Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
1,047
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
1,047 results for “Disability”
Toxic Sentence Classification Dataset with labels of categories such as religion, mental health, race, sex, body image, disability, physical abuse, and politics
<p>The dataset has a collection of various toxic sentences belonging to different categories. It was collected from various sources. It indicates which category each sentence belongs to. The values of the category columns are binary 1 or 0 indicating whether the sentence belongs to that particular category or not. Each sentence belongs to only 1 category. </p> <p> </p> <p>Columns:<br>1.comment_text: Contains toxic sentences that are insensitive and offensive, focusing on various categories.<br>2.mental_health: Binary value 1 indicates that the sentence focuses on mental health.<br>3.Race:Binary value 1 indicates that the sentence is racist.<br>4.sex:Binary value 1 indicates that the sentence focuses on sexuality.<br>5.body_image:Binary value 1 indicates that the sentence focuses on body image.<br>6.disability:Binary value 1 indicates that the sentence focuses on physical disability and related issues.<br>7.religion:Binary value 1 indicates that the sentence can be triggering to people who are extremely religious.<br>8.physical_abuse:Binary value 1 indicates that the sentence focuses on physical abuse issues.<br>9.politics:Binary value 1 indicates that the sentence focuses on political issues.</p>
"Moira knows what you did": Glasgow Disability Alliance Podcast Series Episode 1 for Our Heritage, Our Stories
<p>https://open.spotify.com/episode/0mwaMu6cqqbgx9RoFR6EFf</p>
The visualization of the collected data corresponding to the following paper: "The development of a Self-Rated ICF-based questionnaire (HEAR-COMMAND Tool) to evaluate Hearing, Communication, and Conversation disability: multinational experts' and patients' perspectives"
<p>These two PDF files include the data collected for a study conducted by Afghah et.al, 2022. They include the responses of the participant in this study to a newly developed self-rated ICF-based questionnaire. One file includes the responses to 30 demographic questions and the other one 88 ICF-based questions. The presented data were collected in Germany, the USA, and Egypt as well as overall data.</p> <p>The design of the questionnaire is described here:<br> Afghah, T., Alfakir, R., Meis, M., van Leeuwen, L. M., Kramer, S. E., Hammady, M., Youssif, M., & Wagener, K. C. (2021). The development of a Self-Rated ICF-based questionnaire (HEAR-COMMAND Tool) to evaluate hearing, communication, and conversation disability: multinational experts' and patients' perspectives. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5534360.</p> <p>This study was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) – Project ID: 352015383 – SFB 1330, C4.</p>
Effect of long-term physical disability and aging on extracellular matrix biogenesis in human skeletal muscle
<p>Supplemental Table for a study <strong>Effect of long-term physical disability and aging on extracellular matrix biogenesis in human skeletal muscle</strong></p>
Accessibility Reviews Associated with Visual Disabilities or Eye Conditions
<p>A dataset of nearly 180 million user reviews from which we extracted 4,999 accessibility reviews that express concerns that affect users with visual disabilities or eye conditions. </p> <p>This data is related to the following paper:</p> <p>Alberto Dumont Alves Oliveira, Paulo Sérgio Henrique Dos Santos, Wilson Estécio Marcílio Júnior, Wajdi M Aljedaani, Danilo Medeiros Eler, and Marcelo Medeiros Eler. 2023. Analyzing Accessibility Reviews Associated with Visual Disabilities or Eye Conditions. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 37, 1–14. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581315" rel="nofollow">https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581315</a></p>
Stakeholder views on the barriers and facilitators of psychosocial interventions to address reduction in aggressive challenging behaviour in adults with intellectual disabilities
<p>Success of psychosocial interventions in reducing aggressive challenging behaviour is likely to be related not only to mechanistic aspects but also to therapeutic and system factors. The study aims to examine the facilitators and barriers that influence whether psychosocial interventions for aggressive challenging behaviour in adults with intellectual disabilities lead to positive change. We conducted 42 semi-structured interviews with adults with intellectual disabilities and aggressive challenging behaviour, family/paid carers, and professionals engaged in or delivering a psychosocial intervention across the UK. Data were analysed thematically using a framework approach. Stakeholders considered therapeutic and supportive relationships and personalised care as facilitating factors of psychosocial interventions to address aggressive challenging behaviour. The operational structure of community intellectual disability services and conflicting expectations of professionals and carers were the main contextual barriers that impeded the implementation of psychosocial interventions addressing aggressive challenging behaviour in adults with intellectual disabilities. Findings highlight the valued components that maximise positive change in adults with intellectual disabilities who display aggressive challenging behaviour. Several operational adjustments including referral criteria, roles of professionals and workforce issues need to be addressed in services to maximise the implementation of psychosocial interventions to reduce aggressive challenging behaviour in adults with intellectual disabilities.</p>
Aging With Long Term Physical Disabilities
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT04589988. IPD Sharing: UNDECIDED. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.
Building Community Capacity for Disability Prevention for Minority Elders (Positive Minds - Strong Bodies)
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT02317432. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 2. Publications: 2.
Evaluation and Treatment of Substance Abuse in Veterans With PTSD Disability Claims
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT01597856. IPD Sharing: UNDECIDED. Countries: 1. Publications: 3.
Macular Pigment and Glare Disability
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT00909090. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 2.
Study of Teriflunomide in Reducing the Frequency of Relapses and Accumulation of Disability in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT00134563. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 21. Publications: 7.
The Back Exercises to Neutralize Disability Study
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT02308189. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.
A Community Wellness Program for Adults Living With Long-term Physical Disability
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03653390. IPD Sharing: YES. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Supervised Manual Physical Therapy Exercise for Ankle Disability After Motor Vehicle Accidents.
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06010706. IPD Sharing: YES. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.
Upper Extremity Function in Multiple Sclerosis Patients With Advanced Disability Treated With Ocrevus
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03562975. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 14.
Preventive Care of Chronic Cervical Pain and Disabilities
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT00566930. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.
Deutetrabenazine Treatment for Tardive Dyskinesia in Intellectual/Developmental Disabilities
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06997198. IPD Sharing: YES. Countries: 1. Publications: 27.
Assessment of Disability Compensation With the C-LEG COMPACT 2 Knee (Ref. 3C60 et 3C60=ST)
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT02382991. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 3. Publications: 11.
Best Practices to Prevent COVID-19 Illness in Staff and People With Serious Mental Illness and Developmental Disabilities in Congregate Living Settings
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT04726371. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 5.
Benefits Counseling to Preserve Function Among Disability Applicants
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT00715650. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 2.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.