Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
41,236
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
41,236 results for “Reviewers”
Fig. 3 in Taxonomic revision of the genus Elmomorphus Sharp, 1888. II. Redescription of the genus and review of the species from India, Nepal, Bhutan, Myanmar, China, Thailand, Laos, Cambodia, and Vietnam (Coleoptera: Dryopidae)
Fig. 3. Details of mouthparts and thorax. A. Elmomorphus brevicornis Sharp, 1888, mentum and submentum. B. E. brevicornis, labium, ventral aspect. C. E. brevicornis, setae in distal portion of ligula. D. E. brevicornis, apical sensory area on terminal labial palpomere. E. E. paramontanus Kodada, Selnekovič & Jäch sp. nov., pronotum. F. E. brevicornis, male head and prosternum. G. E. amamiensis Nomura, 1959, male metaventrite.
Fig. 2 in Taxonomic revision of the genus Elmomorphus Sharp, 1888. II. Redescription of the genus and review of the species from India, Nepal, Bhutan, Myanmar, China, Thailand, Laos, Cambodia, and Vietnam (Coleoptera: Dryopidae)
Fig. 2. Details of antennae and mouthparts. A. Elmomorphus brevicornis Sharp, 1888, left antenna, dorsal aspect. B. Same, frontal aspect. C. E. brevicornis, lacinia. D. E. brevicornis, right mandible, dorsal aspect. E. E. brevicornis, left mandible, ventral aspect. F. E. paramontanus Kodada, Selnekovič & Jäch sp. nov., lateral sensory area on terminal maxillary palpomere. G. E. paramontanus, maxilla, ventral aspect. H. Same, dorsal aspect. I. E. paramontanus, apical sensory area on terminal maxillary palpomere. J. E. paramontanus, basal sensory area on terminal maxillary palpomere.
Fig. 1 in Taxonomic revision of the genus Elmomorphus Sharp, 1888. II. Redescription of the genus and review of the species from India, Nepal, Bhutan, Myanmar, China, Thailand, Laos, Cambodia, and Vietnam (Coleoptera: Dryopidae)
Fig. 1. Details of head. A. Elmomorphus brevicornis Sharp, 1888, male head. B. E. paramontanus Kodada, Selnekovič & Jäch sp. nov., labrum, dorsal aspect. C. E. paramontanus, labrum, ventral aspect. D. E. brevicornis, head, ventral aspect. E. E. paramontanus, medio-anterior portion of labrum in ventral aspect with flat setae. F. E. paramontanus, head, ventral aspect. G. E. paramontanus, flat papillae with seta on ventral side of labrum.
Fig. 34 in Taxonomic revision of the genus Elmomorphus Sharp, 1888. II. Redescription of the genus and review of the species from India, Nepal, Bhutan, Myanmar, China, Thailand, Laos, Cambodia, and Vietnam (Coleoptera: Dryopidae)
Fig. 34. Elmomorphus ellipticus sp. nov., holotype (IAECAS), aedeagus. A. Lateral aspect. B. Ventral aspect. Scale bar: 0.1 mm.
Fig. 39. A. Elmomorphus prosternalis Hinton, 1935 in Taxonomic revision of the genus Elmomorphus Sharp, 1888. II. Redescription of the genus and review of the species from India, Nepal, Bhutan, Myanmar, China, Thailand, Laos, Cambodia, and Vietnam (Coleoptera: Dryopidae)
Fig. 39. A. Elmomorphus prosternalis Hinton, 1935, holotype (BMNH), prosternal process and median part of metaventrite. B. E. montanus (Grouvelle, 1913), syntype, male (MNHN), prosternal process and median part of metaventrite. C. E. montanus, syntype (MNHN), aedeagus, lateral aspect. D. Same, ventral aspect, detail of parameres and penis. E. Same, ventral aspect. Scale bars: 0.1 mm.
Fig. 20 in Taxonomic revision of the genus Elmomorphus Sharp, 1888. II. Redescription of the genus and review of the species from India, Nepal, Bhutan, Myanmar, China, Thailand, Laos, Cambodia, and Vietnam (Coleoptera: Dryopidae)
Fig. 20. Elmomorphus fusiformis sp. nov., paratype from type locality (CKB), aedeagus. A. Lateral aspect. B. Ventral aspect. Scale bar: 0.1 mm.
Fig. 36 in Taxonomic revision of the genus Elmomorphus Sharp, 1888. II. Redescription of the genus and review of the species from India, Nepal, Bhutan, Myanmar, China, Thailand, Laos, Cambodia, and Vietnam (Coleoptera: Dryopidae)
Fig. 36. Elmomorphus mazzoldii sp. nov., holotype (NMW), aedeagus. A. Lateral aspect. B. Ventral aspect. Scale bar: 0.1 mm.
