Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 2 in Revision, Phylogenetic, Biogeographic, And Host Analyses Of The Endemic Western North American Phymatopsallus Group, With The Description Of 9 New Genera And 15 New Species (Insecta: Hemiptera: Miridae: Phylinae)

Fig. 2. Habitus views of Phymatopsallus-group taxa: Ceratopsallus croceus–Ceratopsallus vauqueliniae, Cercocarpopsallus bispinosus (see appendix for specimens examined).

Fig. 6 in Revision, Phylogenetic, Biogeographic, And Host Analyses Of The Endemic Western North American Phymatopsallus Group, With The Description Of 9 New Genera And 15 New Species (Insecta: Hemiptera: Miridae: Phylinae)

Fig. 6. Bisulcopsallus fuscipunctatus: A. Lateral view of head. B. Mesothoracic spiracle and metathoracic scent-efferent system. C. Setae on costal margin of wing. D. Lateral view of pretarsus. E. Lateral view of pygophore. F. Bisulcopsallus huachucae: Confocal microscopic image, lateral view, showing in situ position of vesica in pygophore and abdomen.

Fig. 1 in Revision, Phylogenetic, Biogeographic, And Host Analyses Of The Endemic Western North American Phymatopsallus Group, With The Description Of 9 New Genera And 15 New Species (Insecta: Hemiptera: Miridae: Phylinae)

Fig. 1. Habitus views of Phymatopsallus-group taxa: Angelopsallus, Arizonapsallus, Bisulcopsallus, Ceratopsallus aquilonius (see appendix for specimens examined).

Fig. 9 in Revision, Phylogenetic, Biogeographic, And Host Analyses Of The Endemic Western North American Phymatopsallus Group, With The Description Of 9 New Genera And 15 New Species (Insecta: Hemiptera: Miridae: Phylinae)

Fig. 9. Bisulcopsallus huachucae: Male genitalia (AMNH_PBI 00062967; entire vesica drawn at 50% scale of other structures).

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2014View details →

Figure 3 in Phylogenetic measures of biodiversity and neo- and paleo-endemism in Australian Acacia

Figure 3 | CANAPE, a two-step procedure described in text. (a) Map of centres of endemism discovered. White cells contain no records; beige cells are not significant. The red values indicate grid cells that contain significantly lower RPE than expected given random sampling of the same number of species from a null tree, termed 'centres of neo-endemism'. The blue values indicate grid cells that contain significantly higher RPE than expected, termed 'centres of paleo-endemism'. The purple values indicate grid cells that are a mix of neo-endemism and paleo-endemism; the most highly significant of which (darker purple) are termed 'centres of superendemism'. (b) Bivariate plot showing the relationship between the numerator (y axis) and denominator (x axis) of RPE, applied following the two-step CANAPE procedure described in text, for comparison with a. The grey points in the background are results of the randomization, the beige points are actual values for grid cells that are not significant, the red points are actual values for grid cells that are interpreted as significantly dominated by neo-endemism, the blue points are actual values for grid cells that are interpreted as significantly dominated by paleo-endemism, and the purple points are actual values for grid cells significant for both the y-axis and x-axis variables separately, the most highly significant of which (darker purple) are termed 'centres of super-endemicity'.

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2014View details →

Figure 2 in Phylogenetic measures of biodiversity and neo- and paleo-endemism in Australian Acacia

Figure 2 | Maps showing significance levels resulting from of a randomization test in Australian Acacia. White cells contain no records; beige cells are not significant. (a) PD: the red values indicate grid cells that contain significantly less PD than expected; the blue values indicate grid cells that contain significantly more PD than expected. (b) RPD: the red values indicate grid cells that contain significantly less RPD than expected; the species present in that cell are significantly more closely related than expected. The blue values indicate grid cells that contain significantly more RPD than expected; the species present in that cell are significantly more distantly related than expected. (c) Phylogenetic endemism (PE). The red values indicate grid cells that contain significantly less PE than expected; the blue values indicate grid cells that contain significantly more PE than expected. (d) Relative phylogenetic endemism (RPE). The red values indicate grid cells that contain significantly lower RPE than expected; the blue values indicate grid cells that contain significantly higher RPE than expected.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2021View details →

