Skip to main content
Powered by ShareScore

Find research datasets worth reusing

Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.

34

datasets available to search

ShareScore release 0.9.0

Reset

Dataset results

34 results for “Pharmaceutical Data”

Learn how ShareScore rates datasets ↗
dryad32/100

Clinical Trial Transparency and Data-Sharing Among Bio-Pharmaceutical Companies and the Role of Company Size, Location, and Product Type: A Cross-Sectional Descriptive Analysis

<p><b>Objective</b>: To examine company characteristics associated with better transparency and to apply a tool used to measure and improve clinical trial transparency among large companies and drugs, to smaller companies and biologics.</p> <p><b>Design</b>: Cross-sectional descriptive analysis.</p> <p><b>Setting and participants. </b>Novel drugs and biologics FDA approved in 2016 and 2017, and their company sponsors.</p> <p>Using established Good Pharma Scorecard (GPS) measures, companies and products were evaluated on their clinical trial registration, results dissemination, and FDA Amendments Act (FDAAA) implementation; Companies were ranked using these measures and a multi-component data sharing measure. Associations between company transparency scores with company size (large vs non-large), location (US vs non-US), and sponsored product type (drug vs biologic) were also examined. 26% of products (16/62) had publicly available results for all clinical trials supporting their FDA approval and 67% (39/58) had public results for trials in patients by 6 months after their FDA approval; 58% (32/55) were FDAAA compliant. Large companies were significantly more transparent than non-large companies (overall median transparency score of 95% [IQR 91-100] vs 59% [IQR 41-70], p&lt;0.001), attributable to higher FDAAA compliance (median of 100% [IQR 88-100] vs 57% [0-100], p=0.01) and better data sharing (median of 100% [IQR 80-100] vs 20% [IQR 20-40], p&lt;0.01). No significant differences were observed by company location or product type. It was feasible to apply the GPS transparency measures and ranking tool to non-large companies and biologics. Large companies are significantly more transparent than non-large companies, driven by better data sharing procedures and implementation of FDAAA trial reporting requirements. Greater research transparency is needed, particularly among non-large companies, to maximize the benefits of research for patient care and scientific innovation.  </p>

opencc-zeroJun 2021View details →
dryad32/100

Data for: Can pharmaceutical pollution alter the spread of infectious disease? A case study using fluoxetine.

<p>Human activity is changing global environments at an unprecedented rate, imposing new ecological and evolutionary ramifications on wildlife dynamics, including host-parasite interactions. Here we investigate how an emerging concern of modern human activity, pharmaceutical pollution, influences the spread of disease in a population, using the water flea <em>Daphnia</em> <em>magna</em> and the bacterial pathogen <em>Pasteuria</em> <em>ramosa</em> as a model system. We found that exposure to different concentrations of fluoxetine—a widely prescribed psychoactive drug and widespread contaminant of aquatic ecosystems—affected the severity of disease experienced by an individual in a non-monotonic manner. The direction and magnitude of any effect, however, varied with both the infection outcome measured, as well as the genotype of the pathogen. In contrast, the characteristics of unexposed animals, and thus the growth and density of susceptible hosts, were robust to fluoxetine. Using our data to parameterise an epidemiology model, we show that fluoxetine is unlikely to lead to a net increase or decrease in the likelihood of an infectious disease outbreak, as measured by a pathogen's transmission rate or basic reproductive number. Instead, any given pathogen genotype may experience a two-fold change in likely fitness, but often in opposing directions. Our study demonstrates that changes in pharmaceutical pollution give rise to complex genotype-by-environment interactions in its influence on disease dynamics, with repercussions on pathogen genetic diversity and evolution.</p>

opencc-zeroMay 2023View details →
dryad32/100

Data from: Simultaneous determination of diosmin and hesperidin in combined pharmaceutical preparation by synchronous fluorescence spectrofluorimetric method

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicMar 2024View details →
dryad32/100

Data from: Water-borne pharmaceuticals reduce phenotypic diversity and response capacity of natural phytoplankton communities

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicMar 2018View details →
dryad32/100

Data for: Can pharmaceutical pollution alter the spread of infectious disease? A case study using fluoxetine.

