Skip to main content
Powered by ShareScore

Find research datasets worth reusing

Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.

858

datasets available to search

ShareScore release 0.9.0

Reset

Dataset results

858 results for “Monitoring Data”

Learn how ShareScore rates datasets ↗
edi52/100

National Park Service - South Florida/Caribbean Inventory & Monitoring Network - Mary's Point SET Surface Water level data from Virgin Islands National Park, St. John, US Virgin Islands

Surface water level data (m) was collected in Virgin Islands National Park, Mary's Point (MARY) by the South Florida/Caribbean Inventory and Monitoring Network (SFCN) as part of the Soil Elevation Table (SET) vital sign monitoring program. Water level data collected from 2017 to 2024 is included in this dataset. The water level data was collected using HOBOware Onset Water Level Data Loggers. This data-package is complete.

openCC (other)May 2025View details →
edi52/100

National Park Service - South Florida/Caribbean Inventory & Monitoring Network - Water Creek SET Surface Water level data from Virgin Islands National Park, St. John, US Virgin Islands

Surface water level data (m) was collected in Virgin Islands National Park, Water Creek (WACR) by the South Florida/Caribbean Inventory and Monitoring Network (SFCN) as part of the Soil Elevation Table (SET) vital sign monitoring program. Water level data collected from 2017 to 2024 is included in this dataset. The water level data was collected using HOBOware Onset Water Level Data Loggers. This data-package is complete.

openCC (other)May 2025View details →
edi52/100

Data associated with the 2019 Freshwater Oil Spill Remediation Study (FOReSt) assessing the use of enhanced Monitored Natural Recovery (eMNR) and shoreline washing agent (SWA) of diluted bitumen spills conducted in shoreline enclosures at the IISD Experimental Lakes Area, ON, Canada from 2019 to 2020

The following package includes data from the 2019 Freshwater Oil spill Remediation Study (FOReSt) at the IISD Experimental Lakes Area studying the use of enhanced monitored natural recovery (eMNR) and shoreline washing agent (SWA) as a secondary remediation method for diluted bitumen spills in freshwater shoreline enclosures. This package includes data tables on polycyclic aromatic compound chemistry in water and sediments, basic water quality, nutrient chemistry, and tritium chemistry monitored in the experimental and reference enclosures, and lake reference sites over the duration of the study. Data included in this package was first collected and used in the paper by Palace et al., titled Polycyclic aromatic compounds in freshwater ecosystems following non-invasive remediation of controlled diluted bitumen spills: The Freshwater Oil Spill Remediation Study (FOReSt) at the Experimental Lakes Area, Canada.

openCC (other)Jun 2025View details →
edi52/100

Clear Lake water quality monitoring data from 2019 to 2023 by the University of California, Davis

A major barrier to effective water quality restoration at Clear Lake is the absence of quantitative data on the anticipated response to restoration projects. In-lake monitoring (in-situ measurements) is needed to understand better the processes contributing to poor water quality. This data package contains the in-situ measurements collected by the University of California, Davis at Clear Lake between 2019 and 2023, which include: continous stream properties at three locations (Middle, Scott, and Kelsey Creeks); continuous meteorological variables at seven locations around the perimeter of the lake; continuous lake temperature and dissolved oxygen at multiple depths and locations across the lake (six permanent water quality stations); continuous lake surface temperature in the shoreline; and discreate samples to measure nutrient concentrations and phytoplankton biovolumes and species identification throughout the water column and across all three lake basins every 6-8 weeks.

openCC (other)Jun 2025View details →
edi52/100

Mangrove Coast Collaborative Project, Hydrologic monitoring data in mangrove forests, Jobos Bay NERR, April 2024 - December 2024

The dataset describes the hydrologic conditions of the soil porewater (water level, conductivity, and temperature) at a depth of ~70 cm below ground in six mangrove forest locations in Jobos Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve (JBNERR) at 30-minute intervals between April 2024 to December 2024. Locations of minimal forest recovery following the effects of Hurricane Maria (September 2017) were identified and selected for hydrologic monitoring coincident with sites sampled for structural metrics in 2022. One reference site, defined as a site that was observed to be recovering following the hurricane, was selected in black mangrove forest. Two of the six sampling locations were selected to monitor effects of human encroachment on the western boundary of the reserve. These two sites were not coincident with structural sampling plots established in 2022. This dataset is associated with the MCC Catalyst Project entitled Limits of Resilience (2023-2025) funded by the National Estuarine Research Reserve System (NERRS) Science Collaborative.

openCC (other)Sep 2025View details →
edi52/100

Mangrove Coast Collaborative Project, Hydrologic monitoring data in mangrove forests, Rookery Bay NERR, April 2024 - December 2024

The dataset describes the hydrologic conditions of the soil porewater (water level, conductivity, and temperature) at a depth of ~70 cm below ground in six black mangrove forest locations in Rookery Bay National Esturarine Research Reserve (NERR) at 30-minute intervals between April 2024 to December 2024. Locations of minimal forest recovery following the effects of Hurricane Irma (September 2017) were identified and selected for hydrologic monitoring. The design consists of three sites in mainland/interior black mangroves and three sites on ocean-facing islands, all of which are located on the east side of Hurricane Irma eyewall. In each group, two of the sites selected were considered sites of minimal recovery whereas one site was selected as a reference (location of recovering mangroves). This dataset is associated with the MCC Catalyst Project entitled Limits of Resilience (2023-2025) funded by the National Estuarine Research Reserve System (NERRS) Science Collaborative.