Fig. 12. Bursa copulatrix and vagina. A in Taxonomic revision of the genus Elmomorphus Sharp, 1888. II. Redescription of the genus and review of the species from India, Nepal, Bhutan, Myanmar, China, Thailand, Laos, Cambodia, and Vietnam (Coleoptera: Dryopidae)
Fig. 12. Bursa copulatrix and vagina. A. Elmomorphus striatellus Delève, 1968, Cuc Phuong, Vietnam (CKB). B. E. siamensis Kodada, Selnekovič & Jäch sp. nov., paratype, Umphang, Thailand (CKB). C. E. parabrevicornis sp. nov., paratype from type locality (NMW). Scale bar: 0.1 mm.
Fig. 4 in Taxonomic revision of the genus Elmomorphus Sharp, 1888. II. Redescription of the genus and review of the species from India, Nepal, Bhutan, Myanmar, China, Thailand, Laos, Cambodia, and Vietnam (Coleoptera: Dryopidae)
Fig. 4. Details of elytra, legs, and abdomen. A. Elmomorphus paramontanus Kodada, Selnekovič & Jäch sp. nov., stridulatory area on anterolateral ventral surface of elytron. B. E. brevicornis Sharp, 1888, dorsal plastron on elytra (scales). C. E. brevicornis, ventral plastron on abdomen (setae). D. E. brevicornis, dorsal face of left mesofemur. E. E. brevicornis, male foreclaws, lateral aspect. F. E. paramontanus, apex of protibia. G. E. brevicornis, male abdomen, ventral aspect. H. E. brevicornis, apex of male ventrite 5. I. E. paramontanus, apex of female ventrite 5. J. E. amamiensis Nomura, 1959, male ventrite 5.
Fig. 30 in Taxonomic revision of the genus Elmomorphus Sharp, 1888. II. Redescription of the genus and review of the species from India, Nepal, Bhutan, Myanmar, China, Thailand, Laos, Cambodia, and Vietnam (Coleoptera: Dryopidae)
Fig. 30. Elmomorphus sulcatus sp. nov., holotype (IAECAS), aedeagus. A. Lateral aspect. B. Ventral aspect. Scale bar: 0.1 mm.
Fig. 24 in Taxonomic revision of the genus Elmomorphus Sharp, 1888. II. Redescription of the genus and review of the species from India, Nepal, Bhutan, Myanmar, China, Thailand, Laos, Cambodia, and Vietnam (Coleoptera: Dryopidae)
Fig. 24. Elmomorphus calvus sp. nov., holotype (NMW), aedeagus. A. Lateral aspect. B. Ventral aspect. Scale bar: 0.1 mm.
Table 1 in The lower actinopterygian fauna from the Lower Carboniferous Albert shale formation of New Brunswick, Canada - a review of previously described taxa and a description of a new genus and species
<p><b>Table 1.</b> Identities of Jackson’s figured specimens. Plate and figure numbers, past and present museum catalog numbers, Jackson’s (1851a, b) and Lambe’s (1910) identifications, and type status included. Abbreviations: BSNH, Boston Society of Natural History; MCZ, Museum of Comparative Zoology. Genera abbreviated: <i>E.</i>, <i>Elonichthys</i>; <i>P.</i>, <i>Palaeoniscum</i>; <i>R.</i>, <i>Rhadinichthys</i>.</p><table><tbody><tr><th>Plate and fig. no.</th><th>BSNH</th><th>Former</th><th>Current</th><th>Jackson (1851)</th><th>Lambe (1910)</th><th>Type</th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th>Jackson (1851a, b)</th><td>no.</td><td>MCZ no.</td><td>MCZ no.</td><td>ID</td><td>ID</td><td>status</td></tr><tr><th>Plate I, fig. 1</th><td>7899</td><td>1960</td><td>5082</td><td>† <i>P. alberti</i></td><td>† <i>R. alberti</i></td><td>Holotype</td></tr><tr><th>Plate I, fig. 2</th><td>7900</td><td>1961</td><td>5083</td><td>† <i>P. brownii</i></td><td>† <i>E. brownii</i></td><td>Holotype</td></tr><tr><th>Plate I, fig. 3</th><td>7899a</td><td>1956</td><td>5084</td><td>† <i>P. cairnsii</i></td><td>† <i>R. alberti</i></td><td>Holotype † <i>P. cairnsii</i> (Jackson)</td></tr><tr><th>Plate I, fig. 4</th><td>Lost?</td><td>X</td><td>X</td><td>† <i>Palaeoniscus</i> sp.