Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
733
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
733 results for “physicians”
Data from: Physician assessment of pretest probability of malignancy and adherence with guidelines for pulmonary nodule evaluation
The annual incidence of pulmonary nodules is estimated at 1.57 million. Guidelines recommend using an initial assessment of nodule probability of malignancy (pCA). A previous study found that despite this recommendation, physicians did not follow guidelines. METHODS: Physician assessments (N = 337) and two previously validated risk model assessments of pretest probability of cancer were evaluated for performance in 337 patients with pulmonary nodules based on final diagnosis and compared. Physician-assessed pCA was categorized into low, intermediate, and high risk, and the next test ordered was evaluated. RESULTS: The prevalence of malignancy was 47% (n = 158) at 1 year. Physician-assessed pCA performed better than nodule prediction calculators (area under the curve, 0.85 vs 0.75; P < .001 and .78; P = .0001). Physicians did not follow indicated guidelines when selecting the next test in 61% of cases (n = 205). Despite recommendations for serial CT imaging in those with low pCA, 52% (n = 13) were managed more aggressively with PET imaging or biopsy; 12% (n = 3) underwent biopsy procedures for benign disease. Alternatively, in the high-risk category, the majority (n = 103 [75%]) were managed more conservatively. Stratified by diagnosis, 92% (n = 22) with benign disease underwent more conservative management with CT imaging (20%), PET scanning (15%), or biopsy (8%), although three had surgery (8%). CONCLUSIONS: Physician assessment as a means for predicting malignancy in pulmonary nodules is more accurate than previously validated nodule prediction calculators. Despite the accuracy of clinical intuition, physicians did not follow guideline-based recommendations when selecting the next diagnostic test. To provide optimal patient care, focus in the areas of guideline refinement, implementation, and dissemination is needed.
Data from: Exploring the perceptions of physicians, caregivers and families towards artificial nutrition and hydration for people in permanent vegetative state: how can a photo-elicitation method help?
The question of withdrawing artificial nutrition and hydration from people in a permanent vegetative state sparks considerable ethical and legal debate. Therefore, understanding the elements that influence such a decision is crucial. However, exploring perceptions of artificial nutrition and hydration is methodologically challenging for several reasons. First, because of the emotional state of the professionals and family members, who are facing an extremely distressing situation; second, because this question mirrors representations linked to a deep-rooted fear of dying of hunger and thirst; and third, because of taboos surrounding death. We sought to determine the best method to explore such complex situations in depth. This article aims to assess the relevance of the photo-elicitation interview method to analyze the perceptions and attitudes of health professionals and families of people in a permanent vegetative state regarding artificial nutrition and hydration. The photo-elicitation interview method consists in inserting one or more photographs into a research interview. An original set of 60 photos was built using Google Images and participants were asked to choose photos (10 maximum) and talk about them. The situations of 32 patients were explored in 23 dedicated centers for people in permanent vegetative state across France. In total, 138 interviews were conducted with health professionals and family members. We found that the photo-elicitation interview method 1) was well accepted by the participants and allowed them to express their emotions constructively, 2) fostered narration, reflexivity and introspection, 3) offered a sufficient "unusual angle" to allow participants to go beyond stereotypes and habits of thinking, and 4) can be replicated in other research areas. The use of visual methods currently constitutes an expanding area of research and this study stressed that this is of special interest to enhance research among populations facing end-of-life and ethical issues.
Predictors of the use of physician's televisits during the COVID-19 pandemic in Poland
<p>The dataset used for the analysis in the paper "Predictors of the use of physician’s televisits during the COVID-19 pandemic in Poland"</p>
Efficacy of Monetary Incentives for Primary Care Physicians on Patients
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT00674037. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Telephone Call From Acute Care Physicians to Long Term Care Physicians: Impact on Transitional Care of Elderly Patients
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT00281749. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Impact of Medical Education of Physician Action 2
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT02696551. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Explainable Insulin Decision-making System to Assist Physicians in Diabetes Management
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06434584. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Physician Perceptions About Parenteral Hydration in Latin America and Spain
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT01011140. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Diagnostic Performance of Echocardiography Performed by Emergency Physicians After a Basic Training
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT02974790. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
The Sponsor Assigns Test Products to Six Skin Areas According to a Concealed Randomization Schedule; Neither the Evaluating Physicians Nor the Participants Know Which Product is Applied to Which Site,
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT07154004. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
A Study of MHB088C Injection Versus Treatment of Physician's Choice in Subjects With Relapsed Small Cell Lung Cancer
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06954246. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Survey Study - Sensitivity Comparison Between MelaFind and Physician Group
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT01011153. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 0. Publications: 0.
Survey of Patient and Physician Knowledge and Perception Regarding Medicare Part D Plan Selection
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT02241980. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Biomarkes Of Job STRess In Emergency Senior Physicians - Detection of Stressful Events
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT04334083. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
A Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Adjuvant Giredestrant Compared With Physician's Choice of Adjuvant Endocrine Monotherapy in Participants With Estrogen Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Ea
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT04961996. IPD Sharing: YES. Countries: 54. Publications: 0.
A "Physician & Patient-powered" Cohort Registry (MY MYELOMA)
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05001087. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Multimodal Deep Learning for Lymph Node Metastasis Prediction and Physician Performance Assessment in T1 Gastric Cancer
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT07124754. IPD Sharing: UNDECIDED. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Remote Monitoring to Improve Physician Monitoring, Patient Satisfaction, and Predict Readmissions Following Surgery
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03800329. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Impact of a Triage Liaison Physician
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT02980159. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Evaluation of Web-based Training to Educate Physicians in the Methods of Interpreting Florbetapir-PET Scans
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT01550549. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 0. Publications: 0.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.