openCC (other)Sep 2025View details →
edi52/100

Itasca Biological Station Lake Monitoring Data, MN (1905 - 2021)

This dataset is a compilation of lake monitoring efforts across time at the Itasca Biological Station and Laboratories. The first records date back to 1905, and coverage is intermittent throughout 1900's and into the 2000's. Measurements were recorded by several instructors and station staff across several lakes in the Itasca, MN region. At each sampling site, weather conditions, water clarity (via Secchi disk), and depth-specific measurements of temperature, dissolved oxygen, and photosynthetically active radiation were recorded.

openCC (other)Jan 2026View details →
edi52/100

Interagency Ecological Program: Fish catch and water quality data from the Sacramento River floodplain and tidal slough, collected by the Yolo Bypass Fish Monitoring Program, 1998-2024.

Largely supported by the Interagency Ecological Program (IEP), California Department of Water Resources (DWR) has operated a fish monitoring program in the Yolo Bypass, a seasonal floodplain and tidal slough, since 1998. The objectives of the Yolo Bypass Fish Monitoring Program (YBFMP) are to: 1. Collect baseline data on water quality, chlorophyll, lower trophic level biota, and fish in the Yolo Bypass to monitor spatial and temporal changes in trends and abundance. 2. Analyze and communicate Yolo Bypass data with interested parties and the scientific and management communities to address pertinent management-related questions. 3. Provide technical expertise on Yolo Bypass aquatic ecology and monitoring and sampling methods. The YBFMP operates a rotary screw trap and fyke trap and conducts biweekly beach seine and lower trophic surveys in addition to maintaining water quality instrumentation in the bypass. Only juvenile and adult fish catch with associated water quality are presented in this dataset. The rotary screw trap sampling objectives are to: (1) examine species abundance and life stage of juvenile outmigrants and resident small-bodied fishes, (2) identify temporal and spatial patterns in fish abundance and species composition, and (3) examine the effect of physical and environmental conditions on these patterns. The fyke trap sampling objectives are to: (1) examine abundance of migrating and resident adult fishes, (2) identify temporal and spatial patterns in fish abundance and species composition, especially with regard to anadromous species, (3) examine the effect of physical and environmental conditions on these patterns, and (4) provide data on the timing and duration of species captured in the Yolo Bypass for comparison to those captured in other Sacramento Valley tributaries. The beach seine surveys are conducted in the Yolo Bypass’s perennial channel (Toe Drain), inundated floodplain, disconnected inundated ponds, and perennial ponds. The objectives o

openCC (other)Apr 2025View details →
edi52/100

Interagency Ecological Program: Over four decades of juvenile fish monitoring data from the San Francisco Estuary, collected by the Delta Juvenile Fish Monitoring Program, 1976-2025

The United States Fish and Wildlife Service Delta Juvenile Fish Monitoring Program (DJFMP) has monitored juvenile Chinook Salmon Oncorhynchus tshawytscha and other fish species within the San Francisco Estuary (Estuary) since 1976 using a combination of surface trawls and beach seines. Since 2000, three trawl sites and 58 beach seine sites have been sampled weekly or biweekly within the Estuary and lower Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers. As part of the Interagency Ecological Program (IEP) that manages the Estuary, the DJFMP has tracked the relative abundance and distribution of naturally and hatchery produced juvenile Chinook Salmon of all races as they outmigrate through the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta for over four decades. The data that DJFMP collected has been used not only to help inform the management of Chinook Salmon, but also to monitor the status of native species of interest such as the previously listed Sacramento Splittail Pogonichthys macrolepidotus and invasive species such as Mississippi Silverside Menidia audens and Largemouth Bass Micropterus salmoides. DATA CORRECTION/UPDATE: Previous data versions 244.6, 244.7, and 244.8 contained an error and resulted in duplicated records of hatchery Chinook Salmon in the datasets. These datasets were removed from the data repository and the error was corrected in version 244.9 and after. DNA Data: Full more details of the DNA methods and results for juvenile Chinook salmon included in this dataset, please check out Blankenship, S.M., J. Israel, E. Buttermore, and K. Reece. 2021. Knights Landing, California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Genetic Determination of Population of Origin 2017 through 2019 ver 1. Environmental Data Initiative. https://doi.org/10.6073/pasta/85fbc988c0b1362e84c318e69c7a939e. For more information on the Delta Juvenile Fish Monitoring Program: https://www.fws.gov/project/delta-juvenile-fish-monitoring-program

openCC (other)Jan 2026View details →
edi52/100

Interagency Ecological Program: Zooplankton catch and water quality data from the Sacramento River floodplain and tidal slough, collected by the Yolo Bypass Fish Monitoring Program, 1998-2018

Largely supported by the Interagency Ecological Program (IEP), the California Department of Water Resources (DWR) has operated a fisheries and invertebrate monitoring program in the Yolo Bypass since 1998. The main objectives of the Yolo Bypass Fish Monitoring Program (YBFMP) are to collect baseline data on lower trophic levels (phytoplankton, zooplankton and insect drift), juvenile and adult fish, hydrology, and water quality parameters. As the Yolo Bypass has been identified as a high restoration priority by numerous regulatory agencies, these baseline data are critical for evaluating success of future restoration projects. In addition, the data have already served to increase our understanding of the role of the Yolo Bypass in the life history of native fishes, and its ecological function in the San Francisco Estuary. Zooplankton are an important component in the diet of larval, juvenile, and small adult fishes within the San Francisco Estuary, including Delta Smelt, juvenile Chinook Salmon, Striped Bass, and Sacramento Splittail. The YBFMP collects zooplankton year-round from two sites. Since 2011, samples have been collected biweekly (every other week) to weekly (during floodplain inundation) using 150- and 50- micrometer mesh plankton nets. Zooplankton are identified and enumerated by contractors (currently BSA Environmental Services). The goals of the zooplankton monitoring program are to compare the seasonal variation in species densities and trends between (1) the Sacramento River channel, and (2) the Yolo Bypass, the river’s seasonal floodplain. Data on zooplankton catch and associated water quality parameters are presented in this dataset.

