Skip to main content
Powered by ShareScore

Find research datasets worth reusing

Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.

26

datasets available to search

ShareScore release 0.9.0

Reset

Dataset results

26 results for “Packaging design”

Learn how ShareScore rates datasets ↗
edi32/100

Data Package Design for Special Cases

In this document we consider special cases for archiving research data based on their data type, format, or acquisition method, and recommend practices that ensure optimal re-usability of the data. Most recommendations here are aimed at improving documentation of data acquisition and processing to avoid misinterpretation. This includes the recommendation to publish raw data and/or processing code along with the data products. Others are aimed at usability in terms of data size/volume or connecting related data. Some recommendations involve including a metadata document formatted according to a new and emerging standard (e.g., codeMeta) or a data inventory table. Data inventory tables can cross the line between metadata and data and are intended to improve discoverability and navigation of archived data.

openCC (other)Feb 2021View details →
zenodo28/100

Replication Package for the paper: "How Does Modern Code Review Impact Software Design Degradation? An In-depth Empirical Study"

<p>This is the replication package for the paper: &quot;How Does Modern Code Review Impact Software Design Degradation? An In-depth Empirical Study&quot;, published at the&nbsp;36th International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution (ICSME&#39; 20).</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>It contains all the preliminary and final results of our empirical methodology. We highlight the manual classification of design-related and&nbsp;design-unrelated reviews, according to the developers&rsquo; intent of improving the structural design of the system. This might be used for further studies on the impact of design discussions on the structural quality of design.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Feel free to use any part of this replication package in your study, please cite as:</p> <p>Anderson Uch&ocirc;a, Caio Barbosa, Willian Oizumi, Publio Blen&iacute;lio, Rafael Lima, Alessandro Garcia, and&nbsp;Carla Bezerra. How Does Modern Code Review Impact Software Design Degradation? An In-depth Empirical Study. Proceedings&nbsp;of the 36th International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution (ICSME), Adelaide, Australia, September 2020.</p>

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2020View details →
zenodo28/100

Replication package with data used in the study: "The effect of code smells on the relationship between design patterns and defects. An empirical study"

<p>This is a replication package with data used in a study by T. Alkhaeir and B. Walter &quot;The effect of code smells on the relationship between design patterns and defects. An empirical study&quot;</p> <p>This dataset contains the following folders:</p> <ul> <li> <p>&quot;Analyzed systems&quot; folder:</p> <ul> <li> <p>For each subject system (Ant-1.7, JEdit-4.2, Lucene-2.4, Camel-1.6, Log4j-1.2, Xalan-2.7, Poi-3.0, Ivy-2.0, Xerces-2.0, Velocity-1.6), we identify the following datasets: SDP, nSDP, SnDP, and nSnDP. Each dataset is represented by a separate csv file.</p> </li> <li> <p>Those csv files include raw data about every class in every release. Each file includes columns which represent:</p> <ul> <li> <p>System:&nbsp; The analyzed system</p> </li> <li> <p>className: A fully qualified class name</p> </li> <li> <p>Pattern: if the class is part of any pattern the cell contains the name of the pattern, and &ldquo;null&rdquo; otherwise</p> </li> <li> <p>Smell: if the class is part of affected by any smell&nbsp; the cell contains the name of the smell, and &ldquo;null&rdquo;&nbsp; otherwise</p> </li> <li> <p>Bugs: Number of defects reported inside the class (extracted from the PROMISE dataset)</p> </li> </ul> </li> </ul> </li> <li> <p>A &quot;detailed analysis&quot; folder:</p> <ul> <li> <p>For each pattern, we report all the classes which participate in it in all the analyzed systems. The csv files inside this folder follow&nbsp;the same structure as the other csv files reported above</p> </li> </ul> </li> </ul> <p><br> &nbsp;</p>

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2020View details →
zenodo28/100

Replication package with data used in the study: The effect of code smells and design patterns on two change-related metrics: An exploratory study

