Find research datasets worth reusing

FIG. 9 in Systematics and Taxonomy of the Northern Banjo Frog (Anura: Limnodynastidae: Limnodynastes terraereginae) and Allied Taxa

FIG. 9. Boxplot comparison of variation in the advertisement call traits between the Limnodynastes dorsalis group lineages redescribed herein, depicting variation in (A) dominant frequency (kHz), (B) call duration (s), (C) fundamental frequency (kHz), and (D) call rate (calls/min). Small dots represent outliers.

FIG. 3 in Systematics and Taxonomy of the Northern Banjo Frog (Anura: Limnodynastidae: Limnodynastes terraereginae) and Allied Taxa

FIG. 3. Results of clustering analyses of SNP data for the eastern Limnodynastes dorsalis group: (A) initial PCoA ordination with representative samples of all eastern Limnodynastes dorsalis group members, (B) PCoA of CYP and WS lineages only, (C) STRUCTURE barplot for a balanced subset of individuals showing preference for K ¼ 3 ancestry model.

FIG. 1 in Systematics and Taxonomy of the Northern Banjo Frog (Anura: Limnodynastidae: Limnodynastes terraereginae) and Allied Taxa

FIG. 1. Distribution of genotyped samples for the eastern Australian Limnodynastes dorsalis group examined in this study. Purple circles ¼ CYP lineage; red circles ¼ WS lineage; green circles ¼ EC lineage; gray circles ¼ L. dumerilii (including all subspecies); and black circles ¼ L. interioris. Surface hydrology in blue.

FIG. 6 in Systematics and Taxonomy of the Northern Banjo Frog (Anura: Limnodynastidae: Limnodynastes terraereginae) and Allied Taxa

FIG. 6. Comparison of morphological measurements between adult specimens of the Limnodynastes dorsalis group lineages redescribed herein.

FIG. 2 in Systematics and Taxonomy of the Northern Banjo Frog (Anura: Limnodynastidae: Limnodynastes terraereginae) and Allied Taxa

FIG. 2. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic analyses of the Limnodynastes dorsalis group inferred using mitochondrial ND4 sequences. Tree is rooted with Limnodynastes fletcheri, L. peronii, L. depressus, L. tasmaniensis, and L. salmini. Dots at nodes indicate bootstrap support values:.95% black dots; 70–95% gray dots. Scale bar represents substitutions/nucleotide site. See Data Accessibility for tree file.

FIG. 10 in Systematics and Taxonomy of the Northern Banjo Frog (Anura: Limnodynastidae: Limnodynastes terraereginae) and Allied Taxa

FIG. 10. Illustration of hind foot webbing extent, a useful diagnostic character for identification of the Limnodynastes dorsalis group. (A) Well-developed webbing (extends to beyond half-way between the 1st subarticular tubercle and tip of Toe 1), (B) moderate webbing (extends one-quarter to half-way between the 1st subarticular tubercle on Toe 1), (C) vestigial webbing (does not or only slightly extends beyond the 1st subarticular tubercle on the 1st Toe). Illustration copyright Alana de Laive.

FIG. 8 in Systematics and Taxonomy of the Northern Banjo Frog (Anura: Limnodynastidae: Limnodynastes terraereginae) and Allied Taxa

FIG. 8. Comparison of the male advertisement calls of (A) WS lineage—Rockhampton, QLD (FrogID 312613), (B) EC lineage—Harrington, NSW (AMS R.188164), (C) CYP lineage—Finch Bay, Cooktown, QLD (QM J97862), (D) Limnodynastes dumerilii dumerilii—Tenterfield Creek, NSW (AMS R.188096), and (E) L. interioris —Narrandera, NSW (FrogID 276467). Audiospectrograms and oscillograms were produced in Raven Pro 1.6 with a fast-Fourier transformation of 512 points, and 50% overlap.

FIGURE 15 in Taxonomic revision of south-eastern Australian giant burrowing frogs (Anura: Limnodynastidae: Heleioporus Gray)

FIGURE 15. Historic distribution of eastern Australian Heleioporus by decadal sampling periods from the ALA (accessed May 2020). Circles show where records have declined in the far south east of the distribution of H. a. flavopunctatus subsp. nov. and in the Greater Blue Mountains area in the north west of the distribution of H. a. australiacus.

FIGURE 13 in Taxonomic revision of south-eastern Australian giant burrowing frogs (Anura: Limnodynastidae: Heleioporus Gray)

FIGURE 13. Images of eastern Australian Heleioporus types. A–E) Neotype of Heleioporus a. australiacus. AMS R104952 from Maroota State Forest, NSW. F–J) Heleioporus a. flavopunctatus subsp. nov. NMV D56515 from Yalmy Road, 1 km E.N.E. of Waratah Road junction, Gippsland, Victoria. Photograph in life P. Robertson.

FIGURE 14. Heleioporus a. flavopunctatus subsp. nov. aggressive call and distress call. A in Taxonomic revision of south-eastern Australian giant burrowing frogs (Anura: Limnodynastidae: Heleioporus Gray)

FIGURE 14. Heleioporus a. flavopunctatus subsp. nov. aggressive call and distress call. A) Distress call from Broadwater State Forest NSW, and B) Aggressive call from Broadwater State Forest, NSW.

