Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
41
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
41 results for “Creophilus”
Figure 16 in Testing the phylogenetic utility of morphological character systems, with a revision of Creophilus Leach (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae)
Figure 16. Creophilus incanus, details of morphology (setae of mandibles, antenna, and pronotum omitted). A, mandibles, dorsal (bases omitted); B, right antenna, dorsal (only apical setae shown; anterior is to the left); C, median lobe apex, ventral; D, paramere, dorsal; E, apical part of median lobe with fully everted internal sac, right lateral; F, aedeagus with details of inverted internal sac, right lateral (parameral setae omitted); G, pronotum (small male); H, right elytron (only whitish setae shown); I, female internal genitalia, ventral (surface of vf with minute teeth as shown for vp of C. maxillosus villosus in Fig. 9M); J, ventral sclerite of internal sac, ventral (lower) and apical (upper). Abbreviations: T1, T2, T3, mandibular teeth. Additional abbreviations as in Figure 3 (male) and Figure 5 (female). Scale bars = 1 mm.
Figure 15 in Testing the phylogenetic utility of morphological character systems, with a revision of Creophilus Leach (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae)
Figure 15. Distribution of all georeferenced specimens of C. maxillosus villosus (white circles) and C. m. maxillosus (black circles) in North America. Creophilus m. villosus is also recorded from Guatemala, Panama, and Chile (no locality). The holotype of C. arcticus, a synonym of C. m. villosus, is from Russia: Kamchatka.
Figure 14 in Testing the phylogenetic utility of morphological character systems, with a revision of Creophilus Leach (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae)
Figure 14. Ventral vestiture patterning of A, C. maxillosus maxillosus and B, C. m. villosus. Scale bar = 10 mm.
Figure 13 in Testing the phylogenetic utility of morphological character systems, with a revision of Creophilus Leach (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae)
Figure 13. Creophilus maxillosus, details of morphology (setae of mandibles, antenna, and pronotum omitted). C. m. maxillosus (A–G); C. m. villosus (H). A, mandibles, dorsal (bases omitted); B, right elytron (only whitish setae shown) C, paramere, dorsal; D, aedeagus with details of inverted internal sac, right lateral (parameral setae omitted); E, pronotum (small male); F, right antenna, dorsal (only apical setae shown); G, female internal genitalia, ventral H, ventral sclerite of internal sac, ventral (lower) and apical (upper). Abbreviations: T1, T2, T3, mandibular teeth. Additional abbreviations as in Figure 3 (male) and Figure 5 (female). Scale bars: H = 0.1 mm; rest = 1 mm.
Figure 35 in Testing the phylogenetic utility of morphological character systems, with a revision of Creophilus Leach (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae)
Figure 35. Distribution of all georeferenced specimens of C. huttoni in southern New Zealand (circles). For location of map within New Zealand see rectangle in Figure 34.
Figure 12 in Testing the phylogenetic utility of morphological character systems, with a revision of Creophilus Leach (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae)
Figure 12. Strict consensus of 11 most-parsimonious trees from the combined analysis of 121 adult morphological characters of the Creophilus complex (TL = 297; CI = 0.55; RI = 0.78). A, bars indicate the proportional contribution of each character system to the total synapomorphies supporting each clade. Numbers above branches are partitioned Bremer support values for structure, male genitalia, female genitalia, and chaetotaxy characters, respectively; small numbers below branches are bootstrap proportions. B, filled squares = uniquely optimized character state changes, open squares = homoplasious changes. Character and state numbers are given above and below branches, respectively. * = ACCTRAN; + = DELTRAN. Taxa in bold type are marine littoral species. Large numbers 1–18 indicate nodes referred to in the text.
Figure 36 in Testing the phylogenetic utility of morphological character systems, with a revision of Creophilus Leach (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae)
Figure 36. Creophilus rekohuensis, details of morphology (A, B, D–H, J, K = holotype; setae of mandibles, antenna, pronotum, and legs omitted). A, mandibles, dorsal (bases omitted); B, right antenna, dorsal (only apical setae shown); C, ventral sclerite of internal sac, ventral (lower) and apical (upper); D, paramere, dorsal; E, aedeagus with details of inverted internal sac, ventral; F, same, right lateral (parameral setae omitted); G, protarsus, dorsal; H, pronotum; I, female internal genitalia, ventral; J, right protibia, anterior; K, median lobe apex, ventral. Abbreviations: T1, T2, T3, mandibular teeth. Additional abbreviations as in Figure 3 (male) and Figure 5 (female). Scale bars: C = 0.1 mm; rest = 1 mm.
