Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
38
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
38 results for “Comparison Tables”
Supplementary File 13: Tables of estimates and Forest plots of pairwise comparisons from original studies for Subgroups of Primary Outcomes
<p>Supplementary File #13 for Cochrane Review entitled: "Non-invasive respiratory support in preterm infants as primary mode: a network meta-analysis"</p>
Tables of direct, indirect and networks estimates and Forests plots of pairwise comparisons for all secondary outcomes
<p>Supplementary File #12 for Cochrane review entitled: "Non-invasive respiratory support in preterm infants as primary mode: a network meta-analysis"</p>
A subset of the Scientific Literature Comparison Tables Dataset
<p>The Scientific Literature Comparison Table (SLCT) dataset was collected using the arXiv and Semantic Scholar APIs. It underwent a series of processing steps, including manual inspection and editing.</p> <p>The processing steps are summarized as follows:</p> <p>1) Downloading Survey Papers’ LaTeX files using the Arxiv API.</p> <p>2) Preprocessing LaTeX files to HTML format.</p> <p>3) Extracting tables from the HTML files.</p> <p>4) Creating a Golden Table as a reference.</p> <p>5) Generating descriptions for column headers.</p> <p>6) Acquiring citation data.</p> <p>7) Finalizing the dataset.</p>
Comparison of Three Summary of Finding Tables to Improve Understanding in the Presentation of Systematic Review Results
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT02813941. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 4.
Table 8: Pairwise comparison matrix – driver and motorcyclist perceptions
<p>Pairwise comparison matrix for driver and motorcyclist perceptions</p>
Supplementary File 12: Tables of direct, indirect and networks estimates and Forests plots of pairwise comparisons for all secondary outcomes
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Table ¹: Comparison of analysis of variance results for skull (occlusal view) and mandible (side view) shape in Rhipidomys mastacalis from three vegetation classes in Brazil. Object asymmetry and correspondence methods were employed to assess asymmetry for skulls and mandibles, respectively. in Morphological symmetry of Rhipidomys mastacalis (Mammalia, Rodentia, Cricetidae) in fragmented habitats of the Atlantic Forest in Northeastern Brazil: a study on the influence of the environment on an endemic species
<p><b>Table ¹:</b> Comparison of analysis of variance results for skull (occlusal view) and mandible (side view) shape in <i>Rhipidomys mastacalis</i> from three vegetation classes in Brazil.Object asymmetry and correspondence methods were employed to assess asymmetry for skulls and mandibles,respectively.</p><table><tbody><tr><th><b>Shape procrustes ANOVA</b></th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th><b>Effect Sum of squares</b></th><td><b>Mean squares</b></td><td><b>Degrees of freedom</b></td><td><i>F statistic</i></td><td><i>p -Value</i></td><td><b>Pillai tr.</b></td><td><i>p -Value</i></td></tr><tr><th><b>Skulls</b></th></tr><tr><th><b>Forested vegetation</b></th></tr><tr><th>Individual</th><td>0.19908517</td><td>0.0004253957</td><td>468</td><td>22.36</td><td><0.0001</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>Side</th><td>0.00366522</td><td>0.0002036232</td><td>18</td><td>10.70</td><td><0.0001</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>Individual × side</th><td>0.00890443</td><td>0.0000190266</td><td>468</td><td>2.24</td><td><0.0001</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>Error 1</th><td>0.00825565</td><td>0.0000084935</td><td>972</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th><b>Occupancy mosaics in forested areas</b></th></tr><tr><th>Individual</th><td>0.37829478</td><td>0.0003965354</td><td>954</td><td>18.57</td><td><0.0001</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>Side</th><td>0.00547536</td><td>0.0003041869</td><td>18</td><td>14.25</td><td><0.0001</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>Individual × side</th><td>0.02037065</td><td>0.0000213529</td><td>954</td><td>1.89</td><td><0.0001</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>Error 