Find research datasets worth reusing

Figure 7 in Diet and reproductive outputs of common barn-owl (Tyto alba) during the common vole (Microtus arvalis) outbreak and crash

Figure 7. GLMM diagrams illustrating the effect of the main and alternative prey taxa and the two derived indices on the number of fledglings (A: Common vole, B: Apodemus genus, C: Microtinae/Murinae ratio, D: Trophic level index).

Figure 5 in Diet and reproductive outputs of common barn-owl (Tyto alba) during the common vole (Microtus arvalis) outbreak and crash

Figure 5. GLMM diagrams illustrating the effect of the main and alternative prey taxa and the two derived indices on clutch size (A: Common vole, B–C: Apodemus genus, D–E: Microtinae/Murinae ratio, F: Trophic level index).

Figure 4 in Diet and reproductive outputs of common barn-owl (Tyto alba) during the common vole (Microtus arvalis) outbreak and crash

Figure 4. Box plots of the relative frequency of the main and alternative prey taxa. The bottom and top limits of each box are the lower and upper quartiles; error bars equal ±1.5 times the interquartile range; the horizontal black band within each box is the median; and the red triangle is the mean.

Figure 6 in Diet and reproductive outputs of common barn-owl (Tyto alba) during the common vole (Microtus arvalis) outbreak and crash

Figure 6. GLMM diagrams illustrating the effect of the main and alternative prey taxa and the two derived indices on the number of hatchlings (A: Common vole, B: Apodemus genus, C: Microtinae/Murinae ratio, D: Trophic level index).

Figure 3 in Diet and reproductive outputs of common barn-owl (Tyto alba) during the common vole (Microtus arvalis) outbreak and crash

Figure 3. Rank abundance curves of the prey composition of the common barn-owl in different outbreak and crash years, and cumulative results of these two periods.

Figure 2 in Diet and reproductive outputs of common barn-owl (Tyto alba) during the common vole (Microtus arvalis) outbreak and crash

Figure 2. Box plots of barn owls' breeding parameters (A: clutch size; B: number of hatchlings; C: number of fledglings). The bottom and top limits of each box are the lower and upper quartiles; error bars equal ±1.5 times the interquartile range; the horizontal black band within each box is the median; and the red triangle is the mean.

Figure 1 in Diet and reproductive outputs of common barn-owl (Tyto alba) during the common vole (Microtus arvalis) outbreak and crash

Figure 1. Study area in Baranya County (Hungary), showing the location of sampled nesting pairs (settlements).

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2003View details →

Figure 2 in Endemic and enigmatic: the reproductive biology of Aegla (Crustacea: Anomura: Aeglidae) with observations on sperm structure

Figure 2. Light micrographs of Aegla rostrata Jara, 1977. A, Spermatophoric lobes; B–G, Squash of spermatophoric lobe contents showing spermatozoa (arrowheads) scattered amongst assorted cells (Asterisk in E and G indicate individual spermatozoa with three microtubular arms).

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2003View details →

Figure 1 in Endemic and enigmatic: the reproductive biology of Aegla (Crustacea: Anomura: Aeglidae) with observations on sperm structure

Figure 1. Occurrence of ovigerous females of Aegla species obtained from literature sources and USNM specimens. Total USNM specimens examined = 958 (40 ovigerous females). Symbols: 1 Bahamonde and López (1961); 2 Jara (1989); 3 Bueno and Bond-Buckup (2000); 4 Swiech-Ayoub and Masunari (2001a, 2001b); 5 Rodrigues and Hebling (1978); 6 Jara (1977); 7 Lopéz (1965). Shading = range from literature sources indicated. Solid black bar = number from USNM collection for that month.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2003View details →

Figure 3 in Endemic and enigmatic: the reproductive biology of Aegla (Crustacea: Anomura: Aeglidae) with observations on sperm structure

Figure 3. Transmission electron micrograph of spermatozoon of Aegla longirostri Bond-Buckup and Buckup, 1994 in longitudinal section. Abbreviations: av, acrosome vesicle; cy, cytoplasm; m, mitochondrion; ms, membrane system; mt, microtubular bundle; n, nucleus; p, perforatorial column; pm, periacrosomal material.

FIG. 4. — A, B in New data on the morphology, reproduction and distribution of a freshwater brown alga Porterinema fluviatile (Porter) Waern (Phaeophyceae)

FIG. 4. — A, B, Protoplast division into several parts in apical filament cells resulting in the formation of aplanospores; C, nonmotile aplanospores; D, new thalli developing from aplanospores. Scale bars: 10 µm.

FIG. 2. — A in New data on the morphology, reproduction and distribution of a freshwater brown alga Porterinema fluviatile (Porter) Waern (Phaeophyceae)

FIG. 2. — A, Young filaments composed from elongated vegetative cells with an anastomosis (+) between their filaments. Filament with elongated vegetative cells in the transformation process (+); B, young filaments composed from elongated vegetative cells with plastids; C, D, first phase of the transformation of elongated vegetative cells to inflated vegetative cells. Scale bars: 10 µm.

FIG. 1 in New data on the morphology, reproduction and distribution of a freshwater brown alga Porterinema fluviatile (Porter) Waern (Phaeophyceae)

FIG. 1. — Study area map. Location of the karst limnocrene Mlava Spring and cross section through the siphonal channel.

FIG. 3. — A, B in New data on the morphology, reproduction and distribution of a freshwater brown alga Porterinema fluviatile (Porter) Waern (Phaeophyceae)

FIG. 3. — A, B, Newly formed inflated vegetative cells (ic) with thick walls and a large number of lipid droplets (ld), formation of the approximately oval dark cells (dc) with thick walls, elongated axial cells (eac) of filaments, gradually narrowing to the top; C, D, developing intercalary plurilocular sporangia; E, intercalary plurilocular sporangia on the pedicels. Scale bars: 10 µm.

Fig. 9 in Age, Growth and Reproduction of Coryphaena hippurus (Linnaeus, 1758) in Maltese Waters, Central Mediterranean

Fig. 9: Mean monthly GSI values for male and female dolphinfish categorised as spawners. Error bars represent ± 2 SE.

Fig. 8 in Age, Growth and Reproduction of Coryphaena hippurus (Linnaeus, 1758) in Maltese Waters, Central Mediterranean

Fig. 8: Maturity ogive for male and female dolphinfish collected from Maltese longline and FAD fisheries in the period 2004–2010.

Fig. 7 in Age, Growth and Reproduction of Coryphaena hippurus (Linnaeus, 1758) in Maltese Waters, Central Mediterranean

Fig. 7: Sex ratio for different size classes of dolphinfish from the Maltese FAD fishery in the period 2004–2010.

Fig. 10 in Age, Growth and Reproduction of Coryphaena hippurus (Linnaeus, 1758) in Maltese Waters, Central Mediterranean

Fig. 10: Birthdate distribution for male and female juvenile dolphinfish sampled from the Maltese FAD fishery.

Fig. 5 in Age, Growth and Reproduction of Coryphaena hippurus (Linnaeus, 1758) in Maltese Waters, Central Mediterranean

Fig. 5: Dorsal spine found to be most suitable for measurement and subsequent calculation of the MIR. This was the first of the longest spines in the dorsal fin (arrow) of dolphinfish. Spine numbers within the dorsal fin are indicated. (Scale bar: 3 cm).

Fig. 4 in Age, Growth and Reproduction of Coryphaena hippurus (Linnaeus, 1758) in Maltese Waters, Central Mediterranean

Fig. 4: L-W relationships for male and female dolphinfish sampled from the Maltese longline and FAD fisheries in the period 2004-2010.