Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
11,177
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
11,177 results for “identify”
FIGURE 6 in Integrative taxonomy identifies Macrobiotus papei, a new tardigrade species of the Macrobiotus hufelandi complex (Eutardigrada: Macrobiotidae) from the Udzungwa Mountains National Park (Tanzania)
FIGURE 6. Macrobiotus papei sp. nov.—egg seen in PCM: A—midsection; B—surface; C–D—magnification on surface; E—magnification on midsection; F—surface of terminal discs of egg processes. Filled arrowheads indicate thin flexible filaments at the edges of terminal discs on the midsections. A, B and D show the details of a single egg whereas other photos are taken from more than one egg. Scale bars in µm.
FIGURE 3 in Integrative taxonomy identifies Macrobiotus papei, a new tardigrade species of the Macrobiotus hufelandi complex (Eutardigrada: Macrobiotidae) from the Udzungwa Mountains National Park (Tanzania)
FIGURE 3. Macrobiotus papei sp. nov.—buccal apparatus and the oral cavity armature (OCA) seen in PCM (all paratypes): A—dorso-ventral projection of the entire buccal apparatus; B–C oral cavity armature detected in the majority of specimens, i.e. OCA of the patagonicus type (i.e. the second and third band of teeth visible), dorsal (B) and ventral (C) view, respectively; D–E oral cavity armature detected in small specimens, i.e. OCA of the maculatus type (i.e. only the third band of teeth visible), dorsal (D) and ventral (E) view, respectively; F–G—placoid morphology. The arrow indicates pores surrounding mouth opening, flat empty arrowheads indicate the second band of teeth in the oral cavity, filled indented arrowheads indicate the third band of teeth in the oral cavity whereas filled arrowheads indicate faint constrictions in macroplacoids. Scale bars in µm.
FIGURE 2 in Integrative taxonomy identifies Macrobiotus papei, a new tardigrade species of the Macrobiotus hufelandi complex (Eutardigrada: Macrobiotidae) from the Udzungwa Mountains National Park (Tanzania)
FIGURE 2. Macrobiotus papei sp. nov.—cuticular structures on legs: A–B—external granulation on leg II seen in PCM (A) and SEM (B) (paratypes); C–D—a cuticular bulge resembling a pulvinus, faint cuticular fold on the internal surface of leg II with visible muscle attachment seen in PCM (C) and SEM (D) (paratypes); E—two patches of granulation on leg IV (PCM, paratype); F—distal patch of granulation on leg IV (SEM, paratype). Filled, flat arrowheads indicate the cuticular bulge, empty, flat arrowheads indicate the faint cuticular fold under the claws, arrows indicate muscle attachments, whereas filled and empty indented arrowheads indicate proximal and distal patch of granulation on the leg IV respectively. Scale bars in µm.
FIGURES 1–2 in Escalonius, a new subgenus of Calochromus Guérin-Méneville, 1833 identified by the molecular phylogeny of Calochromini (Coleoptera: Lycidae)
FIGURES 1–2. The phylogenetic position of Escalonius subgen. nov. inferred from three-gene maximum likelihood analyses. Numbers at branches indicate bootstrap support values and posterior probabilities. The values under 50% and 0.5 are not shown. The voucher numbers given for each sample provide an access to the sequences deposited in GenBank. 2. Sexually dimorphic Micronychus sp., male and female in copula.
FIGURES 3–12 in Escalonius, a new subgenus of Calochromus Guérin-Méneville, 1833 identified by the molecular phylogeny of Calochromini (Coleoptera: Lycidae)
FIGURES 3–12. Calochromus (Escalonius) amabilis subgen. nov. (3) General appearance; (4) antenna; (5) head; (6) pronotum; (7) male genitalia, lateral view; (8) ditto, dorsal view. C. glaucopterus (9) pronotum; (10) general appearance. (11) male genitalia, lateral view; (12) ditto, dorsal view. Scales: 2–3, 8 = 1 mm; 4–5 = 0.5 mm; 9 = 2.5 mm; 6–7, 11–12 = 0.25 mm.
