongated tepals; note the numerous holes indicating the position of probable secretory cells; c) Flower in longitudinal section showing overlapping elongated tepals, remains of probable poorly developed stamens or staminodes and probable poorly developed carpels on the central conical gynoecial region of the receptacle (cut between orthoslices xz0510 and 0570); d) Flower in longitudinal section (comparable to c) showing overlapping tepals, poorly developed stamens or staminodes, and probable poorly developed carpels on the central conical gynoecial region of the receptacle; note the prominent cavities from secretory cells scattered through the tissues (cut between orthoslice xz0560 and 0575); e) Flower in transverse section showing overlapping tepals, poorly developed stamens or staminodes, and remains of probable poorly developed carpels (cut between orthoslices xy1160 and 1180). Scale bars = 1 mm (a), 500 µm (b–e). in Multiparted, Apocarpous Flowers From The Early Cretaceous Of Eastern North America And Portugal
Text-fig. 3. Scanning electron micrographs (a, b) and synchrotron radiation X-ray tomographic microscopy orthoslices (c–e) of flower of Lambertiflora elegans gen. et sp. nov. from the Early Cretaceous Puddledock locality, Virginia, USA (holotype, PP53796, Puddledock sample 082). a) Flower in lateral view showing long pedicel and overlapping elongated tepals; b) Detail of flower showing overlapping elongated tepals; note the numerous holes indicating the position of probable secretory cells; c) Flower in longitudinal section showing overlapping elongated tepals, remains of probable poorly developed stamens or staminodes and probable poorly developed carpels on the central conical gynoecial region of the receptacle (cut between orthoslices xz0510 and 0570); d) Flower in longitudinal section (comparable to c) showing overlapping tepals, poorly developed stamens or staminodes, and probable poorly developed carpels on the central conical gynoecial region of the receptacle; note the prominent cavities from secretory cells scattered through the tissues (cut between orthoslice xz0560 and 0575); e) Flower in transverse section showing overlapping tepals, poorly developed stamens or staminodes, and remains of probable poorly developed carpels (cut between orthoslices xy1160 and 1180). Scale bars = 1 mm (a), 500 µm (b–e).
Text-fig. 2. Synchrotron radiation X-ray tomographic microscopy volume renderings (a, b) and orthoslices (c–e) of Mugideiriflora portugallica gen. et sp. nov. from the Early Cretaceous Catefica locality, Portugal (holotype, S174254, Catefica sample 150). Yellow dots – stamens, red dots – carpels. a) Flower in lateral view showing the broad bases of the laminar tepals; b) Flower in longitudinal section showing the flat to slightly concave floral receptacle with a central conical gynoecial region (cut between orthoslices yz0800 and 1220); c) Flower in transverse section showing the numerous laminar tepals in several series and the stamens cut in the region of the poorly differentiated anthers; note cellular differences between outer (op) and inner (in) perianth parts, as well as and transverse sections of anthers, apparently with laterally to slightly dorsally placed pollen sacs (arrow heads) (cut at orthoslice xy0770); d) Flower in transverse section showing the numerous laminar tepals in several series, flattened rhomboidal stamen bases in several series, and poorly differentiated carpels (cut at orthoslice xy0820); e) Flower in transverse section showing the numerous laminar tepals in several series, flattened rhomboidal stamen bases in several series, and poorly differentiated carpels (cut at orthoslice xy0920); f) Flower in longitudinal section showing the shallowly concave floral receptacle with laminar tepals, stamens, and a central conical gynoecial region bearing poorly differentiated carpels (cut at orthoslice yz0900); g) Flower in longitudinal section perpendicular to that in (f) showing stamens and poorly differentiated carpels (cut at orthoslice xz1630). Scale bars = 1 mm (a, b), 500 µm (c–g). in Multiparted, Apocarpous Flowers From The Early Cretaceous Of Eastern North America And Portugal
Text-fig. 2. Synchrotron radiation X-ray tomographic microscopy volume renderings (a, b) and orthoslices (c–e) of Mugideiriflora portugallica gen. et sp. nov. from the Early Cretaceous Catefica locality, Portugal (holotype, S174254, Catefica sample 150). Yellow dots – stamens, red dots – carpels. a) Flower in lateral view showing the broad bases of the laminar tepals; b) Flower in longitudinal section showing the flat to slightly concave floral receptacle with a central conical gynoecial region (cut between orthoslices yz0800 and 1220); c) Flower in transverse section showing the numerous laminar tepals in several series and the stamens cut in the region of the poorly differentiated anthers; note cellular differences between outer (op) and inner (in) perianth parts, as well as and transverse sections of anthers, apparently with laterally to slightly dorsally placed pollen sacs (arrow heads) (cut at orthoslice xy0770); d) Flower in transverse section showing the numerous laminar tepals in several series, flattened rhomboidal stamen bases in several series, and poorly differentiated carpels (cut at orthoslice xy0820); e) Flower in transverse section showing the numerous laminar tepals in several series, flattened rhomboidal stamen bases in several series, and poorly differentiated carpels (cut at orthoslice xy0920); f) Flower in longitudinal section showing the shallowly concave floral receptacle with laminar tepals, stamens, and a central conical gynoecial region bearing poorly differentiated carpels (cut at orthoslice yz0900); g) Flower in longitudinal section perpendicular to that in (f) showing stamens and poorly differentiated carpels (cut at orthoslice xz1630). Scale bars = 1 mm (a, b), 500 µm (c–g).
Text-fig. 1. Scanning electron micrographs of Mugideiriflora portugallica gen. et sp. nov. from the Early Cretaceous Catefica locality, Portugal (holotype, S174254, Catefica sample 150). a) Flower in oblique lateral view showing numerous broad tepals, numerous inwardly curved stamens and the flat floral receptacle with a conical gynoecial region; b–c) Flower in two different oblique apical views showing numerous broad laminar tepals and inwardly curved stamens surrounding the carpels; note cellular differences between outer (op) and inner (in) perianth parts, as well as bases of anthers, apparently with laterally to slightly dorsally placed pollen sacs (arrow heads); d) Detail of flower showing a cluster of poorly differentiated carpels in the center surrounded by elongated stamens; note grooves in the dorsal surface of the stamens indicating the position of the pollen sacs; e) Detail of flower showing the broad bases of the laminar tepals, rhomboidal stamen bases and poorly differentiated carpels; f) Detail of flower showing inwardly arched stamens and poorly differentiated carpels. Scale bars = 1 mm (a–c), 200 µm (d–f). in Multiparted, Apocarpous Flowers From The Early Cretaceous Of Eastern North America And Portugal
Text-fig. 1. Scanning electron micrographs of Mugideiriflora portugallica gen. et sp. nov. from the Early Cretaceous Catefica locality, Portugal (holotype, S174254, Catefica sample 150). a) Flower in oblique lateral view showing numerous broad tepals, numerous inwardly curved stamens and the flat floral receptacle with a conical gynoecial region; b–c) Flower in two different oblique apical views showing numerous broad laminar tepals and inwardly curved stamens surrounding the carpels; note cellular differences between outer (op) and inner (in) perianth parts, as well as bases of anthers, apparently with laterally to slightly dorsally placed pollen sacs (arrow heads); d) Detail of flower showing a cluster of poorly differentiated carpels in the center surrounded by elongated stamens; note grooves in the dorsal surface of the stamens indicating the position of the pollen sacs; e) Detail of flower showing the broad bases of the laminar tepals, rhomboidal stamen bases and poorly differentiated carpels; f) Detail of flower showing inwardly arched stamens and poorly differentiated carpels. Scale bars = 1 mm (a–c), 200 µm (d–f).
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.