Find research datasets worth reusing

Figure 2 in Molecular evolutionary trends and biosynthesis pathways in the Oribatida revealed by the genome of Archegozetes longisetosus

Figure 2 Comparisons and annotations of the official gene set (OGS) of Archegozetes longisetosus.a – Number of gene models of the mites compared to other mites, chelicerates and the fruit fly (Grbić et al., 2011; Cao et al., 2013; dos Santos et al., 2015; Gulia-Nuss et al., 2016; Schwager et al., 2017). b – Non-linear multidimensional scaling plot (NMDS) of clustered orthogroups based on the OGS or predicted proteins

Figure 3 in Molecular evolutionary trends and biosynthesis pathways in the Oribatida revealed by the genome of Archegozetes longisetosus

Figure 3 Orthology comparison and phylogenetic placement of Archegozetes longisetosusamong other chelicerates. a – Maximum likelihood phylogeny based on concatenation of 1,121 orthologs showing the mites phylogenetic position within the Oribatida (all nodes have 100%

Figure 7 in Molecular evolutionary trends and biosynthesis pathways in the Oribatida revealed by the genome of Archegozetes longisetosus

Figure 7 Horizontal gene transfer (HGT) and implications for the feeding biology of Archegozetes longisetosus. a – Blob-plot of the long- read genome assembly contigs plotting the read coverage against GC proportion [%]. Contigs are colored according to the taxonomic order

Figure 6 in Molecular evolutionary trends and biosynthesis pathways in the Oribatida revealed by the genome of Archegozetes longisetosus

Figure 6 The sensory systems of Archegozetes longisetosusand phylogenetic analysis of selected photoreceptor and chemosensory genes. a – Scanning electron micrograph (SEM) showing the end of tarsus on Archegozetes′ first leg. Images shows normal setae, but also modified chemosensory setae, namely eupathidia, both paired (p) and single (s), as well as an omega-3 solenidium. SEM picture courtesy of Michael Heethoff. b – Phylogeny and classification of opsin genes across the Metazoa, including those of several Chelicerata. The tree was constructed using a maximum likelihood approach (LG+F+R4 model) and rooted with a jelly fish opsin. Archegozetes sequences are depicted in red, Drosophila in turquoise; branch length unit is substitutions per site. c – Maximum likelihood phylogeny of ionotropic receptors and ionotropic glutamate receptors (LG+F+R6 model) of Archegozetes (Along), Dinothrombium (Dt), Leptothrombidium (Ld), Tetranychus (Tu) and Drosophila (Dmel). IR25a/IR8a and antenna/1 st leg IRs contain genes with known chemosensory function in Drosophila. The tree was rooted to the middle point; Archegozetes sequences are depicted in red, Drosophila in turquoise; branch length unit is substitutions per site. Bootstrap values can be found in the supplementary Figure S13. d – Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree of gustatory receptors (JTT+F+R6 model) of Archegozetes(Along), Ixodes (Is), Tropilaelaps (Tm), Metaseiulus (Mocc) and Drosophila (Dmel). The tree was rooted to the middle point; Archegozetessequences are depicted in red, Drosophila in turquoise; branch length unit is substitutions per site. Bootstrap values can be found in the supplementary Figure S14. e – Combined image of volume rendering (grey) and reconstructed nervous system of Archegozetesin dorsal view. Color-code corresponds to different parts of the nervous system, as depicted in the legend. The blue structure in the middle of the synganglion is the part of the esophagus which penetrates the synganglion. Scale bar: 200 µm. Image courtesy of Sebastian Schmelzle based

Figure 1 in Molecular evolutionary trends and biosynthesis pathways in the Oribatida revealed by the genome of Archegozetes longisetosus

Figure 1 The mite, Archegozetes longisetosus, in its phylogenetic and natural environment. a – Species tree of selected oribatid mites of the family Trhypochthoniidae based on phylogenetic analyses and divergence time estimates (Heethoff et al., 2011b). b – Two adults and one tritonymph of Archegozeteson a piece of leaf litter. The algae growing on the leaf serves as a food source for the mites. c – Habitus of an adult mite based on a surface rendering of a µCT-scan reconstruction. Image courtesy of Sebastian Schmelzle. d – Hi-C interaction matrix maps of the nine Archegozeteschromosomes. The corrected contacts are indicated by the color scale on the right from red (high density) to blue (low density)