1</th><td>0.02201359</td><td>0.0000113239</td><td>1944</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th><b>Cocoa plantations</b></th></tr><tr><th>Individual</th><td>0.0645902300</td><td>0.0001302222</td><td>496</td><td>5.18</td><td><0.0001</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>Side</th><td>0.0113531900</td><td>0.0007095741</td><td>16</td><td>28.23</td><td><0.0001</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>Individual × side</th><td>0.0124666800</td><td>0.0000251344</td><td>496</td><td>1.88</td><td><0.0001</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>Error 1</th><td>0.0136608800</td><td>0.0000133407</td><td>1024</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th><b>Mandibles</b></th></tr><tr><th><b>Forested vegetation</b></th></tr><tr><th>Individual</th><td>0.70443879</td><td>0.0012579264</td><td>560</td><td>8.10</td><td><0.0001</td><td>14.16</td><td><0.0001</td></tr><tr><th>Side</th><td>0.00549957</td><td>0.0002749783</td><td>20</td><td>1.77</td><td>0.0207</td><td>0.0207</td><td>0.0069</td></tr><tr><th>Individual × side</th><td>0.08696012</td><td>0.0001552859</td><td>560</td><td>2.46</td><td><0.0001</td><td>10.75</td><td><0.0001</td></tr><tr><th>Error 1</th><td>0.07312665</td><td>0.0000387718</td><td>1160</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th><b>Occupancy mosaics in forested areas</b></th></tr><tr><th>Individual</th><td>1.19843989</td><td>0.0011984399</td><td>1000</td><td>8.16</td><td><0.0001</td><td>14.70</td><td><0.0001</td></tr><tr><th>Side</th><td>0.01169771</td><td>0.0005848855</td><td>20</td><td>3.98</td><td><0.0001</td><td>0.74</td><td>0.0001</td></tr><tr><th>Individual × side</th><td>0.14685738</td><td>0.0001468574</td><td>1000</td><td>3.03</td><td><0.0001</td><td>11.21</td><td><0.0001</td></tr><tr><th>Error 1</th><td>0.09880745</td><td>0.0000484350</td><td>2040</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th><b>Cocoa plantations</b></th></tr><tr><th>Individual</th><td>0.3269927600</td><td>0.0004808717</td><td>680</td><td>4.52</td><td><0.0001</td><td>14.14</td><td><0.0001</td></tr><tr><th>Side</th><td>0.0143644400</td><td>0.0007182221</td><td>20</td><td>6.75</td><td><0.0001</td><td>0.86</td><td>0.0017</td></tr><tr><th>Individual × side</th><td>0.0723474900</td><td>0.0001063934</td><td>680</td><td>2.39</td><td><0.0001</td><td>10.41</td><td>0.0017</td></tr><tr><th>Error 1</th><td>0.0622041800</td><td>0.0000444316</td><td>1400</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr></tbody></table>
Table ²: Comparison of the results of analysis of variance on the shape of scapulae (occlusal view) and pelvis (side view) in Rhipidomys mastacalis from three vegetation classes in Brazil. Correspondence asymmetry was the only method used for asymmetry analysis. in Morphological symmetry of Rhipidomys mastacalis (Mammalia, Rodentia, Cricetidae) in fragmented habitats of the Atlantic Forest in Northeastern Brazil: a study on the influence of the environment on an endemic species
<p><b>Table ²:</b> Comparison of the results of analysis of variance on the shape of scapulae (occlusal view) and pelvis (side view) in <i>Rhipidomys mastacalis</i> from three vegetation classes in Brazil. Correspondence asymmetry was the only method used for asymmetry analysis.</p><table><tbody><tr><th><b>Shape procrustes ANOVA</b></th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th><b>Effect Sum of squares</b></th><td><b>Mean squares</b></td><td><b>Degrees of freedom</b></td><td><i>F statistic</i></td><td><i>p -Value</i></td><td><b>Pillai tr.