Skip to main content
Powered by ShareScore

Find research datasets worth reusing

Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.

8,817

datasets available to search

ShareScore release 0.7.1

Reset

Dataset results

8,817 results for “2011”

Learn how ShareScore rates datasets ↗
edi56/100

Monthly fluorescence parallel factor analysis (PARAFAC) components for Shark River Slough, Taylor Slough, and Florida Bay, Everglades National Park (FCE LTER), Florida, USA, April 2011 - ongoing

Dissolved organic matter plays an important role in biogeochemical processes in aquatic environments such as elemental cycling, microbial loop energetics, and the transport of materials across landscapes. Since most of N (> 90%) and P (around 90%) is in the organic form in the oligotrophic subtropical Florida Coastal Everglades (FCE), study of the source and dynamics of dissolved organic matter (DOM) in the ecosystem is crucial for the better understanding of the biogeochemical cycling of nutrients. FCE are composed of estuaries with distinct regions with different biogeochemical processes. Freshwater marsh primarily receives terrestrial input and local autochthonous vegetation production. Mangrove ecotone, nevertheless, is affected by the tidal contributions from Florida Bay and local mangrove production. Florida Bay (FB) is a wedge-shaped shallow oligotrophic estuary which lays south of the Everglades, the bottom of which is covered with a dense biomass of seagrass. The sources of both freshwater and nutrients in FCE are difficult to quantify, owing to the non-point source nature of runoff from the Everglades and the dendritic cross channels in the mangroves. Furthermore, the combination of multiple DOM sources (freshwater marsh vegetation, mangroves, phytoplankton, seagrass, etc.), and the potential seasonal variability of their relative contribution, along with the history of (photo)chemical and microbial diagenetic processing, and complex advective circulation, makes the study of DOM dynamics in FCE particularly difficult using standard schemes of estuarine ecology. Quantitative information of DOM is very useful to investigate the biogeochemical cycling of DOM to a certain degree, however, qualitative information is necessary to better understand the source and dynamics of DOM. Since fluorescence spectroscopic techniques are very sensitive, quick and simple, they have been applied to investigate the fate of DOM in estuaries. Here, we have quantified a series of

openCC (other)Dec 2025View details →
edi56/100

Respiration of Coarse Woody Debris in the Clearcut Site at Harvard Forest in 2011

This study explored the effects of log position and microclimate variability on the rates of coarse woody debris (CWD) respiration. The rates of respiration of downed Norway spruce (Picea abies) logs were repeatedly measured in-situ using an LI-6200 gas analyzer. Treatments included native logs in the clearcut site, native logs in a neighboring mature spruce stand, and logs transferred from the clearcut site to the mature spruce stand.

openCC0Dec 2023View details →
edi56/100

Nonstructural Carbohydrates in Red Maple at Harvard Forest and Bartlett Forest 2011-2012

Nonstructural carbohydrates (NSC) are the primary products of photosynthesis, composed mostly of sugars and starch. Recent studies show that NSC pools in mature trees can be quite large and on average a decade old. Thus, NSC pools integrate years of carbon assimilation and represent significant ecological memory at the whole plant and ecosystem level. However, we know very little about how older stored NSC versus newly assimilated NSC are used to support growth and metabolism, or how available older NSC are to trees during stress or following disturbance. To better understand these potential lags in NSC allocation, we studied mature red maple (Acer rubrum) trees in two New England temperate forests. We determined stemwood concentrations of stored sugars and starch of five trees at each site. Applying the radiocarbon (14C) “bomb spike” approach, we estimated the age of carbon in stemwood NSC, ring cellulose, and bole respiration. We also collected stump sprouts regrowing from a separate set of recently harvested red maple trees at each site, and determined the radiocarbon age of this tissue. Our data show that younger NSC is preferentially used for growth and day-to-day metabolic demands. More recently stored NSC contributes to annual ring growth and metabolism in the dormant season. Older reserves are available to the tree after disturbance (e.g. harvesting).

openCC0Dec 2023View details →
edi56/100

Role of Moose and Deer Browsing in Unharvested Forests of Southern New England since 2011