FIGURE 12 in Taxonomic revision of south-eastern Australian giant burrowing frogs (Anura: Limnodynastidae: Heleioporus Gray)

FIGURE 12. Aggressive calls in eastern Australian Heleioporus. A) H. a. australiacus, Ourimbah State Forest, NSW. B) Enlargement of one call showing dense pulses, and C) enlargement of a call from H. a. flavopunctatus subsp. nov. from Morton National Park, NSW.

FIGURE 10 in Taxonomic revision of south-eastern Australian giant burrowing frogs (Anura: Limnodynastidae: Heleioporus Gray)

FIGURE 10. Comparison of eastern Australian Heleioporus male calls A–B) Heleioporus a. australiacus, from Dharawal Nature Reserve, Darkes Forest, NSW (D. Stewart); and C–D) H. a. flavopunctatus subsp. nov. from APM track, Mt Alfred State Forest, Vic. (R. Bilney).

FIGURE 9 in Taxonomic revision of south-eastern Australian giant burrowing frogs (Anura: Limnodynastidae: Heleioporus Gray)

FIGURE 9. Differences in call repetition rate and pulse repetition rate related to temperature in eastern Australian Heleioporus. A) fast call, Morton National Park, NSW (60 calls per minute; 19°C), B) moderate, Ku-ring-gai Chase National Park, NSW (36 calls per minute, 17°C), two males, a and b, alternating calling; C) slow, Watts Creek, Vic. (24 calls per minute, 8°C).

FIGURE 6 in Taxonomic revision of south-eastern Australian giant burrowing frogs (Anura: Limnodynastidae: Heleioporus Gray)

FIGURE 6. Colour pattern profiles for adult individuals of A) plate from Shaw & Nodder (1795); B–H) Heleioporus a. australiacus, and I–P) H. a. flavopunctatus subsp. nov.

FIGURE 8 in Taxonomic revision of south-eastern Australian giant burrowing frogs (Anura: Limnodynastidae: Heleioporus Gray)

FIGURE 8. Variation in the pre-orbital papillae in anterior corner of eye of eastern Australian Heleioporus. Heleioporus a. australiacus—A) AMS R104952 (neotype) Maroota State Forest, B) AMS R5958 North Sydney, C) AMS R9470 Wollemi National Park, D) AMS R78853 Commodore Heights. H. a. flavopunctatus subsp. nov.—E) AMS R136719 Coolangubra State Forest, F) ANWC A0357 Wadbilliga, G) AMS R136730 Coolangubra State Forest, H) ANWC A1504 Bondi State Forest.

FIGURE 7 in Taxonomic revision of south-eastern Australian giant burrowing frogs (Anura: Limnodynastidae: Heleioporus Gray)

FIGURE 7. Examples of the colour patterning around the cloaca in eastern Australian Heleioporus. A–H) Heleioporus a. australiacus; A) AMS R27631 Darkes Forest NSW, B) SAMA R45377, C) Ourimbah NSW, D) AMS R78853 Pittwater NSW, E) SAMA R12064 Gosford, F) ANWC A0357 Wadbilliga, G) AMS R95406 Darkes Forest, H) AMS R104952 (neotype) Maroota; and I–P) H. a. flavopunctatus subsp. nov., I) Yambulla NSW, J) Yambulla NSW, K) Narooma NSW, L) NMV D50515 (type) Yalmy Road, Vic., M) NMV D33671 6 km S Ben Cruachan, Vic., N) NMV D33672 6 km S Ben Cruachan, Vic., O) no voucher state forest near Eden, NSW, P) AMS R136722 Coolangubra State Forest, NSW.

FIGURE 11 in Taxonomic revision of south-eastern Australian giant burrowing frogs (Anura: Limnodynastidae: Heleioporus Gray)

FIGURE 11. Dominant frequency (DF) and mean 5% and 95% frequency levels for 13 locations plotted against latitude in eastern Australian Heleioporus. Locality code numbers are indicated (see Supplementary Table S4)

FIGURE 5 in Taxonomic revision of south-eastern Australian giant burrowing frogs (Anura: Limnodynastidae: Heleioporus Gray)

FIGURE 5. Histograms of linear discriminant (LD) for analyses of morphological variation on transformed morphological data for female and male H. a. australiacus (red), and H. a. flavopunctatus subsp. nov. (blue).

FIGURE 4 in Taxonomic revision of south-eastern Australian giant burrowing frogs (Anura: Limnodynastidae: Heleioporus Gray)

FIGURE 4. Phylogenetic analyses of Heleioporus concatenated SNP data based on A) maximum likelihood and B) SVDQuartets analyses. Terminal taxa of eastern Heleioporus are numbered with locality codes in Table 1. Numbers at nodes in the ML tree are bootstrap proportions, all nodes in the SVDQuartets tree had 100% bootstrap proportions.

FIGURE 2 in Taxonomic revision of south-eastern Australian giant burrowing frogs (Anura: Limnodynastidae: Heleioporus Gray)

FIGURE 2. ML tree of relationships among Heleioporus mitochondrial ND4 nucleotide sequences from eastern Australian Heleioporus with ML bootstrap proportions and Bayesian posterior probabilities at nodes. Terminal taxa of eastern Heleioporus are numbered with locality codes in Table 1.