openCC (other)Dec 2021View details →
edi52/100

Surface Water Quality Monitoring Data collected in South Florida Coastal Waters (FCE LTER), Florida, USA, June 1989-ongoing

The Southeast Environmental Research Center at Florida International University operates a network of 331 fixed sampling sites distributed throughout the estuarine and coastal ecosystems of south Florida. The purpose of this network is to address concerns in regional water quality which cross and overlap separate political boundaries. Funding has come from different sources with individual programs being added as funding became available. Biscayne Bay, Florida Bay, Whitewater Bay, Ten Thousand Islands, Rookery Bay, Estero Bay, and Pine Island Sound are sampled monthly while the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary (FKNMS) and the southwest shelf are sampled quarterly. Variables currently being measured include surface and bottom temperature, salinity, dissolved oxygen, nitrate, nitrite, ammonium, total nitrogen, total organic nitrogen, total phosphorus, soluble reactive phosphorus, total organic carbon, total silicate, chlorophyll a, alkaline phosphatase activity, turbidity, and light extinction. The purpose of this network is to address concerns in regional water quality which cross and overlap separate political boundaries. One of the products is a quasi-synoptic big picture of nutrient and phytoplankton biomass distributions over the South Florida Coastal Waters. The SERC network will, in time, provide us with the data necessary to determine whether conditions within the estuaries and sanctuary are improving or declining.

openCC (other)Nov 2025View details →
edi52/100

Monthly monitoring fluorescence data for Florida Bay, Ten Thousand Islands, and Whitewater Bay, in southwest coast of Everglades National Park (FCE) for February 2001 to December 2002

Dissolved organic matter plays an important role in biogeochemical processes in aquatic environments such as elemental cycling, microbial loop energetics, and the transport of materials across landscapes. Since most of N (Greater than 90%) and P (around 90%) is in the organic form in the oligotrophic subtropical Florida Coastal Estuaries (FCES), study of the source and dynamics of dissolved organic matter (DOM) in the ecosystem is crucial for the better understanding of the biogeochemical cycling of nutrients. FCES are composed of estuaries with distinct regions with different biogeochemical processes. Florida Bay (FB) is a wedge-shaped shallow oligotrophic estuary which lays south of the Everglades, the bottom of which is covered with a dense biomass of seagrass. Whitewater bay (WWB) is a semi-enclosed mangrove estuary with a relatively long residence time, which receives overland freshwater input from the Everglades marshes. Ten thousand Islands (TTI) covers the southwest margin of the Florida Coastal Everglades, which are highly compartmentalized by local geomorphology. The sources of both freshwater and nutrients in FCES are difficult to quantify, owing to the non-point source nature of runoff from the Everglades and the dendritic cross channels in the mangroves. Furthermore, the combination of multiple DOM sources (freshwater marsh vegetation, mangroves, phytoplankton, seagrass, etc.), and the potential seasonal variability of their relative contribution, along with the history of (photo)chemical and microbial diagenetic processing, and complex advective circulation, makes the study of DOM dynamics in FCES particularly difficult using standard schemes of estuarine ecology. Quantitative information of DOM is very useful to investigate the biogeochemical cycling of DOM to a certain degree, however, qualitative information is necessary to better understand the source and dynamics of DOM. Since fluorescence spectroscopic techniques are very sensitive, quick and sim

openCC (other)Feb 2024View details →
edi52/100

Monthly monitoring fluorescence data for Shark River Slough and Taylor Slough, Everglades National Park (FCE) for October 2004 to February 2014

Dissolved organic matter plays an important role in biogeochemical processes in aquatic environments such as elemental cycling, microbial loop energetics, and the transport of materials across landscapes. Since most of N (> 90%) and P (around 90%) is in the organic form in the oligotrophic subtropical Florida Coastal Everglades (FCE), study of the source and dynamics of dissolved organic matter (DOM) in the ecosystem is crucial for the better understanding of the biogeochemical cycling of nutrients. FCE are composed of estuaries with distinct regions with different biogeochemical processes. Freshwater marsh primarily receives terrestrial input and local autochthonous vegetation production. Mangrove ecotone, nevertheless, is affected by the tidal contributions from Florida Bay and local mangrove production. Florida Bay (FB) is a wedge-shaped shallow oligotrophic estuary which lays south of the Everglades, the bottom of which is covered with a dense biomass of seagrass. The sources of both freshwater and nutrients in FCE are difficult to quantify, owing to the non-point source nature of runoff from the Everglades and the dendritic cross channels in the mangroves. Furthermore, the combination of multiple DOM sources (freshwater marsh vegetation, mangroves, phytoplankton, seagrass, etc.), and the potential seasonal variability of their relative contribution, along with the history of (photo)chemical and microbial diagenetic processing, and complex advective circulation, makes the study of DOM dynamics in FCE particularly difficult using standard schemes of estuarine ecology. Quantitative information of DOM is very useful to investigate the biogeochemical cycling of DOM to a certain degree, however, qualitative information is necessary to better understand the source and dynamics of DOM. Since fluorescence spectroscopic techniques are very sensitive, quick and simple, they have been applied to investigate the fate of DOM in estuaries.

openCC (other)Feb 2024View details →
edi52/100

PIE LTER salt marsh vegetation cover data from regularly monitored quadrats along transects in Rowley, MA.

