Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 1. Pseudohelice annamalai n in Fig. 6 in Garypus sanasai Lin, Huang & Chang 2022, sp. nov.

Fig. 1. Pseudohelice annamalai n. sp. with preserved coloration. A, dorsal view of male; B, ventral view of male; C, dorsal view of female; D, ventral view of female. A, B, holotype, CASAU CR-1011 (17.3 × 14.6 mm); C, D, NCHUZOOL 17049 (14.3 × 12.5 mm).

Fig. 5. A in Fig. 6 in Garypus sanasai Lin, Huang & Chang 2022, sp. nov.

Fig. 5. A Bayesian inference (BI) tree for species of Pseudohelice and the outgroups, based on the cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) gene. Probability values at the nodes represent support values for BI, maximum likelihood (ML) and maximum parsimony (MP). For haplotype names, see table 1.

Fig. 4 in Fig. 6 in Garypus sanasai Lin, Huang & Chang 2022, sp. nov.

Fig. 4. Color in life of Pseudohelice annamalai n. sp. (A–G) from higher intertidal zone of the Vellar River estuary, Tamil Nadu, India. A, B, dorsal view of male; C, D, frontal and dorsal views of female, respectively; E, F, dorsal and frontal views of an ovigerous female, respectively; G, male at the burrow entrance near mangrove pneumatophores; H, burrow in the habitat. A, CASAU CR-1012 (18.2 × 15.5 mm); B, CASAU CR-1016 (18.7 × 15.4 mm), C–F, specimens not collected; G, NCHUZOOL 17049 (18.2 × 16.8 mm).

Fig. 3 in Fig. 6 in Garypus sanasai Lin, Huang & Chang 2022, sp. nov.

Fig. 3. Habitats of Pseudohelice annamalai n. sp. A, higher intertidal zone of the Vellar River estuary, in front of the Centre of Advanced Study in Marine Biology, Tamil Nadu, southeastern India; B, artificial mangroves of Rhizophora sp. and Avicennia sp., in the margin of Vellar River.

Fig. 5. A in Fig. 3 in Garypus sanasai Lin, Huang & Chang 2022, sp. nov.

Fig. 5. A major ocean current flow pattern in Korean waters (A) and a possible scenario for the introduction and expansion of C. brevipedalia in the Korean coasts (B). The big cycles represent the haplotype compositions sampled in the present study, while the small cycles indicate the current distribution of C. brevipedalia in Korean waters. The big orange cycle represents clade A haplotypes while the blue cycle represents clade B haplotypes. Moreover, the orange color in clade B represents the shared haplotypes between southern coastal regions (SCR) and eastern coastal regions (ECR). JCR; Japanese coastal regions.

Fig. 2 in Fig. 3 in Garypus sanasai Lin, Huang & Chang 2022, sp. nov.

Fig. 2. Maximum likelihood and Bayesian inference phylogenetic tree, showing taxonomic relationship of C. brevipedalia and other jelly fish species. Numbers separated by a slash above each branch are posterior probabilities (on the left side) followed by bootstrap values (on the right side). Nodal support of less than 50% is not shown.

Fig. 1 in Garypus sanasai Lin, Huang & Chang 2022, sp. nov.

Fig. 1. Roosting-sites of black-necked cranes in the Caohai wetland, China, and the study quadrats sampled in this study.

Fig. 1 in Garypus sanasai Lin, Huang & Chang 2022, sp. nov.

Fig. 1. Mean ± SE of species richness in the understory and the shrub layer of three different vegetation types. LP = L. camara plots, IBP = Indigenous bush-dominated plots and IGP = Indigenous grass-dominated plots inside the Groenkloof Nature Reserve, South Africa.

Fig. 1. A in Fig. 3 in Garypus sanasai Lin, Huang & Chang 2022, sp. nov.

Fig. 1. A map showing four sampling locations (St. 1, St. 2, St. 3, and St. 4; (A) of C. brevipedalia specimens (B) collected from the southern coastal regions (SCR) and eastern coastal regions (ECR) of Korea.

Fig. 4 in Fig. 3 in Garypus sanasai Lin, Huang & Chang 2022, sp. nov.

Fig. 4. Mantel test showing relationships between genetic distance and the logarithm of geographic distance between all pairs of 42 COI haplotypes of C. brevipedalia populations from two coastal regions of Korea.

