Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2020View details →

IMPACT HTA, WP7 (Methodological tools using multi-criteria value methods for HTA decision-making), Task 2 (Multi-criteria evaluation framework), Results of the 1st Web-Delphi process to HTA stakeholders, organized into 6 separate parallel panels

IMPACT HTA, WP7 (Methodological tools using multi-criteria value methods for HTA decision-making), Task 2 (Multi-criteria evaluation framework), Results of the 1st Web-Delphi process to HTA stakeholders, organized into 6 separate parallel panels (one panel per stakeholder group, 2 rounds), about the views of stakeholders regarding “This aspect should be considered in the evaluation of new medicines on a common basis” (2019) For details on the Web-Delphi process, see: IMPACT HTA, Work Package 7 (Methodological tools using multi-criteria value methods for HTA decision-making), Task 2, Deliverable 7.2 (Multi-criteria evaluation framework), Advancing knowledge and MCDA tools to assist HTA agencies in evaluating medicines on a common basis (2021) Oliveira, M.D. (IST), Panos Kanavos (LSE), Bana e Costa, C. (IST)

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2021View details →

Survey of Electrical & Electronic Equipment (EEE) Sector Stakeholders & End Users of EEE regarding Circular Economy in the EEE Sector

The data is the full results of surveys of stakeholders in the electrical and electronic equipment (EEE) value chain conducted as part of the Horizon 2020 funded <a href="https://c-serveesproject.eu/index.php">C-SERVEES project</a>.   The purpose of the survey was to provide guidance for the successful implementation of circularity in the EEE sector, specifically to develop circular economy business plans for four items of equipment: printers (inc. toner cartridges); washing machines; televisions; and network monitoring equipment. The survey aimed to capture data on: <ul> <li>Circular economy awareness;</li> <li>Current practices relating to circular economy; and</li> <li>Circular economy opportunities, barriers and enablers.</li> </ul> Investigation of opportunities, barriers and enablers focused on technical, economic, socio-cultural, regulatory and environmental themes. In addition, background information was also collected to enable some of the attributes of the respondent to be recorded. This included: country; city, years of experience in the industry as well as, in the household users’ survey, age and education level.  The stakeholder groups surveyed are noted below, these being the key EEE supply chain actors. A separate dataset is available for each. <ol> <li>Designers of EEE</li> <li>Suppliers to manufacturers of EEE</li> <li>Manufacturers of EEE</li> <li>EEE Retailers</li> <li>Business users of EEE</li> <li>Household users of EEE</li> <li>Waste EEE handlers</li> </ol> A project report analysing the results of the survey is available: <a href="https://c-serveesproject.eu/project_activities.php?op=5">Guidelines for circular economic models in the E&E sector</a> . A journal article outlining the subsequent development of the circular economy business models is also available: <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S095965262101430X">A circular economy business model innovation process for the electrical and electronic equipment sector</a>.

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2021View details →

Roles and responsibilities of stakeholders in the RDM lifecycle

In efforts to better articulate the roles and responsibilities of key stakeholders (not exhaustive) involved in data management and stewardship throughout the research data management (RDM) lifecycle, this infographic was developed as part of RDM training. The infographic is an integrative adaptation of the Data Asset Framework Implementation Guide (JISC et al., 2009, page 3) and Research Data Governance & Materials Handling Policy (UNSW, 2019, page 10).

opencc-by-4.0Jan 2019View details →

Driving social and economic development in the MENA region: the role of international organizations - Stakeholders' engagement meeting report

On 15 November 2018, the Center for Public Policy and Democracy Studies (PODEM) hosted a stakeholders’ meeting in Istanbul with twenty-nine participants, including academics, experts, and representatives from civil society and international humanitarian and development organizations from Europe and the MENA region, as part of the Middle East North Africa Regional Architecture Project (MENARA). Through two panels of expert presentations and facilitated discussion, the participants addressed present challenges, ongoing transformations and future opportunities facing societies across the region, as well as the role of international organizations in addressing these challenges and opportunities. This report will summarize the discussion during that meeting in two broad parts, focusing on the region’s challenges and positive developments respectively and is further divided into sections by issue subject. Two sets of policy recommendations are provided at the end of the report.