</b></td><td><i>p -Value</i></td></tr><tr><th><b>Scapulae</b></th></tr><tr><th><b>Forested vegetation</b></th></tr><tr><th>Individual</th><td>0.0941373400</td><td>0.0010459705</td><td>90</td><td>3</td><td><0.0001</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>Side</th><td>0.0100439600</td><td>0.0010043960</td><td>2.88</td><td>0.0037</td><td>0.0003</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>Individual × side</th><td>0.0314069500</td><td>0.0003489662</td><td>90</td><td>5.89</td><td><0.0001</td><td>4.91</td><td><0.0001</td></tr><tr><th>Error 1</th><td>0.0118544100</td><td>0.0000592721</td><td>200</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th><b>Occupancy mosaics in forested areas</b></th></tr><tr><th>Individual</th><td>0.2064168200</td><td>0.0010320841</td><td>200</td><td>4.82</td><td><0.0001</td><td>7.15</td><td><0.0001</td></tr><tr><th>Side</th><td>0.0262808000</td><td>0.0026280796</td><td>10</td><td>12.28</td><td><0.0001</td><td>0.86</td><td>0.0022</td></tr><tr><th>Individual × side</th><td>0.0428160400</td><td>0.0002140802</td><td>200</td><td>2.68</td><td><0.0001</td><td>4.98</td><td><0.0001</td></tr><tr><th>Error 1</th><td>0.0335675700</td><td>0.0000799228</td><td>420</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th><b>Cocoa plantations</b></th></tr><tr><th>Individual</th><td>0.2508635400</td><td>0.0009291242</td><td>270</td><td>4.07</td><td><0.0001</td><td>7.11</td><td><0.0001</td></tr><tr><th>Side</th><td>0.0256608100</td><td>0.0025660812</td><td>10</td><td>11.24</td><td><0.0001</td><td>0.87</td><td><0.0001</td></tr><tr><th>Individual × side</th><td>0.0616394000</td><td>0.0002282941</td><td>270</td><td>3.10</td><td><0.0001</td><td>5.72</td><td><0.0001</td></tr><tr><th>Error 1</th><td>0.0412323300</td><td>0.0000736292</td><td>560</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th><b>Pelvis</b></th></tr><tr><th><b>Forested vegetation</b></th></tr><tr><th>Individual</th><td>0.0543411200</td><td>0.0004312787</td><td>126</td><td>4.63</td><td><0.0001</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>Side</th><td>0.0043155600</td><td>0.0003082544</td><td>14</td><td>3.31</td><td>0.0002</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>Individual × side</th><td>0.0117297800</td><td>0.0000930935</td><td>126</td><td>2.31</td><td><0.0001</td><td>6.07</td><td><0.0001</td></tr><tr><th>Error 1</th><td>0.0112943700</td><td>0.000040337</td><td>280</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th><b>Occupancy mosaics in forested areas</b></th></tr><tr><th>Individual</th><td>0.1059661700</td><td>0.0003440460</td><td>308</td><td>4.42</td><td><0.0001</td><td>9.69</td><td><0.0001</td></tr><tr><th>Side</th><td>0.0049395300</td><td>0.0003528236</td><td>14</td><td>4.53</td><td><0.0001</td><td>0.85</td><td>0.0311</td></tr><tr><th>Individual × side</th><td>0.0239852500</td><td>0.0000778742</td><td>308</td><td>2.00</td><td><0.0001</td><td>6.64</td><td><0.0001</td></tr><tr><th>Error 1</th><td>0.0251368400</td><td>0.0000390324</td><td>644</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th><b>Cocoa plantations</b></th></tr><tr><th>Individual</th><td>0.1292837500</td><td>0.0003420205</td><td>378</td><td>5.68</td><td><0.0001</td><td>10.51</td><td><0.0001</td></tr><tr><th>Side</th><td>0.0043550500</td><td>0.0003110747</td><td>14</td><td>5.17</td><td><0.0001</td><td>0.84</td><td>0.0016</td></tr><tr><th>Individual × side</th><td>0.0227608400</td><td>0.0000602139</td><td>378</td><td>2.24</td><td><0.0001</td><td>6.17</td><td><0.0001</td></tr><tr><th>Error 1</th><td>0.0210413800</td><td>0.0000268385</td><td>714</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr></tbody></table>
TABLE 4. Pairwise comparison for the 18 S in Revised status of Omolicna subgenus Agoo (Hemiptera: Auchenorrhyncha: Fulgoroidea: Derbidae) with a new species from Costa Rica and new country records
<p><b>TABLE 4.</b> Pairwise comparison for the 18S gene based on 1,000 bootstrap replications using the p-distance method.</p><table><tbody><tr><th></th><th></th><th>1</th><th>2</th><th>3</th><th>4</th><th>5</th><th>6</th><th>7</th><th>8</th><th>9</th><th>10</th><th>11</th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th>1</th><td><i>Agoo dahliana</i></td><td></td><td>0.003</td><td>0.008</td><td>0.008</td><td>0.008</td><td>0.007</td><td>0.008</td><td>0.008</td><td>0.008</td><td>0.007</td><td>0.007</td></tr><tr><th>2</th><td><i>Agoo xavieri</i></td><td>0.012</td><td></td><td>0.008</td><td>0.008</td><td>0.008</td><td>0.007</td><td>0.007</td><td>0.008</td><td>0.008</td><td>0.007</td><td>0.007</td></tr><tr><th>3</th><td><i>Omolicna latens</i></td><td>0.097</td><td>0.098</td><td></td><td>0.003</td><td>0.003</td><td>0.008</td><td>0.008</td><td>0.003</td><td>0.003</td><td>0.008</td><td>0.008</td></tr><tr><th>4</th><td><i>Omolicna