Figure 10 in Testing the phylogenetic utility of morphological character systems, with a revision of Creophilus Leach (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae)
Figure 10. Scanning electron micrographs of copulatory pieces. A, Creophilus flavipennis; B, C. maxillosus villosus; C, C. erythrocephalus. Abbreviations as in Figures 3 and 4. Scale bars = 0.1 mm.
Figure 8 in Testing the phylogenetic utility of morphological character systems, with a revision of Creophilus Leach (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae)
Figure 8. Details of morphology (vestiture omitted). Platydracus maculosus (A–C); Hadropinus fossor (D, E); Thinopinus pictus (F, G). A, head, dorsal; B, head, ventral; C, abdominal segments II–V, dorsal; D, right protibia, posterior; E, same, dorsal; F, abdominal segments II and III, dorsolateral; G, abdominal segment II, dorsal. Abbreviations: af, anterolateral flange; bgi, basal gular impression; io, infraorbital ridge; mem, medial emargination; nr, nuchal ridge; pg, postgenal ridge; po, postoccipital suture; ps, parasclerite; sbm, sinuate basal abdominal margin; spi, spiracle; vb, ventral basal ridge. Abbreviations of macrosetae as in Figure 6. Scale bars = 1 mm.
Figure 11 in Testing the phylogenetic utility of morphological character systems, with a revision of Creophilus Leach (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae)
Figure 11. Strict consensus trees from analysis of combined and separate character systems. Grey dots indicate nodes congruent with the analysis of all the data. Numbers above branches indicate Bremer support; numbers below branches are numbered nodes referred to in the text. The taxonomic congruence (Mickevich, 1978) tree represents the strict consensus of trees obtained in the separate analyses. Tree statistics are presented in Table 1.
Figure 5 in Testing the phylogenetic utility of morphological character systems, with a revision of Creophilus Leach (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae)
Figure 5. Female genitalia, details of morphology (all but E, ventral view). A, Creophilus m. villosus, internal genitalia; B, C. erythrocephalus, internal genitalia; C, C. huttoni, internal genitalia; D, C. oculatus, gonocoxites and styli (setae omitted from left side); E, Thinopinus pictus, abdominal segments VIII–X, dorsal (vestiture omitted); F, T. pictus, internal genitalia; G, Staphylinus caesareus, internal genitalia; H, Platydracus maculosus, internal genitalia; I, Hadrotes crassus, right gonocoxites and stylus (vestiture omitted) – arrow indicates membranous articulation; J, T. pictus, right gonocoxite. Abbreviations: bcx, bursa copulatrix; fl, flagellum (note that the complete structure is not shown); gc, gonocoxite; gcm, gonocoxal macroseta; gc1, gonocoxite I, gc2, gonocoxite II; mg, median groove; pls, paired lateral sclerites of vaginal plate; sc, sclerite of bursa copulatrix; sd, spermathecal duct; sp, spermatheca; ss, sclerotized strip of vaginal plate; sty, gonostyle; vf, vaginal fold; vp, vaginal plate. Scale bars = 1 mm.
Figure 4 in Testing the phylogenetic utility of morphological character systems, with a revision of Creophilus Leach (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae)
Figure 4. Male copulatory pieces of selected species in the Creophilus-complex, dorsal view. In each figure the large paired dark structures are the sclerotized arms of the copulatory piece. A, C. variegatus; B, C. maxillosus maxillosus; C, C. m. villosus; D, C. galapagensis; E, C. flavipennis; F, C. incanus; G, C. oculatus; H, C. erythrocephalus; I, C. imitator; J, C. lanio; K, C. albertisi; L, Hadrotes crassus; M, Thinopinus pictus; N, Hadropinus fossor; O, Liusus hilleri. Abbreviations: iedg, apical inner edge of arms of copulatory piece; por, parallel oblique ridges of copulatory piece (see also Fig. 10); xbar, 'cross-bar' of appendix. Additional abbreviations as in Figure 3. Scale bar = 1 mm.
Figure 6 in Testing the phylogenetic utility of morphological character systems, with a revision of Creophilus Leach (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae)
Figure 6. Scheme of taxonomically and phylogenetically informative macrosetae (chaetotaxy) identified in this study. A, head, prothorax, and pterothorax (dorsal); B, same (ventral); C, abdomen, dorsal. Abbreviations: (Head) – ad, additional temporal; al, anterolateral; am, anteromarginal; ba, basiantennal; gn, genal; mn, mental; oc, occipital; pl, posterolateral; sc, scapal; sm, submental; so, supraorbital; tm, temporal; vs, ventroscapal; (Prothorax) – an, anterolateral pronotal; ap, anterior pronotal group; bp, basolateral pronotal; bs, basisternal; pc, apical procoxal group; pp, procoxal patch; tr, protrochanteral; (Pterothorax) – ae, anterior elytral; bh, basohumeral; ds, discal series; hm, humeral; ma, metatrochanteral; mc, apical mesocoxal; me, metacoxal patch; mo, apical metacoxal; mp, mesocoxal patch; mr, mesoventral row; mt, mesotrochanteral; mv, metaventrital discal; pe, posterior elytral; pm, posteromedian metaventrital; ps1, parascutellar 1; ps2, parascutellar 2; pt, posterior elytral patch; (Abdomen) – il, inner lateral; mm, median; ol, outer lateral; pa, parascleral. III–VIII indicates numbering of true morphological segments (I and II being reduced and hidden beneath the elytra). The tergal chaetotaxy formula shown is 6–6–6–6–6–6.
