Find research datasets worth reusing

FIGURE 2. Tylencholaimellus striatus Thorne, 1939. A in Description of two new and two known species of the Genus Tylencholaimellus Cobb in M. V. Cobb, 1915 (Nematoda: Dorylaimida: Tylencholaimoidea)

FIGURE 2. Tylencholaimellus striatus Thorne, 1939. A. Anterior region; B. Anterior end showing amphid; C. Pharyngeal bulb; D. Pharyngo-intestinal junction; E & F. Female genital system; G. Vulval region; H. Female posterior region. (Scale bar A, B, D, = 10 µm; C, E–H = 20 µm)

FIGURE 5 in Description of two new and two known species of the Genus Tylencholaimellus Cobb in M. V. Cobb, 1915 (Nematoda: Dorylaimida: Tylencholaimoidea)

FIGURE 5. Tylencholaimellus arabicus sp. n. A. Entire female; B. Anterior region; C. Anterior end showing amphid; D. Pharyngeal region; E. Pharyngeal bulb; F. Female genital system; G. Female posterior region.

FIGURE 8 in Description of two new and two known species of the Genus Tylencholaimellus Cobb in M. V. Cobb, 1915 (Nematoda: Dorylaimida: Tylencholaimoidea)

FIGURE 8. Tylencholaimellus masakii sp. n. A & B. Anterior region; C. Anterior end showing amphid; D & E. Pharyngeal bulb; F. Female genital system; G. Vulval region; H. Female posterior region. (Scale bar A–C, G = 10 µm; D–F, H = 20 µm)

FIGURE 1. Tylencholaimellus striatus Thorne, 1939. A in Description of two new and two known species of the Genus Tylencholaimellus Cobb in M. V. Cobb, 1915 (Nematoda: Dorylaimida: Tylencholaimoidea)

FIGURE 1. Tylencholaimellus striatus Thorne, 1939. A. Entire female; B. Anterior region; C. Anterior end showing amphid; D. Pharyngeal region; E. Pharyngeal bulb; F. Female genital system; G. Female posterior region.

FIGURE 4. Tylencholaimellus projectus Siddiqi, 1964. A. & B in Description of two new and two known species of the Genus Tylencholaimellus Cobb in M. V. Cobb, 1915 (Nematoda: Dorylaimida: Tylencholaimoidea)

FIGURE 4. Tylencholaimellus projectus Siddiqi, 1964. A. & B. Anterior region; C. Anterior end showing amphid; D. Pharyngeal bulb; E. Pharyngeal expansion; F. Female genital system; G. Vulval region; H. Female posterior region. I & J. Male posterior region. (Scale bar A–C, E = 10 µm; D, F–J = 20 µm)

Supplementary material 5 from: Trujano-Ortega M, García-Vázquez UO, Callaghan CJ, Ávalos-Hernández O, Luis-Martínez MA, Llorente-Bousquets JE (2018) Two new genera of metalmark butterflies of North and Central America (Lepidoptera, Riodinidae). ZooKeys 729: 61-85. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.729.20179

Maximum likelihood tree of the relationships among Apodemia and selected species in the Riodinidae inferred with gene Elongation factor 1 α (EF-1a). Numbers near branch nodes are bootstrap branch support : Explanation note: Tree infered with Elongation factor 1 α gene.

Supplementary material 4 from: Trujano-Ortega M, García-Vázquez UO, Callaghan CJ, Ávalos-Hernández O, Luis-Martínez MA, Llorente-Bousquets JE (2018) Two new genera of metalmark butterflies of North and Central America (Lepidoptera, Riodinidae). ZooKeys 729: 61-85. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.729.20179

Maximum likelihood tree of the relationships among Apodemia and selected species in the Riodinidae inferred with Wingless (wg). Numbers near branch nodes are bootstrap branch support : Explanation note: Tree infered with Wingless gene.

Supplementary material 6 from: Trujano-Ortega M, García-Vázquez UO, Callaghan CJ, Ávalos-Hernández O, Luis-Martínez MA, Llorente-Bousquets JE (2018) Two new genera of metalmark butterflies of North and Central America (Lepidoptera, Riodinidae). ZooKeys 729: 61-85. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.729.20179

Data of the photographs shown in the Figure 6 : Explanation note: Location data and credits for the images.

