Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
609
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
609 results for “Morphometric analysis”
Figure 5. Ordinations and discriminant analysis. A in Morphometric analysis of Eocene nummulitids in western and central Cuba: taxonomy, biostratigraphy and evolutionary trends
Figure 5. Ordinations and discriminant analysis. A, two-dimensional ordination of studied specimens; genera are separated by different shapes (squares = Operculinoides; polygons = Palaeonummulites; triangles = Heterostegina). B, three-dimensional ordination of the studied specimens emphasizes the variation in the third component, highlighting the differentiation between Heterostegina sp. indet. and Operculinoides. C, discriminant analysis of Heterostegina species and Operculinoides or Palaeonummulites species; parameters are sorted in order of their importance as discriminators.
Figure 2 in Morphometric analysis of Eocene nummulitids in western and central Cuba: taxonomy, biostratigraphy and evolutionary trends
Figure 2. Measurements of characters in equatorial section. A, embryonic apparatus; B, marginal test spiral; C, chamber measurements; D, example individual, Operculinoides floridensis, specimen 98LC-1H-648.
Figure 1. A in Morphometric analysis of Eocene nummulitids in western and central Cuba: taxonomy, biostratigraphy and evolutionary trends
Figure 1. A, schematic tectonic map of western and central Cuba (after Iturrlade-Vinent 1994), with locations of the stratigraphical sections and samples. B, stratigraphical relations of Eocene units in western and central Cuba, slightly modified from Garćıa-Delgado & Torres-Silva (1997); stratigraphical ranges of the studied sections: A, 98LC-2; B, 98LC-1; C, LM-52; D, NOR-UN; E, 98MT-1; F, E-126; G, CA-215.
Figure 3. A in Morphometric analysis of Eocene nummulitids in western and central Cuba: taxonomy, biostratigraphy and evolutionary trends
Figure 3. A, two-dimensional ordination of studied specimens; colours accord with the results of the K-means cluster analysis. Numbers indicate the measured type material: 1, Nummulites stritoreticulatus, holotype; 2, N. macgillavry (from Butterlin 1981); 3, Operculinoides trinitatensis, holotype; 4, O. spiralis, holotype; 5. O. kugleri, holotype; 6, N. trinitatensis (from Butterlin 1961); 7, O. willcoxi (from Barker 1939); 8, O. willcoxi (from Cole 1941); 9, O. floridensis (from Frost & Langenheim 1974); 10, O. floridensis (from Cole 1941); 11, O. floridensis (from Cole 1941); 12, O. soldadensis (from Vaughan & Cole 1941); 13, O. suteri (from Caudri 1996); 14, N. floridensis (from Butterlin 1961). B, three-dimensional ordination of the studied specimens emphasizes the variation in the third component, highlighting the differentiation between Nummulites from 98LC-2 and Palaeonummulites from 98LC-1. C, discriminant analysis between the interpreted species: Nummulites striatoreticulatus, Palaeonummulites trinitatensis, Operculinoides floridensis and Operculinoides soldadensis; parameters are sorted in order of their importance as discriminators.
Figure 16 in Morphometric analysis of Eocene nummulitids in western and central Cuba: taxonomy, biostratigraphy and evolutionary trends
Figure 16. Operculinoides floridensis (Heilprin). A–C, Loma Candelaria; A, 98LC-1-651; B, 98LC-1-667; C, 98LC-1-815. D, E, Loma Viǵıa; D, CA-216-F3-16; E, CA-216-D1a. F, Loma El Santo, CA-215-852. G, Loma Jabaco, LM-52-759. H, Angelita Quarry, 98MT-1. A–D, F and G are A forms in equatorial section; E and F are A forms in axial section.
FIGURE 7. Age-specific discriminant analysis using all morphometric parameters for all sites. 7A in Taxon-specific variability of leaf traits in three long-ranging fossil-species of the Paleogene and Neogene: Responses to climate?
FIGURE 7. Age-specific discriminant analysis using all morphometric parameters for all sites. 7A: Eocene. 7B: Oligocene. Triangles: Platanus neptuni. Squares: Eotrigonobalanus furcinervis. Circles: Daphnogene cinnamomifolia.
FIGURE 8 in Geometric morphometric analysis of Protoconites minor from the Cambrian (Terreneuvian) Yanjiahe Formation in Three Gorges, South China
FIGURE 8. The ordinary least-squares linear regression of the shape of mirrored Protoconites minor with log10- transformed centroid size. Characteristic specimens are shown in thin-plate splines corresponding to the shapes of specimens in RW 1–2 plane.