Dataset for Green Transition Policies, Stakeholders and Practices in Albania

This dataset contributed to deliverable 4.2 Regional Mapping Report and shows the Albanian mapping. This report is the second deliverable of WP4 – Measuring and assessing impacts and costs of a just green transition in the WB, of the GreenFORCE project. It was jointly authored by the WB project partners, as well as 2 subcontracted parties from the region. The EU Economic and Investment Plan for the WB includes a green agenda for the WB, with pillars to be pursued for transitioning towards a carbon-neutral economy. Such a shift will surely challenge the economies and societies in the WB. The social and policy context is yet fragile to allow for the development and mass distribution of green transition technologies, while human resources are not prepared and/or are insufficient to produce and implement innovation. Yet, the green transition also paves the way towards new development and resilience opportunities. The research will inform on the readiness/potential of societal actors (industry, academia, policymakers, civic society) to embrace the pathways to transformation, and will propose a framework for continuous monitoring of impacts and costs. The key findings and lessons learnt derived within WP4 will be transferred into the scientific papers and policy briefs (WP 2 & 3) and published under the dissemination events (WP5). Regional mapping is a key task for the research, contributing to initial data gathering and the refinement of the research proposal, and to the sub-question on the identification of sectors and territories affected by the transitions and current progress of transition practices. This is a participatory mapping, engaging local stakeholders and communities to reveal local knowledge. Each WB partner will produce the respective country report, and Co-PLAN will work on the final regional report. This deliverable is the final regional report. It will also include the mapping frame used to conduct the mapping process. The WB partners will do the mapping for their own countries. The PC will subcontract data gathering for the remaining countries. The mapping is done for actors, practices and policies in place, territories upon the level of relevance and potential for engaging in green transition; and sectors. All partners will design the mapping frame, using also knowledge from other mapping processes. The frame will contain the type of information to be collected, the standardisation of data entry, and the tailored instruments to be deployed for accessing information.

Dataset for Green Transition Policies, Stakeholders and Practices in Bosnia and Herzegovina

This dataset contributed to deliverable 4.2 Regional Mapping Report and shows the mapping in Bosnia and Herzegovina. This report is the second deliverable of WP4 – Measuring and assessing impacts and costs of a just green transition in the WB, of the GreenFORCE project. It was jointly authored by the WB project partners, as well as 2 subcontracted parties from the region. The EU Economic and Investment Plan for the WB includes a green agenda for the WB, with pillars to be pursued for transitioning towards a carbon-neutral economy. Such a shift will surely challenge the economies and societies in the WB. The social and policy context is yet fragile to allow for the development and mass distribution of green transition technologies, while human resources are not prepared and/or are insufficient to produce and implement innovation. Yet, the green transition also paves the way towards new development and resilience opportunities. The research will inform on the readiness/potential of societal actors (industry, academia, policymakers, civic society) to embrace the pathways to transformation, and will propose a framework for continuous monitoring of impacts and costs. The key findings and lessons learnt derived within WP4 will be transferred into the scientific papers and policy briefs (WP 2 & 3) and published under the dissemination events (WP5). Regional mapping is a key task for the research, contributing to initial data gathering and the refinement of the research proposal, and to the sub-question on the identification of sectors and territories affected by the transitions and current progress of transition practices. This is a participatory mapping, engaging local stakeholders and communities to reveal local knowledge. Each WB partner will produce the respective country report, and Co-PLAN will work on the final regional report. This deliverable is the final regional report. It will also include the mapping frame used to conduct the mapping process. The WB partners will do the mapping for their own countries. GreenFORCE will subcontract data gathering for the remaining countries. The mapping is done for actors, practices and policies in place, territories upon the level of relevance and potential for engaging in green transition; and sectors. All partners will design the mapping frame, using also knowledge from other mapping processes. The frame will contain the type of information to be collected, the standardisation of data entry, and the tailored instruments to be deployed for accessing information.

