Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 6 in Palaearctic species of Charipinae (Hymenoptera, Figitidae): two new species, synthesis and identification key

Fig. 6. Types of antenna of Dilyta Förster, 1869 and Phaenoglyphis Förster, 1869. 1. D. aleevae Pujade-Villar & Paretas-Martínez, 2011. 2. D. japonica Paretas-Martínez & Ferrer-Suay, 2011. 3. D. longinqua Paretas-Martínez & Pujade-Villar, 2011. 4. D. rathmanae. 5. D. sinica Ferrer-Suay & Paretas-Martínez, 2011. 6. D. subclavata Förster, 1869. 7. P. abbreviata (Thomson, 1877). 8. P. evenhuisi Pujade-Villar & Paretas-Martínez, 2006. 9. P. fuscicornis (Thomson, 1877). 10. P. heterocera (Hartig, 1841). 11. P. insperatus Belizin, 1973. 12. P. insularis (Belizin, 1973). 13. P. longicornis (Hartig, 1840). 14. P. moldavica Ionescu, 1969. 15. P. nigripes (Thomson, 1877). 16. P. proximus Belizin, 1966. 17. P. pubicollis (Thomson, 1877). 18. P. ruficornis (Förster, 1869). 19. P. salicis (Cameron, 1883). 20. P. stricta (Thomson, 1877). 21. P. villosa (Hartig, 1841). 22. P. xanthochroa Förster, 1869. Scale bars: 50 μm.

Fig. 4 in Palaearctic species of Charipinae (Hymenoptera, Figitidae): two new species, synthesis and identification key

Fig. 4. Types of radial cell of Alloxysta Förster, 1869. 1. A. abdera Fergusson, 1986. 2. A. aperta (Hartig, 1841). 3. A. arcuata (Kieffer, 1902). 4. A. aurata Belizin, 1968. 5. A. basimacula (Cameron, 1886). 6. A. brachycera Hellén, 1963. 7. A. brevis (Thomson, 1862). 8. A. brevitarsis (Thomson, 1862). 9. A. castanea (Hartig, 1841). 10. A. circumscripta (Hartig, 1841). 11. A. citripes (Thomson, 1862). 12. A. consobrina (Zetterstedt, 1838). 13. A. crassa (Cameron, 1889). 14. A. crassicornis (Thomson, 1862). 15. A. fracticornis (Thomson, 1862). 16. A. fuscipes (Thomson, 1862). 17. A. heptatoma Hellén, 1963. 18. A. kovilovica Ferrer-Suay & Pujade-Villar, 2013. 19. A. leunisii (Hartig, 1841). 20. A. longipennis (Hartig, 1841). 21. A. macrophadna (Hartig, 1841). 22. A. marshalliana (Kieffer, 1900). 23. A. melanogaster (Hartig, 1840). 24. A. mullensis (Cameron, 1883). Scale bars: 50 μm.

Fig. 1 in Palaearctic species of Charipinae (Hymenoptera, Figitidae): two new species, synthesis and identification key

Fig. 1. Types of mesosoma and metasoma of the Charipinae Dalla Torre & Kieffer, 1910. 1. Mesosoma of Phaenoglyphis spp. 2. Mesosoma of Alloxysta spp. 3. Metasoma of Alloxysta spp. 4. Metasoma of Apocharips spp. Scale bars: 50 μm.

Fig. 3 in Palaearctic species of Charipinae (Hymenoptera, Figitidae): two new species, synthesis and identification key

Fig. 3. Types of antenna of Alloxysta Förster, 1869. 1. A. pedestris (Curtis, 1838). 2. A. piceomaculata (Cameron, 1883). 3. A. pilipennis (Hartig, 1840). 4. A. pleuralis (Cameron, 1879). 5. A. postica (Hartig, 1841). 6. A. proxima Belizin, 1962. 7. A. pusilla (Kieffer, 1902). 8. A. quedenfeldti (Kieffer, 1909). 9. A. ramulifera (Thomson, 1862). 10. A. rufiventris (Hartig, 1840). 11. A. salicicola Belizin, 1973. 12. A. sawoniewiczi Kierych, 1988. 13. A. semiaperta Fergusson, 1986. 14. A. slovenica Ferrer-Suay & Pujade-Villar, 2013. 15. A. soluta Hellén, 1963. 16. A. tscheki (Giraud, 1860). 17. A. victrix (Westwood, 1833). 18. A. xanthocera (Thomson, 1862). 19. A. xanthopa (Thomson, 1862). 20. A. trapezoidea (Hartig, 1841). Scale bars: 50 μm.

