Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
204
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
204 results for “Fjord”
Figure 5 in Harbor seal use of glacier ice and terrestrial haul-outs in the Kenai Fjords, Alaska
Figure 5. Comparison of numbers of mother-pup harbor seal pairs (MP) counted in Aialik Bay and Northwestern Fjord from 2004 to 2013 using multiple survey methods. Area charts indicate maximum annual counts of MP in Aialik Bay and Northwestern Fjord (light blue) and in Aialik Bay (darker blue). Maximum annual MP counts in Northwestern Fjord are indicated by the blue green line. White dots with 95% CI error bars show generalized linear model (GLM) mean estimate MP based on remote video observations in Aialik Bay during standardized favorable haul-out conditions.
Figure 4 in Harbor seal use of glacier ice and terrestrial haul-outs in the Kenai Fjords, Alaska
Figure 4. Comparison of regional changes in numbers of harbor seal pups (Panel A), seals without pups present during pupping (Panel C), and molting seals (Panel D) in four regions of the coastline extending from McCarty Fjord through Johnstone Bay. Pup counts at individual fjords summarized as RB-JB are compared in Panel B. Bars represent maximum counts obtained during aerial surveys. Total counts for all regions (black dots) are measured on the secondary axis. Histogram bars of molt counts represent maximum counts for each year obtained from aerial surveys; triangles indicate counts in Northwestern Fjord based on KFT vessel surveys.
Figure 1 in Harbor seal use of glacier ice and terrestrial haul-outs in the Kenai Fjords, Alaska
Figure 1. Maps showing locations of the study area (Panel A) and of study area place names (Panel B). Red shading along the coastline, in the Panel A inset, illustrates the geographic extent of surveys (portions of flights flown at altitudes <335 m).
Figure 6 in Natural and human effects on harbor seal abundance and spatial distribution in an Alaskan glacial fjord
Figure 6. Estimated area of Disenchantment Bay (km2) containing three different ice cover types: scattered (1–3 tenths), intermediate (4–6 tenths), and dense (7–10 tenths), and all types combined (i.e., ice-covered area [ICA]) from 3 May to 4 August 2002. Estimates of ice cover were averaged within grid cells (when n> 1) and the areas of cells with each type of ice cover were summed (Jansen et al. 2006)) and then scaled upward (proportionately) based on the percent of the study area that was sampled on a given day.
Figure 7 in Natural and human effects on harbor seal abundance and spatial distribution in an Alaskan glacial fjord
Figure 7. Patterns of ship movement and visitation time in Disenchantment Bay, Alaska, in 2002 (n = 56 cruise ships of 105 total during study). Shading of cells represents the cumulative time that visiting ships spent within that cell for each of three months: May, June, and July (including early August). Four distinct shades, from gray to black, reflect increasing residence: <5 min, 5–10 min, 10–20 min,>20 min, respectively. Refer to Figure 1 for geographical points and scale.
Figure 5 in Natural and human effects on harbor seal abundance and spatial distribution in an Alaskan glacial fjord
Figure 5. Standardized resource selection coefficient by harbor seals for ice cover class in Disenchantment Bay, Alaska, 3 May to 4 August 2002, for the Bernoulli part of the P1B model (i.e., for the cell-based abundance of seals). The solid circles and lines are for all seals, and the open circles and dashed lines are for mother-pup pairs. Confidence intervals (95%) are shown by the vertical bars. The thin horizontal line represents equal selection for all ice cover classes.
Figure 4 in Natural and human effects on harbor seal abundance and spatial distribution in an Alaskan glacial fjord
Figure 4. Standardized resource selection coefficient by harbor seals for ice cover class in Disenchantment Bay, Alaska, 3 May to 4 August 2002, for the Bernoulli part of the P1B model (i.e., for the cell-based spatial distribution of seals). The solid circles and lines are for all seals, and the open circles and dashed lines are for mother-pup pairs. Confidence intervals (95%) are shown by the vertical bars. The thin horizontal line represents equal selection for all ice cover classes.