</td><td>† <i>E. brownii</i></td><td>Holotype † <i>P. jacksoni</i> (Dawson)</td></tr><tr><th>Plate I, fig. 5</th><td>7901</td><td>1957</td><td>5085</td><td>Not mentioned</td><td>† <i>E. brownii</i></td><td>Plesiotype</td></tr><tr><th>Plate II, fig. 1</th><td>7902</td><td></td><td>6150</td><td>† <i>Palaeoniscus</i> sp.</td><td>† <i>E. brownii</i></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>Plate II, fig. 2, 2 bis</th><td>7987</td><td>1959</td><td>5086</td><td>† <i>Palaeoniscus</i> sp.</td><td>† <i>R. alberti</i></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>Plate II, fig. 3</th><td>7987a</td><td>1958</td><td>5087</td><td>† <i>Palaeoniscus</i> sp.</td><td>† <i>R. alberti</i></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>Plate II, fig. 4</th><td>Lost?</td><td>X</td><td>X</td><td>Not mentioned</td><td>X</td><td></td></tr><tr><th>Plate II, fig. 5</th><td>7898</td><td></td><td>6151</td><td>Not mentioned</td><td>† <i>R. alberti</i></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>Plate II, fig. 6</th><td>Lost</td><td>X</td><td>X</td><td>X</td><td>X</td><td></td></tr><tr><th>Plate II, fig. 7</th><td>7903</td><td>1953</td><td>5088</td><td>† <i>Palaeoniscus</i> sp.</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>Plate II, fig. 8</th><td>7898a</td><td></td><td>6152</td><td>Not mentioned</td><td>† R. alberti</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>
Table 2 in The lower actinopterygian fauna from the Lower Carboniferous Albert shale formation of New Brunswick, Canada - a review of previously described taxa and a description of a new genus and species
<p><b>Table 2.</b> Identities of Lambe’s (1910) figured specimens. Plate and figure numbers, past and present museum catalog numbers, and identifications included when known. Abbreviations: BSNH, Boston Society of Natural History; MCZ, Museum of Comparative Zoology. Genera abbreviated: <i>E.</i>, † <i>Elonichthys</i>; <i>R.</i>, † <i>Rhadinichthys</i>.</p><table><tbody><tr><th>Plate and fig. no.</th><th>Original</th><th>Former</th><th>Current</th><th>Current</th><th>Lambe (1910)</th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th>Lambe (1910)</th><td>BSNH no.</td><td>MCZ no.</td><td>MCZ no.</td><td>CMN no.</td><td>ID</td></tr><tr><th>Plate III, fig. 1</th><td>?</td><td>?</td><td>?</td><td>?</td><td>† <i>R. alberti</i></td></tr><tr><th>Plate III, fig. 2</th><td>?</td><td>?</td><td>?</td><td>?</td><td>† <i>R. alberti</i></td></tr><tr><th>Plate III, fig. 3</th><td>?</td><td>?</td><td>?</td><td>?</td><td>† <i>R. alberti</i></td></tr><tr><th>Plate III, fig. 4</th><td>7899a</td><td>1956</td><td>5084</td><td>X</td><td>† <i>R. alberti</i></td></tr><tr><th>Plate III, fig. 5</th><td>7987a</td><td>1958</td><td>5087</td><td>X</td><td>† <i>R. alberti</i></td></tr><tr><th>Plate III, fig. 6</th><td>7987a</td><td>1958</td><td>5087</td><td>X</td><td>† <i>R. alberti</i></td></tr><tr><th>Plate IV, fig. 1</th><td>7900</td><td>1961</td><td>5083</td><td>X</td><td>† <i>E. brownii</i></td></tr><tr><th>Plate IV, fig. 2</th><td>7900</td><td>1961</td><td>5083</td><td>X</td><td>† <i>E. brownii</i></td></tr><tr><th>Plate IV, fig. 3</th><td>7902</td><td></td><td>6150</td><td>X</td><td>† <i>E. brownii</i></td></tr><tr><th>Plate IV, fig. 4</th><td>7901</td><td>1957</td><td>5085</td><td>X</td><td>† <i>E. brownii</i></td></tr><tr><th>Plate V, fig. 2, 3, 5, 6</th><td>7900</td><td>1961</td><td>5083</td><td>X</td><td>† <i>E. brownii</i></td></tr><tr><th>Plate V, fig. 4</th><td>7902</td><td></td><td>6150</td><td>X</td><td>† <i>E. brownii</i></td></tr><tr><th>Plate VI, fig. 1</th><td>?</td><td>?</td><td>?</td><td>?</td><td>† <i>E. brownii</i></td></tr><tr><th>Plate VII, fig. 1</th><td>?</td><td>?</td><td>?</td><td>?</td><td>† <i>E. brownii</i></td></tr><tr><th>Plate VIII, fig. 1</th><td>?</td><td>?</td><td>X</td><td>4384</td><td>† <i>E. brownii</i></td></tr><tr><th>Plate IX, fig. 1</th><td>?</td><td>?</td><td>?</td><td>?</td><td>† E. brownii</td></tr></tbody></table>
