Skip to main content
Powered by ShareScore

Find research datasets worth reusing

Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.

29

datasets available to search

ShareScore release 0.9.0

Reset

Dataset results

29 results for “Data management services”

Learn how ShareScore rates datasets ↗
dryad32/100

Data from: Detection and initial management of gestational diabetes through primary health care services in Morocco: an effectiveness-implementation trial

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicJan 2019View details →
edi32/100

NH Department of Environmental Services (NHDES) Watershed Management Bureau Biology Section: Lake Trophic Survey Environmental Monitoring data, 1995-2014

This program was initially established in 1975 in order to identify the trophic state of NH lakes and ponds, as required by Section 314(a) of PL 92-500 (the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972). The purpose of the program is to determine lake trophic class and monitor physical, chemical and biological water quality parameters. Each year, 40 different lakes and ponds are surveyed, once in the summer and once in the winter. The surveys are comprehensive physical, chemical and biological surveys, including electronic depth soundings, macrophyte identifications and abundance ratings, shoreline bacteria sampling and at the deep spot a temperature/dissolved oxygen/percent saturation profile, Secchi disk transparency reading, samples for chlorophyll, Ca, Mg Na, and K in the upper water layer, phytoplankton and zooplankton net hauls for identification and counts and discrete water samples at two or three depths for pH, acid neutralization capacity, apparent color, conductivity, TP, Total Kjeldahl nitrogen, nitrite+nitrate nitrogen, chloride, and sulfate. The surveys are designed to assess current baseline conditions and compliance with water quality criteria, identify the lake’s trophic status, determine acid rain impacts and the existence of exotic aquatic plants and provide information for gross long-term trend analyses.

openCC0May 2017View details →
edi32/100

NH Department of Environmental Services (NHDES) Watershed Management Bureau Biology Section: Volunteer Lake Assessment Program (VLAP) Environmental Monitoring data, 1995-2014

The New Hampshire Volunteer Lake Assessment Program was initiated in 1985 in response to an expressed desire of lake associations to be involved in lake protection and watershed management. VLAP is a cooperative program between volunteer monitors and the DES which leads to local awareness of land use and human practices that may be detrimental to lake quality and also empowers communities in their decision-making regarding lake management issues. The three major partners are the NHDES Biology Section, numerous volunteer monitors located throughout the state, and the VLAP satellite laboratories. Sara Steiner, NHDES VLAP Coordinator (who reports directly to Jody Connor, the Limnology Center Director and VLAP Program Manager), has the overall responsibility for training the volunteer monitors throughout the state in sample collection and watershed monitoring, conducting annual site visits and training interns to conduct annual site visits. NHDES and the volunteer monitors will collect samples from their lake/pond and its watershed, and will then bring samples to the NHDES Limnology Center, the Lake Sunapee Region Laboratory at Colby Sawyer College in New London, or the Environmental Research Laboratory at Plymouth State University in Plymouth. The purpose of VLAP is to assess the chemical and biological characteristics of the lakes and ponds throughout the state to determine overall health of the system. Environmental results are measured by making comparisons to established means and ranges of water quality for the state of New Hampshire. Chemical, biological, and physical parameters are measured and compared to lakes throughout the state. This data is provided to NHDES and the volunteer monitors. The data is used by the NHDES for assessment, education, and reporting purposes. The data are used by the volunteer monitors for educational purposes and for guiding local lake management activities. Volunteers collect water at least once per month during the summer (June –

openCC0Jan 2020View details →
dryad28/100

Data from: An ecosystem services perspective on brush management: research priorities for competing land use objectives