Marsh vegetation cover data from quadrats along transects in salt marsh sites in Rowley, MA. The transects are intended to study long term changes in marsh vegetation. Four sites ((12 transects) were originally set up to study the impact of salt marsh haying. Two of these sites (labeled McH and EPH) were regularly hayed until 2002. The other two (PUH and CC) were reference sites. Two additional sites labeled RM and RR (8 transects) were originally set up to track invasion by Phragmites australis.

openCC (other)Jan 2023View details →
edi52/100

SBC LTER: Daily averages of modeled significant wave height (Hs) and peak wave period (Tp) in the Santa Barbara Coastal area from the Coastal Data Information Program - Monitoring and Prediction System (CDIP MOP)

From http://cdip.ucsb.edu: The Coastal Data Information Program (CDIP) is a research group at Scripps Institution of Oceanography that monitors coastal waves and nearshore sand levels on regional scales. CDIP maintains a network of optimally-placed, directional wave buoys from San Diego to Eureka. The buoy measurements are used to initialize a high spatial resolution (100m x 100m) linear spectral wave propagation model. The resulting hourly hindcasts and nowcasts of CA coastal wave conditions have a level of accuracy that is not possible with more traditional wind-wave generation models that are initialized with modeled wind fields.

openCC (other)Jun 2025View details →
zenodo48/100

EPSRC HEED Data Repository: Footfall Monitoring System

<p>The dataset deposited here was prepared under&nbsp;the EPSRC-funded&nbsp;<a href="http://heed-refugee.coventry.ac.uk/">Humanitarian Engineering and Energy for Displacement</a>&nbsp;research project (EP/P029531/1). The project aimed to understand energy needs of displaced communities, create an evidence base on the usage of different energy interventions and provide recommendations for improved design of future energy interventions to better meet the needs of people.&nbsp;</p> <p>As part of the project, we deployed a Footfall Monitoring System&nbsp;in the Uttargaya settlement in Nepal. Footfall monitors are designed to measure the step count of passers-by with the aim to: Evaluate the level of activity in an area by measuring footfall count and Evaluate the effect of streetlights on the level of activity.</p> <p>For the purpose of this study, the 7 footfall monitors are deployed beside 7 streetlights. The footfall monitors were deployed prior to commissioning of streetlights to gather baseline data and evaluate the impact of streetlights on the footfall count. The key constituents of footfall monitors are: Raspberry Pi 3B and Case; PiFace Real Time Clock and CAM008 70&ordm; night vision camera. The total cost of a monitor is &pound;92.88. The Raspberry Pi is the central unit of the system that runs a program to sense the footfall count as measured by the IR sensor. The IR sensor counts footfall by tracking the number of times a horizontal beam of light is &ldquo;broken&rdquo; when a person crosses a threshold. If new data is recorded by the sensor, the updated footfall count along with the direction of movement and the current time (measured from PiFace RTC) is stored onto an SD card. A packet containing the updated values is also transmitted to the heed-data server hosted at Coventry University.</p> <p>Post Deployment Challenges:</p> <ul> <li><strong>Damage to footfall</strong>: In April 2019, footfall monitor 7 was damaged due to a gust of storm and heavy rains in the camp. This monitor was replaced in May 2019.</li> <li><strong>Power outages:</strong> These are common in the camp. Data is lost during this time as the devices have no access to power.</li> <li><strong>Internet connectivity: </strong>The availability and reliability of Wi-Fi continue to be an issue for the transmission of data to heed-data server.</li> </ul>

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2020View details →
zenodo48/100

