Find research datasets worth reusing

FIG. 5 in Three new species of Raphitoma Bellardi, 1847 (Mollusca, Gastropoda, Raphitomidae) from Croatian waters (NE Adriatic Sea)

FIG. 5. — Raphitoma densa (Monterosato, 1884): A, Murter Is., coll. PRK, h = 11.3 mm; B, Biograd, coll. PRK, h = 10.2 mm; C, Vrsi, coll. PET, h = 11.55 mm; D, Vir Is., coll. PET, h = 11.0 mm; E, Murter Is., coll. PET, h = 11.6 mm; F, Sukošan, coll. PET, h = 10.75 mm; G, Vrsi, coll. PET, h = 10.0 mm; H, Zaton, coll. PET, h = 8.8 mm.

FIG. 3 in Three new species of Raphitoma Bellardi, 1847 (Mollusca, Gastropoda, Raphitomidae) from Croatian waters (NE Adriatic Sea)

FIG. 3. — Raphitoma petanii Prkić, Giannuzzi-Savelli & Pusateri n. sp., Stari Trogir. A, holotype, MNHN-IM-2000-34887, h = 10.65 mm; B, paratype, coll. RGS 120245, h = 9.6 mm; C, paratype, MCZR-M-TYPE-00118, h = 9.25 mm; D, paratype, MNHN-IM-2000-34888, h = 9.3 mm; E, paratype, coll. PUS 2798, h = 9.7 mm; F, paratype, HPM 11500, h = 8.7 mm; G, paratype, MZB 60233, h = 8.2 mm.

FIG. 4 in Three new species of Raphitoma Bellardi, 1847 (Mollusca, Gastropoda, Raphitomidae) from Croatian waters (NE Adriatic Sea)

FIG. 4. — Raphitoma petanii Prkić, Giannuzzi-Savelli & Pusateri n. sp.: A, Stari Trogir, paratype, coll. PRK, h = 11.05 mm; B, Stari Trogir, paratype, coll. RGS 120246, h = 11.8 mm; C, Stari Trogir, paratype coll. PET, h = 11.55 mm; D, Sukošan, coll. PET, h = 12.4 mm; E, Stari Trogir, paratype, coll. PRK, h = 12.05 mm; F, Biograd coll. PRK, h = 10.3 mm; G, Murter Is., coll. PRK, h = 10.3 mm; H, Stari Trogir, coll. RGS, h = 9.1 mm.

FIG. 2 in Three new species of Raphitoma Bellardi, 1847 (Mollusca, Gastropoda, Raphitomidae) from Croatian waters (NE Adriatic Sea)

FIG. 2. — Measurements taken on protoconch of Raphitoma pusaterii Prkić & Giannuzzi-Savelli n. sp. Diameter of nucleus (D nuc. = 105 µm), diameter of first half-whorl (D ½ = 159 µm), diameter of first whorl (D 1 = 190 µm), maximum diameter (Max. D = 440 µm), number of whorls (PW = 3.6), number of whorls of protoconch 1 (PW 1 = 1.1). Scale bar: 200 µm.

FIG. 1 in Three new species of Raphitoma Bellardi, 1847 (Mollusca, Gastropoda, Raphitomidae) from Croatian waters (NE Adriatic Sea)

FIG. 1. — Phylogenetic relationships (maximum likelihood topologies) among species of the genus Raphitoma (see Russini et al. 2020 for further details). Numbers at nodes are bootstrap supports after 1000 pseudoreplicates, and posterior probabilities after a Bayesian analysis on the same dataset; only values higher than 75% bootstrap support and 95% posterior probability are reported; black dots indicate nodes supported by 100% bootstrap and 1.0 posterior probability. A, ML analysis on the combined dataset (COI + 16S + 12S + ITS2); B, the histogram portraying the distribution of the pairwise genetic distances (K2p) among the COI sequences (red bars on the left are intraspecific comparisons, yellow bars on the right are interspecific comparisons); C, ML analysis on the ITS2 alignment.

FIG. 15 in Three new species of Raphitoma Bellardi, 1847 (Mollusca, Gastropoda, Raphitomidae) from Croatian waters (NE Adriatic Sea)

FIG. 15. — Murex echinatus Brocchi, 1814: A, lectotype, MCSNM i 5427; B, D, paralectotype, MCSNM i5428; C, E, paralectotype, MCSNM i5429. Photos courtesy: Martina Paolini (MCSNM).

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2015View details →

Figure 1. Adriatic Sea localities where Schizomavella species were found. 1 in Adriatic species of Schizomavella (Bryozoa: Cheilostomata)

Figure 1. Adriatic Sea localities where Schizomavella species were found. 1 – Ždralova Bay (Velebit Channel); 2 – Ćutin Islet (Cres); 3 – Silba; 4 – Dugi otok (North); 5 – Iž Island; 6 – Dugi otok Vele stijene; 7 – Kornati; 8 – Jabuka Shoal; 9 – Jabuka Islet; 10 – Brusnik; 11 – Biševo; 12 – Vis (Komiža); 13 – Sušac; 14 – Hvar (Kozja); 15 – Lastovo; 16 – Korčula; 17 – Pelješac; 18 – Mljet.

