Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
219
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
219 results for “EPIC”
AgMIP's Global Gridded Crop Model Intercomparison (GGCMI) phase 1 output data set: EPIC-IIASA maize
<p>This is model output from EPIC-IIASA for maize as part of AgMIP's Global Gridded Crop Model Intercomparison (GGCMI) phase 1 output data set.</p> <p>The data have been generated following the modeling protocol of Elliott et al. (2015) and has been used to evaluate the models (Müller et al., 2017). A data description paper has been published in Scientific Data (Müller et al. 2019).</p> <p>References:</p> <p>Elliott J, Müller C, Deryng D, Chryssanthacopoulos J, Boote KJ, Büchner M, Foster I, Glotter M, Heinke J, Iizumi T, Izaurralde RC, Mueller ND, Ray DK, Rosenzweig C, Ruane AC, and Sheffield J. 2015, The Global Gridded Crop Model intercomparison: data and modeling protocols for Phase 1 (v1.0). Geosci. Model Dev. 8, 261-277, doi:10.5194/gmd-8-261-2015</p> <p>Müller C, Elliott J, Chryssanthacopoulos J, Arneth A, Balkovic J, Ciais P, Deryng D, Folberth C, Glotter M, Hoek S, Iizumi T, Izaurralde RC, Jones C, Khabarov N, Lawrence P, Liu W, Olin S, Pugh TAM, Ray DK, Reddy A, Rosenzweig C, Ruane AC, Sakurai G, Schmid E, Skalsky R, Song CX, Wang X, de Wit A, and Yang H. 2017, Global gridded crop model evaluation: benchmarking, skills, deficiencies and implications, Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 1403-1422, doi: 10.5194/gmd-10-1403-2017</p> <p>Müller C, Elliott J, Kelly D, Arneth A, Balkovic J, Ciais P, Deryng D, Folberth C, Hoek S, Izaurralde RC, Jones CD, Khabarov N, Lawrence P, Liu W, Olin S, Pugh TAM, Reddy A, Rosenzweig C, Ruane AC, Sakurai G, Schmid E, Skalsky R, Wang X, de Wit A, and Yang H. 2019, The Global Gridded Crop Model Intercomparison phase 1 simulation dataset, Scientific Data, 6, 50, doi: 10.1038/s41597-019-0023-8</p>
AgMIP's global gridded crop model intercomparison (GGCMI) phase II CTWN-A archive: priority 1 outputs from EPIC-TAMU maize simulations
This data set contains output data from simulations with the model EPIC-TAMU for maize as part of AgMIP's Global Gridded Crop Model Intercomparison (GGCMI) phase II output data set. Output variables included are: crop yield, above-ground biomass, planting day, maturity day, actual growing season evapotranspiration . Simulations are based on 31-year simulations using the AgMERRA (Ruane et al. 2015) data set with 4 atmospheric CO2 mixing ratios (C=360, 510, 660, 810 ppm) uniform offsets for temperature (T= -1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 K), water (W= -50, -30, -20, -10, 0, 10, 20, 30 %, and infinite/irrigated), and 3 nitrogen input levels (N= 10, 60, 200 kgN/ha) using 2 assumptions on adaptation (A0= 'none', A1='regain original growing season').
AgMIP's global gridded crop model intercomparison (GGCMI) phase II CTWN-A archive: priority 1 outputs from EPIC-TAMU rice simulations
This data set contains output data from simulations with the model EPIC-TAMU for rice as part of AgMIP's Global Gridded Crop Model Intercomparison (GGCMI) phase II output data set. Output variables included are: crop yield, above-ground biomass, planting day, maturity day, actual growing season evapotranspiration . Simulations are based on 31-year simulations using the AgMERRA (Ruane et al. 2015) data set with 4 atmospheric CO2 mixing ratios (C=360, 510, 660, 810 ppm) uniform offsets for temperature (T= -1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 K), water (W= -50, -30, -20, -10, 0, 10, 20, 30 %, and infinite/irrigated), and 3 nitrogen input levels (N= 10, 60, 200 kgN/ha) using 2 assumptions on adaptation (A0= 'none', A1='regain original growing season').
