Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 15. Orthotylus spp. Male genitalia. A–D in Description of One New Species of Chileria and Three New Species of Orthotylus, with Nomenclatural and Distributional Notes on Neotropical Orthotylinae (Heteroptera: Miridae: Orthotylini)

Fig. 15. Orthotylus spp. Male genitalia. A–D. Phallotheca; arrow in D points to dorsal process on right margin. E–H. Dorsal process of left paramere, medial view. I–L. Genital capsule, lateral right view; arrow indicate processes on aperture margin.

Fig. 14. Orthotylus spp. Male genitalia. A–D. Vesica. A in Description of One New Species of Chileria and Three New Species of Orthotylus, with Nomenclatural and Distributional Notes on Neotropical Orthotylinae (Heteroptera: Miridae: Orthotylini)

Fig. 14. Orthotylus spp. Male genitalia. A–D. Vesica. A. The small arrow indicates variation at apex of right spicule; the large arrow points to the anterior portion of basal rami; B. outline drawing shows variation at apex of left spicule. E–H. Right and left parameres, in lateral and apical, and dorsal views respectively. E, F. Variation among right parameres. H. Arrow shows elevated dorsal ridge.

Fig. 13 in Description of One New Species of Chileria and Three New Species of Orthotylus, with Nomenclatural and Distributional Notes on Neotropical Orthotylinae (Heteroptera: Miridae: Orthotylini)

Fig. 13. Hyporhinocoris fratruelis. Male genitalia: aedeagus in lateral and dorsal views; vesica extended showing detail of secondary gonopore, ventrolateral and dorsal views; right paramere, dorsal view; left paramere, dorsal and lateral left views; genital capsule, posterior and dorsal views; and detail of apex of genital capsule, ventral view. Black arrow points to sensory lobe of left paramere. White arrows point to medial, ventral process of genital capsule.

Fig. 12 in Description of One New Species of Chileria and Three New Species of Orthotylus, with Nomenclatural and Distributional Notes on Neotropical Orthotylinae (Heteroptera: Miridae: Orthotylini)

Fig. 12. Hyporhinocoris fratruelis, male (AMNH_PBI 00194890). SEM of selected structures. A. Mesothoracic spiracle and metathoracic scent gland evaporative area. B. Vestiture on hemelytron, with detail of sericeous setae on the inset. C–D. Pretarsus in dorsal and ventral views respectively.

Fig. 10 in Description of One New Species of Chileria and Three New Species of Orthotylus, with Nomenclatural and Distributional Notes on Neotropical Orthotylinae (Heteroptera: Miridae: Orthotylini)

Fig. 10. Hadronemella argentina. Female genitalia: sclerotized rings on dorsal labiate plate, dorsal view; posterior wall with dorsal lobes of interramal sclerites in dorsal view, interramal sclerite dashed; and subgenital plate, ventral view. Arrow on posterior wall indicates anterior sclerotized prolongation of medial margin of second gonapophysis.

Fig. 11 in Description of One New Species of Chileria and Three New Species of Orthotylus, with Nomenclatural and Distributional Notes on Neotropical Orthotylinae (Heteroptera: Miridae: Orthotylini)

Fig. 11. Hyporhinocoris fratruelis (AMNH_PBI 00194890, male; AMNH_PBI 00194910, female). SEM of selected structures. A. Head in lateral view, male. B. Head in dorsolateral view, male. C. Head in lateral view, female. D. Head in dorsolateral view, female. E. Genital capsule, posterior view. F. Genital capsule, lateral left view. Arrow points to medial, ventral process.

Fig. 3 in Description of One New Species of Chileria and Three New Species of Orthotylus, with Nomenclatural and Distributional Notes on Neotropical Orthotylinae (Heteroptera: Miridae: Orthotylini)

Fig. 3. Biobiocoris setosus. Male genitalia: aedeagus of two specimens in lateral left view showing vesica variation; left paramere; right paramere; genital capsule; and phallotheca in dorsal view.

Fig. 5 in Description of One New Species of Chileria and Three New Species of Orthotylus, with Nomenclatural and Distributional Notes on Neotropical Orthotylinae (Heteroptera: Miridae: Orthotylini)

Fig. 5. Chileria andina (AMNH_PBI 00195132). SEM of selected structures. A. Head, lateral view. B. Mesothoracic spiracle and metathoracic scent gland evaporative area. C. Pretarsus, apical view. D. Vestiture on hemelytron, with detail of sericeous setae on the inset. E. Genital capsule, ventroposterior view; arrow points to dorsal process; detail of lateral left dorsal process on the inset. F. Genital capsule, lateral view.

Fig. 8 in Description of One New Species of Chileria and Three New Species of Orthotylus, with Nomenclatural and Distributional Notes on Neotropical Orthotylinae (Heteroptera: Miridae: Orthotylini)

Fig. 8. Chileria pamparum. Male genitalia: vesica; genital capsule and parameres in situ; genital capsule without parameres, posterior view; left and right paramere, posterior view; and phallotheca.

Fig. 1 in Description of One New Species of Chileria and Three New Species of Orthotylus, with Nomenclatural and Distributional Notes on Neotropical Orthotylinae (Heteroptera: Miridae: Orthotylini)

Fig. 1. Dorsal habitus digital photographs. Biobiocoris setosus, Chileria andina, C. araucana, C. colla, C. pamparum, Hadronemella argentina, and Hyporhinocoris fratruelis. Specimens of H. fratruelis (A–D) show color and total length variation among males and females.