Figure 3 in Natural and human effects on harbor seal abundance and spatial distribution in an Alaskan glacial fjord
Figure 3. Spatial distribution of harbor seals, ice cover zones, and maximum penetration of cruise ships on the day of surveys () and the previous day () in Disenchantment Bay, Alaska, on (A) 6 May, (B) 16 May, (C) 31 May, (D) 20 June, (E) 18 July, and (F) 4 August 2002 (figures for all 18 survey dates are available as supplemental material online). The time of day that ships reached their maximum penetration appears near the location symbol. The range of seal counts summed per grid cell is shown in three levels: small dot (<5 seals), medium dot (5–20 seals), and large dot (>20 seals). A small, overlying white dot indicates the presence of at least one mother-pup pair within that grid cell. Ice cover is represented by a gradient in cell-color shading: light gray (scattered), medium gray (intermediate), dark gray (dense). For this graphic, if cells with no ice data were bounded on three sides by cells with ice measures, the average of neighboring cells was used as an estimate. Refer to Figure 1 for geographical points and scale.
Figure 2 in Natural and human effects on harbor seal abundance and spatial distribution in an Alaskan glacial fjord
Figure 2. Counts of all seals and pups along video sampling transects (relative abundance) in Disenchantment Bay, May to August 2002. Raw counts for all seals are shown as solid circles, and raw counts for pups are shown as open circles. The thick solid curve is the fitted GAM model for all seals, with the 95% prediction intervals shown by the thinner solid lines. The thick dashed curve is the fitted GAM model for pups, with the 95% prediction intervals shown by the thinner dashed lines.
Figure 1 in Natural and human effects on harbor seal abundance and spatial distribution in an Alaskan glacial fjord
Figure 1. Map of Disenchantment Bay study areas near Yakutat, Alaska. Major tidewater glaciers are labeled. The location of the terminus of Hubbard Glacier was mapped in early June 2002 as part of this study. The extent of snow and ice-covered terrain (stippled area) was derived from a NOAA Coastal Service satellite photo taken in 1993. Icy Bay, an adjacent tidewater glacial fjord with a seal population (see Discussion), is shown for reference.
Linked collectors and determiners for: Phytoplankton community composition in the water column of East Greenland fjords, August 2022.
Natural history specimen data linked to collectors and determiners held within, "Phytoplankton community composition in the water column of East Greenland fjords, August 2022". Claims or attributions were made on Bionomia by volunteer Scribes, <a href="http://bionomia.net/dataset/a00e14eb-3398-4c40-87f6-41e78081e7ef">https://bionomia.net/dataset/a00e14eb-3398-4c40-87f6-41e78081e7ef</a> using specimen data from the dataset aggregated by the Global Biodiversity Information Facility, <a href="https://gbif.org/dataset/a00e14eb-3398-4c40-87f6-41e78081e7ef">https://gbif.org/dataset/a00e14eb-3398-4c40-87f6-41e78081e7ef</a>. Formatted as a Frictionless Data package.
Fig. 4. A, B. Trackway S3 in Sauropodomorph dinosaur trackways from the Fleming Fjord Formation of East Greenland: Evidence for Late Triassic sauropods
Fig. 4. A, B. Trackway S3 (Evazoum sp.). This bipedal trackway can possibly be attributed to a non-sauropod sauropodomorph trackmaker. Two smaller tridactyl trackways can be identified in close association with trackway S3. C, D. Detail of the best preserved pes impression RP1 (total depth represented by the color scale is 58 mm). Photogrammetric orthophoto (A), depth-color images (B, C), interpretative drawing (D).
Fig. 3. Trackway S2 in Sauropodomorph dinosaur trackways from the Fleming Fjord Formation of East Greenland: Evidence for Late Triassic sauropods
Fig. 3. Trackway S2 (Eosauropus sp.), which probably represents the same trackmaker species, or even the same individual, as trackway S1; trackmaker is moving towards the southwest. A. Photogrammetric orthophoto. B. Depth-color image. C. Interpretative drawing. Abbreviations: LM, left manus; LP, left pes; RM, right manus; RP, right pes.
Fig. 2. A–C. Trackway S1 in Sauropodomorph dinosaur trackways from the Fleming Fjord Formation of East Greenland: Evidence for Late Triassic sauropods
Fig. 2. A–C. Trackway S1 (Eosauropus sp.), here attributed to a sauropod trackmaker based on pedal synapomorphies; trackmaker is moving towards the south-west. Two consequtive pes impressions of a tridactyl Grallator trackway can be seen left to the S1 trackway. D, E. Detail of representative pes-manus set RP1/RM1. F, G. Detail of representative pes-manus set RP2/RM2. Photogrammetric orthophoto (A), depth-color images (B, D, F), interpretative drawings (C, E, G). Abbreviations: LM, left manus; LP, left pes; RM, right manus; RP, right pes.
