Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
259
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
259 results for “Motor control”
Right inferior frontal gyrus implements motor inhibitory control via beta-band oscillations in humans
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Diverse musculature layers in three species of octopus support precise motor control yet lack smooth muscle.
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Post-processed data for: Diverse operant control of different motor cortex populations during learning
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data from: Control of adaptive action selection by secondary motor cortex during flexible visual categorization
<p>Adaptive action selection during stimulus categorization is an important feature of flexible behavior. To examine neural mechanism underlying this process, we trained mice to categorize the spatial frequencies of visual stimuli according to a boundary that changed between blocks of trials in a session. Using a model with a dynamic decision criterion, we found that sensory history was important for adaptive action selection after the switch of boundary. Bilateral inactivation of the secondary motor cortex (M2) impaired adaptive action selection by reducing the behavioral influence of sensory history. Electrophysiological recordings showed that M2 neurons carried more information about upcoming choice and previous sensory stimuli when sensorimotor association was being remapped than when it was stable. Thus, M2 causally contributes to flexible action selection during stimulus categorization, with the representations of upcoming choice and sensory history regulated by the demand to remap stimulus-action association.</p>
Data from: The function and organization of the motor system controlling flight maneuvers in flies
Animals face the daunting task of controlling their limbs using a small set of highly constrained actuators. This problem is particularly demanding for insects such as Drosophila, which must adjust wing motion for both quick voluntary maneuvers and slow compensatory reflexes using only a dozen pairs of muscles. To identify strategies by which animals execute precise actions using sparse motor networks, we imaged the activity of a complete ensemble of wing control muscles in intact, flying flies. Our experiments uncovered a remarkably efficient logic in which each of the four skeletal elements at the base of the wing are equipped with both large phasically active muscles capable of executing large changes and smaller tonically active muscles specialized for continuous fine-scaled adjustments. Based on the responses to a broad panel of visual motion stimuli, we have developed a model by which the motor array regulates aerodynamically functional features of wing motion.
Replication data for "Diversification of pectoral control through motor pool extension"
<p><span>This dataset is the replication dataset for Gutjahr et al. 2024 ("Diversification of pectoral control through motor pool extension"). The folder contains raw data acquired using high-speed video recordings, neuronal tracings of pectoral motoneurons and patch-clamp electrophysiology of hatchet fish motor neurons, as well as code to analyze the datasets.</span></p>
Normative feedback on performance in a closed motor skill task: A randomized controlled study
<p><span>Augmented feedback can alter motor performance. This study examines whether, in the short term, positive normative feedback influences the execution of a closed motor task differently compared to negative normative feedback and exact augmented feedback. Using a double-blind experimental design, 68 students (73.5% female, <span><em>M<sub>age</sub></em><sub> </sub></span><span></span><span>= </span><span>21.63</span>, <span><em>SD</em> = 2.88) </span>were randomized into three groups: G1 - Exact Augmented Feedback Group (</span><span>𝑛</span><span> = 21), G2 - Positive Normative Feedback Group (</span><span>𝑛</span><span> </span><span>= 24), and G3 - Negative Normative Feedback Group (</span><span>𝑛</span><span> </span><span>= 23). The dependent variable was the score obtained in a dart-throwing task. Results showed that participants receiving positive normative feedback achieved higher scores than those receiving negative normative feedback or exact augmented feedback. These differences persisted in retention and transfer tests conducted 24 hours after the practice phase but only between the positive NF group and the exact AF group. Meanwhile, the exact augmented feedback group performed similarly to the negative normative feedback group. These findings have practical implications for training and execution in motor tasks, potentially contributing to enhanced athletic performance.</span></p>
Neuromodulation of premotor and posterior parietal cortices for enhancing explicit motor sequence learning in healthy individuals: a randomized, sham-controlled crossover trial
<p>Data collected and analysed in the manuscript '<strong>Neuromodulation of premotor and posterior parietal cortices for enhancing explicit motor sequence learning in healthy individuals: a randomized, sham-controlled crossover trial', </strong>by Russo et al. PPCR. The Principles and Practice of Clinical Research, 2021</p>
Figure Data for the paper "From Motor Control to Team Play in Simulated Humanoid Football"
