Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
1,215
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
1,215 results for “Red sea”
Figure 6 in Taxonomy of Oncaeidae (Copepoda, Poecilostomatoida) from the Red Sea. V. Three species of Spinoncaea gen. nov. (ivlevi-group), with notes on zoogeographical distribution
Figure 6. Spinoncaea ivlevi (Shmeleva, 1966) comb. nov., female, elongate form (Red Sea). (A) Habitus, dorsal; (B) urosome, dorsal, seta V on CR omitted [b: P5-bearing somite, ventral, showing midventral spinous processes, exopodal setae omitted]; (C) P4, endopod, anterior, showing reduced inner setae on second segment. Spinoncaea ivlevi (Shmeleva, 1966) comb. nov., female (Adriatic Sea). (D) Habitus, dorsal, pore pattern on prosome not fully discerned; (E) urosome, dorsal; (F) caudal ramus, dorsal, seta VII shown separately; (G) P4, endopod, posterior.
Figure 9 in Taxonomy of Oncaeidae (Copepoda, Poecilostomatoida) from the Red Sea. V. Three species of Spinoncaea gen. nov. (ivlevi-group), with notes on zoogeographical distribution
Figure 9. Spinoncaea humesi sp. nov., female (Red Sea). (A) Antenna; (B) labrum, anterior; (C) same, posterior; (D) mandible, showing individual elements; (E) maxillule; (F) maxilla; (G) maxilliped, anterior.
Figure 4 in Taxonomy of Oncaeidae (Copepoda, Poecilostomatoida) from the Red Sea. V. Three species of Spinoncaea gen. nov. (ivlevi-group), with notes on zoogeographical distribution
Figure 4. Spinoncaea ivlevi (Shmeleva, 1966) comb. nov., female, robust form (Red Sea). (A) P1, anterior [a: second endopod segment, arrow indicating ornamentation on inner margin]; (B) P2, anterior, intercoxal sclerite not shown; (C) P3, posterior; (D) P4, anterior, intercoxal sclerite not shown.
Figure 3 in Taxonomy of Oncaeidae (Copepoda, Poecilostomatoida) from the Red Sea. V. Three species of Spinoncaea gen. nov. (ivlevi-group), with notes on zoogeographical distribution
Figure 3. Spinoncaea ivlevi (Shmeleva, 1966) comb. nov., female, robust form (Red Sea). (A) Antenna, lateral elements are numbered using Roman numerals, distal elements are identified by capital letters; (B) labrum, anterior; (C) same, posterior; (D) mandible, showing individual elements, which are identified by capital letters; (E) maxillule; (F) maxilla; (G) maxilliped, anterior.
Figure 1 in Taxonomy of Oncaeidae (Copepoda, Poecilostomatoida) from the Red Sea. V. Three species of Spinoncaea gen. nov. (ivlevi-group), with notes on zoogeographical distribution
Figure 1. Location of stations. ' = VALDIVIA-Cruise 29, October 1980; - = METEOR-Cruise 5/1, January 1987; • = METEOR-Cruise 5/3b, May 1987; ' = METEOR-Cruise 5/5, July/August 1987; · = METEOR-Cruise 44/2, March 1999.
Figure 5 in Taxonomy of Oncaeidae (Copepoda, Poecilostomatoida) from the Red Sea. V. Three species of Spinoncaea gen. nov. (ivlevi-group), with notes on zoogeographical distribution
Figure 5. Spinoncaea ivlevi (Shmeleva, 1966) comb. nov., male (Red Sea). (A) Habitus, dorsal; (B) maxilliped, anterior [b: same, medial view, claw partly omitted]; (C) maxilliped, posterior; (D) urosome, dorsal, seta V on CR omitted; (E) urosome, ventral; (F) same, lateral; (G) antennule, small middle aesthetasc close to seta figured separately.
Figure 8 in Taxonomy of Oncaeidae (Copepoda, Poecilostomatoida) from the Red Sea. V. Three species of Spinoncaea gen. nov. (ivlevi-group), with notes on zoogeographical distribution
Figure 8. Spinoncaea humesi sp. nov., female (Red Sea). (A) Habitus, dorsal; (B) same, lateral (appendages omitted); (C) urosome, dorsal; (D) urosome, lateral; (E) P5-bearing somite (setae on left side omitted) and genital double-somite, ventral; (F) caudal ramus, dorsal; (G) antennule; (H) leg 5, lateral; (I) same, dorsal; (J) genital aperture.