Tab. 1 in A preliminary review of the fossil species of Ranina Lamarck, 1801 (Decapoda, Brachyura, Raninidae), with systematic remarks
<p>Tab. 1 - List of the <i>Ranina</i> fossil species as revised in this paper.</p><table><tbody><tr><th><b>Species doubtfully attributed to <i>Ranina</i></b></th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th>? <i>Ranina americana</i> Withers, 1924</th><td>Washington State, USA (late Oligocene)</td></tr><tr><th>? <i>Ranina berglundi</i> Squires & Demetrion, 1992</th><td>Baja California Sur, Mexico (early Eocene)</td></tr><tr><th>? <i>Ranina bouilleana</i> A. Milne Edwards, 1872</th><td>Pyrénées Atlantiques, France (early Oligocene); NE Italy (?early Oligocene)</td></tr><tr><th>? <i>Ranina brevispina</i> Lőrenthey, 1898</th><td>Algeria (Miocene, Langhian)</td></tr><tr><th>? <i>Ranina granulosa</i> A. Milne Edwards, 1872</th><td>Gironde, France (Eocene-?Oligocene)</td></tr><tr><th>? <i>Ranina griesbachi</i> Noetling, 1897</th><td>Pakistan (Late Cretaceous, Maastrichtian)</td></tr><tr><th>? <i>Ranina haszlinskyi</i> Reuss, 1859</th><td>Radatice, Slovakia (early Oligocene)</td></tr><tr><th>? <i>Ranina libyca</i> (Van Straelen, 1935)</th><td>Egypt (Paleocene, Danian)</td></tr><tr><th>? <i>Ranina molengraaffi</i> Van Straelen, 1924</th><td>Borneo (Miocene)</td></tr><tr><th>? <i>Ranina oblonga</i> (von Münster, 1840)</th><td>Germany (Oligocene)</td></tr><tr><th>? <i>Ranina ornata</i> De Angeli & Beschin, 2011</th><td>NE Italy (middle Eocene, Lutetian)</td></tr><tr><th>? <i>Ranina speciosa</i> (von Münster, 1840)</th><td>NE Germany (Oligocene) N Italy (late Oligocene-Miocene)</td></tr><tr><th><i>Ranina nomina dubia</i></th></tr><tr><th><i>Ranina elegans</i> (Rathbun, 1945)</th><td>Fiji (Miocene)</td></tr><tr><th><i>Ranina hirsuta</i> Schafhäutl, 1863</th><td>S Germany (middle Eocene)</td></tr><tr><th><i>Ranina lamiensis</i> Rathbun, 1945</th><td>Vitilevu Island, Fiji (Neogene)</td></tr><tr><th><i>Ranina tejoniana</i> Rathbun, 1926</th><td>California, USA (Paleogene, Eocene series)</td></tr><tr><th><b>Species attributed to other raninid genus</b></th></tr><tr><th><i>Lophoranina bavarica</i> (Ebert, 1887) n. comb.</th><td>S Germany (Eocene)</td></tr><tr><th><i>Lophoranina fabri</i> (Schafhäutl, 1863) n. comb.</th><td>S Germany (middle Eocene)</td></tr><tr><th><i>Lophoranina helii</i> (Schafhäutl, 1863) n. comb.</th><td>S Germany (middle Eocene)</td></tr><tr><th><b>Species attributed to other crustacean families</b></th></tr><tr><th><i>Calappa cuspidata</i> (Guppy, 1909) n. comb.</th><td>Trinidad Island, Antilles (early Miocene)</td></tr><tr><th><b>Doubtful species of Decapoda</b></th></tr><tr><th><i>Ranina burleighensis</i> Holland <i>in</i> Holland & Cvancara, 1958</th><td>North Dakota, USA (Paleocene)</td></tr><tr><th><b>Possible valid species of <i>Ranina</i></b></th></tr><tr><th><i>Ranina palmea</i> E. Sismonda, 1846</th><td>N Italy (middle Miocene, Serravallian)</td></tr><tr><th><i>Ranina pellattieroi</i> De Angeli & Beschin, 2011</th><td>N Italy (early Miocene)</td></tr><tr><th><i>Ranina propinqua</i> Ristori, 1891</th><td>Central Italy (early Pleistocene, Gelasian-Calabrian); S Italy (late Pleistocene, Tirrenian)</td></tr><tr><th><i>Ranina ranina</i> (Linnaeus, 1758)</th><td>Ryukyu Island, Japan (late Pleistocene)</td></tr></tbody></table>