In the past 25 years, moose have spread south from Vermont and New Hampshire and recolonized their pre-historical range limit in southern New England from which they had been extirpated almost 200 years earlier. Intensive moose browsing in the boreal forest has caused declines in forest density and shifts in species composition in some areas, generating considerable interest and concern among foresters, wildlife managers, and ecologists as to how moose along with white-tailed deer will impact forest regeneration, composition, and diversity in this region. Harvard Forest in collaboration with researchers at the USGS Massachusetts Cooperative Research Unit has initiated a long-term study of the role of moose and deer in SNE forests using experimental exclosures. The design is a randomized block with 3 factors -- full exclosure, partial exclosure, and control plot. Full exclosures exclude both moose and deer but allow access to small mammals such as mice, squirrels, and rabbits. Partial exclosures have a 60cm opening around the bottom perimeter of the fence, which excludes moose but allows access to deer and other small and medium-sized animals. The design enables us to quantify forest composition and structure in areas (1) exposed to moose and deer browsing, (2) protected from moose and deer browsing, and (3) exposed to deer browsing but protected from moose browsing.

openCC0Dec 2023View details →
edi56/100

Radiometric and Meteorological Data from Harvard Forest Barn Tower 2011-2017

To better quantify the seasonal changes in canopy structure and physiological status (e.g. photosynthetic capacity or efficiency), and provide a more rigorous context for interpretation of the camera data, we installed an extensive set of radiometric instruments on the Harvard Forest Barn Tower beginning in 2011. A complete list of sensors is given in the Methods section. Note that these include both broad-band and narrow-band sensors, and sensors with hemispherical, narrow, and multi-angular fields of view.

openCC0Jan 2024View details →
edi56/100

Climate Change Impacts on Forest Biodiversity at Harvard Forest since 2011

Climate change is rapidly transforming forests over much of the globe in ways that are not anticipated by current science. Large-scale forest diebacks, apparently linked to interactions involving drought, warm winters, and other species, are becoming alarmingly frequent. Models of biodiversity and climate have not provided guidance on if/where/when such responses will occur. Instead models often predict potential numbers of extinctions, but these forecasts not are linked in any mechanistic way to the processes that could cause them. Both modeling and field studies rely on aggregate metrics of species presence/absence or relative abundance at regional scales, but climate affects individuals. Aggregation of individual data to the species level, hides or even qualitatively changes climate effects. By sampling and analysis at the individual scale across continental variation in climate, this study can link the individual scale processes to regional responses. This study will exploit existing research sites and the new NEON platform of sites for synthesis of models and data to determine when and where predicting climate impacts on biodiversity is a plausible goal, understand where surprises are likely to occur, and attribute those predictions back to individual tree health and vulnerability to climate risk factors. The study will provide climate vulnerability forecasts for forest biodiversity that are directly linked to the process scale. Our goal is provide probabilistic forecasts for the joint distribution of forest responses to climate change, including growth, reproduction, and mortality risk. For scientists, US Forest Service researchers, and policy makers predictions will anticipate combined risks of increasing drought and longer growing seasons. Methods developed under this project will be disseminated through training workshops for postdoctoral associates at other universities and resource managers.

openCC0Dec 2023View details →
edi56/100

Diurnal Patterns of Cavitation in Red Maple, Paper Birch and White Ash at Harvard Forest 2011-2012

Previous work at Harvard Forest has suggested that woody plants cavitate and re-dissolve embolisms in xylem on a daily basis. Here we investigated the common assumption that severing stems and petioles under water preserves the hydraulic continuity in the xylem conduits opened by the cut when the xylem is under tension. In red maple and white ash, higher PLC in the afternoon occurred when the measurement segment was excised under water at native xylem tensions, but not when xylem tensions were relaxed prior to sample excision. Bench drying vulnerability curves in which measurement samples were excised at native versus relaxed tensions showed a dramatic effect of cutting under tension in red maple, a moderate effect in sugar maple, and no effect in paper birch. These results suggest that sampling methods can generate PLC patterns indicative of repair under tension by inducing a degree of embolism that is itself a function of xylem tensions at the moment of sample excision.