Arctic falcons population monitoring data

<p>The Arctic Falcon Specialist Group (AFSG) is an informal network of biologists with a research focus on Arctic-breeding peregrine falcons (<em>Falco peregrinus</em>) and gyrfalcons (<em>Falco rusticolus)</em>. AFSG was established to enhance the coordination and collaboration on the monitoring of the two Arctic falcon species and the initial joint effort was to compile the first overview of Arctic falcon monitoring sites, present trends for long-term occupancy and productivity, and summarize information describing abundance, distribution, phenology and health of the two species &ndash; based on data for 24 falcon monitoring sites across the Arctic. The analyses were published in the journal Ambio (Franke et al. 2020) as a contribution to the terrestrial Circumpolar Biodiversity Monitoring Programme (CBMP) defined by Arctic Council&rsquo;s Biodiversity Working Group (Christensen et al. 2018).</p> <p>The data compiled from across the Arctic for the analyses by Franke et al. (2020) are here made available for wider usage and comparisons. However, for the analyses in the Ambio paper, some filtering procedures were applied (e.g. time series shorter than 10 sampling years, or fewer than 10 territories monitored), excluding some of the original data that are now made available in this dataset. In addition, some co-authors preferred either to conduct separate uploads of respective data, or declined the invitation to make the data publicly available (see attached map overview of monitoring sites); hence this dataset does not exactly match the data analysed by Franke et al. (2020).</p> <p>This data set contains the annual estimates of peregrine and gyrfalcon &lsquo;occupancy&rsquo; and &lsquo;productivity&rsquo; in respective monitoring sites; for definitions as well a discussion of challenges in determining, interpreting and comparing those figures across sites with different sampling procedures please consult Franke et al. (2020 and 2017).</p> <p>The file named <strong>Arctic falcons monitoring data - AFSG 2020.csv</strong> contains the annual estimates of occupancy and productivity for peregrine falcon and gyrfalcon along with information on monitoring sites and the principal investigators &nbsp;as specified in the file <strong>ReadMe_Arctic-falcons-monitoring-data.txt</strong>.&nbsp;<strong>Arctic falcons monitoring data - AFSG 2020.xlsx</strong> contains the same data in Microsoft Excel format.</p> <p>The file named <strong>AFSG-MonitoringSites-with-data.png</strong>&nbsp;provides an overview of&nbsp; the 24 monitoring sites described in Franke et al. (2020) with indication of which datasets are included here.</p> <p>Please note that:</p> <ul> <li>The dataset contains information on sample size (number of nesting territories surveyed in each monitoring site and year) for some areas only; for areas without sample size more than 10 territories were usually surveyed. However, for interpreting the data, potential users may need to consult the principal investigators for the specific monitoring sites.</li> <li>The dataset lists the principal investigators (and contact details) as respective &ldquo;data owners&rdquo;; in addition to the Creative Commons License 4.0 specifications covering this data upload, potential data users are strongly encouraged to contact the data owners prior to using or interpreting the data &ndash; for consent and possible co-authorship.</li> </ul>

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2020View details →
zenodo48/100

Data From: Exploring Gelatin-A and Mouse Proline-Rich Protein 5 as Probes for Wine Polyphenols analysis by Quartz Crystal Microbalance with Dissipation Monitoring

<p>Polyphenols are essential in winemaking, affecting the wine's quality, color, astringency, bitterness, and chemical stability. Conventional methods for assessing polyphenolic content are both expensive and time-intensive, underscoring the need for new, efficient techniques.</p> <p>The Quartz Crystal Microbalance with Dissipation Monitoring (QCM-D) sensor is recognized for its speed and reliability as a label-free detection tool. This study applies QCM-D to evaluate Gelatin Type A (Gel-A) from porcine skin and Mouse Proline-Rich Protein 5 (MP5) for polyphenol analysis in red wines without pre-treatment. MP5 notably exhibited a linear dissipation signal response with both total polyphenol and hydroxybenzoic acid concentrations. These findings highlight the potential for creating a stand-alone sensor platform for real-time polyphenol monitoring in winemaking.</p>

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2024View details →
zenodo48/100

Data from: Structure and dynamics of secondary and mature rainforests: insights from South Asian long-term monitoring plots