Figure 8 in Molecular evolutionary trends and biosynthesis pathways in the Oribatida revealed by the genome of Archegozetes longisetosus

Figure 8 Reconstruction of the biosynthetic pathway leading to monoterpenes in Archegozetes longisetosus. a – Representative gas chro- matogram of the mite′ gland content; in order of retention time: 2-hydroxy-6-methyl-benzaldehyde (2,6-HMBD), neral (( Z)-3,7-dimethylocta- 2,6-dienal) neryl formate (( Z)-3,7-dimethyl-2,6-octadienyl formate), tridecane, 3-hydroxybenzene-1,2-dicarbaldehyde (γ-acaridial). Further alkanes/alkenes (pentadec-7-ene, pentadecane, heptadeca-6,9-diene, heptadec-8-ene, heptadecane) are not shown. Monoterpenes are marked

Figure 5 in Molecular evolutionary trends and biosynthesis pathways in the Oribatida revealed by the genome of Archegozetes longisetosus

Figure 5 The genomic organization of the Hox genes and life-stage specific expression patters of developmental genes in Archegozetes longisetosus. a – Schematic of the genomic region enclosing the ArchegozetesHox cluster. The genomic organization of the Hox cluster is collinear,

Figure 4 in Molecular evolutionary trends and biosynthesis pathways in the Oribatida revealed by the genome of Archegozetes longisetosus

Figure 4 Comparison of repeat content estimations and transposable element (TE) landscape of Archegozetes longisetosus. a – Repetitive element categories of Archegozetes based on the results from RepeatModeler and MITETracker. LINE= long interspersed nuclear element, LTR= long terminal repeat. b – Comparison of total repetitive content among Archegozetes, other model chelicerates and the fly. All values are from the respective genome paper of the species, except for the fly. c – Repeat divergence plot showing TE activity through time for the major TE superfamilies of Archegozetes.Transposable elements with a low divergence from the consensus were recently active, while TEs diverging

FIGURE 50 in The Weevil Rostrum (Coleoptera: Curculionoidea): Internal Structure And Evolutionary Trends

FIGURE 50. Semithin sections of head of Gymnaetron sp. (Curculionidae: Curculioninae). A, ventral aspect of head; B, lateral aspect of head; C–H, cross sections proceeding from apex of rostrum toward base; C, section at apex of rostrum through mouthparts; D, section immediately posterior to mouthparts, anterior to antennal insertion; E, diagram of D; F, section near middle of rostrum and at antennal insertion; G, section

FIGURE 45 in The Weevil Rostrum (Coleoptera: Curculionoidea): Internal Structure And Evolutionary Trends

FIGURE 45. Semithin sections of head of Cylindrocopturus adspersus (Curculionidae: Conoderinae). A, ventral aspect of head; B, lateral aspect of head; C–H, cross sections proceeding from apex of rostrum toward base; C, section at apex of rostrum through mouthparts; D, section immediately posterior to mouthparts; E, dia-

FIGURE 40 in The Weevil Rostrum (Coleoptera: Curculionoidea): Internal Structure And Evolutionary Trends

FIGURE 40. Semithin sections of head of Xyleborus sp. (Curculionidae: Scolytinae: Xyleborini). A, ventral aspect of head; B, lateral aspect of head; C–H, cross sections proceeding from apex to middle of head; C, section at apex of head through mouthparts, anterior to antennal insertion; D, section at proximal area of

FIGURE 31 in The Weevil Rostrum (Coleoptera: Curculionoidea): Internal Structure And Evolutionary Trends

FIGURE 31. Semithin sections of head of Sphenophorus sp. (Curculionidae: Dryophthorinae). A, ventral aspect of head; B, lateral aspect of head; C–F, oblique cross sections along rostrum and head; C–D, sections at antennal insertion and base of rostrum and head; E, section at middle of rostrum, anterior to antennal insertion; F, diagram of E.