<p><strong>Data Release for Article: <em>From Motor Control to Team Play in Simulated Humanoid Football</em></strong></p> <p>This package releases a set of Python notebooks each reproducing a quantitative<br> figure featured in the research article "From Motor Control to Team Play in<br> Simulated Humanoid Football".</p> <p><strong>Usage</strong></p> <p>The set of notebooks can be uploaded to and executed using the<br> <a href="https://colab.research.google.com/">Colab</a> runtime service.</p> <p>Alternatively, these notebook files can be executed using a<br> <a href="https://jupyter.org/">Jupyter</a> local runtime with the following commands using<br> <code>virtualenv</code>.</p> <pre><code>cd dm_soccer virtualenv venv source venv/bin/activate pip install -r requirements.txt pip install notebook jupyter notebook </code></pre> <p><strong>Dependencies</strong></p> <p>All Python notebooks are tested against Python <code>3.7</code> as well as the versioned<br> dependencies specified in <code>requirements.txt</code>. All dependencies are satisfied by<br> <a href="https://colab.research.google.com/">Colab</a> as of August 2022 and can be<br> installed locally with <code>pip install -r requirements.txt</code> if using a Jupyter<br> local runtime.</p> <p><strong>License and disclaimer</strong></p> <p>Copyright 2022 DeepMind Technologies Limited</p> <p>All software is licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (Apache 2.0); you<br> may not use this file except in compliance with the Apache 2.0 license. You may<br> obtain a copy of the Apache 2.0 license at:<br> <a href="https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0">https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0</a></p> <p>All other materials are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0<br> International License (CC-BY). You may obtain a copy of the CC-BY license at:<br> <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</a></p> <p>Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, all software and<br> materials distributed here under the Apache 2.0 or CC-BY licenses are<br> distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND,<br> either express or implied. See the licenses for the specific language governing<br> permissions and limitations under those licenses.</p> <p>This is not an official Google product.</p>
Exploring the impact of a brief mindfulness induction on motor inhibitory control
<p>It is the behavioral dataset collected from healthy participants on three different conditions; mindfulness induction, resting and listening to favorite music.</p>
Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation enhances motor score and gait recovery in incomplete spinal cord injury. A double-blind randomized controlled trial
<p><strong><span>Background: </span></strong><span>Although transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) has been suggested as a safe and feasible intervention for gait rehabilitation, no studies have determined its effectiveness compared to sham stimulation.</span></p> <p><strong><span>Objective: </span></strong><span>To determine the effectiveness of tSCS combined with robotic-assisted gait training (RAGT) on lower limb muscle strength and walking function in incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI) participants.</span></p> <p><strong><span>Methods: </span></strong><span>A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled clinical trial was designed. Twenty-seven subacute iSCI participants were randomly allocated to tSCS or sham-tSCS group. The intervention consisted of 20 sessions of standard Lokomat walking training enhanced with tSCS. Primary outcomes were the lower extremity motor score (LEMS) and dynamometry. Secondary outcomes included the 10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT), the Timed Up and Go test (TUG), the 6-Minute Walk test (6MWT), the Spinal Cord Independence Measure III (SCIM III) and the Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury II (WISCI-II). Assessments were performed before and after the intervention and at 1-month follow-up.</span></p> <p><strong><span>Results: </span></strong><span>Although no significant differences between groups were detected after the intervention, the tSCS group showed greater effects than the sham-tSCS group for LEMS (3.4 points; p=0.033), 10MWT (37.5s; p=0.030), TUG (47.7s; p=0.009), and WISCI-II (3.4 points; p=0.023) at the 1-month follow-up. Furthermore, the percentage of subjects who were able to walk at the follow-up was greater in the tSCS group (85.7%) compared to the sham group (43.1%; p=0.029).</span></p> <p><strong><span>Conclusions:</span></strong><span> The combination of standard RAGT with tSCS for 20 sessions was effective for LEMS and gait recovery in subacute iSCI participants after one month of follow-up.</span></p> <p><strong><span>Key words: </span></strong><span>Spinal cord injury; Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation; Lokomat; Robotic-assisted gait training; Motor function; </span><span>Gait rehabilitation.</span></p>
Effectiveness of a Home-based Cervical Motor Control Exercise Programme Versus Conventional Manual Therapy in Patients With Post-whiplash Neck Pain.
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT07324811. IPD Sharing: UNDECIDED. Countries: 1. Publications: 4.
Pain Neuroscience Education Combined With Cognition-targeted Motor Control Training
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT02098005. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 7.
A Randomized Control Trial of Motor-based Intervention for CAS
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT04642053. IPD Sharing: YES. Countries: 1. Publications: 9.
Analisys of Neuromuscular Response, Postural Balance and Quality of Life of Diabetics Type 2 After Sensory-motor Training: Blind Random Controled Clinical Trial
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT01861392. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 5.
Effects of Vestibular Exercises and Motor Control in Cervicogenic Dizziness
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05125250. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.
Effect of Progressive Neck Motor Control Exercises on Temporomandibular Joint Dysfunction
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06148818. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Low Back Pain and Motor Control in Soccer Players
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05934201. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.
Beverage Consumption and Fine Motor Control
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT02928653. IPD Sharing: UNDECIDED. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.
Effect of PNF on Selective Motor Control and Balance in CP
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05649501. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 6.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.