Fig. 8. Cyclops lacustris G.O. Sars, 1863. A−B in Redescription and taxonomic notes on Cyclops bohater Koźmiński, 1933 and Cyclops lacustris G.O. Sars, 1863 (Arthropoda, Crustacea), with an identification key to the Cyclops species of Fenno-Scandinavia

Fig. 8. Cyclops lacustris G.O. Sars, 1863. A−B. ♀. A. Leg 1, frontal (ZMO: lectotype designated herein). B. Leg 4, caudal – distal margin of the first and second exopodal segments bearing spinules on the frontal surface only (ZMO: Sars Coll. 12977 ♀-2). C−F. Ƌ. C. Anal somite and caudal rami, ventral (ZMO: Sars Coll. 12977 Ƌ-1). D. Urosomites 1̅4, ventral (ZMO: Sars Coll. 12977 Ƌ-1). E. Antennal coxobasis, caudal (ZMO: Sars Coll. 12976 Ƌ-1). F. Maxillulary palp (ZMO: Sars Coll. 12976 Ƌ-1). Scale bars = 100 µm.

Fig. 6 in Redescription and taxonomic notes on Cyclops bohater Koźmiński, 1933 and Cyclops lacustris G.O. Sars, 1863 (Arthropoda, Crustacea), with an identification key to the Cyclops species of Fenno-Scandinavia

Fig. 6. Cyclops bohater Koźmiński, 1933, copepodid IV, ♀. A−C. Antennule, ventral. A. Segments 1̅5 (I̅XVI), arrow points to long anterodistal seta of ancestral segment XIV. B. Segments 6̅8 (XVII̅ XXIV). C. Segments 9̅10 (XXV̅XXVIII). D. Leg 2, caudal. E. Leg 3, caudal. All drawings show specimen from Latvia (Lake Brigene ̅ MIZ 2/2016/1). Scale bar = 100 µm.

Fig. 5 in Redescription and taxonomic notes on Cyclops bohater Koźmiński, 1933 and Cyclops lacustris G.O. Sars, 1863 (Arthropoda, Crustacea), with an identification key to the Cyclops species of Fenno-Scandinavia

Fig. 5. Cyclops bohater Koźmiński, 1933, Ƌ. A. Maxillulary palp. B. Maxilliped syncoxopodite, frontal. C. Leg 1, frontal. D. Leg 2, slender spine of first exopodal segment and robust spines of exopodal segments 2 and 3. E. Exopodal armature of leg 3. F. Leg 4 coxopodite, basipodite and intercoxal sclerite, caudal. All drawings show a paralectotype (NHMUK 2016. 40). Scale bars = 100 µm.

Fig. 7. Cyclops lacustris G.O. Sars, 1863 in Redescription and taxonomic notes on Cyclops bohater Koźmiński, 1933 and Cyclops lacustris G.O. Sars, 1863 (Arthropoda, Crustacea), with an identification key to the Cyclops species of Fenno-Scandinavia

Fig. 7. Cyclops lacustris G.O. Sars, 1863, ♀. A. Habitus, dorsal (SMNK: 9567). B−C. Urosome, ventral (Lake Aspern, Norway ̅ MIZ 2/2016/20). B. Urosomites 1̅4. C. Anal somite and caudal rami. D. Antennular segments 12̅17, ventral (Lake Aspern, Norway ̅ MIZ 2/2016/20). E−F. Antennal coxobasis, caudal. E. ♀ from Lake Mjøsa, Norway (ZMO: Sars Coll. 12977 ♀-2). F. ♀ from Lake Aspern, Norway (MIZ 2/2016/20). G−H. Maxillulary palp. G. ♀ from Lake Mjøsa, Norway (ZMO: Sars Coll. 12977 ♀-2). H. ♀ from Lake Aspern, Norway (MIZ 2/2016/20). Scale bars: A̅H = 100 µm.

Fig. 3 in Redescription and taxonomic notes on Cyclops bohater Koźmiński, 1933 and Cyclops lacustris G.O. Sars, 1863 (Arthropoda, Crustacea), with an identification key to the Cyclops species of Fenno-Scandinavia

Fig. 3. Cyclops bohater Koźmiński, 1933, ♀. A. Maxilla, caudal. B. Maxilliped, frontal. C. Leg 1, frontal, arrows point to the long setules of the medial spine/seta of basipodite, and long spinules on the basipodite between the insertions of exopodite and endopodite. D−E. Leg 4: EXP, P4 exp 3; ENP, P4 enp3. All drawings show the lectotype (NHMUK 2016. 38). Scale bars: A̅E = 100 µm.

Fig. 2 in Redescription and taxonomic notes on Cyclops bohater Koźmiński, 1933 and Cyclops lacustris G.O. Sars, 1863 (Arthropoda, Crustacea), with an identification key to the Cyclops species of Fenno-Scandinavia

Fig. 2. Cyclops bohater Koźmiński, 1933, ♀. A−B. Surface ornamentation of antennal coxobasis. A. Frontal, arrow points to insertion site of long spinules missing in C. bohater. B. Caudal, arrow points to a group of spinules sometimes present. C. Labrum, epistoma and rostrum. D. Mandible, frontal, arrow points to insertion site of spinules missing in C. bohater. E. Maxillulary palp, arrows point to long setules of the setae, and spinulose ornamentation of the palp. All drawings show the lectotype (NHMUK 2016.38). Scale bars: A̅E = 100 µm.