openCC0Dec 2023View details →
edi56/100

Phenology and Carbon Allocation of Roots at Harvard Forest 2011-2013

The objective of this study is to estimate the phenology and partitioning of C allocated belowground across the growing season at Harvard Forest in two hardwood stands dominated by Quercus rubra and Fraxinus americana, respectively, and one conifer stand dominated by Tsuga canadensis. The phenology of fine root production was characterized by multiple flushes of growth and mortality, especially in the red oak (Q. rubra) stand. Root exudation rate did not have a clear seasonal signal. The deciduous hardwood stands allocated C belowground earlier in the season compared to the conifer-dominated stand. Deciduous stands also allocated a greater proportion of total belowground C flux (TBCF) to root growth compared to the conifer-dominated hemlock (T. canadensis) stand. Of the three stands, red oak partitioned the greatest proportion of TBCF (~50%) to root growth, while hemlock partitioned the least.

openCC0Dec 2023View details →
edi56/100

Partitioning the Components of Soil Respiration in a Trenching Experiment at Harvard Forest 2011

Total soil respiration (Rt) is a combination of autotrophic (Ra) and heterotrophic respiration (Rh). We used a trenching method to sever the rooting system surrounding a plot to remove the Ra component within the plot. We used a custom-made automated chamber system to measure soil respiration within the trenched plot and the control in an oak dominated forest with the footprint of the LPH tower. This method has some potential limitations. Reduced water uptake in trenched plots could change soil water content, which is one of the environmental controllers of Rt in many ecosystems. Eliminating root inputs could reduce heterotrophic decomposition of SOM via lack of priming.

openCC0Dec 2023View details →
edi56/100

Soil water content measurements and rainfall data for plots with experimentally altered precipitation and nutrient inputs at the Jornada Basin LTER site, 2011-ongoing

This dataset contains soil volumetric water content data collected starting in 2011 for a long-term precipitation and nutrient manipulation experiment at the Jornada Basin LTER site in southern New Mexico, U.S.A. This experiment uses precipitation shelters and irrigation treatments to manipulate water inputs, and fertilization treatments to alter nitrogen input to 2.5 x 2.5 meter plots in a desert grassland. Soil sensors are installed at surface and deep soil layers in each plot and collect hourly averages of volumetric water content using a time-domain reflectometry method. This dataset contains daily averages. This is an ongoing study and the dataset will be updated yearly.

openCC (other)Nov 2025View details →
edi56/100

Soil and foliar carbon and nitrogen content and stable isotope ratios from rainfall manipulation experiments at the Jornada Basin LTER, 2011-2020

As rainfall extremes are expected to increase in novel magnitude and frequency, especially in dryland regions, we asked how prolonged and directional shifts to water availability may affect ecosystem carbon and nitrogen dynamics. This data set includes foliar and soil carbon and nitrogen stable isotope and concentration data collected from multiple long-term rainfall manipulation experiments at the Jornada Basin LTER. Datasets also include rainfall data adjusted to rainfall manipulation intensities. Collection dates range from 5 to 14 years since the onset of experimental treatments. The primary plant species targeted for this study were the dominant grass, Bouteloua eriopoda, and the dominant shrub, Prosopis glandulosa.

openCC (other)Oct 2023View details →
edi56/100

Microbial Observatory at North Temperate Lakes LTER Spatial and temporal cyanobacterial population dynamics in Lake Mendota 2009 - 2011

Toxic cyanobacterial blooms threaten freshwaters worldwide but have proven difficult to predict because the mechanisms of bloom formation and toxin production are unknown, especially on weekly time scales. Water quality management continues to focus on aggregated metrics, such as chlorophyll and total nutrients, which may not be sufficient to explain complex community changes and functions such as toxin production. For example, nitrogen (N) speciation and cycling play an important role, on daily time scales, in shaping cyanobacterial communities because declining N has been shown to select for N fixers. In addition, subsequent N pulses from N2 fixation may stimulate and sustain toxic cyanobacterial growth. Herein, we describe how rapid early summer declines in N followed by bursts of N fixation have shaped cyanobacterial communities in a eutrophic lake (Lake Mendota, Wisconsin, USA), possibly driving toxic Microcystis blooms throughout the growing season. On weekly time scales in 2010 and *2011, we monitored the cyanobacterial community in a eutrophic lake using the phycocyanin intergenic spacer (PC-IGS) region to determine population dynamics. In parallel, we measured microcystin concentrations, N2 fixation rates, and potential environmental drivers that contribute to structuring the community.