AgMIP's global gridded crop model intercomparison (GGCMI) phase II CTWN-A archive: priority 1 outputs from EPIC-TAMU winter wheat simulations
This data set contains output data from simulations with the model EPIC-TAMU for winter wheat as part of AgMIP's Global Gridded Crop Model Intercomparison (GGCMI) phase II output data set. Output variables included are: crop yield, above-ground biomass, planting day, maturity day, actual growing season evapotranspiration . Simulations are based on 31-year simulations using the AgMERRA (Ruane et al. 2015) data set with 4 atmospheric CO2 mixing ratios (C=360, 510, 660, 810 ppm) uniform offsets for temperature (T= -1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 K), water (W= -50, -30, -20, -10, 0, 10, 20, 30 %, and infinite/irrigated), and 3 nitrogen input levels (N= 10, 60, 200 kgN/ha) using 2 assumptions on adaptation (A0= 'none', A1='regain original growing season').
AgMIP's global gridded crop model intercomparison (GGCMI) phase II CTWN-A archive: priority 1 outputs from EPIC-TAMU spring wheat simulations
This data set contains output data from simulations with the model EPIC-TAMU for spring wheat as part of AgMIP's Global Gridded Crop Model Intercomparison (GGCMI) phase II output data set. Output variables included are: crop yield, above-ground biomass, planting day, maturity day, actual growing season evapotranspiration . Simulations are based on 31-year simulations using the AgMERRA (Ruane et al. 2015) data set with 4 atmospheric CO2 mixing ratios (C=360, 510, 660, 810 ppm) uniform offsets for temperature (T= -1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 K), water (W= -50, -30, -20, -10, 0, 10, 20, 30 %, and infinite/irrigated), and 3 nitrogen input levels (N= 10, 60, 200 kgN/ha) using 2 assumptions on adaptation (A0= 'none', A1='regain original growing season').
AgMIP's global gridded crop model intercomparison (GGCMI) phase II CTWN-A archive: priority 1 outputs from EPIC-IIASA maize simulations
This data set contains output data from simulations with the model EPIC-IIASA for maize as part of AgMIP's Global Gridded Crop Model Intercomparison (GGCMI) phase II output data set. Output variables included are: crop yield, above-ground biomass, planting day, maturity day, potential irrigation water withdrawal, actual growing season evapotranspiration . Simulations are based on 31-year simulations using the AgMERRA (Ruane et al. 2015) data set with 4 atmospheric CO2 mixing ratios (C=360, 510, 660, 810 ppm) uniform offsets for temperature (T= -1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 K), water (W= -50, -30, -20, -10, 0, 10, 20, 30 %, and infinite/irrigated), and 3 nitrogen input levels (N= 10, 60, 200 kgN/ha) using 2 assumptions on adaptation (A0= 'none', A1='regain original growing season').
AgMIP's global gridded crop model intercomparison (GGCMI) phase II CTWN-A archive: priority 1 outputs from EPIC-TAMU soybean simulations
This data set contains output data from simulations with the model EPIC-TAMU for soybean as part of AgMIP's Global Gridded Crop Model Intercomparison (GGCMI) phase II output data set. Output variables included are: crop yield, above-ground biomass, planting day, maturity day, actual growing season evapotranspiration . Simulations are based on 31-year simulations using the AgMERRA (Ruane et al. 2015) data set with 4 atmospheric CO2 mixing ratios (C=360, 510, 660, 810 ppm) uniform offsets for temperature (T= -1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 K), water (W= -50, -30, -20, -10, 0, 10, 20, 30 %, and infinite/irrigated), and 3 nitrogen input levels (N= 10, 60, 200 kgN/ha) using 2 assumptions on adaptation (A0= 'none', A1='regain original growing season').
