Find research datasets worth reusing

FIGURE 5 in INTRASPECIFIC VARIATION IN ACOUSTIC TRAITS AND BODY SIZE, AND NEW DISTRIBUTIONAL RECORDS FOR PSEUDOPALUDICOLA GIARETTAI CARVALHO, 2012 (ANURA, LEPTODACTYLIDAE, LEIUPERINAE): IMPLICATIONS FOR ITS CONGENERIC DIAGNOSIS

FIGURE 5: Scatterplot of the first two principal component scores (PCs) from acoustic traits of six populations of P. giarettai. Yellow (Curvelo; type locality); purple (Chapada Gaúcha); green (Coromandel); red (Buritis); blue (Buritizeiro); pink (Unaí).

FIGURE 3 in INTRASPECIFIC VARIATION IN ACOUSTIC TRAITS AND BODY SIZE, AND NEW DISTRIBUTIONAL RECORDS FOR PSEUDOPALUDICOLA GIARETTAI CARVALHO, 2012 (ANURA, LEPTODACTYLIDAE, LEIUPERINAE): IMPLICATIONS FOR ITS CONGENERIC DIAGNOSIS

FIGURE 3: Advertisement call of P. giarettai from the type locality (Curvelo, Minas Gerais). From top to bottom: oscillogram section (ca. 1.6 s) depicting calling pattern, waveform, spectrogram, and power spectrum of the second advertisement from oscillogram section. Sound energy with relative amplitude below 40 dB was clipped to zero dB to remove background noise from power spectrum.

FIGURE 2 in INTRASPECIFIC VARIATION IN ACOUSTIC TRAITS AND BODY SIZE, AND NEW DISTRIBUTIONAL RECORDS FOR PSEUDOPALUDICOLA GIARETTAI CARVALHO, 2012 (ANURA, LEPTODACTYLIDAE, LEIUPERINAE): IMPLICATIONS FOR ITS CONGENERIC DIAGNOSIS

FIGURE 2: Adult specimens of P. giarettai in life from: Above – Parque Nacional Grande Sertão Veredas, Chapada Gaúcha, Minas Gerais (voucher male AAG-UFU 1920: CRC = 14.6 mm); Below – Coromandel (female AAG-UFU 3566: CRC 18.8 mm).

FIGURE 4 in INTRASPECIFIC VARIATION IN ACOUSTIC TRAITS AND BODY SIZE, AND NEW DISTRIBUTIONAL RECORDS FOR PSEUDOPALUDICOLA GIARETTAI CARVALHO, 2012 (ANURA, LEPTODACTYLIDAE, LEIUPERINAE): IMPLICATIONS FOR ITS CONGENERIC DIAGNOSIS

FIGURE 4: Advertisement call of P. giarettai from the Parque Nacional Grande Sertão Veredas (Chapada Gaúcha, Minas Gerais). From top to bottom: oscillogram section (ca. 1.6 s) depicting calling pattern, waveform, spectrogram, and power spectrum of the second advertisement from oscillogram section. Sound energy with relative amplitude below 40 dB was clipped to zero dB to remove background noise from power spectrum.

FIGURE 6 in INTRASPECIFIC VARIATION IN ACOUSTIC TRAITS AND BODY SIZE, AND NEW DISTRIBUTIONAL RECORDS FOR PSEUDOPALUDICOLA GIARETTAI CARVALHO, 2012 (ANURA, LEPTODACTYLIDAE, LEIUPERINAE): IMPLICATIONS FOR ITS CONGENERIC DIAGNOSIS

FIGURE 6: Typical breeding habitat of P. giarettai: a permanent pond associated with a Buriti palm grove marsh at the Parque Nacional Grande Sertão Veredas (Municipality of Chapada Gaúcha), northwestern Minas Gerais, southeastern Brazil.