Dataset for Green Transition Policies, Stakeholders and Practices in Montenegro

This dataset contributed to deliverable 4.2 Regional Mapping Report and shows the Montenegrin mapping. This report is the second deliverable of WP4 – Measuring and assessing impacts and costs of a just green transition in the WB, of the GreenFORCE project. It was jointly authored by the WB project partners, as well as 2 subcontracted parties from the region. The EU Economic and Investment Plan for the WB includes a green agenda for the WB, with pillars to be pursued for transitioning towards a carbon-neutral economy. Such a shift will surely challenge the economies and societies in the WB. The social and policy context is yet fragile to allow for the development and mass distribution of green transition technologies, while human resources are not prepared and/or are insufficient to produce and implement innovation. Yet, the green transition also paves the way towards new development and resilience opportunities. The research will inform on the readiness/potential of societal actors (industry, academia, policymakers, civic society) to embrace the pathways to transformation, and will propose a framework for continuous monitoring of impacts and costs. The key findings and lessons learnt derived within WP4 will be transferred into the scientific papers and policy briefs (WP 2 & 3) and published under the dissemination events (WP5). Regional mapping is a key task for the research, contributing to initial data gathering and the refinement of the research proposal, and to the sub-question on the identification of sectors and territories affected by the transitions and current progress of transition practices. This is a participatory mapping, engaging local stakeholders and communities to reveal local knowledge. Each WB partner will produce the respective country report, and Co-PLAN will work on the final regional report. This deliverable is the final regional report. It will also include the mapping frame used to conduct the mapping process. The WB partners will do the mapping for their own countries. The PC will subcontract data gathering for the remaining countries. The mapping is done for actors, practices and policies in place, territories upon the level of relevance and potential for engaging in green transition; and sectors. All partners will design the mapping frame, using also knowledge from other mapping processes. The frame will contain the type of information to be collected, the standardisation of data entry, and the tailored instruments to be deployed for accessing information.

Dataset for Green Transition Policies, Stakeholders and Practices in North Macedonia

This dataset contributed to deliverable 4.2 Regional Mapping Report and shows the North Macedonian mapping. This report is the second deliverable of WP4 – Measuring and assessing impacts and costs of a just green transition in the WB, of the GreenFORCE project. It was jointly authored by the WB project partners, as well as 2 subcontracted parties from the region. The EU Economic and Investment Plan for the WB includes a green agenda for the WB, with pillars to be pursued for transitioning towards a carbon-neutral economy. Such a shift will surely challenge the economies and societies in the WB. The social and policy context is yet fragile to allow for the development and mass distribution of green transition technologies, while human resources are not prepared and/or are insufficient to produce and implement innovation. Yet, the green transition also paves the way towards new development and resilience opportunities. The research will inform on the readiness/potential of societal actors (industry, academia, policymakers, civic society) to embrace the pathways to transformation, and will propose a framework for continuous monitoring of impacts and costs. The key findings and lessons learnt derived within WP4 will be transferred into the scientific papers and policy briefs (WP 2 & 3) and published under the dissemination events (WP5). Regional mapping is a key task for the research, contributing to initial data gathering and the refinement of the research proposal, and to the sub-question on the identification of sectors and territories affected by the transitions and current progress of transition practices. This is a participatory mapping, engaging local stakeholders and communities to reveal local knowledge. Each WB partner will produce the respective country report, and Co-PLAN will work on the final regional report. This deliverable is the final regional report. It will also include the mapping frame used to conduct the mapping process. The WB partners will do the mapping for their own countries. The PC will subcontract data gathering for the remaining countries. The mapping is done for actors, practices and policies in place, territories upon the level of relevance and potential for engaging in green transition; and sectors. All partners will design the mapping frame, using also knowledge from other mapping processes. The frame will contain the type of information to be collected, the standardisation of data entry, and the tailored instruments to be deployed for accessing information.