openCC (other)Dec 2022View details →
edi56/100

LTREB: Lake Myvatn Predation experiments at Myvatn, Iceland during 2009 and 2011

Changes in one prey species' density can indirectly affect the abundance of another prey species if a shared predator eats both species leading to positive or negative indirect effects. In some cases, indirect effects may occur when prey move into a habitat, such as when riparian predator populations grow in response to adult aquatic insects and increase predation on terrestrial prey. However, predators could instead switch to aquatic insects or become satiated, reducing predation on terrestrial prey. To determine the net indirect effect of aquatic insects on terrestrial arthropods via generalist spider predators, we conducted a field experiment using enclosures on the shoreline of an Icelandic lake with numerous aquatic midges. Midge abundance and wolf spider density were altered to mimic midge influx and a wolf spider numerical response. At all predator densities, the presence of midges decreased rates of predation on terrestrial prey. When midges were absent, predation was 30percent greater at high spider density. But when midges were present, predation of sentinel prey was equal across spider densities, negating the influence of increased predator density. In lab mesocosms, prey survivorship increased greater or equal 50percent where midges were present and rapidly saturated; the addition of 5, 20, 50 and 100 midges equivalently reduced spider predation, supporting predator distraction rather than satiation as the root cause. Our results demonstrate a strong positive indirect effect of midges, and broadly support the concept that predator responses to alternative prey are a major influence on the magnitude and direction of predator-mediated indirect effects.

openCC (other)Dec 2022View details →
edi56/100

Cascade Project at North Temperate Lakes LTER High Frequency Sonde Data from Food Web Resilience Experiment 2008 - 2011

High-frequency sonde data collected from the surface waters of two lakes in Upper Peninsula of Michigan during the summers of 2008-2011. The food web of Peter Lake was slowly transformed by gradual additions of Largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides) while Paul Lake was an unmanipulated reference. Sonde data were used to calculate resilience indicators to evaluate the stability of the food web and to calculate ecosystem metabolism.

openCC (other)Dec 2022View details →
edi56/100

Time lapse camera photos for Green Lakes Valley, 2011 - ongoing.

Time lapse photography is a powerful tool to detect seasonal and interannual change in remote locations. In 2008, a time lapse camera was installed at Niwot Ridge, below D1, with a view overlooking Green Lake 4. The resulting photos give a view into the seasonal evolution of ice and snow cover over the Green Lakes Valley.

openCC (other)Feb 2025View details →
edi56/100

SBC LTER: Ocean: Time-series: nearshore calibrated pH and temperature outside of reefs, ongoing since 2011

Calibrated pH (Total scale, SeaFET sensor) data was collected from 10 reefs in the Santa Barbara Channel along with in situ temperature. Most pH sensors are deployed together with SBC long-term mooring instruments. Data collection intervals and SeaFET sensor depths vary based on the site location.

openCC (other)Jul 2025View details →
zenodo52/100

Summaries of temperature and water table depth prior to peat sampling in Stordalen Mire, 2011-2017

