Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2005View details →

Figure 5 in Population structure and reproductive biology of the fiddler crab Uca urvillei (Brachyura: Ocypodidae) in Maputo Bay (south Mozambique)

Figure 5. Uca urvillei (H. Milne Edwards, 1852): ln egg number plotted against ln carapace width (mm).

Figure 1b in Redescription of the megalopa of the fiddler crab Uca uruguayensis (Decapoda, Brachyura, Ocypodidae) with special emphasis on its setae

Figure 1b. Ventral view of the megalopa of Uca uruguayensis. Only the setae of left pleopods are drawn in ventral view for clarity. Scale bar: 500 mm.

Figure 5 in Redescription of the megalopa of the fiddler crab Uca uruguayensis (Decapoda, Brachyura, Ocypodidae) with special emphasis on its setae

Figure 5. Uca uruguayensis megalopa: (a) pleopods 1–4; (b) uropods and telson; (c) detail of plumose seta of pleopods; (d) detail of hooked seta of pleopod endopodites; (e) detail of plumose spines of telson. Scale bar: 300 mm (a, b); 75 mm (c, d, e).

Figure 3 in Redescription of the megalopa of the fiddler crab Uca uruguayensis (Decapoda, Brachyura, Ocypodidae) with special emphasis on its setae

Figure 3. Uca uruguayensis megalopa: (a) mandible; (b) detail of palp showing multidenticulate and sparsely plumose setae; (c) maxillule; (d) detail of cuspidate seta; (e) maxilla; (f) detail of marginal setae of scaphognathite; (g) first maxilliped; (h) second maxilliped; (i) detail of plumodenticulate seta; (j) third maxilliped. Scale bar: 300 mm (a, c, e, g, h, j); 75 mm (b, d, f, i).

Figure 2 in Redescription of the megalopa of the fiddler crab Uca uruguayensis (Decapoda, Brachyura, Ocypodidae) with special emphasis on its setae

Figure 2. Uca uruguayensis megalopa: (a) antennule; (b) detail of exopodite showing aesthetascs and sparsely plumose setae; (c) antenna. Scale bar: 300 mm (a, c); 75 mm (b).

Figure 4 in Redescription of the megalopa of the fiddler crab Uca uruguayensis (Decapoda, Brachyura, Ocypodidae) with special emphasis on its setae

Figure 4. Uca uruguayensis megalopa: (a) right cheliped; (b) detail of chela teeth; (c) pereiopods 2–4; (d) detail of cuspidate spine of pereiopods 3–4; (e) fifth pereiopod; (f) modified hooked serrate seta of fifth pereiopod. Scale bar: 500 mm (a, c, e); 75 mm (b, d, f).

Figure 2 in Comparative population biology of Uca rapax (Smith, 1870) (Brachyura, Ocypodidae) from two subtropical mangrove habitats on the Brazilian coast

Figure 2. Uca rapax. Comparison of the median sizes of males and females at each site (A) and comparison of the median size of each sex and site (B). Boxes with at least one letter in common showed no statistically significant difference (P.0.05).

Figure 5 in Comparative population biology of Uca rapax (Smith, 1870) (Brachyura, Ocypodidae) from two subtropical mangrove habitats on the Brazilian coast

Figure 5. Uca rapax. Sex ratio by month (A) and size classes of carapace width (mm) (B) for populations from Itamambuca and Ubatumirim. Asterisks above the columns indicate significant differences between the proportions of males and females (P,0.05).

Figure 6 in Comparative population biology of Uca rapax (Smith, 1870) (Brachyura, Ocypodidae) from two subtropical mangrove habitats on the Brazilian coast

Figure 6. Uca rapax. Recruitment in the Itamambuca and Ubatumirim habitats by season of the year. Small letters above bars compare the proportions of juveniles among seasons in the same site. Bars with at least one letter in common did not differ statistically (P.0.05).

Figure 1 in Comparative population biology of Uca rapax (Smith, 1870) (Brachyura, Ocypodidae) from two subtropical mangrove habitats on the Brazilian coast

Figure 1. Uca rapax. Median values (¡SD) of the organic matter content of the sediment at Itamambuca and Ubatumirim. The statistical comparisons were performed for each season between sites (Kruskal–Wallis, a50.05). White bars with at least one letter in common did not differ statistically.

Fig. 12 in Systematics of the family Ocypodidae Rafinesque, 1815 (Crustacea: Brachyura), based on phylogenetic relationships, with a reorganization of subfamily rankings and a review of the taxonomic status of Uca Leach, 1814, sensu lato and its subgenera

Fig. 12. Photographs of some species of the genera Tubuca, Xeruca and Ucides. A, T. urvillei (Ranong, Thailand); B, X. formosensis (Taiwan); C, D, U. cordatus (Brazil).

Fig. 10 in Systematics of the family Ocypodidae Rafinesque, 1815 (Crustacea: Brachyura), based on phylogenetic relationships, with a reorganization of subfamily rankings and a review of the taxonomic status of Uca Leach, 1814, sensu lato and its subgenera

Fig. 10. Photographs of some species of the genera Minuca, Paraleptuca, Petruca and Tubuca. A, M. herradurensis (Panama); B, M. rapax (Brazil); C, Pa. chlorophthalmus (East Africa); D, Pa. crassipes (Donghsa, Taiwan); E, Pa. splendida (Penghu, Taiwan); F, Pe. panamensis (Costa Rica); G, T. arcuata (Hainan, China); H, T. bellator (Labuan, Malaysia). C, courtesy of S. Cannicci.