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicMay 2023View details →
dryad32/100

Data from: Sharing of clinical trial data and results reporting practices among large pharmaceutical companies: cross sectional descriptive study and pilot of a tool to improve company practices

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicJul 2019View details →
dryad32/100

Clinical Trial Transparency and Data-Sharing Among Bio-Pharmaceutical Companies and the Role of Company Size, Location, and Product Type: A Cross-Sectional Descriptive Analysis

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicJun 2021View details →
dryad28/100

Data from: Characterizing the interaction between physicians, pharmacists and pharmaceutical representatives in a middle-income country: a qualitative study

Background: Studies around the world have shown that interactions between pharmaceutical companies, pharmacists and physicians have a great influence on prescribing and drug dispensing practices. In middle-income countries, the nature and extent of these interactions have not been well researched. Our objectives were to qualitatively explore the nature of the interactions between pharmaceutical companies, physicians and pharmacists, their impact on drug prescription and dispensing practices in Lebanon. Methods and Findings: We used grounded theory approach as well as the known sponsor, purposive, and snowballing sampling strategies to identify interviewees from the three respective groups: physicians, pharmacists, and pharmaceutical representatives. We conducted semi-structured and analyzed transcripts thematically. 6 pharmaceutical representatives, 13 physicians and 13 pharmacists participated in the study. The following themes emerged: purpose and driver for the interactions, nature of the interactions, incentives, impact on prescription practices, ethical considerations, and suggestions for managing the interactions. The main purposes for the interaction were educational, promotional, and monitoring prescription practices and dispensing, while the main drivers for these interactions were market potential and neighborhood socio-economic status. Physicians, pharmacists and pharmaceutical representatives who engage in these interactions benefit from a variety of incentives, some of which were characterized as unethical. It appears that pharmaceutical companies give prominence to selected physicians within their communities. Although members of the three interviewed groups refer to some of the interactions as being problematic, they described a culture of acceptance of gift giving. We developed a framework that depicts the prevailing politico-cultural environment, the interactions between the three professional groups, and their impact on drug prescription. Underreporting is the main limitation of this study. Conclusion: Interactions between physicians, pharmacists and pharmaceutical representatives are frequent. Although these interactions can be beneficial, they still have a substantial effect on drug prescription and dispensing practices. Hence, the need for new policies that regulate these interactions and penalize any misconduct.

opencc-zeroDec 2016View details →
zenodo28/100

The method and data for Efficiency Evaluation of Listed Pharmaceutical Companies in China Using Three-Stage DEA with PCA Integration

<p>The method and data used for this article</p>

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2024View details →
zenodo28/100

Support Data Operational Efficiency of Pharmaceutical Companies in China Based on Three Stage DEA with Undesirable Outputs Model.

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2024View details →
dryad28/100

Data from: Characterizing the interaction between physicians, pharmacists and pharmaceutical representatives in a middle-income country: a qualitative study

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicSep 2018View details →
zenodo24/100

Figure 2 from: Stoimenova A, Kirilov B, Zaykova K (2019) Analysis of good distribution practice inspection deficiency data of pharmaceutical wholesalers in Bulgaria. Pharmacia 66(3): 85-89. https://doi.org/10.3897/pharmacia.66.e35880

Figure 2 No of suspended wholesale authorizations 2009–2018.

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2022View details →
zenodo24/100

Figure 1 from: Stoimenova A, Kirilov B, Zaykova K (2019) Analysis of good distribution practice inspection deficiency data of pharmaceutical wholesalers in Bulgaria. Pharmacia 66(3): 85-89. https://doi.org/10.3897/pharmacia.66.e35880

Figure 1 Number of authorizations issued 2007–2018.

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2022View details →
zenodo20/100

Data Set of paper_Photoelectrocatalytic degradation of pharmaceuticals and inactivation of viruses in water with tungsten oxide electrodes

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

opencc-by-4.0May 2022View details →

ScienceDex guides

Understand access before you commit

These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.

Compare curated datasets

Allen Brain Atlas

Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.

allen-brain-atlas
neuroscienceopenDocumentation, web resources, and API references are available online.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)

ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.

abode-home-cage
behavioral-neuroscienceopenThe DataShare record exposes download links for annotations, documentation, license text, and the zipped per-snippet data directory.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

DANDI Archive for NWB datasets

DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.

dandi-nwb
electrophysiologyopenPublished Dandiset metadata and archive endpoints are available through the production DANDI API.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

International Brain Laboratory public data

The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.

ibl
behavioral-neuroscienceopenPublic sessions can be searched and loaded from the IBL public data server through ONE.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

OpenNeuro

OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.

openneuro
neuroscienceopenPublished datasets are available on demand over the internet.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record