FIG. 8. Estimated phylogenetic relationships from a in Fourteen New, Endemic Species Of Shrew (Genus Crocidura) From Sulawesi Reveal A Spectacular Island Radiation

FIG. 8. Estimated phylogenetic relationships from a maximum likelihood analysis of 983 concatenated ultraconserved elements. Samples from Sulawesi are labeled with the species name, locality, and catalog number. Asterisks indicate type specimens from Miller and Hollister (1921). Ultrafast bootstrap values <95 are shown.

Fig. 5 in An endemic new species of Andean lizard of the genus Liolaemus from southern Peru (Iguania: Liolaemidae) and its phylogenetic position

Fig. 5. Geographic distribution of 17 formally described species, and three candidate species of Liolaemus. Symbols with a black dot in the middle represent the type locality of each species. Species with quotation marks in names belong to the candidate species.

Fig. 3 in An endemic new species of Andean lizard of the genus Liolaemus from southern Peru (Iguania: Liolaemidae) and its phylogenetic position

Fig. 3. (A, C, E, G) Adult male of Liolaemus qalaywa sp. nov. (unvouchered specimen; SVL = 91.9 mm, Tail = 121.1 mm); (B, D, F, H) Adult female of Liolaemus qalaywa sp. nov. (MUBI 13260 paratype; SVL = 85.53 mm, Tail = 110.78 mm). Both individuals are from Ñahuinlla, Department of Apurimac, 4,010 m asl.

Fig. 4 in An endemic new species of Andean lizard of the genus Liolaemus from southern Peru (Iguania: Liolaemidae) and its phylogenetic position

Fig. 4. Habitat of Liolaemus qalaywa sp. nov. from localities in the Department of Apurimac: (A) Quequello; (B) Ñahuinlla; (C) Huanquere; (D) Choaquere; (E) Queuña; (F) Ccomerococha; (G) Huanacopampa.

Fig. 2 in An endemic new species of Andean lizard of the genus Liolaemus from southern Peru (Iguania: Liolaemidae) and its phylogenetic position

Fig. 2. Details of the holotype of Liolaemus qalaywa sp. nov. MUBI 13286 (SVL = 85.54 mm, Tail = 110 mm): (A) dorsal and (B) ventral views of body, (C) lateral, (D) dorsal, and (E) ventral views of head, (F) ventral view of precloacal pores, (G) ventral aspect of right hand, (H) ventral aspect of right foot, (I) keeled dorsal body scales, (J) ventral body scales. Scale = 5 mm.

Fig. 15 in Rediscovery of the enigmatic Madagascan endemic Belohina inexpectata Paulian, 1958, with notes on its morphology and phylogenetic position (Coleoptera, Scarabaeoidea: Belohinidae)

Fig. 15 – Maximum likelihood phylogeny of Scarabaeoidea, with a 39-taxon tree of the clade of Belohinidae, Dynamopodidae, and Hybosoridae, and the related families represented as single tips. Ultrafast bootstrap values show branch support. The inset tree on left displays the summary of the family-level relationships of interest for Belohina.

Fig. 16 in Rediscovery of the enigmatic Madagascan endemic Belohina inexpectata Paulian, 1958, with notes on its morphology and phylogenetic position (Coleoptera, Scarabaeoidea: Belohinidae)

Fig. 16 – Distribution map of Belohina, Belohinidae (star), its sister taxon Orubesa, Dynamopodidae (circles), and a potential second Dynamopodidae genus, Adraria (triangle). Sources for Orubesa occurrences: GBIF (1 record), Balthasar (1968), Barari (2001), Chavanon (2018), Gosh et al. (2020), Kocher (1958), Král et al. (2023), Krell (2021), Paulian (1954), Petrovitz (1958), Reitter (1895), Semenow (1895), Semenov-Tian-Shanskij & Medvedev (1929), Shokhin (2007), Zavattari (1934), A. Ballerio, unpublished, P. Moretto, pers comm.; M. J. Paulsen, unpublished, D. Potanin, pers. comm., P. Tauzin pers. comm. Adraria is known only from the locus typicus (Villiers 1956).