Table 2 in Catching carp: a review of bigheaded carp capture strategies
<p><b>Table 2.</b> Summary of active and passive fisheries gears used to capture bigheaded carp (<i>Hypophthalmichthys</i> spp.) across larval, juvenile, and adult life stages. Catches reflect body sizes (mm; minimum–maximum), catch-per-unit-effort (CPUE), minimum and maximum CPUEs, and the relative standard error (RSE). CPUEs were calculated from pooled data set means. Whenever only one data set was available, the mean CPUE was reported. See Table 1 for gear characteristics.</p><table><tbody><tr><th>Species</th><th>Type</th><th>Gear</th><th>Unit of effort</th><th>Length (min–max)</th><th>CPUE</th><th>CPUE(min-max)</th><th>RSE</th><th>Ref.*</th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th>Silver Carp</th><td>Active</td><td>Cast net</td><td>Fish per sample</td><td>96–160</td><td>0.03</td><td>0.03 – 0.03</td><td>–</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>EF–AC</td><td>Fish per hour</td><td>20–890</td><td>16.6</td><td>16.6–16.6</td><td>–</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>EF–DC</td><td>Fish per hour</td><td>1–1140</td><td>17.6</td><td>0.00–475.9</td><td>27</td><td>1:14,34</td></tr><tr><td>Gill net–driven</td><td>Fish per 182 m of net</td><td>310–1036</td><td>3.7</td><td>0.00–83.7</td><td>56</td><td>5,13,15</td></tr><tr><td>Gill/trammel–driven</td><td>Fish per 182 m of net</td><td>352–1000</td><td>37.5</td><td>26.0–72.9</td><td>25</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>Trammel net–driven</td><td>Fish per 182 m of net</td><td>527–933</td><td>41.6</td><td>11.5–69.9</td><td>29</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>Hydroacoustics</td><td>Fish captured per 100 m3 of water</td><td>400–1120</td><td>1.8</td><td>0.2–3.6</td><td>37</td><td>16:18</td></tr><tr><td>Seine–beach</td><td>Fish per sample</td><td>25–67</td><td>0.04</td><td>0.0–99.5</td><td>66</td><td>3, 6</td></tr><tr><td>Seine–contracted</td><td>Fish per sample</td><td>356–980</td><td>164.2</td><td>0.0–1140.5</td><td>60</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>Seine–purse</td><td>Fish per sample</td><td>–</td><td>7.3</td><td>0.6–14.0</td><td>92</td><td>6</td></tr><tr><td>Trawl</td><td>Fish per sample</td><td>10–570</td><td>0.0</td><td>0.0–0.0</td><td>–</td><td>3</td></tr><tr><td>Trawl–Dozer</td><td>Fish per hour</td><td>10–869</td><td>70.9</td><td>58.7–336.8</td><td>58</td><td>9, 10</td></tr><tr><td>Trawl–Paupier</td><td>Fish per hour</td><td>200–960</td><td>64.7</td><td>7.0–209.2</td><td>52</td><td>9, 10, 19</td></tr><tr><td>Passive</td><td>Fyke net</td><td>Fish per net night</td><td>130–837</td><td>0.04</td><td>0.0–0.3</td><td>43</td><td>3, 21</td></tr><tr><td>Gill net</td><td>Fish per 182 m of net</td><td>320–1052</td><td>0.25</td><td>0.0–20.8</td><td>49</td><td>1,3,6,8,14,15,34</td></tr><tr><td>Trammel net</td><td>Fish per 182 m of net</td><td>500–900</td><td>0.06</td><td>0.0–0.1</td><td>80</td><td>3, 14, 23</td></tr><tr><td>Hoop net</td><td>Fish per net night</td><td>180–941</td><td>0.03</td><td>0.0–8.5</td><td>60</td><td>1,3,5,11,12,14,2 1,</td></tr><tr><td>Minnow trap</td><td>Fish per net night</td><td>–</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.0–0.0</td><td>–</td><td>11</td></tr><tr><td>Mini fyke</td><td>Fish per net night</td><td>1–640</td><td>10.9</td><td>0.0–604.9</td><td>58</td><td>3,6,8,11,14</td></tr><tr><td>Pound net</td><td>Fish per net