New Records of Creophilus flavipennis (Hope, 1831) from Taiwan Island and Lutao Island, Taiwan (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae)_Supplementary data I
<p>Records of <em>Creophilus flavipennis</em> (Hope, 1831) from iNaturalist</p>
Figure 22 in Testing the phylogenetic utility of morphological character systems, with a revision of Creophilus Leach (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae)
Figure 22. Distribution of all georeferenced specimens of C. flavipennis (circles).
Figure 31 in Testing the phylogenetic utility of morphological character systems, with a revision of Creophilus Leach (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae)
Figure 31. Creophilus albertisi, details of morphology (setae of head, mandibles, antenna, and pronotum omitted). A, head (large male), dorsal; B, same, ventral; C, mandibles, dorsal (bases omitted); D, apex of median lobe with fully everted internal sac, right lateral; E, aedeagus with details of inverted internal sac, right lateral (parameral setae omitted) – arrow indicates dorsoapical projection of median lobe; F, pronotum (large male); G, right antenna, dorsal (only apical setae shown); H, ventral sclerite of internal sac, ventral; I, female internal genitalia, ventral – arrow indicates thin medial sclerite of vaginal fold; J, paramere, dorsal. Abbreviations: T2, T3, mandibular teeth; lr, lateral spiculose region; pgr, postgenal ridge; vl, ventrolateral carina. Additional abbreviations as in Figure 3 (male) and Figure 5 (female). Scale bars: H = 0.1 mm; rest = 1 mm.
Figure 30 in Testing the phylogenetic utility of morphological character systems, with a revision of Creophilus Leach (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae)
Figure 30. Distribution of all georeferenced specimens of C. lanio in south eastern Australia and Tasmania (circles). One possibly mislabeled specimen was seen from Western Australia.
Figure 23 in Testing the phylogenetic utility of morphological character systems, with a revision of Creophilus Leach (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae)
Figure 23. Creophilus variegatus, details of morphology (setae of mandibles, antenna, pronotum, and abdominal structures omitted. A, mandibles, dorsal (bases omitted); B, right antenna, dorsal (only apical setae shown; anterior is to the left); C, paramere, dorsal; D, ventral sclerite of internal sac, ventral (lower) and apical (upper); E, apical part of median lobe with fully everted internal sac, right lateral; F, aedeagus with details of inverted internal sac, right lateral (parameral setae omitted); G, right elytron (only whitish setae shown); H, pronotum (small male); I, female internal genitalia, ventral; J, ventral sclerite of internal sac with attached sclerotized bar (bar), ventral; K, male abdominal sternites VII and VIII; L, female abdominal tergite X; M, median lobe apex, ventral. Abbreviations: T1, T2, T3, mandibular teeth. Additional abbreviations as in Figure 3 (male) and Figure 5 (female). Scale bars: D and J = 0.1 mm; rest = 1 mm.
Figure 19 in Testing the phylogenetic utility of morphological character systems, with a revision of Creophilus Leach (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae)
Figure 19. Scanning electron micrographs of abdominal tergal microsculpture. A, Creophilus galapagensis, imbricate; B, C. maxillosus villosus (Gravenhorst), transversely strigulate. Scale bars = 0.1 mm.
Figure 18 in Testing the phylogenetic utility of morphological character systems, with a revision of Creophilus Leach (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae)
Figure 18. Creophilus galapagensis, details of morphology (A, C, E, F, I = holotype, small male); setae of mandibles, antenna, and pronotum omitted). A, mandibles, dorsal (bases omitted); B, right antenna, dorsal (only apical setae shown); C, median lobe apex, ventral; D, ventral sclerite of internal sac, ventral (lower) and apical (upper); E, aedeagus with details of inverted internal sac, right lateral (parameral setae omitted); F, pronotum; G, female internal genitalia, ventral; H, apical part of median lobe with fully everted internal sac, right lateral; I, paramere, dorsal. Abbreviations: T1, T2, T3, mandibular teeth. Additional abbreviations as in Figure 3 (male) and Figure 5 (female). Scale bars: D = 0.1 mm; rest = 1 mm.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.