Fig. 1. A in Sauropodomorph dinosaur trackways from the Fleming Fjord Formation of East Greenland: Evidence for Late Triassic sauropods
Fig. 1. A. Location of the "Track Mountain" locality (star) on a ridge on the northeastern slope of Wood Bjerg in the Late Triassic sediments at the west side of Carsberg Fjord. B. Location of Jameson Land (A) in central East Greenland. C. Photograph of the "Track Mountain" locality showing the approximate location of trackways S1, S2, and S3 (view towards the east).
Linked collectors and determiners for: PES-project, Southern Norwegian Fjords.
Natural history specimen data linked to collectors and determiners held within, "PES-project, Southern Norwegian Fjords". Claims or attributions were made on Bionomia by volunteer Scribes, <a href="https://bionomia.net/dataset/4f659137-54b4-4243-8bcb-5b2f534481c8">https://bionomia.net/dataset/4f659137-54b4-4243-8bcb-5b2f534481c8</a> using specimen data from the dataset aggregated by the Global Biodiversity Information Facility, <a href="https://gbif.org/dataset/4f659137-54b4-4243-8bcb-5b2f534481c8">https://gbif.org/dataset/4f659137-54b4-4243-8bcb-5b2f534481c8</a>. Formatted as a Frictionless Data package.
Linked collectors and determiners for: Downward flux of phytoplankton cells in East Greenland fjords, August 2022.
Natural history specimen data linked to collectors and determiners held within, "Downward flux of phytoplankton cells in East Greenland fjords, August 2022". Claims or attributions were made on Bionomia by volunteer Scribes, <a href="https://bionomia.net/dataset/61137d30-c560-4309-b278-b2e5aebce92f">https://bionomia.net/dataset/61137d30-c560-4309-b278-b2e5aebce92f</a> using specimen data from the dataset aggregated by the Global Biodiversity Information Facility, <a href="https://gbif.org/dataset/61137d30-c560-4309-b278-b2e5aebce92f">https://gbif.org/dataset/61137d30-c560-4309-b278-b2e5aebce92f</a>. Formatted as a Frictionless Data package.
A 10 m land mask for the Nuup Kangerlua, Kobbefjord, and Ameralik fjord systems in southwest Greenland
<p>This dataset consists of a 10 m land mask of the Nuup Kangerlua, Kobbefjord, and Ameralik fjord systems in southwest Greenland. The land mask is based on two Sentinel-2 MSI images of the area (tiles WDS and WES) that were acquired at high tide on 30 July 2017. Land was masked by applying a threshold of 0.1 Wm<sup>-2</sup> to the short-wave infrared (SWIR) band at 1614 nm. Mountain lakes and shaded coastal regions were masked using the TanDEM-X digital elevation model. Some inland waters were masked manually. </p> <p>Land and water were assigned values of 0 and 1, respectively, and are provided in geotiff format projected to UTM Zone 22 (WGS 84).</p> <p>The boundaries of the mask area extend from 63.90°N, 51.999°W in the southwest to 64.01°N, 51.302°W in the northeast.</p>
Glacial meltwater determines the balance between autotrophic and heterotrophic processes in a Greenland fjord
<p>Raw data for the summer CTD transect, the annual CTD mooring, data from the seasonal sediment trap, data from the oxygen and 14C incubations and nutrients data presented in the paper</p>
Spat settlement and growth of blue mussels on longlines in a Faroese fjord
<p>Settlement and growth of blue mussels on three kinds of spat settlement ropes were tested. Fuzzy rope, Trawl and a flat rope commonly used as spat collectors at mussel farms in Denmark. The settlement on the flat rope was very poor, with only a few individuals so the data set consists blue mussel density on the two other spat collectors. The spat collectors were deployed at 0-15 m depth for three years with no restocking. The data is used in the report "Blue mussel spat availability and settlement on longlines in a Faroese Fjord" DOI: 10.5218/zenodo.6563040 and "Ecosystem services by blue mussels in a coastal area" Fiskaaling rit 2022-05</p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.