FIGURE 1 in INTRASPECIFIC VARIATION IN ACOUSTIC TRAITS AND BODY SIZE, AND NEW DISTRIBUTIONAL RECORDS FOR PSEUDOPALUDICOLA GIARETTAI CARVALHO, 2012 (ANURA, LEPTODACTYLIDAE, LEIUPERINAE): IMPLICATIONS FOR ITS CONGENERIC DIAGNOSIS

FIGURE 1: Distribution map of Pseudopaludicola giarettai. Star (Type locality: Curvelo, MG); Circles (localities in Minas Gerais): 1 (Buritis), 2 (Chapada Gaúcha), 3 (Unaí), 4 (Buritizeiro), 5 (Coromandel), 6 (Conceição do Mato Dentro; Pimenta et al., 2014), 7 (Muriaé; Santana et al., 2009); Triangle (Flores de Goiás, GO). MG = Minas Gerais; GO = Goiás.

Figure 2. Gorgoderina parvicava Travassos, 1922 in Phylogenetic position of Gorgoderina parvicava Travassos, 1922 (Digenea: Gorgoderidae), a parasite of Leptodactylus labyrinthicus (Spix, 1824) (Anura: Leptodactylidae) in Brazil

Figure 2. Gorgoderina parvicava Travassos, 1922 (Gorgoderidae) parasite ofLeptodactylus labyrinthicus (Spix, 1824) (Leptodactylidae) from Carandá Farm, municipality of Araraquara, São Paulo state, Brazil. A) Detail of the oral sucker, oesophagus, and intestinal caeca; B) Acetabulum; C) Detail of the region of seminal vesicle and metraterm; D) Detail of the terminal genitalia and metraterm, highlighting the genital pore (left above corner); E) Ovary; F) Region of the ovary highlighting the Mehlis' gland and vitelline follicles; G) Detail of the Mehlis' gland; H) Eggs in the uterus, highlighting part of the descending loop of the uterus with immature eggs and an ascending part with mature eggs. Legend: ac – acetabulum, gp – genital pore, ic – intestinal caeca, ig – immature eggs, m – metraterm, me – mature eggs, mg – Mehlis' gland, mo – mature oocytes, od – ovary duct, oe – oesophagus, os – oral sucker, ov – ovary, pp – pars prostatica, sv – seminal vesicle, t – testis, u – uterus, vd – vitelline ducts, vi – vitelline follicles.

Figure 3 in Phylogenetic position of Gorgoderina parvicava Travassos, 1922 (Digenea: Gorgoderidae), a parasite of Leptodactylus labyrinthicus (Spix, 1824) (Anura: Leptodactylidae) in Brazil

Figure 3. Maximum Likelihood topology based on partial 28S ribosomal DNA sequences of gorgoderid trematodes. GenBank accession numbers are indicated next to species names. Numbers above nodes represent supported nodes by posterior probabilities for Bayesian Bayesian inference and bootstrap for maximum likelihood analyses respectively (posterior probabilities> 0.90 and bootstrap scores> 70). Branch length scale bar indicates the number of substitutions per site.

Figure 4 in Phylogenetic position of Gorgoderina parvicava Travassos, 1922 (Digenea: Gorgoderidae), a parasite of Leptodactylus labyrinthicus (Spix, 1824) (Anura: Leptodactylidae) in Brazil

Figure 4. Maximum Likelihood topology based on COI sequences of Gorgoderina, showing the phylogenetic position of the adults of Gorgoderina parvicava from Carandá Farm, municipality of Araraquara, São Paulo State, Brazil. Numbers above nodes represent supported nodes by posterior probabilities for Bayesian Bayesian inference and bootstrap for maximum likelihood analyses respectively (posterior probabilities> 0.90 and bootstrap scores> 70). Branch length scale bar indicates the number of substitutions per site.

Figure 1. Gorgoderina parvicava Travassos, 1922 in Phylogenetic position of Gorgoderina parvicava Travassos, 1922 (Digenea: Gorgoderidae), a parasite of Leptodactylus labyrinthicus (Spix, 1824) (Anura: Leptodactylidae) in Brazil

Figure 1. Gorgoderina parvicava Travassos, 1922 (Gorgoderidae) parasite ofLeptodactylus labyrinthicus (Spix, 1824) (Leptodactylidae) from Carandá Farm, municipality of Araraquara, São Paulo state, Brazil. Ventral view.