Novel gene regulatory networks identified in response to nitro-conjugated linoleic acid in human endothelial cells
<p>A distinct transcriptome regulated by NO<sub>2-</sub>CLA was revealed in primary human coronary artery endothelial cells (HCAECs) through RNA sequencing. </p>
FIGURE 14. Consensus tree obtained from a 847 in The identity of some specimens previously (mis)identified as Rhinoleucophenga obesa (Loew) (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in Brazil, based on morphological and molecular data, with implications on distribution
FIGURE 14. Consensus tree obtained from a 847-bp alignment of cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) gene sequences of Rhinoleucophenga specimens. Above the branches, support values by Neighbour-joining (10,000 bootstrap replications) and posterior probabilities values using Bayesian inference (1,000,000 generations), respectively.
FIGURE 13 in The identity of some specimens previously (mis)identified as Rhinoleucophenga obesa (Loew) (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in Brazil, based on morphological and molecular data, with implications on distribution
FIGURE 13. Female terminalia of an typical specimen of R. cantareira from Porto de Galinhas, Pernambuco. a: ventral view; b: spermathecal capsule; c: dorsal view (scale bar 0.1 mm). c: cercus, e: epiproct,h: hypoproct, S6: sternite 6, S7: sternite 7, T6: tergite 6, T7: tergite 7.
FIGURE 12 in The identity of some specimens previously (mis)identified as Rhinoleucophenga obesa (Loew) (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in Brazil, based on morphological and molecular data, with implications on distribution
FIGURE 12. Female terminalia of an typical specimen of Rhinoleucophenga gigantea from Bossoroca, Rio Grande do Sul, previously determined as R. obesa (Poppe et al 2014). a: dorsal view; b: spermathecal capsule; c: ventral view (scale bar 0.1 mm). c: cercus, e: epiproct,h: hypoproct, S7: sternite 7, T6: tergite 6, T7: tergite 7.
FIGURE 11 in The identity of some specimens previously (mis)identified as Rhinoleucophenga obesa (Loew) (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in Brazil, based on morphological and molecular data, with implications on distribution
FIGURE 11. Rhinoleucophenga gigantea, female, typical specimen from São Domingos, Goiás. Terminalia, a: ventral view; b: spermathecal capsule; c: dorsal view (scale bar 0.1 mm). c: cercus, e: epiproct,h: hypoproct, S6: sternite 6, S7: sternite 7, T6: tergite 6.
FIGURE 7 in The identity of some specimens previously (mis)identified as Rhinoleucophenga obesa (Loew) (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in Brazil, based on morphological and molecular data, with implications on distribution
FIGURE 7. Rhinoleucophenga cantareira, typical specimen from Porto de Galinhas, Pernambuco. a: general habitus, dorsal view; b: general habitus, lateral view; c: wing; d: head, frontal view; e: abdomen, dorsal view (scale bar 1.0 mm).
FIGURE 3 in The identity of some specimens previously (mis)identified as Rhinoleucophenga obesa (Loew) (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in Brazil, based on morphological and molecular data, with implications on distribution
FIGURE 3. Rhinoleucophenga cantareira, typical specimen previously determined by C. Malogolowkin (1946) as R. obesa. a: general habitus, lateral view; b: thorax, dorsal view; c: head, frontal view; d: abdomen, dorsal view (scale bar 1.0 mm, except in c: 0.5 mm).
FIGURE 6 in The identity of some specimens previously (mis)identified as Rhinoleucophenga obesa (Loew) (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in Brazil, based on morphological and molecular data, with implications on distribution
FIGURE 6. Rhinoleucophenga gigantea, typical specimen from Bossoroca, Rio Grande do Sul, previously identified as R. obesa (Poppe et al 2014). a: head, frontal view; b: thorax, dorsal view; c: abdomen, dorsal view; d: wing (scale bar 0.5 mm).