Fig. 8 in Systematics of the family Ocypodidae Rafinesque, 1815 (Crustacea: Brachyura), based on phylogenetic relationships, with a reorganization of subfamily rankings and a review of the taxonomic status of Uca Leach, 1814, sensu lato and its subgenera

Fig. 8. Photographs of some species of the genus Austruca. A, A. annulipes (Tioman, Malaysia); B, A. bengali (Selangor, Malaysia); C, A. iranica (Iran); D, A. lactea (Taiwan); E, A. mjoebergi (New Territory, Australia); F, A. perplexa (Dongsha, Taiwan); G, A. sindensis (Iran); H, A. triangularis (Cebu, Philippines). E, courtesy of P. Backwell.

Fig. 7 in Systematics of the family Ocypodidae Rafinesque, 1815 (Crustacea: Brachyura), based on phylogenetic relationships, with a reorganization of subfamily rankings and a review of the taxonomic status of Uca Leach, 1814, sensu lato and its subgenera

Fig. 7. Photographs of some species of the genus Gelasimus. A, G. borealis (Taiwan); B, G. dampieri (Northern Territory, Australia); C, G. hesperiae (Zanzibar, holotype); D, G. jocelynae (Penghu, Taiwan); E, G. neocultrimana (Fiji); F, G. tetragonon (Penghu, Taiwan); G, G. vocans (Labuan, Malaysia); H, G. vomeris (Queensland, Australia).

Fig. 5 in Systematics of the family Ocypodidae Rafinesque, 1815 (Crustacea: Brachyura), based on phylogenetic relationships, with a reorganization of subfamily rankings and a review of the taxonomic status of Uca Leach, 1814, sensu lato and its subgenera

Fig. 5. Photographs of some species of the genus Ocypode. A, O. ceratophthalmus (Taiwan); B, O. cordimana (Dongsha, Taiwan); C, O. fabricii (Northern Territory, Australia); D, O. kuhlii (Christmas Island); E, O. occidentalis (Panama); F, O. rotundata (Iran); G. O. sinensis (Dongsha, Taiwan); H, O. stimpsoni (Taiwan).

Fig. 2. A in Systematics of the family Ocypodidae Rafinesque, 1815 (Crustacea: Brachyura), based on phylogenetic relationships, with a reorganization of subfamily rankings and a review of the taxonomic status of Uca Leach, 1814, sensu lato and its subgenera

Fig. 2. A Bayesian inference (BI) tree of the family Ocypodidae and outgroups, based on the combined 28S, 16S and COI markers. The solid circle at the node means it is strongly supported by both BI (≥ 90) and ML (≥ 70); and the open circle means only one method is strongly supported. Name of species or genus quoted means it is suggested as a synonym in this study.

Fig. 6 in Systematics of the family Ocypodidae Rafinesque, 1815 (Crustacea: Brachyura), based on phylogenetic relationships, with a reorganization of subfamily rankings and a review of the taxonomic status of Uca Leach, 1814, sensu lato and its subgenera

Fig. 6. Photographs of some species of the genera Afruca and Uca s. str. A, B, A. tangeri (Spain); C, U. heteropleura (Panama); D, U. insignis (El Salvador); E, U. major (Bahamas); F, U. maracoani (Brazil); G, U. princeps (Peru); H, U. stylifera (Panama).

Fig. 3. The simplified phylogenetic tree modified from Figs. 1 & 2 in Systematics of the family Ocypodidae Rafinesque, 1815 (Crustacea: Brachyura), based on phylogenetic relationships, with a reorganization of subfamily rankings and a review of the taxonomic status of Uca Leach, 1814, sensu lato and its subgenera

Fig. 3. The simplified phylogenetic tree modified from Figs. 1 & 2, with number of species beside or below the taxa/group. The gray boxes mean the genera are not fiddler crabs.

Fig. 1. A in Systematics of the family Ocypodidae Rafinesque, 1815 (Crustacea: Brachyura), based on phylogenetic relationships, with a reorganization of subfamily rankings and a review of the taxonomic status of Uca Leach, 1814, sensu lato and its subgenera

Fig. 1. A Bayesian inference (BI) tree of the family Ocypodidae and outgroups, based on the combined 28S rRNA, 16S rRNA and COI markers, showing the three clades (three subfamilies), indicated in different colours. The subfamily Gelasiminae is composed of two groups, one is for all Indo-West Pacific fiddler crabs, the other for the American broad-fronted fiddler crabs.

Fig. 4 in Systematics of the family Ocypodidae Rafinesque, 1815 (Crustacea: Brachyura), based on phylogenetic relationships, with a reorganization of subfamily rankings and a review of the taxonomic status of Uca Leach, 1814, sensu lato and its subgenera

Fig. 4. The distribution of 11 genera of fiddler crabs, mainly based on Crane (1975) and the website (http://www.fiddlercrab.info/index. html; Rosenberg, 2014).