opencc-by-4.0May 2024View details →

AdriE ocean climate model ensemble for the Adriatic Sea - monthly fields

<p>This dataset contains the monthly-averaged fields of the key physical oceanographic quantities from the AdriE ocean model ensemble. The model runs were carried out by using the ROMS modelling system (Haidvogel et al., 2008) forced by the SMHI-RCA4 Regional Climate Model (Samuelsson et al., 2021), in turn driven by different General Circulation Models. The period is 1987-2099 in the severe RCP8.5 scenario for the climate simulations, whereas the evaluation runs span the period 1987-2010. Each file contains the results for one run.</p> <p>The model implementation and its validation are fully described in a manuscript recently submitted to Ocean Science (Bonaldo, D., Carniel, S., Colucci, R. R., Denamiel, C., Pranic, P., Raicich, F., Ricchi, A., Sangelantoni, L., Vilibic, I., and Vitelletti, M. L.: AdriE: a high-resolution ocean model ensemble for the Adriatic Sea under severe climate change conditions, EGUsphere [preprint], https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1468, 2024).</p>

Fig. 4 in Mollusc fauna associated with the Cystoseira algal associations in the Gulf of Trieste (Northern Adriatic Sea)

Fig. 4: Comparison of mean mollusc richness (S) and abundance (N) per 400 cm2 in logarithmic scale with standard error bars (±SE) in different algal species (A) and at different depths (B) at sites investigated in 2012. Samples with C. barbata were: MBP1-5, PI4, PA1-5, STR1-4, FI1-2; with C. compressa were PI1-3.5, CM1-3, PO1-3, with C. corniculata were RR1-5; with H. incurva DR 1-5. Samples collected between 1 and 1.9 m were: DR3-4, MBP-1, PI1-4, PA3-5; between 2 and 2.9 m were: DR1- 2, 5, MBP2-5; PI2-3.5, PA1-2; STR 1-4, FI1-2; CM1-3, PO1-3, more than 3m were RR 1-5.

Fig. 1 in Mollusc fauna associated with the Cystoseira algal associations in the Gulf of Trieste (Northern Adriatic Sea)

Fig. 1: The study area with sampling sites. Five sites were sampled in 2012 [DR Debeli rtič], RR (Cape Ronek), PA (Pacug), MBP (Marine Biology Station), and PI (Piranček)). Four sites were sampled in 2008 (STR (Natural Reserve Strunjan), FI (Fiesa), CM (Cape Madona Natural Monument) and PO Izola)].

Fig. 3 in Mollusc fauna associated with the Cystoseira algal associations in the Gulf of Trieste (Northern Adriatic Sea)

Fig. 3: Comparison of the proportions of mollusc feeding guilds among sampling sites investigated in 2012, in terms of mean abundance (A) and richness (B) per 400 cm2.

Fig. 2 in Mollusc fauna associated with the Cystoseira algal associations in the Gulf of Trieste (Northern Adriatic Sea)

Fig. 2: K-dominance curve for sampling sites investigated in 2012. The graph shows the distribution of species abundances in the assemblage, plotted as a percentage of cumulative abundance (y axis) as a function of rank (x axis). Curves with low initial dominance reaching the asymptote slowly represent assemblages with homogeneous abundances and with high diversity.

Fig. 5 in Mollusc fauna associated with the Cystoseira algal associations in the Gulf of Trieste (Northern Adriatic Sea)

Fig. 5: Cluster of samples associated with four canopy-forming algal species (H_inc=H. incurva; C_corn=C. corniculata; C_ bar=C. barbata; C_comp=C. compressa), based on mollusc abundance data. Groups were formed with a cut at 20% of similarity.

Fig. 6 in Seasonal response of benthic foraminifera to anthropogenic pressure in two stations of the Gulf of Trieste (northern Adriatic Sea, Italy): the marine protected area of Miramare versus the Servola water sewage outfall

Fig. 6: Rank-frequency diagram for the Ser(a) and Res(b) stations using the cumulative abundance (as relative frequency) for y-axe and the decreasing rank order for x-axe of each species for each sample. Both axes are on logarithmic scale.

Fig. 4 in Seasonal response of benthic foraminifera to anthropogenic pressure in two stations of the Gulf of Trieste (northern Adriatic Sea, Italy): the marine protected area of Miramare versus the Servola water sewage outfall

Fig. 4: Foraminiferal data for Ser and Res stations using the complete living assemblage of the 0-2 cm level: a) Foraminiferal density (FD) as the number of specimens normalised to 50 cc of sediments and species richness; b) Dominance index; c) bias corrected Shannon (H' bc) and the exponential function Exp(H' ) indexes.

Fig. 3 in Seasonal response of benthic foraminifera to anthropogenic pressure in two stations of the Gulf of Trieste (northern Adriatic Sea, Italy): the marine protected area of Miramare versus the Servola water sewage outfall

Fig. 3: Potentially toxic elements (PTE) concentration in the Ser (a) and Res (b) stations calculated for the 0-1 cm level. PTEs are expressed in micrograms per gram (µg/g).

Fig. 1 in Seasonal response of benthic foraminifera to anthropogenic pressure in two stations of the Gulf of Trieste (northern Adriatic Sea, Italy): the marine protected area of Miramare versus the Servola water sewage outfall

Fig. 1: Study area and location of the Ser (Servola) and Res (Riserva Naturale Marina di Miramare) stations. The Servola pipeline is evidenced in the enlarged square.

Fig. 2 in Seasonal response of benthic foraminifera to anthropogenic pressure in two stations of the Gulf of Trieste (northern Adriatic Sea, Italy): the marine protected area of Miramare versus the Servola water sewage outfall

Fig. 2: Vertical profiles of temperature, salinity, pH, oxygen saturation and chlorophyll a at Ser and Res stations during the seasonal sampling.

opencc-by-4.0May 2018View details →

Fig. 15 in Seasonal dynamics of small-scale fisheries in the Adriatic Sea

Fig. 15: Size-frequency distributions of trammel net landings. TL = total length; CL = carapace length; ML = mantle length. Vertical lines: minimum landing size.