AgMIP's global gridded crop model intercomparison (GGCMI) phase II CTWN-A archive: priority 1 outputs from EPIC-IIASA rice simulations
This data set contains output data from simulations with the model EPIC-IIASA for rice as part of AgMIP's Global Gridded Crop Model Intercomparison (GGCMI) phase II output data set. Output variables included are: crop yield, above-ground biomass, planting day, maturity day, potential irrigation water withdrawal, actual growing season evapotranspiration . Simulations are based on 31-year simulations using the AgMERRA (Ruane et al. 2015) data set with 4 atmospheric CO2 mixing ratios (C=360, 510, 660, 810 ppm) uniform offsets for temperature (T= -1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 K), water (W= -50, -30, -20, -10, 0, 10, 20, 30 %, and infinite/irrigated), and 3 nitrogen input levels (N= 10, 60, 200 kgN/ha) using 2 assumptions on adaptation (A0= 'none', A1='regain original growing season').
AgMIP's global gridded crop model intercomparison (GGCMI) phase II CTWN-A archive: priority 1 outputs from EPIC-IIASA soybean simulations
This data set contains output data from simulations with the model EPIC-IIASA for soybean as part of AgMIP's Global Gridded Crop Model Intercomparison (GGCMI) phase II output data set. Output variables included are: crop yield, above-ground biomass, planting day, maturity day, potential irrigation water withdrawal, actual growing season evapotranspiration . Simulations are based on 31-year simulations using the AgMERRA (Ruane et al. 2015) data set with 4 atmospheric CO2 mixing ratios (C=360, 510, 660, 810 ppm) uniform offsets for temperature (T= -1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 K), water (W= -50, -30, -20, -10, 0, 10, 20, 30 %, and infinite/irrigated), and 3 nitrogen input levels (N= 10, 60, 200 kgN/ha) using 2 assumptions on adaptation (A0= 'none', A1='regain original growing season').
AgMIP's global gridded crop model intercomparison (GGCMI) phase II CTWN-A archive: priority 1 outputs from EPIC-IIASA winter wheat simulations
This data set contains output data from simulations with the model EPIC-IIASA for winter wheat as part of AgMIP's Global Gridded Crop Model Intercomparison (GGCMI) phase II output data set. Output variables included are: crop yield, above-ground biomass, planting day, maturity day, potential irrigation water withdrawal, actual growing season evapotranspiration . Simulations are based on 31-year simulations using the AgMERRA (Ruane et al. 2015) data set with 4 atmospheric CO2 mixing ratios (C=360, 510, 660, 810 ppm) uniform offsets for temperature (T= -1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 K), water (W= -50, -30, -20, -10, 0, 10, 20, 30 %, and infinite/irrigated), and 3 nitrogen input levels (N= 10, 60, 200 kgN/ha) using 2 assumptions on adaptation (A0= 'none', A1='regain original growing season').
AgMIP's global gridded crop model intercomparison (GGCMI) phase II CTWN-A archive: priority 1 outputs from EPIC-IIASA spring wheat simulations
This data set contains output data from simulations with the model EPIC-IIASA for spring wheat as part of AgMIP's Global Gridded Crop Model Intercomparison (GGCMI) phase II output data set. Output variables included are: crop yield, above-ground biomass, planting day, maturity day, potential irrigation water withdrawal, actual growing season evapotranspiration . Simulations are based on 31-year simulations using the AgMERRA (Ruane et al. 2015) data set with 4 atmospheric CO2 mixing ratios (C=360, 510, 660, 810 ppm) uniform offsets for temperature (T= -1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 K), water (W= -50, -30, -20, -10, 0, 10, 20, 30 %, and infinite/irrigated), and 3 nitrogen input levels (N= 10, 60, 200 kgN/ha) using 2 assumptions on adaptation (A0= 'none', A1='regain original growing season').