Dataset for Green Transition Policies, Stakeholders and Practices in Serbia

This dataset contributed to deliverable 4.2 Regional Mapping Report and shows the Serbian mapping. This report is the second deliverable of WP4 – Measuring and assessing impacts and costs of a just green transition in the WB, of the GreenFORCE project. It was jointly authored by the WB project partners, as well as 2 subcontracted parties from the region. The EU Economic and Investment Plan for the WB includes a green agenda for the WB, with pillars to be pursued for transitioning towards a carbon-neutral economy. Such a shift will surely challenge the economies and societies in the WB. The social and policy context is yet fragile to allow for the development and mass distribution of green transition technologies, while human resources are not prepared and/or are insufficient to produce and implement innovation. Yet, the green transition also paves the way towards new development and resilience opportunities. The research will inform on the readiness/potential of societal actors (industry, academia, policymakers, civic society) to embrace the pathways to transformation, and will propose a framework for continuous monitoring of impacts and costs. The key findings and lessons learnt derived within WP4 will be transferred into the scientific papers and policy briefs (WP 2 & 3) and published under the dissemination events (WP5). Regional mapping is a key task for the research, contributing to initial data gathering and the refinement of the research proposal, and to the sub-question on the identification of sectors and territories affected by the transitions and current progress of transition practices. This is a participatory mapping, engaging local stakeholders and communities to reveal local knowledge. Each WB partner will produce the respective country report, and Co-PLAN will work on the final regional report. This deliverable is the final regional report. It will also include the mapping frame used to conduct the mapping process. The WB partners will do the mapping for their own countries. The PC will subcontract data gathering for the remaining countries. The mapping is done for actors, practices and policies in place, territories upon the level of relevance and potential for engaging in green transition; and sectors. All partners will design the mapping frame, using also knowledge from other mapping processes. The frame will contain the type of information to be collected, the standardisation of data entry, and the tailored instruments to be deployed for accessing information.

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2023View details →

Summary of Input from Stakeholders and other institutions involved in dynamic force applications

Survey data used to create Deliverable 1 of ComTraForce project "Roadmap detailing the future requirements for improved force transfer standards and associated calibration methods for force testing machines taking into account realistic uncertainties".

Challenges of cultural heritage adaptive reuse: a stakeholders-based comparative study in three European cities. Dataset