Fig. 7. Chileria araucana and C in Description of One New Species of Chileria and Three New Species of Orthotylus, with Nomenclatural and Distributional Notes on Neotropical Orthotylinae (Heteroptera: Miridae: Orthotylini)

Fig. 7. Chileria araucana and C. colla. Male genitalia: vesica; genital capsule and parameres in situ; and phallotheca. C. araucana specimen (paratype) is teneral. The gray arrow on C. colla indicates where variation in serration on the short (lateral) portion of the anteriorly directed ramus occurs. Black arrow indicates position of longer (medial) portion of ramus in paratype, and dotted line indicates usual position of this portion of the ramus in other specimens.

Fig. 2. Dorsal habitus digital photographs. Orthotylus chilensis, O. chullan, O. kikin, O. kakan, O in Description of One New Species of Chileria and Three New Species of Orthotylus, with Nomenclatural and Distributional Notes on Neotropical Orthotylinae (Heteroptera: Miridae: Orthotylini)

Fig. 2. Dorsal habitus digital photographs. Orthotylus chilensis, O. chullan, O. kikin, O. kakan, O. tafoensis, and Saileria bella. Specimens of O. kikin (A–C, arrows) show variation on embolium coloration from brown to white.

Figure 5 in Three ways to distinguish species: using behavioural, ecological, and molecular data to tell apart two closely related ants, Camponotus renggeri and Camponotus rufipes (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)

Figure 5. Box plots of Kimura two-parameter (K2P) distance of 672 bp cytochrome c oxidase subunit I sequences within and between Camponotus renggeri and Camponotus rufipes. Boxes indicate interquartile range (upper line, quartile 3; lower line, quartile 1). Horizontal lines with boxes indicate median and whiskers the minimum and the maximum values. Outliers are shown as individual circles.

Figure 4 in Three ways to distinguish species: using behavioural, ecological, and molecular data to tell apart two closely related ants, Camponotus renggeri and Camponotus rufipes (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)

Figure 4. Genetic structure analyses of Camponotus renggeri (yellow) and Camponotus rufipes (red) workers from Mogi- Guaçu (Brazil), using microsatellites. A, model-based assignment of individuals to the most likely number of clusters (K = 2) using STRUCTURE software. B, model-based assignment of individuals to different classes of hybrids or 'pure' species. Each individual is represented by a vertical line and the colours indicate the probability of the individual being assigned to a group in (A), or a hybrid or 'pure species' class in (B). C, scatterplot of the model-free principal coordinates analysis considering the two first principal coordinates (PCo1 and 2).

Figure 2 in Three ways to distinguish species: using behavioural, ecological, and molecular data to tell apart two closely related ants, Camponotus renggeri and Camponotus rufipes (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)

Figure 2. Main vegetation physiognomies of the cerrado reserve at Mogi-Guaçu, Brazil. Cerrado sensu stricto consists of a dense scrub of shrubs and trees and a fair amount of herbaceous vegetation, whereas the cerradão is a closed woodland with a reduced ground layer. Nests of Camponotus renggeri (N = 46) were found in cerrado sensu stricto (22%) and cerradão (78%), whereas Camponotus rufipes (N = 40) occurred only in cerrado sensu stricto. Drawing by L. Mota.

Figure 1 in Three ways to distinguish species: using behavioural, ecological, and molecular data to tell apart two closely related ants, Camponotus renggeri and Camponotus rufipes (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)

Figure 1. Workers of (A) Camponotus renggeri and (B) Camponotus rufipes. The two species are usually differentiated in the field by nuances in the integument colour (C. renggeri is shiny; C. rufipes is matte), and colour of the legs (yellowish in C. renggeri; reddish in C. rufipes). Photographs courtesy of L. Mota.

Figure 6 in Three ways to distinguish species: using behavioural, ecological, and molecular data to tell apart two closely related ants, Camponotus renggeri and Camponotus rufipes (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)

Figure 6. Analyses of the cytochrome c oxidase subunit I haplotypes of Camponotus renggeri (yellow) and Camponotus rufipes (red). A, neighbour-joining tree constructed with Kimura two-parameter distances between C. renggeri and C. rufipes with bootstrap support values based on 10 000 replications indicated on each branch. B, median-joining network amongst the obtained haplotypes. Values on the branches represent the numbers of mutational steps distinguishing the haplotypes, represented as circles whose areas are proportional to the number of individuals with that haplotype.

Figure 3 in Three ways to distinguish species: using behavioural, ecological, and molecular data to tell apart two closely related ants, Camponotus renggeri and Camponotus rufipes (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)

Figure 3. Frequency distribution of nest categories in Camponotus renggeri and Camponotus rufipes in the cerrado reserve at Mogi-Guaçu, Brazil. The species differed in the structure and building materials used for nesting.

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2021View details →

Fig. 3 in A review of the New Zealand Berosus (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae) with descriptions of three new species

Fig. 3. Distribution and habitats of Berosus in New Zealand. A–D. Maps of examined specimens. E–H. Habitat photos of collection sited. E – shore of Lake Roundabout in Mid Canterbury, type locality of B. halasi sp. nov.; F – isolated rocky pools along Boyle River at Windy Point in North Canterbury, type locality of B. maru sp. nov.; G – pool at Wanaka Mount Aspiring Road in Otago Lakes, locality of B. pallidipennis (Sharp, 1884); H – exposed puddles in riverbed of Kahutara River at Inland Kaikoura Road in Kaikoura, locality of B. pallidipennis.