<div> <p>This dataset provides summaries of temperature (T) and water table depth (WTD) conditions prior to the collection of peat samples from Stordalen Mire, Sweden, in July of 2011-2017. These summaries include the following files:</p> <h2><strong>t_wtd_summaries_July2011-2017samplings.csv</strong></h2> </div> <p>This file gives summary statistics over various time intervals for the following environmental measurements:</p> <ul> <li><strong>AirTemperature</strong>: Mean daily air temperature (&deg;C), obtained from automatic sensors at the nearby Abisko Scientific Research Station (ANS) (station ID 188790; the source file [ANS_Daily_Wx_Jul84_Dec17.txt] is not included due to sharing restrictions).</li> <li><strong>WTD</strong>: Water table depths (cm), obtained from <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10420396">Manual active layer and and water table depth measurements from the autochamber sites at Stordalen Mire, northern Sweden (2003-2017)</a> (from Patrick Crill et al.).</li> </ul> <p>The time intervals for these summaries are defined relative to the peat sampling date at each site (see <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12827096">EMERGE Sample Metadata Sheet for Samples with Microbiomes</a>), which varies by site and year. The specific intervals are defined as follows:</p> <ul> <li><strong>7d</strong>: 7 days prior to the sampling date, plus the sampling date itself.</li> <li><strong>14d</strong>: 14 days prior to the sampling date, plus the sampling date itself.</li> <li><strong>21d</strong>: 21 days prior to the sampling date, plus the sampling date itself.</li> <li><strong>28d</strong>: 28 days prior to the sampling date, plus the sampling date itself.</li> <li><strong>growing</strong>: Time from beginning of growing season (defined as June 1) until (and including) the sampling date.</li> <li><strong>all_growing</strong>: Entire growing season (June 1 &ndash; Sept. 30).</li> </ul> <p>For clarity, the start and end dates for each time interval (inclusive) are also given under the columns <strong>Start_Date</strong> and <strong>End_Date</strong>, where End_Date=<strong>Sampling_Date</strong> for all intervals except all_growing.</p> <p>Summary statistics for each interval include: measurement count (<strong>n</strong>), median (<strong>median</strong>), mean (<strong>mean</strong>), and standard deviation (<strong>sd</strong>), and are given under the column names beginning with these statistic labels.</p> <p><em>IMPORTANT NOTE:&nbsp; </em>For temperature, these statistics are calculated based on the average temperature measured on each day, meaning that<strong> </strong><em>the standard deviations do NOT account for within-day temperature variation.</em> To provide short-term (1 day) temperature variation context for each sampling date, the within-day mean, minimum, and maximum air temperatures for the sampling date only (taken directly from the corresponding row &amp; columns in the source ANS data file) are provided in the columns <strong>samplingdate_mean_AirTemperature</strong>, <strong>samplingdate_min_AirTemperature</strong>, and <strong>samplingdate_max_AirTemperature</strong>.</p> <div> <div> <h2><strong>wtd_summaries_July2011-2017samples.csv</strong></h2> </div> <p>This file gives the percentage of time that each peat sample's depth midpoint (<strong>DepthAvg__</strong>) was at or below the water table depth (WTD), over each of the longer time intervals (&ge;21 days) defined above for the temperature &amp; WTD summaries. (Intervals &lt;21 days are not included due to the lower frequency of WTD measurements, which results in low <em>n</em> for shorter intervals.)</p> <p>The first few columns are taken directly from the <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12827096">EMERGE Sample Metadata Sheet for Samples with Microbiomes</a>, for the samples collected in July of 2011-2017 from the MainAutochamber sites. The last set of columns include the following, with the time interval labels (defined as in the above temperature summaries) appended at the end of each column name:</p> <ul> <li><strong>n_WTD_*</strong>: Number of WTD measurements used in the calculation.</li> <li><strong>pct_time_below_WTD_*</strong>: Fraction (relative to 1) of measured WTDs over the given time interval that were at or above the DepthAvg__ for each sample, which equates to the fraction of measurement timepoints during which the given sample was at or below the WTD. This is the same method used for calculating "% Time below water table" in Figure 6 of <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-018-0065-5">Singleton et al. (2018)</a>. For palsa sites, this value is automatically set to 0 based on the lack of a water table at all timepoints in the analysis.)</li> </ul> <p>As above, the WTD values used for these calculations were obtained from <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10420396">Manual active layer and and water table depth measurements from the autochamber sites at Stordalen Mire, northern Sweden (2003-2017)</a>&nbsp;(Patrick Crill et al.).</p> <h1>Funding acknowledgments</h1> <p>This research is a contribution of the EMERGE Biology Integration Institute, funded by the National Science Foundation, Biology Integration Institutes Program, Award # 2022070.</p> <p>This research was also funded by the Genomic Science Program of the United States Department of Energy Office of Biological and Environmental Research, grant #s DE-SC0004632, DE-SC0010580, and DE-SC0016440.</p> <p>The temperature summary has been made possible by data provided by Abisko Scientific Research Station and the Swedish Infrastructure for Ecosystem Science (SITES).</p> <p>We thank the Swedish Polar Research Secretariat and SITES for the support of the work done at the Abisko Scientific Research Station. SITES is supported by the Swedish Research Council's grant 4.3-2021-00164.</p> </div>

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2024View details →
zenodo52/100

Spectral reflectance data of Mercury's surface collected by the Mercury Atmospheric and Surface Composition Spectrometer (MASCS) instrument during orbital observations of the NASA MESSENGER mission between 2011 and 2015 resampled to a [55399 × 396] tabular data format.