Supplementary material 3 from: Trujano-Ortega M, García-Vázquez UO, Callaghan CJ, Ávalos-Hernández O, Luis-Martínez MA, Llorente-Bousquets JE (2018) Two new genera of metalmark butterflies of North and Central America (Lepidoptera, Riodinidae). ZooKeys 729: 61-85. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.729.20179

Maximum likelihood tree of the relationships among Apodemia and selected species in the Riodinidae inferred with Cytochrome Oxidase I (COI). Numbers near branch nodes are bootstrap branch support : Explanation note: Tree infered with Cytochrome Oxidase I gene.

Supplementary material 2 from: Trujano-Ortega M, García-Vázquez UO, Callaghan CJ, Ávalos-Hernández O, Luis-Martínez MA, Llorente-Bousquets JE (2018) Two new genera of metalmark butterflies of North and Central America (Lepidoptera, Riodinidae). ZooKeys 729: 61-85. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.729.20179

Collection and voucher data for Riodinids genetic samples used in this study : Explanation note: Voucher data and GenBank accession numbers of samples used in the molecular analyses. The table is arranged alphabetically by species name and voucher number.

Supplementary material 1 from: Studer A, Cardoso de Sousa M, Barcena Goyena B (2018) Breeding biology and nest success of Short-tailed Antthrush Chamaeza campanisona (Aves: Formicariidae) in the Atlantic rainforest of northeastern Brazil. Zoologia 35: 1-8. https://doi.org/10.3897/zoologia.35.e12906

Nests of Chamaeza campanisona found during the study period (1986–2016) with their respective characteristics : Data type: species data

Supplementary material 1 from: Unterweger PA, Klammer J, Unger M, Betz O (2018) Insect hibernation on urban green land: a winter-adapted mowing regime as a management tool for insect conservation. BioRisk 13: 1-29. https://doi.org/10.3897/biorisk.13.22316

Table with all captured species / morphotypes sorted by order, family and species / morphotype. : Explanation note: Collection: University of Tübingen, Evolutionary Biology of Invertebrates, Auf der Morgenstelle 28, 72076 Tübingen, Germany. Individuals with scientific species name that were checked by a taxonomic expert were counted as taxonomic species (s); all the other determinations were counted as morphotypes (m). Morphotypes are defined by the lowest practical taxonomic level (e.g. Hanula et al. 2009; Kutschbach-Brohl et al. 2010). In some cases, the family or the morphometric body length (in mm, numbers in column C, Mini: smaller than 1 mm) was counted as a morphotype (Daly 1985). In cases for which the determination was not validated by a taxonomic expert, our species determination was checked for plausibility in terms of its geographical occurrence via the Entomofauna Germanica (http://www.colkat.de, 2017.11.06). Alternatively (if no taxonomic name could be found), a classification letter / number was assigned for a morphotype. The provided author name refers to the lowest practical taxonomic level (e.g. Hanula et al. 2009; Kutschbach-Brohl et al. 2010). Validation: name of scientific expert who checked the taxonomic determination. Management type of meadow in autumn: mown /unmown. Plant compartment: flower head, stem, tuft, leaves. All numbers represent total sums of all sample sites over the entire study period. Brown-labelled species names are thought to have hibernated in the soil. Green-labelled species names could only be found in flower heads and stems. Black-labelled species occurred in all plant compartments without any preference for a specific plant compartment.

FIGURE 17. A–M in The freshwater shrimp family Euryrhynchidae Holthuis, 1950 (Crustacea: Decapoda: Caridea) revisited, with a taxonomic revision of the genus Euryrhynchus Miers, 1878

FIGURE 17. A–M, Euryrhynchus amazoniensis Tiefenbacher, 1978: (A–H) male (cl 7.5 mm), Barcelos, Amazonas, Brazil (MZUSP 20014); (I–M) female (cl 5.7 mm) Igarapé Japiina, near Porto Grande, Amapá, Brazil (MZUSP 21431). (A) Right first pleopod, ventral view; (B) Right second pleopod, ventral view; (C) Same, gonopod (endopod) and exopod, dorsal view; (D) Same, lateral view; (E) Same, mesial view; (F) Right third pleopod, ventral view; (G) Right fourth pleopod, ventral view; (H) Right fifth pleopod, ventral view; (I) Right first pleopod, ventral view; (J) Right second pleopod, ventral view; (K) Right third pleopod, ventral view; (L) Right fourth pleopod, ventral view; (M) Right fifth pleopod, ventral view. Distal setae omitted.