Figure 16 in Taxonomy of Oncaeidae (Copepoda, Poecilostomatoida) from the Red Sea. V. Three species of Spinoncaea gen. nov. (ivlevi-group), with notes on zoogeographical distribution
Figure 16. Spinoncaea tenuis sp. nov., female (Adriatic Sea). (A) Habitus, dorsal, pore pattern on prosome not discerned; (B) urosome, dorsal; (C) P4, posterior. Spinoncaea tenuis sp. nov., male (Adriatic Sea) (D) Habitus, dorsal, pore pattern not fully discerned.
Figure 2 in Taxonomy of Oncaeidae (Copepoda, Poecilostomatoida) from the Red Sea. V. Three species of Spinoncaea gen. nov. (ivlevi-group), with notes on zoogeographical distribution
Figure 2. Spinoncaea ivlevi (Shmeleva, 1966) comb. nov., female, robust form (Red Sea). (A) Habitus, dorsal; (B) same, lateral (appendages omitted); (C) urosome, dorsal, seta V on left side missing; (D) urosome, lateral; (E) P5-bearing somite and genital double-somite, ventral; (F) caudal ramus, dorsal, lanceolate seta V shown separately; (G) antennule; (H) leg 5, dorsal; (I) same, ventral; (J) genital aperture; (K) paired egg-sac [note the scale].
Figure 15 in Taxonomy of Oncaeidae (Copepoda, Poecilostomatoida) from the Red Sea. V. Three species of Spinoncaea gen. nov. (ivlevi-group), with notes on zoogeographical distribution
Figure 15. Spinoncaea tenuis sp. nov., male (Red Sea). (A) Habitus, dorsal; (B) maxilliped, anterior, syncoxa missing [b: inner margin of basis, posterior]; (C) maxilliped, medial view; (D) urosome, dorsal, seta V omitted; (E) urosome, ventral, seta V on right side omitted; (F) same, lateral; (G) antennule [g: inner margin of segments 1–3, showing ornamentation].
Figure 14 in Taxonomy of Oncaeidae (Copepoda, Poecilostomatoida) from the Red Sea. V. Three species of Spinoncaea gen. nov. (ivlevi-group), with notes on zoogeographical distribution
Figure 14. Spinoncaea tenuis sp. nov., female (Red Sea). (A) P1, anterior; (B) P2, anterior; (C) P3, posterior; (D) P4, posterior, intercoxal sclerite not shown.
Figure 11 in Taxonomy of Oncaeidae (Copepoda, Poecilostomatoida) from the Red Sea. V. Three species of Spinoncaea gen. nov. (ivlevi-group), with notes on zoogeographical distribution
Figure 11. Spinoncaea humesi sp. nov., male (Red Sea) (A) Habitus, dorsal; (B) maxilliped, anterior; (C) maxilliped, medial view; (D) urosome, dorsal, seta V on left side missing; (E) urosome, ventral; (F) same, lateral; (G) antennule, middle aesthetasc on segment 4 arrowed.
Figure 7 in Taxonomy of Oncaeidae (Copepoda, Poecilostomatoida) from the Red Sea. V. Three species of Spinoncaea gen. nov. (ivlevi-group), with notes on zoogeographical distribution
Figure 7. Spinoncaea ivlevi (Shmeleva, 1966) comb. nov., female, robust form (Monterey Bay). (A) Urosome, dorsal. Spinoncaea ivlevi (Shmeleva, 1966) comb. nov., male (Adriatic Sea). (B) Habitus, dorsal, pore pattern on prosome not discerned.
Figure 10 in Taxonomy of Oncaeidae (Copepoda, Poecilostomatoida) from the Red Sea. V. Three species of Spinoncaea gen. nov. (ivlevi-group), with notes on zoogeographical distribution
Figure 10. Spinoncaea humesi sp. nov., female (Red Sea). (A) P1, posterior; (B) P2, posterior, intercoxal sclerite not shown; (C) P3, posterior; (D) P4, posterior, reduced proximal seta on second endopod segment arrowed.