Rice productivity along waterlogging gradient in Indonesian peatlands (EPIC-IIASA model outputs)
<p>[1] The spatially explicit modelled water table depth data (WTBL, in m) were produced for a total of ten waterlogging intensity scenarios (WetScen) in Indonesian peatlands using the Environmental Policy Integrated Climate-based modelling framework EPIC-IIASA. The WetScen scenarios 1 to 10 represent a gradient from water-logged to deeply drained soils. The dataset provides monthly WTBL series simulated between 2001 and 2010 at 0.25×0.25 arc-deg spatial resolution across all Indonesia peatland soils (<a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6997968">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6997968</a>). This data brings harmonized groundwater regime data in large-scale agricultural modelling to allow assessing the impact of peatland rewetting on rice productivity in Indonesia. These data were prepared as a part of the RESTORE+ project, separately for two rice growing seasons (seasons 1 and 2) and rice double-cropping on mineral (miner) and shallow peat soils (peat) with a depth of less than 1 m.</p> <p>[2] The spatially explicit datasets of annual rice yield (YLDG in tDM/ha) and monthly root zone soil water content (RZSW, in mm) were simulated at 0.25×0.25° spatial resolution following the waterlogging scenarios described above. The datasets explore (a) two nutrient management, namely the good agricultural practice (GAP) and management that was back-calibrated against statistically reported regional yields (BackCalc), (b) two rice seasons (season 1 and 2) plus a double-cropping system, and (c) ten waterlogging scenarios (WetScen) in all peatland grids with soils suitable for rice production, i.e., all mineral soils (miner) and soils with the shallow peat material (peat). The simulations were carried out from 2001 to 2010, consistently with the scenario data and modelling framework described above. This database was created as a part of the RESTORE+ project. The details are described in a separate document (see <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7355835">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7355835</a>).</p>
A systematic evaluation of normalization methods and probe replicability using infinium EPIC methylation data
<p><strong>Background </strong></p> <p>The Infinium EPIC array measures the methylation status of > 850,000 CpG sites. The EPIC BeadChip uses a two-array design: Infinium Type I and Type II probes. These probe types exhibit different technical characteristics which may confound analyses. Numerous normalization and pre-processing methods have been developed to reduce probe type bias as well as other issues such as background and dye bias. <strong> </strong></p> <p><strong>Methods</strong></p> <p>This study evaluates the performance of various normalization methods using 16 replicated samples and three metrics: absolute beta-value difference, overlap of non-replicated CpGs between replicate pairs, and effect on beta-value distributions. Additionally, we carried out Pearson's correlation and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) analyses using both raw and SeSAMe 2 normalized data. <strong> </strong></p> <p><strong>Results</strong></p> <p>The method we define as SeSAMe 2, which consists of the application of the regular SeSAMe pipeline with an additional round of QC, pOOBAH masking, was found to be the best-performing normalization method, while quantile-based methods were found to be the worst performing methods. Whole-array Pearson's correlations were found to be high. However, in agreement with previous studies, a substantial proportion of the probes on the EPIC array showed poor reproducibility (ICC < 0.50). The majority of poor-performing probes have beta values close to either 0 or 1, and relatively low standard deviations. These results suggest that probe reliability is largely the result of limited biological variation rather than technical measurement variation. Importantly, normalizing the data with SeSAMe 2 dramatically improved ICC estimates, with the proportion of probes with ICC values > 0.50 increasing from 45.18% (raw data) to 61.35% (SeSAMe 2).</p>
K2 Campaign 2 observations of EPIC 203354381
<p>K2 Campaign 2 observations of the rapid rotator EPIC 203354381, 23 August 2014 to 10 November 2014. We downloaded the detrended light curve from the <a href="https://luger.dev/everest/catalog.html">EVEREST catalog</a> (Luger et al. 2016, AJ, 152, 100). This version excludes NaNs and 3<span class="math-tex">\(\sigma\)</span> flux outliers. In our paper <em>Optimal frequency-domain analysis for spacecraft time series: Introducing the missing-data multitaper power spectrum estimator, </em>we trimmed the first 50 observations in this data file before estimating the power spectrum; these observations record a stellar flare.</p>
Nurse Coach-Led Early Palliative Care for Older Adults With COPD and Their Care Partners: The Project EPIC Pilot RCT
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05040386. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.
Enabling Patient-Reported Outcomes Through Innovative Care - ACS (EPIC-ACS)
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT07390006. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 6.
Ponatinib in Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) (EPIC)
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT01650805. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 24. Publications: 2.
EPIC Nitinol Stent System in the Treatment of Atherosclerotic Lesions in Iliac Arteries
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT00896337. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.
Evaluation of Protease Inhibition for COVID-19 in Standard-Risk Patients (EPIC-SR).
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05011513. IPD Sharing: YES. Countries: 20. Publications: 3.
Early Prophylaxis Immunologic Challenge (EPIC) Study
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT01376700. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 12. Publications: 1.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.