Dataset analysed in Pintossi, N., Ikiz Kaya, D., van Wesemael, P. J. V., & Pereira Roders, A. R. (2023). Challenges of cultural heritage adaptive reuse: A stakeholders-based comparative study in three European cities. Habitat International, 136, [102807]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2023.102807. <ul> <li>Date of data collection: a) 31/05/2018, b) 27/11/2018, and c) 28/03/2019</li> <li>Geographic location of data collection: a) Amsterdam, The Netherlands. The venue of the data collection was Pakhuis de Zwijger, Piet Heinkade 179, 1019 HC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; b) Salerno, Italy. The venue of the data collection was Salone dei marmi, Palazzo di Città, via Roma, 84121 Salerno, Italy; and c) Rijeka, Croatia. The venue of the data collection is RiHub, Ul. Ivana Grohovca 1/a, 51000, Rijeka, Croatia.</li> <li>Activity of data collection: a) Historic Urban Landscape workshop 1 - Amsterdam. Held in Amsterdam, the Nethelands, on 30-31/05/2018; b) Historic Urban Landscape workshop 2 - Salerno. Held in Salerno, Italy, on 26-27/11/2018; and c) Historic Urban Landscape workshop 3 - Rijeka. Held in Rijeka, Croatia, on 28/03/2019.</li> <li>Aim of data collection: Multi-scale, participatory identification of challenges entailed in the adaptive reuse of cultural heritage and solutions to overcome these challenges.</li> <li>Methods for collection/generation of data: See the methodology section in a) Pintossi, N., Ikiz Kaya, D., & Pereira Roders, A. (2021). Identifying Challenges and Solutions in Cultural Heritage Adaptive Reuse through the Historic Urban Landscape Approach in Amsterdam. Sustainability, 13(10), 5547. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105547; b) Pintossi, N., Ikiz Kaya, D., Pereira Roders, A. (2023). Cultural heritage adaptive reuse in Salerno: Challenges and solutions. City, Culture and Society, 33, 100505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccs.2023.100505; and  c) Pintossi, N., Ikiz Kaya, D., & Pereira Roders, A. (2021). Assessing Cultural Heritage Adaptive Reuse Practices: Multi-Scale Challenges and Solutions in Rijeka. Sustainability, 13(7), 3603. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073603.</li> <li>Researchers facilitating roundtable discussion and writing down paper version of data: a) Gamze Dane, Antonia Gravagnuolo, Paloma Guzman Molina, Ana Pereira Roders, Nadia Pintossi, and Julia Rey-Perez; b) Marco Acri, Gaia Daldanise, Gamze Dane, Cristina Garzillo, Antonia Gravagnuolo, Lu Lu, Nadia Pintossi, and Ruba Saleh; and c) Marco Acri, Martina Bosone, Deniz Ikiz Kaya, Silvia Iodice, Lu Lu, and Nadia Pintossi.</li> <li>Language of the data: English.</li> <li>References: a) Pintossi, Nadia. (2021). Assessing cultural heritage adaptive reuse practices: multi-scale challenges and solutions in Rijeka. Dataset [Data set]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4518743; b) Pintossi, Nadia. (2020). Identifying challenges and solutions in cultural heritage adaptive reuse through the Historic Urban Landscape approach in Amsterdam. Dataset [Data set]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4250495; and c) Pintossi, Nadia. (2023). Cultural heritage adaptive reuse in Salerno: challenges and solutions. Dataset [Data set]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3925602</li> </ul>

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2022View details →

Stakeholder in Agricultural Data Ecosystem in Croatia

To discover the relevant priority groups for further focus in open data ecosystem maturation, we have imposed the level of the stakeholder importance (derived from the number of query references) to the level of the stakeholder influence to the data supply (average expert assessment).

opencc-by-4.0May 2019View details →

Teaser SUNRISE Stakeholder Workshop

Promotion video: The next big event for the SUNRISE community will take place on 17-18 June, 2019 in Brussels.

opencc-by-4.0Feb 2017View details →

Supplementary material 1: Reviewer Comments from: Widening the circle of care: An arts-based, participatory dialogue with stakeholders on cancer care for First Nations, Inuit, and Métis peoples in Ontario, Canada - Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e9115 (25 May 2016) https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9115

The attached file includes the evaluation of the postdoctoral fellowship application from three reviewers. Guidelines for reviewers are available online for more inforamtion (http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/33043.html), including the rating scale that is used to score each section of the evaluation.

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2024View details →

External Stakeholders Survey Results - The Future of Aquaculture The impact of 4.0 technologies worldwide

Aquaculture 4.0 technologies have landed and are very likely to stay, aiming to play a major role within the implementation of new Circular Bioeconomy approaches. In this context, European aquaculture has been recently applying innovative and disruptive technologies to transform fishery management strategies. The so-called “4th industrial revolution” is projected to allow a 15-20% increase in the sector by the year 2030. In addition to the growth the revolution can provide, the benefits of Industry 4.0 include improved productivity, efficiency and reduced costs. Companies will be able to produce more, in less time, while allocating resources more effectively, due to a smooth adoption of interconnectivity through the Internet of Things (IoT), access to real-time data, and the introduction of cyber-physical systems. According to FAO data, the estimated production volume of fish from European aquaculture in 2028 will increase to approximately 1.4 million tons, needing more circular, digitized solutions to cover end user demand. This data was collected from a survey investigating the Future of Aquaculture The impact of 4.0 technologies worldwide. The results of this survey were used to understand the main challenges faced within the Aquaculture 4.0 market concerning usage experience and level of awareness, in order to identify barriers for implementation and key drivers to encourage adoption of innovative technologies within their businesses. The insights gathered will help us to improve our concept and ultimately the whole value chain of the Aquaculture 4.0 market.