Figure 1 in Taxonomic review of the "posteli-species group" of goatfishes (genus Parupeneus, Mullidae), with description of a new species from the northern Red Sea
Figure 1. – Relationships among eight morphometric characters including SL and total number of gill rakers in the five posteli-group species and three populations of Parupeneus posteli.
Figure 3. – A-E in Taxonomic review of the "posteli-species group" of goatfishes (genus Parupeneus, Mullidae), with description of a new species from the northern Red Sea
Figure 3. – A-E: Parupeneus posteli; A: SAIAB 83959, 88 mm SL, Baissac Bank, southern Mascarene Plateau (O. Alvheim and D. Tweddle); B: SAIAB 83959, 90 mm SL, same locality details (O. Alvheim and D. Tweddle); C: SAIAB 83898, 105 mm SL, Soudan Bank, southern Mascarene Plateau (O. Alvheim and D. Tweddle); D: large-sized fish (SL unknown), Réunion, Mascarene Islands (P. Guézé); E: MNHN 1965-0056, HT, 150 mm SL, same locality details (MNHN); F: Parupeneus sinai n. sp., MNHN 1967-0557, HT, 83 mm SL, northern Red Sea, right side shown, image reversed (F. Uiblein). Scale bars = 20 mm.
Figure 2. – A in Taxonomic review of the "posteli-species group" of goatfishes (genus Parupeneus, Mullidae), with description of a new species from the northern Red Sea
Figure 2. – A: Parupeneus chrysonemus BPBM 34775, 129 mm SL, Midway Atoll, Hawaiian Islands (J.E. Randall); B: P. chrysonemus BPBM 39141, 140 mm SL, Oahu, Hawaiian Islands (J.E. Randall); C: P. louise, large-sized fish (SL unknown), Rurutu, Austral Islands, French Polynesia (A. Stein); D: P. moffiti, HT, 230 mm SL, Guam, Mariana Islands (R.F. Myers). Scale bars = 20 mm.
Figure 2. Neodendrina carnelia igen. et isp. n in Large dendrinids meet giant clam: the bioerosion trace fossil Neodendrina carnelia igen. et isp. n. in a Tridacna shell from Pleistocene-Holocene coral reef deposits, Red Sea, Egypt
Figure 2. Neodendrina carnelia igen. et isp. n. on the inner side of a Tridacna maxima bivalve shell from the Pleistocene–Holocene coral reef deposits in the Marsa Alam area, Red Sea, Egypt. (a) Inner side of valve (left; prior to sectioning) with hundreds of N. carnelia specimens, and outer surface (right) intensely bioeroded by the sponge boring Entobia isp. (b) Section of the valve (MB.W 5640) with the holotype (centre) and the paratypes (all other specimens) in various ichnogenetic stages. (c) Close-up of the holotype trace. (d–e) Respective micro-CT scan of the holotype in plan and angular views as seen from inside the substrate.
Figure 1 in Large dendrinids meet giant clam: the bioerosion trace fossil Neodendrina carnelia igen. et isp. n. in a Tridacna shell from Pleistocene-Holocene coral reef deposits, Red Sea, Egypt
Figure 1. The Pleistocene raised coral reef limestones exposed at the type locality of Neodendrina carnelia igen. et isp. n. just south of the Carnelia Beach Resort, located between El Quseir and Marsa Alam, exhibiting scleractinian corals as primary reef builders (a) and giant clams Tridacna spp. weathering from the carbonate–siliciclastic rocks (b) that mix with Holocene and modern Tridacna valves, forming a highly time-averaged assemblage (c).
Figure 4. Neodendrina carnelia igen. et isp. n in Large dendrinids meet giant clam: the bioerosion trace fossil Neodendrina carnelia igen. et isp. n. in a Tridacna shell from Pleistocene-Holocene coral reef deposits, Red Sea, Egypt
Figure 4. Neodendrina carnelia igen. et isp. n. on the outer surface of a large recent Tridacna squamosa valve from Nosy-BØ, northern Madagascar (ZMB/Mol 102671). (a) Shell surface with various encrusters as well as bioerosion traces. (b) Close-up of a cluster of N. carnelia. (c) A large specimen with distinct pitted arrays developed in most of the branches.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.