<p><strong>1) DESCRIPTION&nbsp;</strong></p> <p>The dataset contains annual woody stems (shrubs and trees) census data collected from two long-term ecological monitoring plots spanning one hectare each in the Anamalai Hills of the Southern Western Ghats, India. These two plots represent one situated in a mature forest located within relatively undisturbed rainforest of the Anamalai Tiger Reserve (ATR) and one in secondary forest on the Valparai Plateau, respectively. Both plots have been censused and measured from 2017 to 2022 following the standardized protocol (RAINFOR-GEM, Marthews et al. 2014).</p> <p><br><strong>2) CONTACTS</strong></p> <p>CONTACT #1<br>1. Name: Akhil Murali<br>2. Work Address: Nature Conservation Foundation, 1311, 12th A Main, Vijayanagar 1st Stage, Mysuru 570017, Karnataka, India<br>3. Work Phone: +91 82812 97441<br>4. Email address: akhil@ncf-india.org<br>5. ORCID: 0000-0001-6149-6458</p> <p>CONTACT #2<br>1. Name: Srinivasan Kasinathan<br>2. Work Address: Nature Conservation Foundation, 1311, 12th A Main, Vijayanagar 1st Stage, Mysuru 570017, Karnataka, India<br>3. Work Phone: +91 821 2515601<br>4. Email address: srini@ncf-india.org<br>5. ORCID: 0000-0001-7323-6653&nbsp;</p> <p>CONTACT #3<br>1. Name: Kshama Bhat<br>2. Work Address: Nature Conservation Foundation, 1311, 12th A Main, Vijayanagar 1st Stage, Mysuru 570017, Karnataka, India<br>3. Work Phone: +91 821 2515601<br>4. Email address: kshama@ncf-india.org<br>5. ORCID: 000-0002-6190-2687</p> <p>CONTACT #4&nbsp;<br>1. Name: Jayashree Ratnam&nbsp;<br>2. Work Address: National Centre for Biological Sciences, TIFR, Bellary Road, Bengaluru 560065, Karnataka, India<br>3. Work Phone: +91 80 23666001&nbsp;<br>4. Email address: jratnam@ncbs.res.in&nbsp;<br>5. ORCID: 0000-0002-6568-8374</p> <p>CONTACT #5<br>1. Name: Mahesh Sankaran&nbsp;<br>2. Work Address: National Centre for Biological Sciences, TIFR, Bellary Road, Bengaluru 560065, Karnataka, India<br>3. Work Phone: +91 80 23666001<br>4. Email address: mahesh@ncbs.res.in&nbsp;<br>5. ORCID: 0000-0002-1661-6542</p> <p>CONTACT #6<br>1. Name: Divya Mudappa<br>2. Work Address: Nature Conservation Foundation, 1311, 12th A Main, Vijayanagar 1st Stage, Mysuru 570017, Karnataka, India<br>3. Work Phone: +91 821 2515601<br>4. Email address: divya@ncf-india.org<br>5. ORCID: 0000-0001-9708-4826</p> <p>CONTACT #7<br>1. Name: T. R. Shankar Raman<br>2. Work Address: Nature Conservation Foundation, 1311, 12th A Main, Vijayanagar 1st Stage, Mysuru 570017, Karnataka, India<br>3. Work Phone: +91 821 2515601<br>4. Email address: trsr@ncf-india.org<br>5. ORCID: 0000-0002-1347-3953</p> <p>CONTACT #8<br>1. Name: Anand M Osuri&nbsp;<br>2. Work Address: Nature Conservation Foundation, 1311, 12th A Main, Vijayanagar 1st Stage, Mysuru 570017, Karnataka, India<br>3. Work Phone: +91 821 2515601<br>4. Email address: aosuri@ncf-india.org&nbsp;<br>5. ORCID: 0000-0001-9909-5633</p> <p><br><strong>3) GEOGRAPHIC COVERAGE and SITE DESCRIPTION</strong></p> <p>a) Site type: : Tropical Forest<br>b) Geography: : Anamalai Tiger Reserve, Southern Western Ghats.<br>c) Habit: : Mid elevation Wet evergreen Forest<br>d) Site History: :&nbsp;</p> <p>i) MANAMBOLI- The Mature Forest plot (10.357748&deg; N, 76.889747&deg; E; 825 m asl) is situated within a relatively undisturbed 200-hectare mid-elevation tropical wet evergreen rainforest tract at the core of the Anamalai Tiger Reserve (ATR). This area has been protected from logging and other significant disturbances since its establishment as a protected area in 1979.</p> <p>ii) CANDURA- The Secondary Forest plot (10.30855411&deg; N, 76.83391853&deg; E; 875 m asl) is situated within a 124-hectare rainforest remnant on the Valparai Plateau: the Candura rainforest remnant. The Candura site experienced episodic selective logging in the 1990s and early 2000s, with the last logging episode occurring in 2004. In the early 2000s, the understorey of the remnant was cleared for Vanilla (Vanilla planifolia) cultivation in the central and southern parts (abandoned in 2007), robusta coffee (Coffea canephora) in the northwestern corner (abandoned in the early 2000s), and pepper in 21 hectares in the northeastern part (established in 2015, abandoned in 2021).</p> <p>Climate: Humid tropical with about 2400 mm rainfall annually, falling mainly during the southwest monsoon.</p> <p><br><strong>4) TEMPORAL COVERAGE</strong></p> <p>a) Begins: 2017-11-30 (Year, Month, Day)<br>b) Ends: 2022-11-12 (Year, Month, Day)</p> <p><br>5) SAMPLING DESIGN AND METHODS&nbsp;</p> <p>a) Plot Design: Each 1 ha plot of 100 m &times; 100 m, sub-divided into 100 continuous sub-plots of 10 m &times; 10 m, was surveyed and mapped to maximum accuracy using a theodolite in the field, with grid corners permanently staked.&nbsp;<br>b) Data collection period and frequency: After the plot establishment in NOvember -- December 2017, the plots were recensused each year (around November).&nbsp;<br>c) Research Methods: All woody plant individuals with girth at breast height (GBH, at 1.3 m) &ge;10 cm were tagged with numbered aluminum tags and spatially mapped. Plant species were identified using standard floral keys. Stem GBH was measured for all single stemmed individuals. For trees with buttresses, the GBH point of measurement (POM) was taken at 50 cm above the buttresses or at the height where the stem is regular. New saplings that recruited into the &ge;10 cm GBH class were identified, mapped, tagged, and added to the monitoring. Stems that appeared to be dead were recorded at each monitoring and those that showed no signs of recovery in subsequent visits were recorded as mortality.</p> <p><br><strong>6) FILES INCLUDED</strong></p> <p>The dataset includes the following 9 files, whose details and contents are explained below. (Wherever used in the various files, NA implies not available.)</p> <p>01_README.txt<br>Metadata (this file) including information on the dataset explaining associated files and their contents.