FIGURE 1 in The identity of some specimens previously (mis)identified as Rhinoleucophenga obesa (Loew) (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in Brazil, based on morphological and molecular data, with implications on distribution
FIGURE 1. Geopolitical map of South America with localities of Rhinoleucophenga specimens previously determined as R. obesa and re-analyzed in the present paper: (1) Bossoroca (Poppe et al 2014), (2) São Luiz Gonzaga and (3) Cruz Alta (Ho- chmüller et al 2010)—Rio Grande do Sul; (4) Deodoro, Rio de Janeiro (Costa Lima 1935); (5) Salobra, Mato Grosso do Sul (Malogolowkin 1946); (6) Tangará da Serra, Mato Grosso (Blauth & Gottschalk 2007); (7) São Domingos, Goiás (Mata et al 2008) and (8) Porto de Galinhas, Pernambuco (Poppe et al 2017). Note: specimens form localities N° 1, 2, 3 and 7 were here determined as R. gigantea; and the others were here determined as R. cantareira.
FIGURE 2 in The identity of some specimens previously (mis)identified as Rhinoleucophenga obesa (Loew) (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in Brazil, based on morphological and molecular data, with implications on distribution
FIGURE 2. Rhinoleucophenga cantareira, typical specimen previously determined by A. Costa Lima (1935) as R. obesa. a: general habitus, lateral view; b: general habitus, dorsal view; c: head, frontal view (scale bar 1.0 mm).
FIGURE 5 in The identity of some specimens previously (mis)identified as Rhinoleucophenga obesa (Loew) (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in Brazil, based on morphological and molecular data, with implications on distribution
FIGURE 5. Rhinoleucophenga cantareira, female (♀09), typical specimen previously determined by C. Malogolowkin (1946) as R. obesa. Terminalia, a: dorsal view; b: ventral view; c: spermathecal capsule (scale bar 0.1 mm). c: cercus, h: hypoproct, S6: sternite 6, S7: sternite 7, T6: tergite 6, T7: tergite 7.
FIGURE 4 in The identity of some specimens previously (mis)identified as Rhinoleucophenga obesa (Loew) (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in Brazil, based on morphological and molecular data, with implications on distribution
FIGURE 4. Rhinoleucophenga cantareira, male (♂03), typical specimen previously determined by C. Malogolowkin (1946) as R. obesa. Terminalia, a: aedeagus and aedeagal apodeme, dorsal view; b: aedeagus and aedeagal apodeme, lateral view; c: aedeagus, paraphysis and aedeagal apodeme, ventral view; d: epandrium, anterior view (scale bar 0.1 mm). a: aedeagus, aa: aedeagal apodeme, c: cercus, p: prensisetae, pa: paraphysis, s: surstylus.
FIGURE 10 in The identity of some specimens previously (mis)identified as Rhinoleucophenga obesa (Loew) (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in Brazil, based on morphological and molecular data, with implications on distribution
FIGURE 10. Rhinoleucophenga gigantea, male, typical specimen from Bossoroca, Rio Grande do Sul, previously identified as R. obesa (Poppe et al 2014). Terminalia, a: aedeagus and aedeagal apodeme, dorsal view; b: aedeagus and aedeagal apodeme, ventral view; c: epandrium, anterior view (scale bar 0.1 mm). a: aedeagus, aa: aedeagal apodeme, c: cercus, p: prensisetae, s: surstylus.
FIGURE 9 in The identity of some specimens previously (mis)identified as Rhinoleucophenga obesa (Loew) (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in Brazil, based on morphological and molecular data, with implications on distribution
FIGURE 9. Rhinoleucophenga cantareira, male, typical specimen from the Porto de Galinhas, Pernambuco. Terminalia, a: ep- andrium, anterior view b: aedeagus and aedeagal apodeme, ventral view (scale bar 0.1 mm). a: aedeagus, aa: aedeagal apodeme, c: cercus, p: prensisetae, s: surstylus.
FIGURE 8 in The identity of some specimens previously (mis)identified as Rhinoleucophenga obesa (Loew) (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in Brazil, based on morphological and molecular data, with implications on distribution
FIGURE 8. Epandrium of Rhinoleucophenga cantareira specimens from (a) Porto de Galinhas, Pernambuco and (b) Salobra, Mato Grosso do Sul (C. Malogolowkin (1946)); and Rhinoleucophenga gigantea specimens (c–f) from Bossoroca, Rio Grande do Sul. Arrows point to the different curved shape of epandria ventral lobe among the specimens from Bossoroca. Note: specimens c, d and e: sp_3, sp_2 and sp_4, respectively, in the molecular analyzes (see tables 1 and 3).
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.