Fig. 1 in Redescription and taxonomic notes on Cyclops bohater Koźmiński, 1933 and Cyclops lacustris G.O. Sars, 1863 (Arthropoda, Crustacea), with an identification key to the Cyclops species of Fenno-Scandinavia

Fig. 1. Cyclops bohater Koźmiński, 1933, ♀. A. Habitus, dorsal. B. Pediger 5 and genital doublesomite, ventral, arrow points to lateral "wing-like" protrusion of pediger 5. C. Anal somite and caudal rami, dorsal. D−G. Antennule, ventral. D. Segments 1̅6 (I̅XIV). E. Segments 7̅14 (XV-XXIII). F. Segments 12̅14 (XXI̅XXIII). G. Segments 15̅17 (XXIV̅XXVIII). Except for A (NHMUK 2016. 39) all drawings show the lectotype (NHMUK 2016. 38). Scale bars: A = 1 mm; B̅G = 100 µm.

Fig. 10 in A revision of the genus Rhinotorus Förster, 1869 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Ctenopelmatinae), with descriptions of three new species and an illustrated identification key

Fig. 10. Rhinotorus nasutus (Gravenhorst, 1829). A. Face. B. Head dorsally. C. Propodeum. D. First metasomal tergite dorsally. E. Habitus.

Fig. 13 in A revision of the genus Rhinotorus Förster, 1869 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Ctenopelmatinae), with descriptions of three new species and an illustrated identification key

Fig. 13. Rhinotorus tarsilatus sp. nov., holotype, ♀. A. Face. B. Head dorsally. C. Metasoma. D. Habitus.

Fig. 8 in A revision of the genus Rhinotorus Förster, 1869 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Ctenopelmatinae), with descriptions of three new species and an illustrated identification key

Fig. 8. Rhinotorus longicornis (Schmiedeknecht, 1914). A. Mesoscutellum. B. Metasoma dorsally. C. Face. D. Head dorsally. E. Habitus.

Fig. 7 in A revision of the genus Rhinotorus Förster, 1869 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Ctenopelmatinae), with descriptions of three new species and an illustrated identification key

Fig. 7. Rhinotorus leucostomus (Gravenhorst, 1829). A. First metasomal tergite dorsally with projections at spiracles (arrows). B. Mesoscutellum. C. Propodeum. D. Face. E. Habitus.

Fig. 2. Mesoleius roepkei Teunissen, 1945 in A revision of the genus Rhinotorus Förster, 1869 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Ctenopelmatinae), with descriptions of three new species and an illustrated identification key

Fig. 2. Mesoleius roepkei Teunissen, 1945, holotype, ♀. A. Face. B. First metasomal tergite with shallow subapical transverse impressions (arrow). C. Habitus.

Fig. 3 in A revision of the genus Rhinotorus Förster, 1869 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Ctenopelmatinae), with descriptions of three new species and an illustrated identification key

Fig. 3. Rhinotorus alpinus (Roman, 1909), lectotype, ♀. A. Face. B. Mesopleuron. C. Propodeum. D. Head dorsally. E. Habitus.

Fig. 15 in A revision of the genus Rhinotorus Förster, 1869 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Ctenopelmatinae), with descriptions of three new species and an illustrated identification key

Fig. 15. Rhinotorus umbrarum (Holmgren, 1857). A. ♀, face. B. ♂, face. C. Metasoma dorsally. D. Propodeum.

Fig. 1. A–D in A revision of the genus Rhinotorus Förster, 1869 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Ctenopelmatinae), with descriptions of three new species and an illustrated identification key

Fig. 1. A–D. Saotis brachycerus (Kasoparyan & Kopelke, 2009) comb. nov. A. Face. B. Propodeum. C. Habitus paratype, ♂ S. brachycerus (Kasoparyan & Kopelke, 2009). D. Habitus holotype, ♀ S.brachycerus (Kasoparyan & Kopelke, 2009). E–F. Saotis granulator Kasparyan & Kopelke, 2010. E. Habitus ♂ S. granulator Kasparyan & Kopelke, 2010. F. Habitus ♀ S. granulator Kasparyan & Kopelke, 2010.

Fig. 11 in A revision of the genus Rhinotorus Förster, 1869 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Ctenopelmatinae), with descriptions of three new species and an illustrated identification key

Fig. 11. Rhinotorus ovalis (Davis, 1897), lectotype, ♀. A. Metasoma dorsally. B. Face. C. Habitus dorsally. D. Habitus laterally.