</p> <p>02_Candura_annual_census.csv&nbsp;<br>This contains the Annual census data with the following column headings:&nbsp;<br>site: Site name (Can = Candura)<br>cno: Census Number (1 = 2017, 2 = 2018..., 6 = 2022)<br>ymd: Date in DD-MM-YYYY format (Day Month Year)<br>gno: Grid Number<br>tno: Unique tag number for the plant<br>pno: Pole Number (unique alphabetic code for each stem of multi-stemmed individuals)<br>sps: Species name as codes<br>lx: X coordinate of tree in the 10 m &times; 10 m subplot (in metres)<br>ly: Y coordinate of tree in the 10 m &times; 10 m subplot (in metres)<br>ht1: Point of measurement at 1.3 m above the ground or 50 cm above the top of the highest buttress or stilt root (POM1)<br>c1: Alive status of the stem at the POM1 (coded according Marthews et al. 2014, page: 97)<br>g1: Stem girth at POM1 (in centimetre)<br>ht2: 20 cm above the ht1 or point of measurement 2 (POM2) recording girth at which the dendroband is attached<br>c2: Alive status of the stem at the POM2 (coded acording Marthews et al. 2014, page: 97)<br>g2: Girth at POM2 (in centimetre)<br>dyn: whether the dendroband is attached to the tree or not (y-Yes, n-No)<br>da: alive status of stem (d-dead,a-alive)<br>remarks: remarks or notes</p> <p>03_Manamboly_annual_census.csv<br>This contains Annual census data with the following column headings:&nbsp;<br>site: Site name (Man = Manamboli)<br>cno: Census Number (1 = 2017, 2 = 2018..., 6 = 2022)<br>ymd: Date in DD-MM-YYYY format (Day Month Year)<br>gno: Grid Number<br>tno: Unique tag number for the plant<br>pno: Pole Number (unique alphabetic code for each stem of multi-stemmed individuals)<br>sps: Species name as codes<br>lx: X coordinate of tree in the 10 m &times; 10 m subplot (in metres)<br>ly: Y coordinate of tree in the 10 m &times; 10 m subplot (in metres)<br>ht1: Point of measurement at 1.3 m above the ground or 50 cm above the top of the highest buttress or stilt root (POM1)<br>c1: Alive status of the stem at the POM1 (coded according Marthews et al. 2014, page: 97)<br>g1: Stem girth at POM1 (in centimetre)<br>ht2: 20 cm above the ht1 or point of measurement 2 (POM2) recording girth at which the dendroband is attached<br>c2: Alive status of the stem at the POM2 (coded acording Marthews et al. 2014, page: 97)<br>g2: Girth at POM2 (in centimetre)<br>dyn: whether the dendroband is attached to the tree or not (y-Yes, n-No)<br>da: alive status of stem (d-dead,a-alive)<br>remarks: remarks or notes</p> <p>04_Candura_vernier.csv<br>This file has the girth measurement of trees with lianas where digital vernier calipers were used to measure stem diameter since it was not possible to measure stem girth using measuring tape.<br>site: Site name (Can = Candura)<br>cno: Census Number<br>ymd: Date in DD-MM-YYYY format (Day Month Year)<br>gno: Grid Number<br>tno: Unique tag number for the plant<br>pno: Pole Number (unique alphabetic code for each stem of multi-stemmed individuals)<br>sps: Species name as codes<br>vern1_d1 First measure of diameter at POM1 (in millimetre)&nbsp;<br>vern2_d1 Second measure of diameter at POM1 (in millimetre)&nbsp;<br>vern3_d1 Third measure of diameter at POM1 (in millimetre)&nbsp;<br>calc_g1: Girth at POM1 (in centimetre; calculated using the averaged value as diameter from the three measurements)<br>vern1_d2 First measure of diameter at POM2 (in millimetre)&nbsp;<br>vern2_d2 Second measure of diameter at POM2 (in millimetre)&nbsp;<br>vern3_d2 Third measure of diameter at POM2 (in millimetre)&nbsp;<br>calc_g2 Girth at POM2 (in centimetre; calculated using the averaged value as diameter from the three measurements)<br>Remarks Remarks and notes</p> <p>05_Manamboli_vernier.csv<br>This file has the girth measurement of trees with lianas where digital vernier calipers were used to measure stem diameter since it was not possible to measure stem girth using measuring tape.<br>site: Site name (Man = Manamboli)<br>cno: Census Number<br>ymd: Date in DD-MM-YYYY format (Day Month Year)<br>gno: Grid Number<br>tno: Unique tag number for the plant<br>pno: Pole Number (unique alphabetic code for each stem of multi-stemmed individuals)<br>sps: Species name as codes<br>vern1_d1 First measure of diameter at POM1 (in millimetre)&nbsp;<br>vern2_d1 Second measure of diameter at POM1 (in millimetre)&nbsp;<br>vern3_d1 Third measure of diameter at POM1 (in millimetre)&nbsp;<br>calc_g1: Girth at POM1 (in centimetre; calculated using the averaged value as diameter from the three measurements)<br>vern1_d2 First measure of diameter at POM2 (in millimetre)&nbsp;<br>vern2_d2 Second measure of diameter at POM2 (in millimetre)&nbsp;<br>vern3_d2 Third measure of diameter at POM2 (in millimetre)&nbsp;<br>calc_g2 Girth at POM2 (in centimetre; calculated using the averaged value as diameter from the three measurements)<br>Remarks Remarks and notes</p> <p>06_Candura_Height_data.csv<br>This contains data on the heights of individual trees in plot as measured in 2018.<br>site: Site name (Can = Candura)<br>ymd: Date in YYYY/MM/DD format (Year Month Day)<br>gno: Grid Number:&nbsp;<br>tno: unique tag number:&nbsp;<br>pno: Pole Number (unique alphabetic code for each stem of multi-stemmed individuals)<br>sps: Species name as codes:&nbsp;<br>lx: X coordinate of tree in the 10 m &times; 10 m subplot (in metres)<br>ly: Y coordinate of tree in the 10 m &times; 10 m subplot (in metres)<br>height: Height of tree in metres<br>remarks: Remarks: and notes</p> <p>07_Manamboli_Height_data.csv<br>This contains data on the heights of individual trees in plot as measured in 2018.<br>site: Site name (Man = Manamboli)<br>ymd: Date in YYYY-MM-DD format (Year Month Day)<br>gno: Grid Number:&nbsp;<br>tno: unique tag number:&nbsp;<br>pno: Pole Number (unique alphabetic code for each stem of multi-stemmed individuals)<br>sps: Species name as codes:&nbsp;<br>lx: X coordinate of tree in the 10 m &times; 10 m subplot (in metres)<br>ly: Y coordinate of tree in the 10 m &times; 10 m subplot (in metres)<br>height: Height of tree in metres<br>remarks: Remarks: and notes</p> <p>08_Species_name_match.csv<br>This file provides the combined list of species codes updated taxonomy and successional guild. Scientific names were updated to current taxonomy using the species name matching tool of the Global Biodiversity Information Facility, GBIF (www.gbif.org).<br>sps: Species codes<br>query : Scientific name of the plant at the time of data collection:&nbsp;<br>scientificName: : with auther citation:&nbsp;<br>key: GBIF key<br>rank: Taxonomic rank or level of identification (GENUS, SPECIES)<br>kingdom: Taxonomic Kingdom (plants) provided by GBIF name matching tool:&nbsp;<br>phylum: Taxonomic Phylum provided by GBIF name matching tool<br>class: Taxonomic Class provided by GBIF name matching tool<br>order: Taxonomic Order provided by GBIF name matching tool<br>family: Taxonomic Family provided by GBIF name matching tool<br>genus: Taxonomic Genus provided by GBIF name matching tool<br>botanical_name: Updated scientific name of the species provided by GBIF name matching tool<br>habt_new: Successional guild of the species (Mature = mature forest species; Secondary = secondary successional species; Int - Introduced species)</p> <p>09_R_scrpt_for_manuscript.R<br>Text file with code in the R statistical and programming environment (www.r-project.org).</p> <p><br><strong>Reference</strong><br>Marthews TR, Riutta T, Oliveras Menor I, Urrutia R, Moore S, Metcalfe D, Malhi Y, Phillips O, Huaraca Huasco W, Ruiz Ja&eacute;n M, Girardin C, Butt N, Cain R and colleagues from the RAINFOR and GEM networks (2014). Measuring Tropical Forest Carbon Allocation and Cycling: A RAINFOR-GEM Field Manual for Intensive Census Plots (v3.0). Manual, Global Ecosystems Monitoring network, http: //gem.tropicalforests.ox.ac.uk/.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p>