FIGURE 9 in Geometric morphometric analysis of Protoconites minor from the Cambrian (Terreneuvian) Yanjiahe Formation in Three Gorges, South China
FIGURE 9. The ordinary least-squares linear regression of the shape of straight-shelled Protoconites minor with log10- transformed centroid size. Characteristic specimens are shown in thin-plate splines corresponding to the shapes of specimens in RW 1–2 plane.
FIGURE 10 in Geometric morphometric analysis of Protoconites minor from the Cambrian (Terreneuvian) Yanjiahe Formation in Three Gorges, South China
FIGURE 10. Protoconites minor from the Cambrian (Terreneuvian) Yanjiahe Formation showing morphological variance during the ontogeny. Size of these specimens increases from right to left and from top to bottom. 1. No. Y-596 (2)- 2; 2. No. Y-735A (20)-2; 3. No. Y-800A (19)-2; 4. No. Y-469B (5); 5. No. Y-581 (2); 6. No. Y-134 (10); 7. No. Y-523; 8. No. Y-1236 (2); 9. No. Y-29; 10. No. Y-617A (4)-3; 11. No. Y-558A (17); 12. No. Y-141A (19)-1; 13. No. Y-558A (33); 14. No. Y-617A (2); 15. No. Y-546A (2); 16. No. Y-732A (20); 17. No. Y-142A (8)-1; 18. No. Y-816A (4); 19. No. Y-1230A (45); 20. No. Y-425A (2); 21. No. Y-561A (5); 22. No. Y-567 (2); 23. No. Y-732A (32)-1; 24. No. Y-173A (4); 25. No. Y-1227A (10); 26. No. Y-51A (2); 27. No. Y-24B (2). "Y" means the locality of the fossils from Yangjiachong section.
FIGURE 7 in Geometric morphometric analysis of Protoconites minor from the Cambrian (Terreneuvian) Yanjiahe Formation in Three Gorges, South China
FIGURE 7. Morphospace of straight shell Protoconites minor generated by the Relative Warp (RW) analysis. 1. plot for RW 1–2; 2. plot for RW 1–3. All thin-plate splines correspond to the shapes of specimens in RW 1–2 and RW 1–3 planes, respectively.
FIGURE 6 in Geometric morphometric analysis of Protoconites minor from the Cambrian (Terreneuvian) Yanjiahe Formation in Three Gorges, South China
FIGURE 6. Protoconites minor morphospace generated by the Relative Warp (RW) analysis using mirrored specimens. 1. plot for RW 1–2; 2. plot for RW 1–3. All thin-plate splines correspond to points (indicated as a line) within the morphospace in RW 1–2 and RW 1–3 planes, respectively.
FIGURE 5 in Geometric morphometric analysis of Protoconites minor from the Cambrian (Terreneuvian) Yanjiahe Formation in Three Gorges, South China
FIGURE 5. Protoconites minor morphospace generated by the Relative Warp (RW) analysis using un-mirrored specimens with indication of characteristic thin-plate splines. 1. plot for RW 1–2; 2. plot for RW 1–3. Thin-plate splines show the shapes of specimens in RW 1–2 and RW 1–3 planes, respectively.
FIGURE 4 in Geometric morphometric analysis of Protoconites minor from the Cambrian (Terreneuvian) Yanjiahe Formation in Three Gorges, South China
FIGURE 4. Histogram showing the size spectra of Protoconites minor. 1. size distribution of all specimens analyzed in this study; 2. size distribution without laterally bended specimens.
FIGURE 2 in Geometric morphometric analysis of Protoconites minor from the Cambrian (Terreneuvian) Yanjiahe Formation in Three Gorges, South China
FIGURE 2. Protoconites minor from the Cambrian (Terreneuvian) Yanjiahe Formation in Yichang, Hubei, China. 1. No. Y-24B (2); 2. No. Y-41A (5)-1; 3. No. Y-765A (3); 4. No. Y-127B (1); 5. No. Y-28 (2); 6. No. CH-179A (3); 7. No. Y-273A (1); 8. No. Y-41A (14); 9. No. Y-445 (2); 10. No. Y-494 (2)-2; 11. No. Y-40A (11); 12. No. Y-1234 (3); 13. No. Y-844A (2); 14. No. Y-785 (2); 15. No. Y-40B (9)-1; 16. No. Y-880 (6); 17. No. Y-596 (2)-1; 18. No. Y-531 (3)-2. "CH" means the locality of the fossils from Dingjiaping section, "Y" means the locality of the fossils from Yangjiachong section.
FIGURE 3 in Geometric morphometric analysis of Protoconites minor from the Cambrian (Terreneuvian) Yanjiahe Formation in Three Gorges, South China
FIGURE 3. Definition of landmarks and semi-landmarks and the result of superimposition. 1. and 2. landmarks and semi-landmarks set on both straight and laterally bent specimens. Type II landmarks are 1, 2, and 3, and sliding semilandmarks are 4–34 in 1. and 2.; 3. consensus configuration after superimposition using Generalized Procrustes Analysis.