FIGURE 30 in The Weevil Rostrum (Coleoptera: Curculionoidea): Internal Structure And Evolutionary Trends

FIGURE 30. Semithin sections of head of Lissorhoptrus sp. (Curculionidae: Brachycerinae: Erirhinini): Lissorhoptrus sp. A, ventral aspect of head; B, lateral aspect of head; C–J, cross sections proceeding from apex of rostrum toward base; C–D, sections at apex of rostrum through mouthparts; E, section at proximal area of mouthparts; F, section

FIGURE 27 in The Weevil Rostrum (Coleoptera: Curculionoidea): Internal Structure And Evolutionary Trends

FIGURE 27. Semithin sections of head of Nanophyes sp. (Brentidae: Nanophyinae). A, ventral aspect of head; B, lateral aspect of head; C–G, cross sections proceeding from apex of rostrum toward base; C, section at apex of head through mouthparts; D, section through proximal area of mouthparts; E, section posterior to mouthparts, anterior to antennal insertion; F, section posterior to middle of rostrum and to antennal insertion; G, diagram of F.

FIGURE 25 in The Weevil Rostrum (Coleoptera: Curculionoidea): Internal Structure And Evolutionary Trends

FIGURE 25. Semithin sections of head of female Arrenodes minutus (Brentidae: Brentinae). A, ventral aspect of head; B, lateral aspect of head; C–J, cross sections proceeding from apex of rostrum to base and into head; C, section at apex of rostrum through mouthparts; D, section posterior to mouthparts; E, section anterior to antennal insertion

FIGURE 24 in The Weevil Rostrum (Coleoptera: Curculionoidea): Internal Structure And Evolutionary Trends

FIGURE 24. Semithin sections of head of Ithycerus noveboracensis (Brentidae: Ithycerinae). A, ventral aspect of head; B, lateral aspect of head; C–H, cross sections proceeding from apex of rostrum toward base; C, section at apex of rostrum through mouthparts; D, section at proximal area of mouthparts; E, section posterior to mouthparts at anten-

FIGURE 26 in The Weevil Rostrum (Coleoptera: Curculionoidea): Internal Structure And Evolutionary Trends

FIGURE 26. Semithin sections of head of Apion sp. (Brentidae: Apioninae). A, ventral aspect of head; B, lateral aspect of head; C–I, cross sections proceeding from apex of rostrum toward base; C, section at apex of rostrum through mouthparts; D, section just posterior to mouthparts; E, G, sections posterior to mouth-

FIGURE 23 in The Weevil Rostrum (Coleoptera: Curculionoidea): Internal Structure And Evolutionary Trends

FIGURE 23. Semithin sections of head of Caenominurus topali (Caridae). A, ventral aspect of head; B, lateral aspect of head; C–I, cross sections proceeding from apex of rostrum toward base; C–D, sections at apex of rostrum through mouthparts; E, section at proximal area of mouthparts; F–G, sections posterior to mouthparts, anterior to antennal insertion; H, section before antennal insertion just posterior to middle of rostrum;

FIGURE 22 in The Weevil Rostrum (Coleoptera: Curculionoidea): Internal Structure And Evolutionary Trends

FIGURE 22. Semithin sections of head of Rhynchites auratus (Attelabidae: Rhynchitinae). A, ventral aspect of head; B, lateral aspect of head; C–H, cross sections proceeding from apex of rostrum toward base; C, section at apex of rostrum through mouthparts; D, section just posterior to mouthparts; E, diagram of D; F, section

FIGURE 44 in The Weevil Rostrum (Coleoptera: Curculionoidea): Internal Structure And Evolutionary Trends

FIGURE 44. Semithin sections of head of Odontocorynus sp. (Curculionidae: Baridinae). A, ventral aspect of head; B, lateral aspect of head; C–H, cross sections proceeding from apex of rostrum toward base; C–D, sections at apex of rostrum through mouthparts; E, section immediately posterior to mouthparts, anterior to