brunnea</i></td><td>0.096</td><td>0.097</td><td>0.009</td><td></td><td>0.002</td><td>0.008</td><td>0.008</td><td>0.001</td><td>0.002</td><td>0.008</td><td>0.008</td></tr><tr><th>5</th><td><i>Omolicna puertana</i></td><td>0.099</td><td>0.100</td><td>0.011</td><td>0.006</td><td></td><td>0.008</td><td>0.008</td><td>0.002</td><td>0.003</td><td>0.008</td><td>0.008</td></tr><tr><th>6</th><td><i>Anchimothon dubia</i></td><td>0.075</td><td>0.076</td><td>0.103</td><td>0.103</td><td>0.102</td><td></td><td>0.004</td><td>0.008</td><td>0.009</td><td>0.006</td><td>0.005</td></tr><tr><th>7</th><td><i>Omolicna nero</i></td><td>0.079</td><td>0.075</td><td>0.100</td><td>0.103</td><td>0.100</td><td>0.023</td><td></td><td>0.008</td><td>0.009</td><td>0.006</td><td>0.006</td></tr><tr><th>8</th><td><i>Omolicna triata</i></td><td>0.098</td><td>0.099</td><td>0.009</td><td>0.002</td><td>0.006</td><td>0.103</td><td>0.103</td><td></td><td>0.002</td><td>0.008</td><td>0.008</td></tr><tr><th>9</th><td><i>Omolicna joi</i></td><td>0.098</td><td>0.099</td><td>0.009</td><td>0.006</td><td>0.009</td><td>0.105</td><td>0.104</td><td>0.008</td><td></td><td>0.008</td><td>0.008</td></tr><tr><th>10</th><td><i>Neocenchrea heidemanni</i></td><td>0.067</td><td>0.068</td><td>0.100</td><td>0.100</td><td>0.098</td><td>0.041</td><td>0.047</td><td>0.100</td><td>0.102</td><td></td><td>0.001</td></tr><tr><th>11</th><td><i>Cenchrea dorsalis</i></td><td>0.065</td><td>0.067</td><td>0.099</td><td>0.098</td><td>0.096</td><td>0.040</td><td>0.045</td><td>0.099</td><td>0.100</td><td>0.053</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>
TABLE 1. Comparison between Lepanthes cordillerana E. Restrepo, J. S in Lepanthes cordillerana (Orchidaceae) a new species and the landscape threats to its wild populations
<p><b>TABLE 1.</b> Comparison between <i>Lepanthes cordillerana</i> E.Restrepo, J.S.Moreno & Gal. -Tar. and related species (in alphabetic order).</p><table><tbody><tr><th><b>Character</b></th><th><i>L. cordillerana</i></th><th><i>L. intonsa</i></th><th><i>L. jubata</i></th><th><i>L. protuberans</i></th><th><i>L. teres</i></th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th><b>Leaves</b></th><td>Erect to horizontal,</td><td>Erect, thinly</td><td>Erect to suberect,</td><td>Erect, thickly</td><td>Erect, fleshy,</td></tr><tr><th></th><td>heavily coriaceous,</td><td>coriaceous, ovate,</td><td>coriaceous, ovate,</td><td>coriaceous, narrowly</td><td>narrowly ovoid,</td></tr><tr><th></th><td>lanceolate-acute,</td><td>acuminate, acute.</td><td>acuminate, margins</td><td>elliptical, acute.</td><td>terete, smooth</td></tr><tr><th></th><td>apex attenuate,</td><td></td><td>smooth or minutely</td><td></td><td>margined.</td></tr><tr><th></th><td>emarginate, margin</td><td></td><td>denticulate</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th></th><td>ciliate.</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th><b>Petals</b></th><td>Cream, suffused</td><td>Yellow, suffused</td><td>Whitish internally,</td><td>Greenish white,</td><td>Light yellow with red</td></tr><tr><th></th><td>with magenta-red,</td><td>with orange,</td><td>suffused with</td><td>with red border,</td><td>margins, transversely,</td></tr><tr><th></th><td>transversely bilobed,</td><td>microscopically</td><td>red externally,</td><td>microscopically</td><td>dolabriform,</td></tr><tr><th></th><td>microscopically</td><td>pubescent,</td><td>transversely oblong,</td><td>pubescent,</td><td>the upper lobe</td></tr><tr><th></th><td>pubescent, the upper</td><td>transversely oblong,</td><td>bilobed, both lobes</td><td>transversely</td><td>oblong with the</td></tr><tr><th></th><td>lobe oblong with the</td><td>the upper lobe</td><td>obtuse, the upper</td><td>bilobed, the lobes</td><td>apex rounded, the</td></tr><tr><th></th><td>apex rounded, the</td><td>oblong, apically</td><td>longer.</td><td>subtriangular, about</td><td>lower lobe smaller,</td></tr><tr><th></th><td>lower lobe oblong-</td><td>rounded and the</td><td></td><td>equally long, the</td><td>narrowly triangular,</td></tr><tr><th></th><td>acute, apex obtuse.</td><td>smaller, oblique,</td><td></td><td>apices rounded.</td><td>obtuse.