Skip to main content
Powered by ShareScore

Find research datasets worth reusing

Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.

183

datasets available to search

ShareScore release 0.9.0

Reset

Dataset results

183 results for “Retraction”

Learn how ShareScore rates datasets ↗
zenodo32/100

Supplementary tables for "Inconsistencies and opacity in retraction notices: Snapshot using 50 cases from Elsevier journals"

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2024View details →
dryad32/100

Flood-stimulated herbivory drives range retraction of a plant ecosystem

<p>Climate change is generating extreme climate events, affecting ecosystem integrity and function directly through increases in abiotic stress and disturbance and indirectly through changes in the strength of biotic interactions. As consumers play an essential role in ecosystem functioning and have been shown to be highly sensitive to climate conditions, improved understanding of their role under changing environmental conditions is necessary to accurately anticipate climate change impacts on ecosystem integrity. We evaluated if prolonged heavy rains, a climatic event increasing in severity in many places around the world and coincident increases in coastal flooding duration intensify consumer control of foundational saltmarsh grass structure and quantify the consequences of flooding-consumer interactions on saltmarsh range extent. To achieve this, we analyzed: historic trends in crab grazing; crab numbers and activity in and out of rainy years on the low marsh edge; vegetation retreat from the low marsh edge at a plot-scale in a manipulative exclosure experiment; vegetation retreat at a landscape-scale from drone image analyses; and the vertical erosion in the lowest edge of an Argentinean salt marsh. During flooded periods, crabs congregated in the low marsh, resulting in localized overgrazing of saltmarsh grass and the rapid horizontal retreat of the marsh edge (98.5 cm on average). Saltmarsh edge retreat resulted in a loss of ~4.5% of the total marsh area at the landscape-scale. Inside crab exclusion plots, although grass cover declined slightly during the study period, the marsh edge did not retreat. Synthesis: This study provides experimental evidence that an extreme climate event can destabilize a local consumer-prey interaction, indirectly triggering the range contraction of a critical coastal habitat. This work contributes to a growing body of research demonstrating that consumers can be unleashed, rather than suppressed, by extreme climatic events. Moreover, in cases where consumer fronts form during such events, the result can be not only local (along habitat edges) but also landscape-scale extinction of foundation species and the habitats they biogenically create. Together, this supports the more general call that models of future climate scenarios integrate the indirect effects on ecosystem-regulating food web interactions. --</p>

opencc-zeroJun 2021View details →
dryad32/100

Raw FTIR Data for retraction of: An Eocene army ant

<p><span>This dataset is related to a retraction of a published Biology Letters article, Sosiak et al. 2022, entitled "An Eocene Army Ant" (<a href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2022.0398">https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2022.0398</a></span><span>). Shortly after publication of Sosiak et al. (2022), we received reports from two readers of historical collections </span><span>comprising specimens similar in appearance to the one we reported in our initial article. These historic collections were originally mislabeled and were more recently revealed to be much younger sub-fossil resins (copal); both of these collections were also established roughly around the same timeframe (1920–1930s) associated with the museum specimen from Sosiak et al. (2022). This prompted us to investigate the provenance of the specimen reported in Sosiak et al. (2022) via FTIR spectroscopy. Our spectroscopic analysis did not recover a unique characteristic signature of Baltic amber and confirms that </span><span>the specimen we initially reported is not Baltic amber but instead most probably sub-fossil copal. These data comprise the raw FTIR spectroscopic data we used to generate Figure 1 in the retraction as well as the R code underpinning that figure. </span></p>

opencc-zeroMar 2023View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

Is There a Risk of Perioperative Stroke Due to the Retraction Used During Anterior Cervical Discectomy?

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05717010. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

Preoperative Psychological Risk Factors for the Retractable Capsulitis of the Shoulder After Shoulder Rotator Cuff Repair Surgery

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT04044196. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.

closedIPD-NOFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

External Root Resorption and Periodontal Status During Retraction of the Upper Anterior Teeth

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06873490. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 5.

closedIPD-NOFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

Effects of QUANTUM Probe for Skin Rejuvenation and Subdermal Retraction in Patients Undergoing High-Definition Liposculpture

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06958978. IPD Sharing: YES. Countries: 1. Publications: 3.

controlledIPD-YESFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

"Clinical Evaluation of Retraction Cord Effectiveness Using Intraoral Scanner

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06447389. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 4.

closedIPD-NOFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

Three-Dimensional Assessment of Maxillary Canine Retraction With and Without Power Arm

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06352996. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

Evaluation of the Levels of Pain and Discomfort and Periodontal Status Between Two Acceleration Methods of Upper Anterior Teeth Retraction

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05656898. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 5.

closedIPD-NOFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

Evaluation of the Levels of Pain, Discomfort, and Functional Impairment With Two Techniques of Retraction

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05652244. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 5.

closedIPD-NOFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

Evaluation of Incisors' Position Following Anterior Segment Retraction

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT04878939. IPD Sharing: YES. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.

controlledIPD-YESFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

Reliability Testing of Silverman-Andersen Retraction Score in Preterm Infants

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03199898. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.

closedIPD-NOFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

Effectiveness of Two Corticotomy Techniques in Retracting the Upper Anterior Teeth by Using Miniscrews

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03279042. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 9.

closedIPD-NOFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

Effect of Gradually Increasing Force Magnitude on the Rate of Canine Retraction Randomized Controlled Trial

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05643443. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.

closedIPD-NOFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

The Use of Corticotomy for Upper Incisors Retraction

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03149016. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 7.

closedIPD-NOFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

Association Between Lingual Retraction and Hemodynamic Changes in Patients Receiving Dental Treatment Under General Anesthesia

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT07240688. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.

closedIPD-NOFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

Friction or Frictionless: What is the Most Effective Method for Retracting Anterior Teeth?

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06928896. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.

closedIPD-NOFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

Pain and Discomfort in Two Acceleration Methods of Canine Retraction

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05265416. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 6.

closedIPD-NOFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

Cephalometric Changes Following Retraction of the Upper Anterior Teeth Stimulated by Low-intensity Electrical Current

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06639204. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 4.

closedIPD-NOFeb 2026View details →

ScienceDex guides

Understand access before you commit

These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.

Compare curated datasets

Allen Brain Atlas

Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.

allen-brain-atlas
neuroscienceopenDocumentation, web resources, and API references are available online.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)

ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.

abode-home-cage
behavioral-neuroscienceopenThe DataShare record exposes download links for annotations, documentation, license text, and the zipped per-snippet data directory.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

DANDI Archive for NWB datasets

DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.

dandi-nwb
electrophysiologyopenPublished Dandiset metadata and archive endpoints are available through the production DANDI API.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

International Brain Laboratory public data

The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.

ibl
behavioral-neuroscienceopenPublic sessions can be searched and loaded from the IBL public data server through ONE.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

OpenNeuro

OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.

openneuro
neuroscienceopenPublished datasets are available on demand over the internet.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record