Fig. 2 in Garypus sanasai Lin, Huang & Chang 2022, sp. nov.

Fig. 2. The test results of the ROC curve. Note: the diagonal represents that the model had no judgment ability (50% area and below), while above the diagonal represents that the model had judgment ability (50% or above).

Fig. 2 in Garypus sanasai Lin, Huang & Chang 2022, sp. nov.

Fig. 2. Mean ± SE of morphospecies richness (top left), abundance (top right) and biomass (bottom left) of invertebrate recorded in pitfall and window traps in the three different vegetation types in the Groenkloof Nature Reserve. Means are shown for all invertebrates, herbivores, predators and detrivores. LP = L. camara plots; IBP = Indigenous bush-dominated plots; IGP = Indigenous grass-dominated plots.

Fig. 3 in Fig. 3 in Garypus sanasai Lin, Huang & Chang 2022, sp. nov.

Fig. 3. The haplotype TCS network (A) and Bayesian inference and maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree (B) show phylogeography and relationships among the 42 COI haplotypes of C. brevipedalia collected from the southern (SCR; orange colors) and eastern coastal regions (ECR; blue colors) of Korea. Each circle on the haplotype network represents individual haplotypes, and the size of the cycle is the proportion of haplotype frequency. The colors indicate the geographical origin of the haplotypes. Each line between haplotypes represents a 1-nucleotide mutational change. Small black dots indicate unsampled haplotypes. On the phylogenetic tree, numbers on branches are Bayesian posterior probabilities/bootstrap support values.

Fig. 6 in Garypus sanasai Lin, Huang & Chang 2022, sp. nov.

Fig. 6. Lateral view of the female spermathecal. A, Aphractus acuminatus; B, Polycleptis scutellifera; C, Paraphractus abbreviatus; D, Polycleptidella chilensis. AcGld, accessory gland; Dct, duct of the spermatheca; GC, genital chamber; Odl, lateral oviduct; Sgp, subgenital plate; Spt, spermatheca; St, abdominal sternite; VI, ovipositor blade. Scale bars = 1 mm.

Fig. 5. Female abdomen. A, C, E, G in Garypus sanasai Lin, Huang & Chang 2022, sp. nov.

Fig. 5. Female abdomen. A, C, E, G, ventral view of subgenital plate, scale bar = 1 mm; B, D, F, G, lateral view of subgenital plate and ovipositor, scale bar: 3 mm. A, B, Aphractus acuminatus; C, D, Polycleptis scutellifera; E, F, Paraphractus abbreviatus; G, H, Polycleptidella chilensis.

Fig. 4 in Garypus sanasai Lin, Huang & Chang 2022, sp. nov.

Fig. 4. Micrographs of male titillator and apex process. A, B, Aphractus acuminatus; C, D, Polycleptis scutellifera; E, F, Polycleptidella chilensis; G, H, Paraphractus abbreviatus. Scale bars: A, C = 500 µm; E, G = 250 µm; B, D, F, H = 50 µm.

Fig. 3. Paraphractus abbreviatus male paraproct. A in Garypus sanasai Lin, Huang & Chang 2022, sp. nov.

Fig. 3. Paraphractus abbreviatus male paraproct. A, ventral view; B, lateral view. Scale bars 1mm; arrows indicate ventral tubercle.

Fig. 2. Male abdominal apex. A, B, C in Garypus sanasai Lin, Huang & Chang 2022, sp. nov.

Fig. 2. Male abdominal apex. A, B, C, Aphractus acuminatus; D, E, F, Polycleptis scutellifera; G, H, I, Polycleptidella chilensis; J, K, L, Paraphractus abbreviatus. A, D, G, I ventral view; B, E, H, K dorsal view; C, F, I, K lateral view. Scale bars = 2 mm.

Fig. 1 in Garypus sanasai Lin, Huang & Chang 2022, sp. nov.

Fig. 1. Live habitus of Aphractini genera, females and males: A, Aphractus acuminatus (Los Ruiles); B, Polycleptis scutellifera (Vilches Alto); C, Paraphractus abbreviatus (ñ Los Ruiles, ò Licán Ray); D, Polycleptidella chilensis (Anticura). Scale bars = 10 mm.