</td></tr><tr><th></th><td></td><td>obtuse lower lobe.</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th><b>Lip and</b></th><td>Cream-yellow, the</td><td>Reddish, the blades</td><td>Reddish, the blades</td><td>Rose, pubescent,</td><td>Yellow with red</td></tr><tr><th><b>appendix</b></th><td>blades marginally</td><td>oblong-obovate,</td><td>oblong, oblique, the</td><td>ciliate anteriorly,</td><td>margins, blades</td></tr><tr><th></th><td>suffused with red,</td><td>concave, the apical</td><td>margins with straight</td><td>the laminae oblong,</td><td>oblong, the</td></tr><tr><th></th><td>bilaminate, oblong,</td><td>margin long ciliated,</td><td>hairs, the connectives</td><td>with the apices and</td><td>apex ciliate, the</td></tr><tr><th></th><td>the apical margin</td><td>the connectives</td><td>rectangular,</td><td>bases rounded, the</td><td>connectives short,</td></tr><tr><th></th><td>abundantly long</td><td>oblong, elongated,</td><td>erect, lifting the</td><td>connectives broadly</td><td>cuneate, the appendix</td></tr><tr><th></th><td>ciliated at the apex,</td><td>lifting the appendix</td><td>blades above the</td><td>oblong, oblique,</td><td>a subspherical,</td></tr><tr><th></th><td>the connectives short,</td><td>straplike, sigmoid</td><td>column, the body</td><td>protuberant body,</td><td>bilobed body</td></tr><tr><th></th><td>cuneate, the body</td><td>in the lateral</td><td>broad, the sinus</td><td>the apex minimally</td><td>accommodated in a</td></tr><tr><th></th><td>broad, connate to the</td><td>view, pubescent,</td><td>broadly rounded</td><td>retuse without an</td><td>cavity in the sinus.</td></tr><tr><th></th><td>base of the column,</td><td>terminating in a small</td><td>and protruding</td><td>appendix.</td><td></td></tr><tr><th></th><td>the appendix capitate,</td><td>gland, hinged to the</td><td>with a minute,</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th></th><td>cuneate basally,</td><td>sinus.</td><td>pedunculated,</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th></th><td>apically caved,</td><td></td><td>bilobed appendix</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th></th><td>villose.</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>
Comparison for Efficacy and Safety of Bowel Preparation Between Oral Sulfate Table and 2L-polyethylene Glycol/Ascorbate in Elderly
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05249335. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 0. Publications: 1.
Suppelementary Table S1. List of heat-affected proteins in buds, open flowers, wilted flowers, and donor leaves of common buckwheat accessions 'Panda' and PA15. Comparison of protein abundance between heat-treated plants and those growing in optimal conditions.
<p>Suppelementary Table S1. List of heat-affected proteins in buds, open flowers, wilted flowers, and donor leaves of common buckwheat accessions ‘Panda’ and PA15. Comparison of protein abundance between heat-treated plants and those growing in optimal conditions. </p>
Table 7: Pairwise comparison matrix – motorcyclist perceptions
<p>Pairwise comparison matrix for motorcyclist perceptions</p>
A comparison of model-based and model-free agents in solving semi-automatically generated PPDDL problems - Agent classification table
<p>This table classifies the agents used in the work to those which use models in their decision-making, which are model-based (MB), and those which do not, which are model-free (MF).</p>
Comparison of Bipolar Vascular Sealing and Conventional Back-table Dissection
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05917054. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Table 9: Pairwise comparison matrix – perceptions from all the respondents
<p>Pairwise comparison matrix for perceptions from all the respondents</p>
Tables of direct, indirect and networks estimates and Forest plots of pairwise comparisons for all Secondary Outcomes
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Tables of direct, indirect, and network estimates and Forest plots of pairwise comparisons for Subgroup Analyses of Primary Outcomes (</= 28 weeks and >28 weeks)
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.