Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2012View details →

Fig 1 in The Bulgarian Odonata database - current status, organisation and a case study new entries

Fig 1. Total area coverage for Bulgarian Odonata database. Legend: Red dots represent all grids covered prior to 2001, while blue and yellow stand for the data after 2001. Blue are for records collected by odonatologists and yellow for volunteers.

Fig. 2 in New localities of four Bulgarian endemic Hydrobiidae species (Mollusca: Gastropoda: Risooidea)

Fig. 2. Belgrandiella angelovi from the new locality: 1 – shell, front view, 2 – shell, side view, 3 - penis.

Fig. 1 in New localities of four Bulgarian endemic Hydrobiidae species (Mollusca: Gastropoda: Risooidea)

Fig. 1. Shells of the stygobite snails of the Temnata Dupka cave (Lakatnik): 1 – the newly recorded Belgrandiella pussila, 2 – Belgrandiella hessei, 3 – Bythiospeum bureschi. The shells are displayed in respective proportions.

Fig. 4 in New localities of four Bulgarian endemic Hydrobiidae species (Mollusca: Gastropoda: Risooidea)

Fig. 4. Grossuana thracica from the spring at the Tri Voditsi fish farms near village of Hadzievo: 1 – shell, 2 – soft body (the snout, eye, tentacle and mantle pigmentation are visible) with penis (up on right), 3 – penis, 4 – the louvered distal part of the penis, penis tip was showed with an arrow (light microscope photography).

Fig. 3 in New localities of four Bulgarian endemic Hydrobiidae species (Mollusca: Gastropoda: Risooidea)

Fig. 3. Bythiospeum copiosus from Glava Panega spring, front (left) and back (right) side view of the shell.

Figure 6 in Comparison of trophic structure of the benthic macroinvertebrates in three Bulgarian riverine water bodies

Figure 6. Dendrogram of cluster analysis of the species composition in SH (see the abbreviations in Section 2).

Figure 2 in Comparison of trophic structure of the benthic macroinvertebrates in three Bulgarian riverine water bodies

Figure 2. Relative share of FFGs (%) in the mountain stations of the studied river basins (see the abbreviations in Section 2).

Figure 8 in Comparison of trophic structure of the benthic macroinvertebrates in three Bulgarian riverine water bodies

Figure 8. Ordination diagram (CCA analysis) of the distribution of studied benthic communities along the gradient of environmental factors (see the abbreviations in Section 2).

Figure 3 in Comparison of trophic structure of the benthic macroinvertebrates in three Bulgarian riverine water bodies

Figure 3. Relative share of FFGs (%) in the foothill stations of the studied river basins (see the abbreviations in Section 2).

Figure 4 in Comparison of trophic structure of the benthic macroinvertebrates in three Bulgarian riverine water bodies

Figure 4. Relative share of FFGs (%) in the plain stations of the studied river basins (see the abbreviations in Section 2).

Figure 5 in Comparison of trophic structure of the benthic macroinvertebrates in three Bulgarian riverine water bodies

Figure 5. Similarity of species composition of the FFGs between studied sites (MDS plot) (the numbers correspond to the surveyed stations as described in Section 2).

Figure 7 in Comparison of trophic structure of the benthic macroinvertebrates in three Bulgarian riverine water bodies

Figure 7. Dendrogram of cluster analysis of the species composition in DF (see the abbreviations in Section 2).

opencc-by-4.0Feb 2016View details →

Figures 7-12 in Synthesis Of The Bulgarian Protozoological Investigations Of South Shetland Islands (The Antarctic)

Figures 7-12. Scanning electron photographs of some common interstitial testate amoebae, found in subantarctic region of Chile and on Livingston Island. 7 – Centropyxiella arenaria; 8 – Ogdeniella elegans; 9 – Psammonobiotus linearis; 10 – Pseudocorythion acutum; 11 - Corythionella minima; 12 – Chardezia caudata.

Fig. 6 in Ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) from the region of Cape Emine (central Bulgarian Black sea coast). Part III. Spatial distribution and gradient analysis

Fig. 6. PCA distribution of the sampling sites and the subclasses of life forms (according to Sharova 1981): Z_Phytob – Zoophagous phytobionts; Z_Strat – Zoophagous stratobionts; M_Strat – Mixophytophagous stratobionts; M_Short – Mixophytophagous stratohortobionts; M_Geoh – Mixophytophagous geobionts.