1. The vegetation of semi-arid and arid landscapes is often comprised of mixtures of herbaceous and woody vegetation. Since the early 1900s, shifts from herbaceous to woody plant dominance, termed woody plant encroachment and widely regarded as a state change, have occurred world-wide. This shift presents challenges to the conservation of grassland and savanna ecosystems and to animal production in commercial ranching systems and pastoral societies. 2. Dryland management focused on cattle and sheep grazing has historically attempted to reduce the abundance of encroaching woody vegetation (hereafter, 'brush management') with the intent of reversing declines in forage production, stream flow or groundwater recharge. Here, we assess the known and potential consequences of brush management actions, both positive and negative, on a broader suite of ecosystem services, the scientific challenges to quantifying these services and the trade-offs among them. 3. Our synthesis suggests that despite considerable investments accompanying the application of brush management practices, the recovery of key ecosystem services may be short-lived or absent. However, in the absence of such interventions, those and other ecosystem services may be compromised, and the persistence of grassland and savanna ecosystem types and their endemic plants and animals threatened. 4. Addressing the challenges posed by woody plant encroachment will require integrated management systems using diverse theoretical principles to design the type, timing and spatial arrangement of initial management actions and follow-up treatments. These management activities will need to balance cultural traditions and preferences, socio-economic constraints and potentially competing land-use objectives. 5. Synthesis. Our ability to predict ecosystem responses to management aimed at recovering ecosystem services where grasslands and savannas have been invaded by native or exotic woody plants is limited for many attributes (e.g. primary production, land surface–atmosphere interactions, biodiversity conservation) and inconsistent for others (e.g. forage production, herbaceous diversity, water quality/quantity, soil erosion, carbon sequestration). The ecological community is challenged with generating robust information about the response of ecosystem services and their interactions if we are to position land managers and policymakers to make objective, science-based decisions regarding the many trade-offs and competing objectives for the conservation and dynamic management of grasslands and savannas.

opencc-zeroDec 2013View details →
dryad28/100

Data from: Soil management shapes ecosystem service provision and trade-offs in agricultural landscapes

Agroecosystems are principally managed to maximize food provisioning even if they receive a large array of supporting and regulating ecosystem services (ESs). Hence, comprehensive studies investigating the effects of local management and landscape composition on the provision of and trade-offs between multiple ESs are urgently needed. We explored the effects of conservation tillage, nitrogen fertilization and landscape composition on six ESs (crop production, disease control, soil fertility, water quality regulation, weed and pest control) in winter cereals. Conservation tillage enhanced soil fertility and pest control, decreased water quality regulation and weed control, without affecting crop production and disease control. Fertilization only influenced crop production by increasing grain yield. Landscape intensification reduced the provision of disease and pest control. We also found tillage and landscape composition to interactively affect water quality regulation and weed control. Under N fertilization, conventional tillage resulted in more trade-offs between ESs than conservation tillage. Our results demonstrate that soil management and landscape composition affect the provision of several ESs and that soil management potentially shapes the trade-offs between them

opencc-zeroDec 2015View details →
zenodo28/100

Data from "Cooperative Management of Ecosystem Services: Coalition Formation, Landscape Structure and Policies"

<p>Simulated data generated to perform the simulations of the paper &quot;Bareille, F., Zavalloni, M., Raggi, M., &amp; Viaggi, D. (2021). Cooperative management of ecosystem services: coalition formation, landscape structure and policies. Environmental and Resource Economics, 79(2), 323-356.&quot;</p>

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2022View details →
dryad28/100

Data from: Soil management shapes ecosystem service provision and trade-offs in agricultural landscapes

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicAug 2016View details →
dryad28/100

Data from: An ecosystem services perspective on brush management: research priorities for competing land use objectives

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicNov 2014View details →
dryad28/100

Data from: Ecosystem service multifunctionality of low-productivity forests and implications for conservation and management

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicJan 2020View details →

ScienceDex guides

Understand access before you commit

These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.

Compare curated datasets

Allen Brain Atlas

Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.

allen-brain-atlas
neuroscienceopenDocumentation, web resources, and API references are available online.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)

ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.

abode-home-cage
behavioral-neuroscienceopenThe DataShare record exposes download links for annotations, documentation, license text, and the zipped per-snippet data directory.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

DANDI Archive for NWB datasets

DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.

dandi-nwb
electrophysiologyopenPublished Dandiset metadata and archive endpoints are available through the production DANDI API.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

International Brain Laboratory public data

The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.

ibl
behavioral-neuroscienceopenPublic sessions can be searched and loaded from the IBL public data server through ONE.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

OpenNeuro

OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.

openneuro
neuroscienceopenPublished datasets are available on demand over the internet.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record