Fig. 13 – Belohina inexpectata a in Rediscovery of the enigmatic Madagascan endemic Belohina inexpectata Paulian, 1958, with notes on its morphology and phylogenetic position (Coleoptera, Scarabaeoidea: Belohinidae)

Fig. 13 – Belohina inexpectata a, abdomen, with insert showing the small, sclerotized tubercle of abdominal tergite 3; b, abdomen with detail showing the small, sclerotized tubercle of abdominal tergite 3; c, abdomen, lateral view; d, detail of the small, sclerotized tubercle of abdominal tergite 3. Scale bar for a, b, c: 2 mm. Scale bar for inserts of a and b: 0.5 mm.

Fig. 14 in Rediscovery of the enigmatic Madagascan endemic Belohina inexpectata Paulian, 1958, with notes on its morphology and phylogenetic position (Coleoptera, Scarabaeoidea: Belohinidae)

Fig. 14 – Sound production by Belohina inexpectata. A, Oscillogram (relative amplitude vs time) and spectrogram (time vs frequency vs relative amplitude) of five echemes. The spectrogram was based on a short-time Fourier transform with a sliding Hanning window (512 samples, 85% of overlap) and 30 dB dynamic range. A 200 Hz high-pass filter was applied before analysis. B, Detail (grey region of A) of a single echeme showing successive pulses. C, Detail (grey region of B) of four successive pulses showing elementary oscillations.

Fig. 12 in Rediscovery of the enigmatic Madagascan endemic Belohina inexpectata Paulian, 1958, with notes on its morphology and phylogenetic position (Coleoptera, Scarabaeoidea: Belohinidae)

Fig. 12 – Belohina inexpectata male genitalia, a, b, c, d, aedeagus (pes = proximal endophallic sclerite; popes = parameroid of proximal endophallic sclerite); e, aedeagus of paratype after clearing; f, abdomen dorsal; g, abdomen ventral; aedeagus in resting position; i, spiculum gastrale. Scale bar for a, b, c, d, i: 0.7 Scale bar for f, g: 2 mm.

Fig. 11 – Belohina inexpectata a, b, c in Rediscovery of the enigmatic Madagascan endemic Belohina inexpectata Paulian, 1958, with notes on its morphology and phylogenetic position (Coleoptera, Scarabaeoidea: Belohinidae)

Fig. 11 – Belohina inexpectata a, b, c, last tarsomere of mesotarsi; d, patch of dense setae (dsp) on the surface of the profemora opposing the procoxae. Scale bar for a, b, c: 0.05 mm. Scale bar for d: 2 mm.

Fig. 9 – Belohina inexpectata a, b in Rediscovery of the enigmatic Madagascan endemic Belohina inexpectata Paulian, 1958, with notes on its morphology and phylogenetic position (Coleoptera, Scarabaeoidea: Belohinidae)

Fig. 9 – Belohina inexpectata a, b, epipharynx (dorsal and ventral), c, d, labium (ventral and dorsal); e, again ventral view of epipharynx. Scale bar for a, b: 0.5 mm, for c, d: 0.5 mm.

Fig. 7 in Rediscovery of the enigmatic Madagascan endemic Belohina inexpectata Paulian, 1958, with notes on its morphology and phylogenetic position (Coleoptera, Scarabaeoidea: Belohinidae)

Fig. 7 – Belohina inexpectata, mandibles a, ventral view; b, dorsal view; c, molar lobe; d, SEM of dorsal view. Scale bar for a, b, c: 0.3 mm.

Fig. 3 in Rediscovery of the enigmatic Madagascan endemic Belohina inexpectata Paulian, 1958, with notes on its morphology and phylogenetic position (Coleoptera, Scarabaeoidea: Belohinidae)

Fig. 3 – Belohina inexpectata (Atreaky forest), habitus of adult a, dorsal; b, ventral; c, lateral. Scale bar: 3 mm.