night</td><td>662–1010</td><td>19.5</td><td>2.9–38.9</td><td>45</td><td>5, 21</td></tr><tr><td>Stop log net</td><td>Fish per net night</td><td>–</td><td>0.9</td><td>0.9–0.9</td><td>–</td><td>23</td></tr><tr><th>Bighead Carp</th><td>Active</td><td>Cast net</td><td>Fish per sample</td><td>–</td><td>0.00</td><td>0.0–0.0</td><td>–</td><td>24</td></tr><tr><td>EF–AC</td><td>Fish per hour</td><td>183–859</td><td>0.02</td><td>0.2–0.2</td><td>–</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>EF–DC</td><td>Fish per hour</td><td>1–1140</td><td>0.08</td><td>0.0–2.3</td><td>39</td><td>2,3,4,7,8,11,14,2 4,25, 34</td></tr><tr><td>Gill net</td><td>Fish per 182 m of net</td><td>397–2039</td><td>0.4</td><td>0.0–5.0</td><td>57</td><td>5,15,25</td></tr><tr><td>Gill/trammel</td><td>Fish per 182 m of net</td><td>252–1800</td><td>2.0</td><td>0.1–4.0</td><td>57</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>Trammel</td><td>Fish per 182 m of net</td><td>1045–1103</td><td>1.4</td><td>0.2–2.9</td><td>53</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>Hydroacoustic</td><td>Fish captured per 100 m3 of water</td><td>400–1200</td><td>0.3</td><td>0.1–0.9</td><td>50</td><td>17,18</td></tr><tr><td>Seine–beach</td><td>Fish per sample</td><td>10–170</td><td>0.3</td><td>0.0–4.17</td><td>72</td><td>5,26</td></tr><tr><td>Seine–contracted</td><td>Fish per sample</td><td>503–1220</td><td>6.3</td><td>0.0–63.9</td><td>59</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>Trawl</td><td>Fish per sample</td><td>710–710</td><td>0.0</td><td>0.0–0.1</td><td>–</td><td>3</td></tr><tr><td>Passive</td><td>Fyke net</td><td>Fish per net night</td><td>100–922</td><td>0.1</td><td>0.0–1.0</td><td>41</td><td>3,21</td></tr><tr><td>Gill net</td><td>Fish per 182 m of net</td><td>1072–1323</td><td>0.2</td><td>0.0–0.4</td><td>28</td><td>3,8,14,15,24,34</td></tr><tr><td>Trammel net</td><td>Fish per 182 m of net</td><td>480–1200</td><td>0.4</td><td>0.0–0.7</td><td>97</td><td>3,22</td></tr><tr><td>Hoop net</td><td>Fish per net night</td><td>1200–1385</td><td>0.02</td><td>0.0–0.7</td><td>30</td><td>3,5,24,21,11,14</td></tr><tr><td>Minnow trap</td><td>Fish per net night</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>11</td></tr><tr><td>Mini fyke</td><td>Fish per net night</td><td>1–800</td><td>0.2</td><td>0.0–1.6</td><td>37</td><td>3,8,11,14</td></tr><tr><td>Pound net</td><td>Fish per net night</td><td>517–1141</td><td>2.6</td><td>0.0–13.0</td><td>64</td><td>5,21</td></tr><tr><td>Stop log net</td><td>Fish per net night</td><td>–</td><td>0.4</td><td>0.4–0.4</td><td>–</td><td>23</td></tr><tr><th>Bigheaded Carp</th><td>Active</td><td>Bongo net</td><td>Fish captured per 100 m3 of water</td><td>–</td><td>0.8</td><td>0.0–261.6</td><td>82</td><td>27, 28, 29</td></tr><tr><td>Push net</td><td>Fish captured per 100 m3 of water</td><td>3–32</td><td>4.2</td><td>0.2–1335.1</td><td>94</td><td>30, 31</td></tr><tr><td>Hydroacoustic</td><td>Fish captured per 100 m3 of water</td><td>400–1200</td><td>0.2</td><td>0.4–261.6</td><td>39</td><td>17, 32</td></tr><tr><td>Passive</td><td>Driftnet</td><td>Fish captured per 100 m3 of water</td><td>3–8</td><td>0.4</td><td>0.0–0.9</td><td>54</td><td>30, 31</td></tr><tr><td>Light trap</td><td>Fish per net night</td><td>6–35</td><td>9.06</td><td>0.0–9.1</td><td>100</td><td>31,33</td></tr></tbody></table><p>*References: (1) Ridgway and Bettoli 2017; (2) DeBoer et al. <i>unpublished data</i>; (3) LTRMP 2020; (4) ORSANCO 2020; (5) ICMRWG 2020; (6) Collins et al. 2017; (7) Bouska et al. 2017; (8) Eggleton et al. 2010; (9) Hammen et al. 2019; (10) Hammen