<p>This is a replication package with data used in a study by T. Alkhaeir and B. Walter &quot;The effect of code smells and design patterns on two change-related metrics: An exploratory study&quot;</p> <p>This dataset contains the following folders:</p> <ul> <li>Aggregated Results Per System <ul> <li>&nbsp;For each subject system (AOI, Jedit, JHotDraw), we identify the following datasets: DP, nDP, S, nS ,SDP, nSDP, SnDP, and nSnDP. Each dataset is represented by a separate csv file.</li> <li>&nbsp;Those csv files include raw data about every class in every release, the csv files also include columns which represent: <ul> <li>- CHURN (CLPLPR(C)*100): defined as the sum of added and deleted lines in a class in a release, adjusted to the size of the class and to the number of revisions in the release;</li> <li>- and FREQ (MTPR(C)*100): defined as the average number of changes made to a class in a release, adjusted to the number of revisions in the release</li> </ul> </li> </ul> </li> <li>Detailed Results Per Smell Or Pattern <ul> <li>&nbsp;For each specific code smell (S) in each public release (Rel) of all subject systems, we identify SDP and SnDP datasets. Each dataset is in a separate .csv file</li> <li>&nbsp;For each specific design pattern (DP) in each public release (Rel) of all subject systems, we identify SDP and nSDP&nbsp;</li> </ul> </li> <li>Plots<br> We also include QQ plots for CHURN, FREQ values for every dataset in every system, that could serve as a supplementary data for the paper.</li> </ul>

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2019View details →
zenodo28/100

Replication package with data used in the study: The effect of code smells and design patterns on two change-related metrics: An exploratory study"

<p>This is a replication package with data used in a study by T. Alkhaeir and B. Walter &quot;The effect of code smells and design patterns on two change-related metrics: An exploratory study&quot;</p> <p>This dataset contains the following folders:</p> <ul> <li>Aggregated Results Per System <ul> <li>&nbsp;For each subject system (AOI, Jedit, JHotDraw), we identify the following datasets: DP, nDP, S, nS ,SDP, nSDP, SnDP, and nSnDP. Each dataset is represented by a separate csv file.</li> <li>&nbsp;Those csv files include raw data about every class in every release, the csv files also include columns which represent: <ul> <li>- CHURN (CLPLPR(C)*100): defined as the sum of added and deleted lines in a class in a release, adjusted to the size of the class and to the number of revisions in the release;</li> <li>- and FREQ (MTPR(C)*100): defined as the average number of changes made to a class in a release, adjusted to the number of revisions in the release</li> </ul> </li> </ul> </li> <li>Detailed Results Per Smell Or Pattern <ul> <li>&nbsp;For each specific code smell (S) in each public release (Rel) of all subject systems, we identify SDP and SnDP datasets. Each dataset is in a separate .csv file</li> <li>&nbsp;For each specific design pattern (DP) in each public release (Rel) of all subject systems, we identify SDP and nSDP&nbsp;</li> </ul> </li> <li>Plots<br> We also include QQ plots for CHURN, FREQ values for every dataset in every system, that could serve as a supplementary data for the paper.</li> </ul>

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2019View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov24/100

Design Factors for Evaluating Child Resistant Packaging

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03925623. IPD Sharing: YES. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.

controlledIPD-YESFeb 2026View details →

ScienceDex guides

Understand access before you commit

These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.

Compare curated datasets

Allen Brain Atlas

Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.

allen-brain-atlas
neuroscienceopenDocumentation, web resources, and API references are available online.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)

ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.

abode-home-cage
behavioral-neuroscienceopenThe DataShare record exposes download links for annotations, documentation, license text, and the zipped per-snippet data directory.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

DANDI Archive for NWB datasets

DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.

dandi-nwb
electrophysiologyopenPublished Dandiset metadata and archive endpoints are available through the production DANDI API.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

International Brain Laboratory public data

The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.

ibl
behavioral-neuroscienceopenPublic sessions can be searched and loaded from the IBL public data server through ONE.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

OpenNeuro

OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.

openneuro
neuroscienceopenPublished datasets are available on demand over the internet.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record