Fig. 16. Xeruca formosensis, zoea I. A in Fig. 3 in Historical Biogeography of the Group (Anura, Leptodactylidae): Identification of Ancestral Areas and Events that Modeled their Distribution.

Fig. 16. Xeruca formosensis, zoea I. A, carapace; B, antennule; C, antenna; D, maxillule; E, maxilla; F, first maxilliped; G, second maxilliped; H, pleon and telson.

Fig. 15. Tubuca paradussumieri, zoea I. A in Fig. 3 in Historical Biogeography of the Group (Anura, Leptodactylidae): Identification of Ancestral Areas and Events that Modeled their Distribution.

Fig. 15. Tubuca paradussumieri, zoea I. A, carapace; B, antennule; C, antenna; D, maxillule; E, maxilla; F, first maxilliped; G, second maxilliped; H, pleon and telson.

Fig. 13. Tubuca coarctata, zoea I. A in Fig. 3 in Historical Biogeography of the Group (Anura, Leptodactylidae): Identification of Ancestral Areas and Events that Modeled their Distribution.

Fig. 13. Tubuca coarctata, zoea I. A, carapace; B, antennule; C, antenna; D, maxillule; E, maxilla; F, first maxilliped; G, second maxilliped; H, pleon and telson.

Fig. 12. Tubuca arcuata, zoea I. A in Fig. 3 in Historical Biogeography of the Group (Anura, Leptodactylidae): Identification of Ancestral Areas and Events that Modeled their Distribution.

Fig. 12. Tubuca arcuata, zoea I. A, carapace; B, antennule; C, antenna; D, maxillule; E, maxilla; F, first maxilliped; G, second maxilliped; H, pleon and telson.

Fig. 11. Tubuca acuta, zoea I. A in Fig. 3 in Historical Biogeography of the Group (Anura, Leptodactylidae): Identification of Ancestral Areas and Events that Modeled their Distribution.

Fig. 11. Tubuca acuta, zoea I. A, carapace; B, antennule; C, antenna; D, maxillule; E, maxilla; F, first maxilliped; G, second maxilliped; H, pleon and telson.

Fig. 9. Paraleptuca crassipes, zoea I. A in Fig. 3 in Historical Biogeography of the Group (Anura, Leptodactylidae): Identification of Ancestral Areas and Events that Modeled their Distribution.

Fig. 9. Paraleptuca crassipes, zoea I. A, carapace; B, antennule; C, antenna; D, maxillule; E, maxilla; F, first maxilliped; G, second maxilliped; H, pleon and telson.

Fig. 8. Gelasimus vocans, zoea I. A in Fig. 3 in Historical Biogeography of the Group (Anura, Leptodactylidae): Identification of Ancestral Areas and Events that Modeled their Distribution.

Fig. 8. Gelasimus vocans, zoea I. A, carapace; B, antennule; C, antenna; D, maxillule; E, maxilla; F, first maxilliped; G, second maxilliped; H, pleon and telson.

Fig. 10. Paraleptuca splendida, zoea I. A in Fig. 3 in Historical Biogeography of the Group (Anura, Leptodactylidae): Identification of Ancestral Areas and Events that Modeled their Distribution.

Fig. 10. Paraleptuca splendida, zoea I. A, carapace; B, antennule; C, antenna; D, maxillule; E, maxilla; F, first maxilliped; G, second maxilliped; H, pleon and telson.

Fig. 7. Gelasimus tetragonon, zoea I. A in Fig. 3 in Historical Biogeography of the Group (Anura, Leptodactylidae): Identification of Ancestral Areas and Events that Modeled their Distribution.

Fig. 7. Gelasimus tetragonon, zoea I. A, carapace; B, antennule; C, antenna; D, maxillule; E, maxilla; F, first maxilliped; G, second maxilliped; H, pleon and telson.

Fig. 6. Gelasimus jocelynae, zoea I. A in Fig. 3 in Historical Biogeography of the Group (Anura, Leptodactylidae): Identification of Ancestral Areas and Events that Modeled their Distribution.

Fig. 6. Gelasimus jocelynae, zoea I. A, carapace; B, antennule; C, antenna; D, maxillule; E, maxilla; F, first maxilliped; G, second maxilliped; H, pleon and telson.