et al. <i>unpublished data</i>; (11) Hayer et al. 2014; (12) Stuck et al. 2015; (13) Sullivan et al. 2017; (14) Wanner and Klumb 2009; (15) Butler et al. 2018; (16) Coulter et al. 2019; (17) MacNamara et al. 2016; (18) MacNamara et al. 2018; (19) Ridgway et al. 2020; (21) Collins et al. 2015; (22) Williamson and Garvey 2005; (23) Schultz et al. 2007; (24) Ridgway 2016; (25) Sullivan 2016; (26) Lohmeyer and Garvey 2008; (27) DeGrandchamp et al. 2007; (28) Deters et al. 2013; (29) Schrank et al. 2001; (30) Schaick et al. 2023; (31) Roth et al. 2023; (32) Coulter et al. 2018; (33) La Hood et al. <i>unpublished data</i>; (34) Morris et al. unpublished data.</p>
Figure 1 in Taxonomic status of the Western Hemispingus Sphenopsis ochracea (Thraupidae) and a review of species limits in the genus Sphenopsis P. L. Sclater, 1861
Figure 1. Lateral view of SMF 58282, the only surviving syntype of Sphenopsis ochracea (von Berlepsch & Taczanowski, 1884), collected by Siemiradzki at Chaguarpata, Chimborazo, Ecuador, on 5 March 1883. The original field label reads: 'Hemispingus? / ♀? / Chaguarpata (5700') [= 1,737 m] / 5/III 83 / Siemiradzki'. The identification on the secondary (Berlepsch) label reads: 'Chlorospingus [in black ink] ochraceus, Berl. & Tacz. [in pencil]', with 'Chloro' crossed out and replaced by 'Hemi' in pencil, and 'melanotis' in pencil (© Gerald Mayr)
TABLE 1 in Taxonomic status of the Western Hemispingus Sphenopsis ochracea (Thraupidae) and a review of species limits in the genus Sphenopsis P. L. Sclater, 1861
<p>TABLE 1 Five alternative taxonomies of the genus <i>Sphenopsis</i> as presented in (from left to right) the present study; eBird/Clements checklist v.2021 (Clements <i>et al</i>. 2021); IOC world bird list v.12.1 (Gill <i>et al</i>. 2021); Howard & Moore v.4 (Dickinson & Christidis 2014); HBW/Birdlife International digital checklist v.6 (HBW & BirdLife International 2021). The South American Checklist Committee (SACC) of the American Ornithological Society (AOS) currently recognises two species (<i>S. melanotis</i>, <i>S. frontalis</i>) in line with eBird/ Clements and Howard & Moore. The ‘linearised’ taxonomic sequence used in this study (see Appendix) was based on Price-Waldman (2019), wherein <i>S. melanotis</i> (<i>sensu lato</i>, as treated by eBird/Clements and Howard & Moore) was reconstructed as paraphyletic. Taxa recognised at species rank within each taxonomy are shown in boldface. Taxa for which study skins were not personally examined in the present study are denoted thus (—).</p><table><thead><tr><th>Present study</th><th>eBird/Clements</th><th>IOC</th><th>Howard & Moore</th><th>HBW/Birdlife</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><th>S. melanotis melanotis</th><td>S. m. melanotis</td><td>S. m. melanotis</td><td>S. m. melanotis</td><td>S. m. melanotis</td></tr><tr><th>S. m. castaneicollis</th><td>S. m. castaneicollis</td><td>S. m. castaneicollis</td><td>S. m. castaneicollis</td><td>S. m. castaneicollis</td></tr><tr><th>S. frontalis frontalis</th><td>S. f. frontalis</td><td>S. f. frontalis</td><td>S. f. frontalis</td><td>S. f. frontalis</td></tr><tr><th>S. f. hanieli</th><td>S. f. hanieli</td><td>S. f. hanieli</td><td>S. f. hanieli</td><td>S. f. hanieli</td></tr><tr><th>—</th><td>S. f. ignobilis</td><td>S. f. ignobilis</td><td>S. f. ignobilis</td><td>S. f. ignobilis</td></tr><tr><th>—</th><td>S. f. flavidorsalis</td><td>S. f. flavidorsalis</td><td>S. f. flavidorsalis</td><td>S. f. flavidorsalis</td></tr><tr><th>—</th><td>S. f. iterata</td><td>S. f. iterata</td><td>S. f. iterata</td><td>S. f. iterata</td></tr><tr><th><i>S. piurae</i></th><td>S. m. piurae</td><td><i>S. p. piurae</i></td><td>S. m. piurae</td><td>S. p. piurae</td></tr><tr><th>S. ochracea</th><td>S. m. ochracea</td><td><i>S. ochracea</i></td><td>S. m. ochracea</td><td><i>S. ochracea</i></td></tr><tr><th>—</th><td>S. m. berlepschi</td><td>S. m. berlepschi</td><td>S. m. berlepschi</td><td>S. m. berlepschi</td></tr><tr><th>—</th><td>S. m. macrophrys</td><td>S. p. macrophrys</td><td>S. m. macrophrys</td><td>S. p. macrophrys</td></tr></tbody></table>