FIGURES 9–20 in New or rare Madagascar tiger beetles-17. Description of Pogonostoma (Microstenocera) noheli sp. nov. and redescription of P. (M.) flavomaculatum W. Horn (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae)

FIGURES 9–20. Pogonostoma (Microstenocera) noheli sp. nov. from type locality. 9––head, ♂, HT (SDEI); 10––mandibles, ♂, PT (CCJM); 11––galea with lacinia, ♂, HT; 12–13––labrum: 12––♂, HT; 13––♀, AT (CJVB); 14–20––aedeagi: 14––PT (CCJM); 15––ditto, dorsal view; 16––PT (CJVB); 17––ditto, ventral view; 18–19––PT (CJVB); 20––apex, HT (SDEI). Bars= 1 mm.

FIGURES 1–8 in New or rare Madagascar tiger beetles-17. Description of Pogonostoma (Microstenocera) noheli sp. nov. and redescription of P. (M.) flavomaculatum W. Horn (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae)

FIGURES 1–8. Pogonostoma (Microstenocera) noheli sp. nov. from type locality. 1–2––habitus: 1—♂, HT, 7.3 mm (SDEI); 2—♀, AT, 7.5 mm (CJVB); 3–4––elytron: 3—♂, HT; 4––♀, AT; 5–6––pronotum: 5––♂, HT; 6––♀, AT; 7–8––elytral apices: 7––♂, HT; 8––♀, AT. Bars = 1 mm.

FIGURES 31–44 in New or rare Madagascar tiger beetles-17. Description of Pogonostoma (Microstenocera) noheli sp. nov. and redescription of P. (M.) flavomaculatum W. Horn (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae)

FIGURES 31–44. Pogonostoma (Microstenocera) flavomaculatum W. Horn. 31––head, ♂, Andasibe-Mantadia (CCJM); 32– 33––maxillae: 32––lacinia, ♂, HT (SDEI); 33––lacinia and galea, ♂, Andasibe-Mantadia (CJVB); 34–36––labrum: 34––♂, HT (SDEI); 35––♂, Andasibe-Mantadia (CJVB); 36––♀, ibid. (CMTD); 37–43––aedeagi: 37––ibid., CMTD); 38–– ibid. (CCJM); 39––ditto, ventral view; 40–43––ibid.(CJVB); 44––original labels of HT (SDEI). Bars= 1 mm.

FIGURES 21–30 in New or rare Madagascar tiger beetles-17. Description of Pogonostoma (Microstenocera) noheli sp. nov. and redescription of P. (M.) flavomaculatum W. Horn (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae)

FIGURES 21–30. Pogonostoma (Microstenocera) flavomaculatum W. Horn. 21–22––habitus: 21––♂, HT (SDEI); 22––♂, Andasibe-Mantadia (CMTD); 23–24––elytral apices: 23––♂, ibid. (CCJM); 24––♀, ibid. (CMTD); 25–27––elytron: 25––♂, HT (SDEI); 26––♀, Andasibe-Mantadia (CCJM); 27––♂, apex of right elytron, HT (SDEI); 28–30––pronotum: 28––♀, Andasibe-Mantadia (CMDT); 29––♂, ibid. (CJVB); 30––♂, HT (SDEI). Bars= 1 mm.

opennotspecifiedMar 2018View details →

FIGURES 138–149. Live specimens, Mesabolivar togatus group. 138–139. M in The South American spider genera Mesabolivar and Carapoia (Araneae, Pholcidae): new species and a framework for redrawing generic limits

FIGURES 138–149. Live specimens, Mesabolivar togatus group. 138–139. M. togatus (Keyserling, 1891), males from Sooretama (with Arachnocoris bug; arrow) and Santa Maria Madalena. 140. M. baianus sp. n., male from Serra Bonita. 141– 142. M. similis sp. n., male and female from Morro de Pedra. 143–144. M. buraquinho sp. n., male from Bonito, female from Mata do Buraquinho. 145–146. M. caipora Huber, 2015, male and female from Serra da Itabaiana. 147. M. inmanis sp. n., male from Vargem Alta. 148–149. M. cyaneomaculatus (Keyserling, 1891), males from Penedo.

opennotspecifiedMar 2018View details →

FIGURES 378–389. Live specimens, Mesabolivar iguazu group. 378–379. M in The South American spider genera Mesabolivar and Carapoia (Araneae, Pholcidae): new species and a framework for redrawing generic limits

FIGURES 378–389. Live specimens, Mesabolivar iguazu group. 378–379. M. chapeco sp. n., male and female from Chapecó. 380–381. M. yucuma sp. n., male and female from Turvo. 382–383. M. iguazu Huber, 2000, males from Iguaçú. 384–385. M. charrua Machado et al., 2013, male and female from Serra Geral. 386–387. M. catarinensis sp. n., male and female from Serra Geral. 388–389. M. bicuspis sp. n., male and female from St. Hilaire/Lange.