<p>MASCS is a three sensor point spectrometer with a spectral coverage from 200 nm to 1450 nm.<br> Single spectra are resamples in to steps to a format useful for our ML application : a datacube with ~400 spectral channel covering the whole surface of Mercury.<br> The final dataset has dimension [N&times;M] where N is the number of grid cells (360 &times; 180 = 64, 800) and M is the number of spectral features (396).<br> Due to the incomplete coverage and data filtering, some grid cells are empty.<br> After removing these empty cells, the size of the dataset is [55399 &times; 396].</p> <p>This specific product is stored as a gzip compressed json, where each element is a grid cell.<br> We are in the process to publish a complete pipeline to produce this product from RAW data on https://github.com/epn-ml/MESSENGER-Mercury-Surface-Cassification-Unsupervised_DLR/ .</p> <p>Spectral reflectance data of Mercury&rsquo;s surface collected by the Mercury Atmospheric and Surface Composition Spectrometer (MASCS) instrument during orbital observations of the NASA MESSENGER mission between 2011 and 2015.<br> MASCS is a three sensor point spectrometer with a spectral coverage from 200 nm to 1450 nm.<br> Single spectra are resamples in to steps to a format useful for our ML application : a datacube with ~400 spectral channel covering the whole surface of Mercury.<br> The final dataset has dimension [N&times;M] where N is the number of grid cells (360 &times; 180 = 64, 800) and M is the number of spectral features (396).<br> Due to the incomplete coverage and data filtering, some grid cells are empty.<br> After removing these empty cells, the size of the dataset is [55399 &times; 396].</p> <p>0. Pre-filtering<br> We used the most recent dataset that had large-scale photometric corrections and thus was almost free from observation geometry effects.<br> However, extreme geometry are still present and are typically associated with high noise and some residual instrumental effects.<br> Based on our empirical tests, we filtered out observations with an emission/incidence angle &ge;80∘.<br> We also calculated the median value per wavelength and per cell grid when constructing the global hyperspectral data cube and filtered out observations falling under the 2nd percentile and above 99.9th percentile to clean some residual geometry effects.<br> With this approach we create an effective noise filter while retaining enough observations to be able to analyse the entirety of the surface of the planet.</p> <p>1. Spectral resmpling<br> Unprocessed MASCS spectra could have 512 or 256 channes, depending on binning.<br> We resampled the data in the spectral dimension to a common wavelength range from 260 nm to 1052 nm with a&nbsp; 4 nm resolution (2 nm spectral sampling), resulting in 396 spectral channels.<br> This approach slightly oversamples the original 4.77 nm spectral resolution and removes some points from the original 200-1050 nm range.<br> The resulting data matrix is expressed in tabular form, with each row representing a single grid cell or pixel on the surface.<br> The elements of each row are the spectral reflectance values from the VIS instrument at 396 (resampled) wavelengths.</p> <p>2. Spatial resmpling<br> The whole dataset of &sim; 5 million spectra is resampled to a planet-wide rectangular grid of 1&times;1deg in the latitudinal band between &plusmn; 80.<br> The cell longitudinal size varies between &sim; 40 km at the equator to a minimum of &sim; 10 km at &plusmn;80∘.<br> Thus, the area spanned by each grid cell depends on the latitude. However, the same is true for the acquisition process, where higher spatial resolution is reached near the equator and lower resolution at the poles.</p>

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2022View details →
zenodo52/100