Fig. 7 in Ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) from the region of Cape Emine (central Bulgarian Black sea coast). Part III. Spatial distribution and gradient analysis

Fig. 7. PCA distribution of the sampling sites and categories of life forms (according to SHAROVA 1981): Life form class 1. Zoophagous. Life form subclass: 1.1 – Phytobios; 1.2 – Epigeobios; 1.3 – Stratobios; 1.4 – Geobios. Life form groups: 1.1.2 – stemdwelling hortobionts; 1.1.3 – leaf-dwelling dendrohortobionts; 1.2.2 – large walking epigeobionts; 1.2.2(1) – large walking dendroepigeobionts; 1.2.3 – running epigeobionts; 1.2.4 – flying epigeobionts; 1.3(1) – series crevice-dwelling stratobionts; 1.3(1).1 – surface & litter-dwelling; 1.3(1).2 – litter-dwelling; 1.3(1).3 – litter & crevice-dwelling; 1.3(1).4 – endogeobionts; 1.3(1).5 – litter & bark-dwelling; 1.3(1).6 – bothrobionts; 1.3(2).1 – litter & soil-dwelling; 1.4.2(1) – large digging geobionts. Life form class 2. Mixophytophagous. Life form subclass: 2.1 – Stratobios; 2.2 – Stratohortobios; 2.3 – Geohortobios. Life form groups: 2.1.1 – crevice-dwelling stratobionts; 2.2.1 – stratohortobionts; 2.3.1 – harpaloid geohortobionts; 2.3.1(1) – crevice-dwelling harpaloid geohortobionts; 2.3.2 – zabroid geohortobionts; 2.3.3 – dytomeoid geohortobionts.

Fig. 4 in Ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) from the region of Cape Emine (central Bulgarian Black sea coast). Part III. Spatial distribution and gradient analysis

Fig. 4. Ordination of the sampling sites in relation to the humidity and vegetation. The calculations were performed by the use of the results from all of the sampling sites and all of the catches, standardized through the recalculation of the data as number of specimens per 100 trapdays.

opencc-by-4.0May 2018View details →

Fig. 1 in Araeopteron ecphaea, a new addition to the Bulgarian fauna (Insecta: Lepidoptera: Erebidae)

Fig. 1. Araeopteron ecphaea: 1 - Male, Kamenitsa, 10.viii.2015. Scale bar 5 mm. 2 - Male genitalia with phallus (bottom), the median surface of the valvae is shown. Rupite, 13.vi.2014. Scale bar 250 μm.

Fig. 3 in Ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) from the region of Cape Emine (central Bulgarian Black sea coast). Part III. Spatial distribution and gradient analysis

Fig. 3. Distribution of the permanent species in relation to the humidity and vegetation. The analysis included only the permanent species – those with a frequency above 50% (see TEOFILOVA 2015): A aenea – Amara aenea; A anth – Amara anthobia; A famil – Amara familiaris; Ac megac – Acinopus megacephalus; Agon sp – Agonum (Europhilus) sp.; Br crep – Brachinus crepitans; Br expl – Brachinus explodens; C ambig – Calathus ambiguus; C cinct – Calathus cinctus; C fuscip – Calathus fuscipes; Car conv – Carabus convexus; Car cor – Carabus coriaceus; Car ullr – Carabus ullrichi; Chl nit – Chlaenius nitidulus; H dimid – Harpalus dimidiatus; H dist – Harpalus distinguendus; H flavic – Harpalus flavicornis; H rubrip – Harpalus rubripes; H tardus – Harpalus tardus; Laem ter – Laemostenus terricola; Lei ruf – Leistus rufomarginatus; M maurus – Microlestes maurus; M minut – Microlestes minutulus; Myas ch – Myas chalybaeus; N brevic – Nebria brevicollis; O azur – Ophonus azureus; Par mend – Parophonus mendax; Ps rufip – Pseudoophonus rufipes; Pt melas – Pterostichus melas; Tr q – Trechus quadristriatus.