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2023View details →
zenodo48/100

Data from Yellow Sigatoka monitoring methods in the subtropical climate of southern Brazil

<h2>Description of the data and file structure</h2> <p>In this study four methods of disease monitoring were tested under field conditions: Biological Pre Warning (BPW); Stage of Evolution (SE); youngest Leaf Spotted (YLS); Infection Index (II). The BPW system evaluates the youngest leaves (2, 3, and 4), assigning a value for each type of lesion present, as well as for intensity of the lesion on the leaves&nbsp;(BUREAU et al., 1992). In the dataset is cited as the variable gross sum (points).</p> <p>The SE evaluates more leaves (1, 2, 3, 4, and 5) and scores only the most advanced symptoms of leaf disease, but without considering lesion intensity (GANRY et al., 2008). The SE calculation also corrects the gross sum of the disease according to leaf emission. The leaf emission rate was calculated using the Brun scale, which&nbsp;evaluates cigar leaf growth in decimals from 0.0 to 0.8.&nbsp; In the dataset is cited as the variable corrected gross sum (points).</p> <p>YLS is evaluated as the first leaf that has 10 spots with gray centers (CARLIER et al., 2003).&nbsp; In the dataset is cited as the variable YLS, which means the leaf position counted from the top to the botton of the plant (leaf number 3, leaf number 4...).</p> <p>Sigatoka Infection Index is quantified by assessing the severity of banana leaf disease using the Stover scale, with indexes from 0 to 50%, by means of the following formula: Infection Index =% (IF): [&Sigma;n&nbsp;&times; b / (N- 1) &times; T] &times; 100, in which: n = the number of leaves at each Stover scale level; b = degree according to the scale; N = the number of degrees employed in the scale (6); T = the total number of leaves evaluated (CARLIER et al., 2003).&nbsp; In the dataset is cited as the variable Infection index that should be understood like the severity of this leaf disease.</p> <p>In the second phase of the study, two monitoring methods were applied in commercial orchards in order to compare the standard model (Biological Pre-Warning &ndash; BPW) with the alternative method selected in the experimental phase (Youngest Leaf Spotted &ndash; YLS). The methods were applied, as described before in three sites in Crici&uacute;ma (site 1) and Sider&oacute;polis (sites 2 e 3), municipalities in the southern coast of the state of Santa Catarina, from March 2016 to November 2018. During this period, 37 disease evaluations were performed at each location.</p> <p>Disease data of the experimental area were submitted to descriptive analysis and Pearson correlation at 5% probability of error. Disease progress curves were also plotted. The disease development data in commercial orchards were analyzed by plotting disease progress curves for BPW and by frequency distribution (%) for the YLS variable during all period of the experiment.</p>

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2024View details →

ScienceDex guides

Understand access before you commit

These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.

Compare curated datasets

Allen Brain Atlas

Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.

allen-brain-atlas
neuroscienceopenDocumentation, web resources, and API references are available online.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)

ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.

abode-home-cage
behavioral-neuroscienceopenThe DataShare record exposes download links for annotations, documentation, license text, and the zipped per-snippet data directory.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

DANDI Archive for NWB datasets

DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.

dandi-nwb
electrophysiologyopenPublished Dandiset metadata and archive endpoints are available through the production DANDI API.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

International Brain Laboratory public data

The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.

ibl
behavioral-neuroscienceopenPublic sessions can be searched and loaded from the IBL public data server through ONE.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

OpenNeuro

OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.

openneuro
neuroscienceopenPublished datasets are available on demand over the internet.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record