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2024View details →

Public Procurement of Innovation stakeholders map

This interactive map contains a database of Public Procurement of Innovation (POI) stakeholders, including public buyers, procures, SMEs, start-ups, spin-offs, universities, incubators, technology centres, projects & other relevant actors. Go through the<a href="https://procedin.eu/stakeholder-map/"> interactive stakeholders map</a>, find the best contact and set up a call to enhance your businesses together. You can also explore F6S Platform or Tenderio, your place for match making.   Additionally, you can find valuable information at:  – <a href="https://procurement-forum.eu/">Procurement Forum</a> – <a href="https://eafip.eu/">European Assistance for Innovation Procurement (EAFIP)</a>  – <a href="https://sustainable-procurement.org/sustainable-public-procurement/">Sustainable Procurement Platform</a>

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2024View details →

Literature review of the enablers and barriers to stakeholder and citizen engagement in climate change adaptation process (as part of Adaptation AGORA project)

This dataset is the result of collaborative work for Deliverable 4.1 (WP4; T4.1) of the Adaptation AGORA project. This database was used to conduct a literature review of the enablers and barriers to stakeholder and citizen engagement in climate change adaptation process. It contains 123 papers retrived from Web of Science Databse in June 2023. We used a keyword search to identify and select articles that fell within the scope of our research, with each article containing at least one keyword related to climate change adaptation solutions, climate change, co-production, citizen and stakeholder involvement and factors (enablers and barriers).  We divided the coding framework into four main sections: <ul> <li> Section 1 collected basic information about the paper (i.e., date, journal, authors, type of study and methods for data collection). </li> <li> Section 2 sought to better understand the adaptation initiatives treated in the paper. Here, we analysed 5 variables (the adaptation solutions type, sectors, benefits, scale, and location).  </li> <li> Section 3 collected characteristics of the climate change adaptation co-production process, including the definition of co-production, the type of the co-production process, its outputs, and the methods used to engage stakeholders. </li> <li> Section 4 described the factors that enable or hinder the co-production process and their influence on different aspects of the process. After naming and defining each driver, we recorded the main type of factor, its impact, origin, and spatial and temporal scale of influence; the stakeholders who were responsible for and influenced by the factor, and the impacts on the various steps and outcomes of the co-production process. </li> </ul>

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2021View details →

Multi-level stakeholder engagement

Visualisation indicating the multi-level stakeholder process pursued in e-SAFE. The visualisation indicates how different stakeholder engagement processes are linked together. The Advisory Board gives advice about the design and implementation of the real pilot in Catania (where one building is renovated with the e-SAFE technical solution) as well as the co-design and stakeholder engagement protocol. These protocols are informed by the results from the real pilot in Catania, and tested in two virtual pilots in other seismic prone cities outside of Italy.  The EU-stakeholder forum exchanges feedback and information with the real and virtual pilots, and gets access to the co-design and stakeholder engagement protocol. In that way, local, regional and European level stakeholders are engaging with the e-SAFE project.

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2021View details →

S-LCA - Datasets for PlastiCircle Social Evaluation of the Light Packaging Waste Management (stakeholder perpectives)

This deliverable (7.5) presents S-LCA results for the waste management systems in Valencia (Spain), Utrecht (Netherland) and Alba Iulia (Romania). Moreover, an extrapolation of the results has been calculated to show the results on the European level. Data is collected from groups of citizens, citizens associations, waste managers and municipalities (city hall workers). Questionnaires have been done in order to ask this groups of people questions to assess the social impact of the waste management systems in each city. Questions have been prepared according to the guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products - UNEP DTIE.