TABLE 2 in Taxonomic status of the Western Hemispingus Sphenopsis ochracea (Thraupidae) and a review of species limits in the genus Sphenopsis P. L. Sclater, 1861
<p>TABLE 2 Plumage colour of species in the genus <i>Sphenopsis</i>, scored using study skins (<i>n</i> = 43) in the Academy of Natural Sciences of Drexel University, Philadelphia (ANSP) and Delaware Museum of Nature & Science, Greenville (DMNH) collections (see Appendix for lists of specimens examined). The codes ‘tail-D’ and ‘tail-V’ denote the dorsal and ventral surface of the tail, respectively. Numbers are taken from Smithe (1975): (18) Orange Yellow; (23) Raw Umber; (28) Olive-Brown; (49) Greenish Olive; (51) Citrine; (82) Blackish Neutral Gray; (83) Dark Neutral Gray; (89) Jet Black; (119A) Hair Brown; (121) Vandyke Brown; (121A) Prout’s Brown; (123A) Cinnamon; (123B) Clay Color; (123C) Yellow Ocher; (124) Buff; (129) Dark Brownish Olive; (136) Raw Sienna; (223D) Tawny Olive.</p><table><thead><tr><th>Species</th><th>Crown</th><th>Back</th><th>Tail-D</th><th>Tail-V</th><th>Throat</th><th>Breast</th><th>Belly</th><th>Vent</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><th><i>S. melanotis melanotis</i></th><td>833</td><td>837</td><td>283</td><td>23</td><td>123A</td><td>123A</td><td>124</td><td>123A</td></tr><tr><th><i>S. m. castaneicollis</i></th><td>82</td><td>837</td><td>283</td><td>28</td><td>893</td><td>136</td><td>124</td><td>1364</td></tr><tr><th><i>S. frontalis frontalis</i></th><td>491,3,5</td><td>493</td><td>283</td><td>28</td><td>186</td><td>515</td><td>515</td><td>515</td></tr><tr><th><i>S. f. hanieli</i></th><td>493</td><td>491,3</td><td>283</td><td>28</td><td>123C 4</td><td>123B</td><td>123B</td><td>123A</td></tr><tr><th><i>S. piurae</i></th><td>893</td><td>119A</td><td>283</td><td>284</td><td>893</td><td>136</td><td>1364</td><td>1364</td></tr><tr><th><i>S. ochracea</i></th><td>831</td><td>1292</td><td>283</td><td>28</td><td>223D</td><td>123B 3</td><td>223D</td><td>123A</td></tr></tbody></table><p><sup>1</sup> slightly browner <sup>5</sup> slightly more yellow <sup>2</sup> slightly lighter and more olive <sup>6</sup> slightly duller, less bright <sup>3</sup> slightly darker <sup>7</sup> slightly more olive <sup>4</sup> slightly lighter</p>
Appendix for Review Paper Entitled: "A literature review of "lawful" text and data mining."
<p>This appendix complements the review paper entitled ““A literature review of “lawful” text and data mining” with 8 Tables highlighting which scholarly works were used for each section of the literature review, but also how those works were used.</p>
Supplementary data for "a systematic literature review on design for testability approaches in software systems" paper
<p>The Microsoft Excel files containing the supplementary data and diagrams for the paper:</p> <p><strong>A systematic literature review on design for testability approaches in software systems</strong></p> <p>The article is under review in the ACM Computing Surveys.</p> <p> </p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.