Syrian Migration to Europe, 2011-21: Data Inventory

<p>This inventory includes metadata on various quantitative and qualitative sources of information on Syrian migration to Europe in 2011-21 that can be used for agent-based modelling purposes, with each source accompanied by data quality assessment. The files are available in a TSV and MS Excel format. The judgement-based quality ratings provided are specific to the requirements of agent-based modelling, as detailed in the <a href="https://www.baps-project.eu/inventory/project_outputs/data_sources/Background%20paper%20Data%20and%20knowledge.pdf">background paper.</a> A queryable version of the inventory is available on the website of the project Bayesian Agent-Based Population Studies (BAPS), funded by the European Research Council (725232): <a href="https://baps-project.eu/inventory/data_inventory">https://baps-project.eu/inventory/data_inventory</a>. The methodology behind assembling this dataset and assessing the individual data sources according to pre-defined quality criteria is detailed in:</p> <p>Nurse S and Bijak J (2022) Building a Knowledge Base for the Model. In: J Bijak et al., <em>Towards Bayesian Model-Based Demography. Agency, Complexity and Uncertainty in Migration Studies</em>. Methodos Series, vol 17. Springer, Cham. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-83039-7_4">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-83039-7_4</a></p>

opencc-by-4.0Jan 2023View details →
zenodo52/100

Monthly aggregated GLASS FAPAR V6 (250 m): 50th percentile monthly time-series (2011)