FIGURE 1 in Geometric morphometric analysis of Protoconites minor from the Cambrian (Terreneuvian) Yanjiahe Formation in Three Gorges, South China
FIGURE 1. Locality and stratigraphy of the Cambrian (Terreneuvian) Yanjiahe Formation in Yichang, Hubei Province, China. 1. Sketch map of the People's Republic of China, showing the position of the collecting locality in Hubei Province; 2. Simplified geological sketch map of the Three Gorges area, Hubei Province, South China, showing the outcrops of Cambrian strata. Red boxes around 3 (Yanjiahe area) and 4 (Dingjiaping area) denote areas that are enlarged for additional detail; 3. Detailed geological sketch map of the Yanjiahe area, showing the outcrops of the Yanjiahe Formation; 4. Detailed geological sketch map of the Dingjiaping area, showing the outcrops of the Yanjiahe Formation. (In 3 and 4 map: White = Ediacaran Dengying Formation; Pink and light green = Cambrian Yanjiahe Formation; Yellow and light blue = the Cambrian Shuijingtuo Formation; Green = Cambrian Shipai Formation; Black triangles indicate locations of measured stratigraphic sections) 5. Stratigraphic sequence of Lower Cambrian strata in the Gunziao section, Three Gorge area, indicating the horizons where fossils were collected.
Рис. 4. ГенитаΛьные структуры самки Ctenoceratoda tancrei с усΛовными обозначениями морфометрических характеристик (см. текст) Fig. 4. Female genitalia structures of Ctenoceratoda tancrei with morphometric characteristics abbreviations (see text) in Morphometric analysis of genitalia of Ctenoceratoda tancrei (Graeser, 1892) (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae)
Рис. 4. ГенитаΛьные структуры самки Ctenoceratoda tancrei с усΛовными обозначениями морфометрических характеристик (см. текст) Fig. 4. Female genitalia structures of Ctenoceratoda tancrei with morphometric characteristics abbreviations (see text)
Рис. 3. ЭΑеагус Ctenoceratoda tancrei с усΛовными обозначениями морфометрических характеристик (см. текст) Fig. 3. Aedeagus of Ctenoceratoda tancrei with morphometric characteristics abbreviations (see text) in Morphometric analysis of genitalia of Ctenoceratoda tancrei (Graeser, 1892) (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae)
Рис. 3. ЭΑеагус Ctenoceratoda tancrei с усΛовными обозначениями морфометрических характеристик (см. текст) Fig. 3. Aedeagus of Ctenoceratoda tancrei with morphometric characteristics abbreviations (see text)
Рис. 1. Ctenoceratoda tancrei, бабочки из разΛичных ΛокаΛитетов: а, e — Киргизский хр., нац. парк «АΛа-Арча»; b, f — хр. ΔжумгаΛтоо, массив Сары-Кайкы; c, d, g, h — хр. МоΛΑо-Тоо, пер. Коро-Гоо. a–d — самцы, e–h — самки Fig. 1. Ctenoceratoda tancrei, the wing pattern variability: a, e — Kirghiz Mts., «Ala-Archa» national park; b, f — Dzhumgaltoo Mts., Sary-Kaiky gorge; c, d, g, h — Moldo-Too Mts., Koro-Goo Pass. a–d — males, e–h — females in Morphometric analysis of genitalia of Ctenoceratoda tancrei (Graeser, 1892) (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae)
Рис. 1. Ctenoceratoda tancrei, бабочки из разΛичных ΛокаΛитетов: а, e — Киргизский хр., нац. парк «АΛа-Арча»; b, f — хр. ΔжумгаΛтоо, массив Сары-Кайкы; c, d, g, h — хр. МоΛΑо-Тоо, пер. Коро-Гоо. a–d — самцы, e–h — самки Fig. 1. Ctenoceratoda tancrei, the wing pattern variability: a, e — Kirghiz Mts., «Ala-Archa» national park; b, f — Dzhumgaltoo Mts., Sary-Kaiky gorge; c, d, g, h — Moldo-Too Mts., Koro-Goo Pass. a–d — males, e–h — females
Fig. 2 in Characterization Of Six Lobster Species Of The Genus Panulirus (Decapoda, Palinuridae) From Aceh Waters, Indonesia Based On Morphometric Analysis
Fig. 2. Map of the research location, where the left is Aceh Jaya Regency and the right is Simeulue Regency (red markers indicate location of the data collection).
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.