<p><strong>List of Subdatasets:</strong></p> <ul> <li>Long-term data: <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8381409">2000-2021</a></li> <li>5th percentile (p05) monthly time-series: <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8408654">2000</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8411611">2001</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8412712">2002</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8413021">2003</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8413689">2004</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8414639">2005</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8411609">2006</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8414085">2007</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8414960">2008</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8415476">2009</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8415686">2010</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8412154">2011</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8414082">2012</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8411364">2013</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8414933">2014</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8415414">2015</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8412246">2016</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8414083">2017</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8411366">2018</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8415203">2019</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8415549">2020</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8387608">2021</a></li> <li>50th percentile (p50) monthly time-series: <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8408710">2000</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8408798">2001</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8408866">2002</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8415319">2003</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8415619">2004</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8415878">2005</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8416080">2006</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8416619">2007</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8417164">2008</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8417513">2009</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8417708">2010</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8415669">2011</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8416000">2012</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8416542">2013</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8417055">2014</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8417467">2015</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8415747">2016</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8416333">2017</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8416835">2018</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8417326">2019</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8417589">2020</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8388078">2021</a></li> <li>95th percentile (p95) monthly time-series: <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8408949">2000</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8409059">2001</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8409154">2002</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8409362">2003</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8416487">2004</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8417029">2005</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8417833">2006</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8417996">2007</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8418308">2008</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8418669">2009</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8418986">2010</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8417649">2011</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8417816">2012</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8417959">2013</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8418253">2014</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8418625">2015</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8417759">2016</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8417898">2017</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8418076">2018</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8418442">2019</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8418751">2020</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8392976">2021</a></li> </ul> <p><strong>General Description</strong></p> <p>The <i>monthly aggregated Fraction of Absorbed Photosynthetically Active Radiation (FAPAR)</i> dataset is derived from <abbr title="glass.umd.edu/FAPAR/MODIS/250m/">250m 8d GLASS V6 FAPAR</abbr>. The data set is derived from Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) reflectance and LAI data using several other FAPAR products (MODIS Collection 6, GLASS FAPAR V5, and PROBA-V1 FAPAR) to generate a bidirectional long-short-term memory (Bi-LSTM) model to estimate FAPAR. The dataset time spans from March 2000 to December 2021 and provides data that covers the entire globe. The dataset can be used in many applications like land degradation modeling, land productivity mapping, and land potential mapping. The dataset includes:</p> <ul> <li><strong>Long-term:</strong></li> </ul> <p>Derived from monthly time-series. This dataset provides linear trend model for the p95 variable: (1) slope beta mean (p95.beta_m), p-value for beta (p95.beta_pv), intercept alpha mean (p95.alpha_m), p-value for alpha (p95.alpha_pv), and coefficient of determination R<sup>2</sup> (p95.r2_m).</p> <ul> <li><strong>Monthly time-series:</strong></li> </ul> <p>Monthly aggregation with three standard statistics: (1) 5th percentile (p05), median (p50), and 95th percentile (p95). For each month, we aggregate all composites within that month plus one composite each before and after, ending up with 5 to 6 composites for a single month depending on the number of images within that month.</p> <p><strong>Data Details</strong></p> <ul> <li><strong>Time period:</strong> March 2000 &ndash; December 2021</li> <li><strong>Type of data:</strong> Fraction of Absorbed Photosynthetically Active Radiation (FAPAR)</li> <li><strong>How the data was collected or derived:</strong> Derived from 250m 8 d GLASS V6 FAPAR using Python running in a local HPC. The time-series analysis were computed using the <a href="https://github.com/scikit-map/scikit-map">Scikit-map</a>&nbsp;Python package.</li> <li><strong>Statistical methods used:</strong> for the long-term, Ordinary Least Square (OLS) of p95 monthly variable; for the monthly time-series, percentiles 05, 50, and 95.</li> <li><strong>Limitations or exclusions in the data:</strong> The dataset does not include data for Antarctica.</li> <li><strong>Coordinate reference system:</strong> EPSG:4326</li> <li><strong>Bounding box (Xmin, Ymin, Xmax, Ymax):</strong> (-180.00000, -62.0008094, 179.9999424, 87.37000)</li> <li><strong>Spatial resolution:</strong> 1/480 d.d. = 0.00208333 (250m)</li> <li><strong>Image size:</strong> 172,800 x 71,698</li> <li><strong>File format:</strong> Cloud Optimized Geotiff (COG) format.</li> </ul> <p><strong>Support</strong></p> <p>If you discover a bug, artifact, or inconsistency, or if you have a question please raise a GitHub issue: <a href="https://github.com/Open-Earth-Monitor/Global_FAPAR_250m/issues">https://github.com/Open-Earth-Monitor/Global_FAPAR_250m/issues</a></p> <p><strong>Reference</strong></p> <p>Hackländer, J., Parente, L., Ho, Y.-F., Hengl, T., Simoes, R., Consoli, D., Şahin, M., Tian, X., Herold, M., Jung, M., Duveiller, G., Weynants, M., Wheeler, I., (2023?) "Land potential assessment and trend-analysis using 2000–2021 FAPAR monthly time-series at 250 m spatial resolution", submitted to PeerJ, preprint available at: <a href="https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3415685/v1">https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3415685/v1</a></p> <p><strong>Name convention</strong></p> <p>To ensure consistency and ease of use across and within the projects, we follow the standard Open-Earth-Monitor file-naming convention. The convention works with 10 fields that describes important properties of the data. In this way users can search files, prepare data analysis etc, without needing to open files. The fields are:</p> <ol> <li><strong>generic variable name:</strong> fapar = Fraction of Absorbed Photosynthetically Active Radiation</li> <li><strong>variable procedure combination:</strong> essd.lstm = Earth System Science Data with bidirectional long short-term memory (Bi&ndash;LSTM)</li> <li><strong>Position in the probability distribution / variable type:</strong> p05/p50/p95 = 5th/50th/95th percentile</li> <li><strong>Spatial support:</strong> 250m</li> <li><strong>Depth reference:</strong> s = surface</li> <li><strong>Time reference begin time:</strong> 20000301 = 2000-03-01</li> <li><strong>Time reference end time:</strong> 20211231 = 2022-12-31</li> <li><strong>Bounding box:</strong> go = global (without Antarctica)</li> <li><strong>EPSG code:</strong> epsg.4326 = EPSG:4326</li> <li><strong>Version code:</strong> v20230628 = 2023-06-28 (creation date)</li> </ol>

opencc-by-sa-4.0Oct 2023View details →

ScienceDex guides

Understand access before you commit

These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.

Compare curated datasets

Allen Brain Atlas

Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.

allen-brain-atlas
neuroscienceopenDocumentation, web resources, and API references are available online.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)

ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.

abode-home-cage
behavioral-neuroscienceopenThe DataShare record exposes download links for annotations, documentation, license text, and the zipped per-snippet data directory.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

DANDI Archive for NWB datasets

DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.

dandi-nwb
electrophysiologyopenPublished Dandiset metadata and archive endpoints are available through the production DANDI API.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

International Brain Laboratory public data

The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.

ibl
behavioral-neuroscienceopenPublic sessions can be searched and loaded from the IBL public data server through ONE.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

OpenNeuro

OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.

openneuro
neuroscienceopenPublished datasets are available on demand over the internet.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record